Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Luni

Luni Avatar Level 134 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Offline
Send mail to Luni Block Luni Invite Luni to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:10/22/2010
Last Login:8/31/2012
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 831 total,  1032 ,  201
Comment Thumbs: 341 total,  676 ,  335
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 83 Content: Srs Business → Level 84 Content: Srs Business
Comment Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 134 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:44920
Times Content Favorited:64 times
Total Comments Made:252
FJ Points:1164
Favorite Tags: Google (2) | Racist (2)

latest user's comments

#4 - thumb for you =3 08/10/2011 on Peta you scary! +3
#4 - And for you! 08/10/2011 on Scumbag Automatic Updates +1
#3 - thumb for you! 08/10/2011 on Scumbag Automatic Updates +1
#301 - Cause a PC lasts longer, does all I need it to do, and I don't… 08/09/2011 on Challenge Accepted 0
#283 - Not even. On PC it's horribad.  [+] (2 new replies) 08/09/2011 on Challenge Accepted +2
#298 - somestupidname (08/09/2011) [-]
Gamer, why you no play xbox?
User avatar #301 - Luni (08/09/2011) [-]
Cause a PC lasts longer, does all I need it to do, and I don't have to ship it away for 2 weeks cause some unknown part decided to break? PC>Any console.
#575 - Only because "Lag Ops" on PC was a horrid ship, laun… 08/05/2011 on 90's nostalgia 0
#531 - That's simply being happy about a time when something was LESS…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/05/2011 on 90's nostalgia 0
User avatar #563 - I Am Monkey (08/05/2011) [-]
In most cases they're not really getting worse, they just seem better in retrospect. Look at Halo, everyone holds Halo 2 up as the greatest game of the series and craps on Reach. In reality Halo 2 was an unfinished load of crap. Not just MW2 "This game is laggy" unfinished. They ran out of time and shipped 2/3rds of a game. The entire last 3rd of the game was cut off and replaced with a cliff-hanger, the co-op and many other features were removed and people still see it as a masterpiece when they look back on it.
User avatar #575 - Luni (08/05/2011) [-]
Only because "Lag Ops" on PC was a horrid ship, launch day every server was unstable, the online portion kept crashing constantly and their were STILL hackers. Halo 2 everyone holds as awesome because halo has always been a game made BY the map, depending how well designed the map was is how it would react and unfortunately Halo 3's map design even with the map editor was a wee on the lacks on launch it panned out AFTER wards but that took a while. As for Reach I think reach's fail was in part because it was named reach but did not tell the "Story" as far as the book is concerened they pretty much just took the book as a refrence and made their own, which WAS PRETTY EPIC I must say but Halo was dethroned by CoD and CoD is dethroning itself in the PC community all ready MW3 is confirmed to not have servers YET AGAIN despite complaints of lag and disgraceful anti-hack protocols (They patched it recently and within 2 hours the hackers were back) so as I said Nostalgia when based on the future looking like shit isn't NOSTALGIA it's lack of an upgrade XD After all in the 90's you EARNED alternate costumes/Maps/abilities, now you have to buy them as DLC. Back in the early DLC days your DLC was FRESH new material then it stared to be more of the same, now developers are cutting parts of the game out and re-selling it as DLC -Cough- Force Unleased 2 -Cough- Can you blame someone for staying in the past?
#505 - You're assuming he's 11 and that he isn't sincerely missing hi…  [+] (4 new replies) 08/05/2011 on 90's nostalgia 0
User avatar #524 - I Am Monkey (08/05/2011) [-]
I'm not saying it was bad. I'm just saying that everything looks better in the past. For instance, now when I play CoD I complain about how it's broken and panders to 12 year olds, but 10 years from now I'll probably be talking about how great it was and all the good times we had playing it. When we look back on things we filter out the bad and only remember the good.

For instance, everyone talks about how great green funnyjunk was. When in reality we all complained about how it stole everything from Albinoblacksheep and crashed all the time.
User avatar #531 - Luni (08/05/2011) [-]
That's simply being happy about a time when something was LESS fucked up. It's more or less the same line as trapping a man hostage for a year, then next year on his entrapped anniversary you cut off his left arm. OF COURSE he'll miss his arm! Comparing shit now in it's advancements to shit back then is stupid. However. Enjoying it for what it WAS is nostalgia in itself Sure when you play CoD 9 you'll love MW2 cause CoD 9 will probably feature 2 killstreak jets and then a 5 kill nuke brigade etc etc. Being happy about something being less broken doesn't mean that i's nostalgia. Knowing it sucked more, and knowing shit didn't matter is. Sure if I compare my old Nokia brick to my new Samnsung Galaxy s2 it's shit, but same way that if you compare a fish by it's ability to climb trees it's shit. It doesn't always LOOK better in the past sometimes... the future is really bleek. Perfect example: Modern day Cartoon Network.
User avatar #563 - I Am Monkey (08/05/2011) [-]
In most cases they're not really getting worse, they just seem better in retrospect. Look at Halo, everyone holds Halo 2 up as the greatest game of the series and craps on Reach. In reality Halo 2 was an unfinished load of crap. Not just MW2 "This game is laggy" unfinished. They ran out of time and shipped 2/3rds of a game. The entire last 3rd of the game was cut off and replaced with a cliff-hanger, the co-op and many other features were removed and people still see it as a masterpiece when they look back on it.
User avatar #575 - Luni (08/05/2011) [-]
Only because "Lag Ops" on PC was a horrid ship, launch day every server was unstable, the online portion kept crashing constantly and their were STILL hackers. Halo 2 everyone holds as awesome because halo has always been a game made BY the map, depending how well designed the map was is how it would react and unfortunately Halo 3's map design even with the map editor was a wee on the lacks on launch it panned out AFTER wards but that took a while. As for Reach I think reach's fail was in part because it was named reach but did not tell the "Story" as far as the book is concerened they pretty much just took the book as a refrence and made their own, which WAS PRETTY EPIC I must say but Halo was dethroned by CoD and CoD is dethroning itself in the PC community all ready MW3 is confirmed to not have servers YET AGAIN despite complaints of lag and disgraceful anti-hack protocols (They patched it recently and within 2 hours the hackers were back) so as I said Nostalgia when based on the future looking like shit isn't NOSTALGIA it's lack of an upgrade XD After all in the 90's you EARNED alternate costumes/Maps/abilities, now you have to buy them as DLC. Back in the early DLC days your DLC was FRESH new material then it stared to be more of the same, now developers are cutting parts of the game out and re-selling it as DLC -Cough- Force Unleased 2 -Cough- Can you blame someone for staying in the past?
#470 - Hey nimrod, as far as I know the 90's had tape cassets with th…  [+] (6 new replies) 08/05/2011 on 90's nostalgia 0
User avatar #490 - I Am Monkey (08/05/2011) [-]
"Educate yourself about the past"? I was there. I see it for what it was. Not how some 11 year old represents it in a compilation of cherrypicked facts.
User avatar #505 - Luni (08/05/2011) [-]
You're assuming he's 11 and that he isn't sincerely missing his past as we all do when we get ashamed of our present. Considering Se7En cam out in 95 and is not a "Popular" movie as far as names go, and that Jurassic park is from 1993 assuming he saw it when it came out, or 3 years later when it was spammed on DVD and TV's that would put him anywhere from 15-18 right now. This is reinforced by the fact that he said his epic games were on N64 which was discontinued in 2003 but started in 1996. All of the statements he makes puts him being born in or around the early 90's if not late 80's. I'm not knocking you for not liking YOUR past, however when someone likes theirs and can show why, do try and do more then simply spout off incorrect reasons as to why you believed it "Sucked"
User avatar #524 - I Am Monkey (08/05/2011) [-]
I'm not saying it was bad. I'm just saying that everything looks better in the past. For instance, now when I play CoD I complain about how it's broken and panders to 12 year olds, but 10 years from now I'll probably be talking about how great it was and all the good times we had playing it. When we look back on things we filter out the bad and only remember the good.

For instance, everyone talks about how great green funnyjunk was. When in reality we all complained about how it stole everything from Albinoblacksheep and crashed all the time.
User avatar #531 - Luni (08/05/2011) [-]
That's simply being happy about a time when something was LESS fucked up. It's more or less the same line as trapping a man hostage for a year, then next year on his entrapped anniversary you cut off his left arm. OF COURSE he'll miss his arm! Comparing shit now in it's advancements to shit back then is stupid. However. Enjoying it for what it WAS is nostalgia in itself Sure when you play CoD 9 you'll love MW2 cause CoD 9 will probably feature 2 killstreak jets and then a 5 kill nuke brigade etc etc. Being happy about something being less broken doesn't mean that i's nostalgia. Knowing it sucked more, and knowing shit didn't matter is. Sure if I compare my old Nokia brick to my new Samnsung Galaxy s2 it's shit, but same way that if you compare a fish by it's ability to climb trees it's shit. It doesn't always LOOK better in the past sometimes... the future is really bleek. Perfect example: Modern day Cartoon Network.
User avatar #563 - I Am Monkey (08/05/2011) [-]
In most cases they're not really getting worse, they just seem better in retrospect. Look at Halo, everyone holds Halo 2 up as the greatest game of the series and craps on Reach. In reality Halo 2 was an unfinished load of crap. Not just MW2 "This game is laggy" unfinished. They ran out of time and shipped 2/3rds of a game. The entire last 3rd of the game was cut off and replaced with a cliff-hanger, the co-op and many other features were removed and people still see it as a masterpiece when they look back on it.
User avatar #575 - Luni (08/05/2011) [-]
Only because "Lag Ops" on PC was a horrid ship, launch day every server was unstable, the online portion kept crashing constantly and their were STILL hackers. Halo 2 everyone holds as awesome because halo has always been a game made BY the map, depending how well designed the map was is how it would react and unfortunately Halo 3's map design even with the map editor was a wee on the lacks on launch it panned out AFTER wards but that took a while. As for Reach I think reach's fail was in part because it was named reach but did not tell the "Story" as far as the book is concerened they pretty much just took the book as a refrence and made their own, which WAS PRETTY EPIC I must say but Halo was dethroned by CoD and CoD is dethroning itself in the PC community all ready MW3 is confirmed to not have servers YET AGAIN despite complaints of lag and disgraceful anti-hack protocols (They patched it recently and within 2 hours the hackers were back) so as I said Nostalgia when based on the future looking like shit isn't NOSTALGIA it's lack of an upgrade XD After all in the 90's you EARNED alternate costumes/Maps/abilities, now you have to buy them as DLC. Back in the early DLC days your DLC was FRESH new material then it stared to be more of the same, now developers are cutting parts of the game out and re-selling it as DLC -Cough- Force Unleased 2 -Cough- Can you blame someone for staying in the past?
#2 - Agreed. 07/24/2011 on Fucking autocorrect! 0
#58 - Nuclear power, is actually 1. Safe if protected and maintai…  [+] (11 new replies) 06/02/2011 on world news +7
#101 - karlossacramento (06/02/2011) [-]
3. is wrong... it is actually the only reason why it isn't already used everywhere
User avatar #110 - Just Another Guy (06/02/2011) [-]
I heard they found some random mountain (possibly in China) where America is gonna dump all the nuclear waste they produce. 3 is definitely not correct :)
#79 - fregi (06/02/2011) [-]
2.: dude, i live in norway, and there are still reindeer and shit dying up here from contaminated food after chernobyl...
User avatar #66 - mjcninjapanda (06/02/2011) [-]
I half agree with you. Nuclear power may very well be the power of the future(even if Germany claim to be shutting all theres down by 2022). But meltdowns even if they are unlikely will happen eventually and it's not just down to incompetence. also it's not easy to dispose of at ALL, it takes hundreds of years for the waste to be broken down and right now they are having major problems with storage.And as far as Chernobyl goes, what the Chernobyl babies who are born (and continue to be) disfigured with short lifespan. The area is now a ghost town that's no one is sick....no one lives there.
User avatar #73 - Jewssassin (06/02/2011) [-]
As I understand it, even if there is a melt down in most modern plants (like the plants the French have, which are the best I believe) it would do barely anything because of all the safety precautions. Chernobyl had like NO protection around the core and wasnt there just no meltdown at Three Mile Island, just almost had one but it was but promptly stopped?
User avatar #76 - mjcninjapanda (06/02/2011) [-]
Well i'm not talking about how likely it is but if it does happen it can be devastating depending on it's were abouts. For example, i live in Ireland and if there was a meltdown at the Sellifield nuclear plant(which is in Wales) I would have to move no question due to the prevailing winds. Granted there safety precautions but nature can cause them. And if the sea level rises it could very well happen.
#65 - nowayimgonasayyes (06/02/2011) [-]
Not completely true, to maintain a stable fission reaction you need to keep the temperature of the fuel within a certain temperature barrier, if this is to high, or too low, the reaction will not occur. In turn, to do so, you need to wast a lot of power. Also, enriching Uranium is a difficult process that takes a long time and energy. Then, to dispose of the radioactive isotopes that are left over after the fission reaction occurs it is necessary to dig deep under ground to berry the radioactive wast, and this damages the ecology greatly... Finally any small malfunctions will result in a another Chernobyl or what happened in Japan. Thus, the question arises, to go nuclear or to continue using fossil fuel as the world's main energy supply?
#80 - anonymous (06/02/2011) [-]
small malfunctions? are you crazy, when a nuclear powerplant is damaged in anyway or shut down, control rods are dropped into the radioactive source. a machine holds them up so when the power goes out they are immediately dropped so even if the machine itself breaks it will work. Chenoble was the equivalent of using dynamite to cook your food instead of a fire. The reason these babies are supposedly being butated due to the radiation is because russia sees no problem in selling them irradiated water. I know I'll get thumbed down for being anonamous but i just finished 2 years of study of nuclear power. the explosions in japan were not nuclear explosions, they were explosions at a nuclear plant, difference. Know your shit. Bitch.
#105 - nowayimgonasayyes (06/02/2011) [-]
First off, I am Russian so i know what happened in Chernobyl. Second, what i said was that any malfunctions, even the smallest one will have catastrophic consequences. Learn to read. Third off, you seem to know that control rods exist, but you don't seem to know what they are used for. During a fission reaction atoms of Uranium are hit with neutrons. One neutrons which collides with a single atom of Uranium will knock three other neutrons from that atom and send them colliding into other atoms.This is called a chain reaction. Control rods are made from silicium or silicon. They have a property which allows the to absorb stray neutrons. When a non-nuclear explosion occurs the ability to control the reaction in this way is lost.
User avatar #63 - SexHarassmentPanda (06/02/2011) [-]
"easy to dispose of"?
that is nuclear powers main flaw actually, what to do with the waste?
I am 100% with you that it is the safest and cleanest energy source, but when something out of human control happens, it is the most dangerous
Fukushima was excellently maintained, but when they had an earthquake which damaged it, they barely avoided a massive disaster when the radiation started leaking
User avatar #61 - brony (06/02/2011) [-]
boobs
#57 - Internet Rule #34 States: If it exists there is porn of it. NO… 06/02/2011 on Rule 34 +6
#1 - **Luni rolls 07** Dubs and I'm lucky 05/28/2011 on Luni's profile 0
#77 - Picture 04/08/2011 on Something Goofy 0
#138 - Picture 04/07/2011 on A MANS WORST TORTURE +4
#923 - Picture 04/07/2011 on Baawwwww Warning 0
#134 - I captain picard loved to party he'd be captain Partyard 03/18/2011 on Sextrek 0
#92 - If captain picard were a baked good he'd be captain Piecard  [+] (3 new replies) 03/18/2011 on Sextrek +4
User avatar #96 - touriopalfreyman (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard was as stupid as shit he would be captain retard
User avatar #100 - RamboTrucker (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard took viagra he would be captain hard
User avatar #134 - Luni (03/18/2011) [-]
I captain picard loved to party he'd be captain Partyard
#83 - If Captain Picard were really dumb he would be Captain Tard.  [+] (5 new replies) 03/18/2011 on Sextrek 0
#88 - lambres has deleted their comment.
User avatar #92 - Luni (03/18/2011) [-]
If captain picard were a baked good he'd be captain Piecard
User avatar #96 - touriopalfreyman (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard was as stupid as shit he would be captain retard
User avatar #100 - RamboTrucker (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard took viagra he would be captain hard
User avatar #134 - Luni (03/18/2011) [-]
I captain picard loved to party he'd be captain Partyard
#283 - Bong=Ancient artifact?! BITCHES IT'S A LAMP!  [+] (2 new replies) 03/16/2011 on Oblivious Parents +16
User avatar #294 - magicgiraffe (03/16/2011) [-]
Flower vase. Yesssss.
User avatar #309 - iTzZac (03/16/2011) [-]
If the bong acted as a flower vase:

See flower in bong

'Must be a science experiment'
#90 - Wonder how pissed the cops were when they saw how hard they we… 02/24/2011 on epic police chaise benny... +1
#1 - I never said that! I would've said she'd never be a good actress! 02/23/2011 on She'll never 0
#103 - Comment deleted 02/23/2011 on If Video Games Came With... 0
#106 - I went to the condom isle grabbed a box, paid for it and walked out. 02/22/2011 on Remember? +2
#79 - Wish this would be implemented in SSB like, if kirby absorbed … 02/22/2011 on kirbeevee +1
[ 206 Total ]

Comments(1):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)