Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu


Rank #7836 on Comments
no avatar Level 154 Comments: Faptastic
Send mail to LordBlackforest Block LordBlackforest Invite LordBlackforest to be your friend
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 113
Date Signed Up:8/11/2010
Last Login:7/10/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#7836
Highest Content Rank:#42659
Highest Comment Rank:#7831
Content Thumbs: 3 total,  4 ,  1
Comment Thumbs: 601 total,  735 ,  134
Content Level Progress: 11.86% (7/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 154 Comments: Faptastic → Level 155 Comments: Faptastic
Content Views:55
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:182
FJ Points:561

Sort by:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#10 - In all honesty all Tumblr has to do is continually jab the bea… 23 hours ago on Tumblr doesn't know their... 0
#8 - What's the deal with the lecture one, anyone know? Why did th…  [+] (9 new replies) 07/09/2014 on Random facts +17
User avatar #90 - rokksiggy (14 hours ago) [-]
Forgot to mention that the majority of the protestors were members of the Univerity of Ottawa's RSM (Revolutionary Student Movement) which is basically the school's Marxist group.
User avatar #87 - rokksiggy (14 hours ago) [-]
One of the professors at the university (an alleged ex-feminazi) scheduled a public lecture on men's rights after a bunch of rape culture controversy went down on campus. A bunch of feminists (female and male) didn't like the fact that the professor was trying to defend men by saying that rape culture doesn't exist and decided to waste everyone's time by being a bunch of immature cunts. There's a video on youtube and it's pretty much fifty minutes of the professor trying to say two words without being interupted. Security showed up too, but couldn't really do anything other than tell them to shut up (which they didn't)
#70 - anonymous (15 hours ago) [-]
lol at you americans

i read about feminazis everyday, but here in germany, never seen one

your society is really REALLY fucked up
i understand why the world hates on you with these bitches representing you
#71 - parashizo (15 hours ago) [-]
forgot to log in

give me your hate
#79 - imagebandetector (15 hours ago) [-]
Most of the people here have never actually seen one, just heard of their bullshit.

Also, that feminazi protest took place in Canada.
#44 - stalini (17 hours ago) [-]
#15 - irishlawyer (21 hours ago) [-]
Probably feminists and that sort of bullshit
#9 - tazze (07/09/2014) [-]
#14 - Looks like the only ***** in your life is you. 07/04/2014 on (untitled) +1
#12 - Where is the crying lady liberty? Its just not a Kelly comic … 06/30/2014 on Football. 0
#11 - yes they are ******** you. this is fake i don't h… 06/29/2014 on How did he get pussy in the... +1
#5 - what episode is this from? I can't remember.  [+] (2 new replies) 06/28/2014 on Sewing 0
User avatar #12 - scg (06/28/2014) [-]
its from all your fault
#11 - Anonomousthirteen (06/28/2014) [-]
I think it's from the first Lemonhope episode, but don't quote me on that.
#72 - get help? I dont think so, but to die somewhere other than the… 06/18/2014 on Spectacular, you said ? 0
#52 - why do you feel the need to say GUN homicides  [+] (26 new replies) 06/14/2014 on Why do you need a gun +23
User avatar #299 - xsirxrepostxalotx (06/14/2014) [-]
Because the UK has over 9000 tea and scone homicides everyday.
#172 - anonymous (06/14/2014) [-]
I'm guessing it's probably because the homicides involved guns
User avatar #99 - enkmaster (06/14/2014) [-]
Because, like Australia, after banning firearms the UKs murders/assaults/armed robbery's using other weapons went through the fucking roof. Whats to stop someone from breaking into a house knowing theres virtually no chance of a firearm being used to defend it?
User avatar #461 - theodordronen (06/14/2014) [-]
Facing someone bigger, stronger and a better fighter? Without being able to hide behind a gun?
User avatar #337 - specialone (06/14/2014) [-]
People are going to rob houses regardless of whether they think the owner has a gun or not.

In fact, I feel safer knowing that any potential burglar I come across is unlikely to have a gun due to gun restrictions.
User avatar #512 - durkadurka (06/14/2014) [-]
Not many people are going to go rob a house if there's a good chance they'd be shot. Would you risk your life over a flat screen tv?
User avatar #546 - specialone (06/14/2014) [-]
If that's the only way you're going to eat for the next week then yes.
#509 - halonachos (06/14/2014) [-]
Actually according to the WHO, the US has the highest amount of reported crime but is ranked 22 in crime per capita. The UK places 4th in per capita and second in total.

Comparing the US to the UK:
US reports more homicides a year.
UK reports more assaults per year.
UK reports more robberies a year per capita than US (double the amount actually)
#487 - anonymous (06/14/2014) [-]
Because it's impossible to get a hold of a good that's illegal, right?
User avatar #545 - specialone (06/14/2014) [-]
No it's not. But it's definitely much more expensive and difficult to get your hands on. For example, I wouldn't know where the fuck to get some cocaine - and even then it's too expensive to be worthwhile.

Generally if you're robbing houses then you're not getting a high level of income.

Also, this whole "well criminals/mentally ill patients can't get guns due to restrictions" has flaws. A lot of people buy guns using someone who doesn't have a conviction or buy them off corrupt commercial sellers.


More gun control, less guns being bought by criminals.
User avatar #216 - futapirate (06/14/2014) [-]
Remember that mass stabbing a while back? (I wouldn't expect you to if you aren't from the US.) Anyway, some kid at some high school went running around with two knives, stabbing people. Several people were injured, but there were no deaths. Change the story to the kid bringing in an assault rifle, it'd be a much more tragic story.
User avatar #472 - kinginyellow (06/14/2014) [-]
No not really, at any point the kid could've killed someone, so either it wasn't his aim to kill or he's too retarded to use a knife correctly, the fact the managed to injure alone should make it obvious that it's easy to grab a knife and go murdering people. Oh and look at Columbine for a complete counter.

"On April 20, Harris was equipped with a 12-gauge Savage-Springfield 67H pump-action shotgun, (which he discharged a total of 25 times) and a Hi-Point 995 Carbine 9 mm carbine with thirteen 10-round magazines, which he fired a total of 96 times.

Klebold was equipped with a 9 mm Intratec TEC-9 semi-automatic handgun with one 52-, one 32-, and one 28-round magazine and a 12-gauge Stevens 311D double-barreled sawed-off shotgun. Klebold primarily fired the TEC-9 handgun, for a total of 55 times."

13 people died there, and the guns were fired a ridiculous amount of times, the point is NOT the weapons used, it all depends on the person using them. Some people can be completely incompetent with a gun or a knife, and others could manage a massacre with either.
User avatar #584 - futapirate (06/15/2014) [-]
Imagine yourself in a crowd of unsuspecting citizens, say, in a high school. How many people do you think you could take down with a combat knife? How many with a handgun?
The fact is: Mass stabbings kill less people than mass shootings. Because it's easier to kill people with guns than it is knives.
User avatar #602 - kinginyellow (06/15/2014) [-]
Oh really? Look at how many shootings contain TRAINED people suffering from ptsd committing the shootings, you know, the people TRAINED to use guns. The "fact" is that a weapon is only as good as the person behind it, look at a lot of mass shootings and the ratio from deaths to actual gunshots, these people wildly spraying won't do anything. You obviously have never used either a knife or a gun in your life if you think they're some piss-easy weapon.
User avatar #604 - futapirate (06/16/2014) [-]
Are you seriously going to argue that you could take down as many people with a knife as you could a gun?
You're right, I've never used either. I understand that guns are more complicated than knives. But as long as I could actually figure out how to fire the gun, I'm sure I'd find it more useful than a knife in killing dozens of unarmed civilians.
User avatar #549 - specialone (06/14/2014) [-]
Bullets are aimed to kill - kitchen knives are not.

It is far easier to kill someone with a knife over a gun.

Knife - only direct areas will result in instant death and with modern medicine a lot of other areas where you might get stabbed (eg the abdomen) bleeding can be limited far easier with a stab wound over a gunshot wound.

Also, bullets can ricochet and splinter causing further complications - thus emergency surgery (which is risky at the best of times) is pretty much always required with a bullet wound whereas in knife attacks you're only treating the direct area.

Don't forget about exit wounds and the fact that it's easier to shoot people running away rather than run up and put a knife in their back.
User avatar #569 - kinginyellow (06/15/2014) [-]
You know knives go beyond just the kitchen right? Look at REAL knives, hunting knives. Those ARE aimed to finish off/gut animals. And no bullets can't "ricochet and splinter" unless you're talking about hollow-point rounds, and good luck getting a hold of those. Bullets only flatten and crumple because they're made of lead, not because they're splintering to cause anymore damage.

And really? Knives can fucking TEAR a person up, they cause bigger entry wounds than bullets and can carve through the body at the will of the person stabbing. That and you can repeatedly stab somebody as well as hit them in areas that are guaranteed death.

I'm not saying a gun is equal with a knife, but it's ot the huge gap you people claim it to be. Most shootings aren't incredibly arccurate if you hadn't noticed, and it is incredibly possible to escape being shot and live, especially if someone is just blindly firing into a crowd. The point you missed is that guns aren't automatic killers and can be fucked up with.
#248 - anonymous (06/14/2014) [-]
you can't legally get your hands on an "assault rifle" in the us, unless you're talking about the ar-15, an semi-auto rifle that "looks super scary so we're going to call it an assault rifle"

fucking faggot
#108 - halonachos (06/14/2014) [-]
The suicide rate using firearms decreased in Australia after they banned firearms, but the overall suicide rate went up. People found other means.
#222 - anonymous (06/14/2014) [-]
>People found other means.

This is pretty much applicable for every situation on earth. If you restrict it, people will find a way. They always will, the question being is what kind of crowd is doing so?
User avatar #231 - guidedhand (06/14/2014) [-]
Levels the playing field a bit tho. Id rather face a robber without a gun, without a gun, than a robber with a , with a gun. Its ther difference between a trip to the hospital and a trip the morgue.
#506 - halonachos (06/14/2014) [-]
Not always, guns are deadly weapons but there is a wide variety of calibers, muzzle velocity, and target factors that determine how lethal it is. For example a .357 to the head will more than likely kill the target, but a .22 to the chest might not. There are a lot of areas that can be non-lethal depending on medical treatment as well. Being shot in the chest can be lethal if it hits a lung(treatable) and will always be lethal if it destroys the heart.

Just saying that guns in general will kill is like assuming that beating someone with your fists will always be non-lethal. It's not always true and it's dependent on many things.
User avatar #559 - guidedhand (06/14/2014) [-]
Its incredibly difficult to kill someone by accident in a punch up. King hits are not easy to do.
User avatar #558 - guidedhand (06/14/2014) [-]
a 22 to the head, lung, heart can kill. And youre alot more like to miss the guys arm/leg/non vital area and kill him, then you are to punch/cut him and kill him in one go
User avatar #109 - enkmaster (06/14/2014) [-]
User avatar #95 - thisisspartah (06/14/2014) [-]
because they use spoons
#51 - You can't cite more guns=more gun problems as proof that less … 06/14/2014 on Why do you need a gun +6
#161 - nukes don't matter unless you're willing to drop one and forev…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/08/2014 on Although the redcoat is a... 0
User avatar #186 - demandsgayversion (06/08/2014) [-]
In Fallout, nobody knows the name of that guy that did the thing. Victimless crime.
[ 163 Total ]

user's channels

Join Subscribe brony

user's friends

Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2450

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#8 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
User avatar #6 - thewowpimp ONLINE (10/12/2011) [-]
/)^3^(\ smooshy dash face!
#4 - thewowpimp ONLINE (04/21/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#5 to #5 - thewowpimp ONLINE (04/21/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#3 - thewowpimp ONLINE (04/21/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - thewowpimp ONLINE (04/20/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 to #1 - thewowpimp ONLINE (04/20/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
 Friends (0)