Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Leyf    

Leyf Avatar Level 209 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to Leyf Block Leyf Invite Leyf to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 49
Date Signed Up:11/26/2009
Last Login:4/11/2013
Location:USA
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 1710 total,  2195 ,  485
Comment Thumbs: 1100 total,  2829 ,  1729
Content Level Progress: 9% (9/100)
Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 209 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 210 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:80495
Times Content Favorited:99 times
Total Comments Made:1158
FJ Points:3003
Favorite Tags: Horatio yeaaahhh (2)
ohai, i am Leyf :D I play World of Warcraft, hate thumbwhores, and love Funnyjunk!

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 38834
    Thumbs Up 998 Thumbs Down 83 Total: +915
    Comments: 52
    Favorites: 51
    Uploaded: 02/18/13
    Curiosity Curiosity
  • Views: 13642
    Thumbs Up 389 Thumbs Down 46 Total: +343
    Comments: 12
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 07/20/12
    Carrie Underwood Carrie Underwood
  • Views: 5096
    Thumbs Up 151 Thumbs Down 33 Total: +118
    Comments: 14
    Favorites: 5
    Uploaded: 08/16/11
    Googled it Googled it
  • Views: 10144
    Thumbs Up 122 Thumbs Down 44 Total: +78
    Comments: 104
    Favorites: 7
    Uploaded: 04/11/10
    Behind a FJ picture Behind a FJ picture
  • Views: 1017
    Thumbs Up 27 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +24
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 04/25/12
    Metal Forks Metal Forks
  • Views: 1707
    Thumbs Up 22 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +21
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 09/18/11
    Clarinet Kid Clarinet Kid
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > [ 57 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#403 - Holy shit that was deep. 03/02/2013 on Facebook (You have no friends) +1
#117 - Roflmao 03/01/2013 on Click and Drag 0
#57 - HA! NO! 02/28/2013 on Read Right To Left 0
#20 - You're missing the point though. We use a lot of food, medical…  [+] (21 new replies) 02/27/2013 on An inspiration to us all 0
#224 - anonymous (03/01/2013) [-]
Exactly. They can't form a coherent thought and not possibly comprehend the things we do for them. But that's not even the point. The point is it's wasted on them because they can't possibly have a future.
#226 - anonymous (03/01/2013) [-]
ignore this. Replied to wrong comment.
#29 - anonymous (02/27/2013) [-]
They give people job's, don't they? They don't ask for the help, people do it cause that's what they want to do in life.
User avatar #23 - Ruspanic (02/27/2013) [-]
Well, yes. And we should, in my opinion. That's why we have social safety nets. Hell, that's why we have society at all - so that individuals can have a higher quality of life and achieve greater success than they'd be able to on their own.

The nice thing about capitalism is that it achieves societal progress without really intending to. In such a system everyone seeks primarily to advance their own self-interest, and they're better off because of their own efforts, which also indirectly contributes to the betterment of society. So individuals benefit from their own labor (an option that disabled people do not have), and everyone benefits from everyone's collective pursuit of happiness.
User avatar #21 - monsieurtimeywimey (02/27/2013) [-]
I second that. I feel heartless saying it, but society would be better off without them.
User avatar #24 - Ruspanic (02/27/2013) [-]
Society would be better off without them, but that's unimportant. Individuals do not exist to serve or benefit society, society exists for the benefit of individuals.
"Society" is simply a faceless collective entity. It has no rights and is secondary in importance to the welfare of the individuals in it.
#53 - anonymous (02/27/2013) [-]
I value a persons life as how much they can contribute to their society. A common criminal's life is not equal to a doctor's who has saved countless lives. I'd sacrifice the criminals life in a heart beat in order to save the doctor. The mentally challenged are useless and are nothing but parasites. If a person can not function in a society, they do not belong in that society. Their existence is meaningless and they contribute nothing. We should deny these parasites the benefits so many of them receive. They leech off the taxpayer-funded services. They are not rightfully entitled to them. These disability services are intended for people who worked and payed taxes and for what ever reason can no longer contribute. They're the ones who deserve the benefits, not the useless members of society.
#97 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
Gotta say, I dislike people like you who view others only as 'tools' which can only be valued by how much use they are to you or 'society' as you prefer to call it and if a 'tool' is no longer of use, you believe it is right for you to toss it away even though they were never yours to begin with, they have their own seperate identities.
#103 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
If they're not contributing anything back to the society they live in then they're just being a parasite. They're taking everything it has to offer and gives nothing in return.
User avatar #165 - Ruspanic (02/28/2013) [-]
It's not like they're stealing from you. Those programs are set up by non-disabled people to help the disabled. They're not entitled to receive those benefits, nor are you or your society entitled to receive their labor. But taking care of the least fortunate among us is an act of kindness and humanity that I feel is worthwhile and affordable.
Of course, charity is preferable to taxes in accomplishing these goals because charity is voluntary, but the government does have a duty to promote the general welfare and thus should have policies aimed at maintaining a minimal standard of living and supporting those who cannot support themselves.

It is an accident of chance that you were born with all your limbs and with full capacity of mind. Likewise it is their misfortune - not their fair and just punishment - that they are physically or mentally disabled.
#214 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
They are stealing from me actually. Ever since I started paying taxes they have been. My tax money should be going to help properly functioning member of societies, not some fucking retards. If I want to help the least fortunate I'd help the ones who actually have a future like the homeless or poor. They could actually profit from the help, a retard will always be a retard.
User avatar #231 - Ruspanic (03/01/2013) [-]
If you think taxes are thievery, take it up with your government. The government is the one taking your money. Whoever happens to benefit from that money are not themselves thieves.

You're free to spend your own money as you wish, and donate it to whatever charities you want. When you pay taxes, you lose control over how that money is spent and who it benefits, except indirectly by voting for legislators. Most of the money you pay to the government is not going to benefit you directly, and a lot of it will go to programs or people you do not support. That's just how taxes work.
#233 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
I'm perfectly fine with my tax money going to help others. Just not those creatures. I don't even want to call them humans. Humans have a developed brain, they do not. They're some sub humanoid species more like it.
User avatar #234 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
Then you're a massive fucking cunt with an irrational hatred for the disabled and a willful ignorance of basic biology.

Do you also hate children, whose brains are not developed to full capacity? What about animals?
#236 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
Kids will one day develop a fully capable brain, a fucking retarded subhuman will not. And yeah I do not consider animals human either... but that goes without saying...
User avatar #238 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
There's no such thing as a subhuman, that's a term people like you use to make themselves feel superior. And I didn't ask if you thought animals were human, I asked it you hated them as you do the mentally disabled.
#242 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
Subhuman is a word, it's in the dictionary.
1. less than or not quite human.
2. almost human.

They have the mental capacity of animals. Actually I don't even know about that... at least some monkeys can learn sign language and use tools.
User avatar #244 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
The word has no objective or scientific meaning. There's no such thing as "less than" or "almost" human. One is either human or not. It's indisputable that mentally disabled people are biologically human.

You don't have to be in a vegetative state to require intensive full-time care. Let's suppose you're only talking about profound mental retardation, which represents an IQ below 20-25 and is the most severe level in medical classification of retardation.
"They may be able to develop basic self-care and communication skills with appropriate support and training."
medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Profound+mental+retardation
#251 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
If we could put all of them on an island and completely separate them from the general public then I could care less. Just get them out of society. Get them the fuck away from me and everyone else. Let them have a retarded "society" there. And i'm using the word society very loosely.
#246 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
They're definitely less than normal people. You believe someone with profound mental retardation is equal to a doctor who has saved many lifes? He's not. At all.
User avatar #249 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
You are talking about utilitarian value. I am talking about biological reality, natural rights, and humane treatment. Completely different and unrelated things.

Mental retardation is an accident. Sometimes it's an accident of heredity, but more often it's an accident caused by environmental agents inside and outside the womb that affect development. Meaning that you could as easily have been born with or developed severe mental disabilities. Your rights in this case are affected only to the extent that you become less able to exercise them: you are not less deserving of rights, and you certainly don't deserve contempt from the more fortunate majority.

Here is a hypothetical question for you: If you could magically provide for the mentally disabled, enable them to live happy and reasonably long lives WITHOUT any extra expenditure of time and resources on society's part, would you do it?
#18 - Well obviously it is not... But really, he does have a point..…  [+] (46 new replies) 02/27/2013 on An inspiration to us all +1
User avatar #19 - Ruspanic (02/27/2013) [-]
They're individuals. They don't have a duty to be useful to others.
User avatar #107 - tehlulzbringer (02/28/2013) [-]
Then they shouldn't be allowed to waste precious air, food, and money

I would recommend euthanising them and using the corpses for science research.
User avatar #161 - Ruspanic (02/28/2013) [-]
It's not your place to "allow" them anything.
You have no more right to euthanize them than they do to euthanize you.
#213 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
They're a waste of resources is what he's saying, and he's right.
User avatar #215 - Ruspanic (02/28/2013) [-]
True, they don't give back the resources that are spent on them.
But I wouldn't call it a waste because I think the cause is worthwhile.
#218 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
The cause is not worthwhile what so ever. It's a complete waste. They're not worth it, those resources would be better spent on someone who would truly appreciate them.
User avatar #219 - Ruspanic (03/01/2013) [-]
You think the disabled can't appreciate and benefit from our efforts to take care of them?
#225 - anonymous (03/01/2013) [-]
Exactly. They can't form a coherent thought and not possibly comprehend the things we do for them. But that's not even the point. The point is it's wasted on them because they can't possibly have a future.
User avatar #228 - Ruspanic (03/01/2013) [-]
What sort of hypothetical disabled people are you talking about here? They're not braindead.
#229 - anonymous (03/01/2013) [-]
They don't have a functioning brain and can never make something out of their life. That's why it's wasted on them. I'm talking about the severely mentally challenged.
User avatar #230 - Ruspanic (03/01/2013) [-]
I'm not sure the people you're talking about actually exist, at least in any significant numbers. It sounds like you think we're throwing money at corpses.

There are plenty of people who are too mentally (or physically) impaired to be able to work or to "make something out of their life", but most of these people are still capable of having emotions and thoughts (albeit on a much simpler level than most). Their brain is severely impaired, but it's still functioning. The way they are treated will affect the quality and length of the life they experience.
#232 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
Ok I'm just going to be completely blunt and honest. I do not give a shit about their quality of life. Their life is meaningless. Wouldn't all this money we're throwing at them better serve someone who just needs to get back on his feet or something? Anything makes them happy... give the little retard a fucking candy bar and he'll have no worries in the world. I don't care if his brain functions or not, his existence serves no purpose.
User avatar #235 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
Your existence serves no purpose either.
People don't exist for your benefit, asshole.
#237 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
Ok first of all they're not really people like I've mentioned before. But I do serve a purpose actually. I'm going to college now (something they'll never do) and will get a job and actually make something useful out of my life. They never will.
User avatar #239 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
Just because you don't call them people doesn't mean they aren't.

You assigned that purpose to your own life, it's not actually the reason you exist.

What about people with locked-in syndrome? They are absolutely paralyzed (except for their eyes, sometimes), and therefore cannot make anything out of their lives or contribute to society. They can't even communicate except by blinking.
However, they are awake and aware and have otherwise fully functioning minds.

Do you consider them human? Do you despise them as you do the mentally disabled? Do you think them "worthy" of receiving support?
#240 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
I'm an advocate of mercy killing. If I was ever in that situation I know I'd rather be killed than live like that. I'd be fine will mercy killing both of them.
User avatar #252 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
"Now let me ask you a question, what good does keeping them alive do? So we can say "Hey look we're good people! See?!""

It does them good, which is the whole point.
#253 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
But why even waste our time on them is the whole point. What does doing them good achieve? So we can feel good about ourselves and have an emotional high or some shit? It's meaningless.
User avatar #248 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
"They take up a bed, medical supplies, and doctor time."
Yes they do. I'm asking if the expenditures are justified, in the case of locked-in syndrome people.

It doesn't matter whether you or I think someone else is "truly living". We have no authority to make such judgments about other people's lives. If their death is anyone's decision, it must be their own, insofar as they are able to make such a choice. (I'm talking specifically about euthanizing people here, not about refusing to pay for their healthcare, because that's not the same as actively killing someone.)

"Retards can't tell you if they want to live or not and it's impossible for us to allow them to"
It's impossible for us to allow them to live? What? No, it isn't.

It's not their fault they are mentally retarded, and it's also not their fault they are "leeches" since they didn't make the decision to be cared for at the taxpayer's expense (assuming that they are, of course, and that their families aren't paying). Your hatred for them is completely unwarranted.

And you didn't answer my question. Do you also hate physically disabled "leeches", like paralyzed people?
#250 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
If they were born with locked-in syndrome than no. If they were once a productive member of society and had some kind of accident dealing massive damage to the brain and causing the locked-in syndrome than they should be taken care of.
And yeah that sentence was weird. I meant it's impossible for them to tell us if they want to live or not and it's impossible for us to find a way to let them tell us if they want to live or not.
No one's blaming them or saying it's their fault. This doesn't change the fact that they are leeches and retarded.
No I don't hate the physically disabled. For example, Stephen Hawkins is physically disabled and has many many scientific breakthroughs. As long as you have a working brain you're good. That and can communicate with others in some way be it a computer or what have you. Now let me ask you a question, what good does keeping them alive do? So we can say "Hey look we're good people! See?!"
User avatar #245 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
(reply limit)

For many of them, you're probably right, and I think they have the right to commit suicide (or seek assisted suicide) if they want to. But not all of them want to.

Take a look: granted, this guy isn't totally paralyzed, but still has locked-in syndrome.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-19340667

Anyway, the point was this: if you hate the mentally disabled because they're "leeches", shouldn't the same standards apply to anyone who takes but cannot give back?

Unless, of course you have some other reason for hating mentally retarded people specifically.
#247 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
They take up a bed, medical supplies, and doctor time. Also how can you even call that truly living? Retards can't tell you if they want to live or not and it's impossible for us to allow them to. I do hate retards because they are leeches. But they're also annoying as fuck, but that's more of a personal level hatred.
User avatar #241 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
You can make that decision for yourself, but not for others.
#243 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
I imagine a large amount of heavily disabled people, if given the ability to think clearly for a short amount of time, would ask for death rather than continue 'living' like that.
User avatar #20 - Leyf (02/27/2013) [-]
You're missing the point though. We use a lot of food, medical supplies, and materials on these people who in return will never re-contribute to society for what society has given to them. Get it?
#224 - anonymous (03/01/2013) [-]
Exactly. They can't form a coherent thought and not possibly comprehend the things we do for them. But that's not even the point. The point is it's wasted on them because they can't possibly have a future.
#226 - anonymous (03/01/2013) [-]
ignore this. Replied to wrong comment.
#29 - anonymous (02/27/2013) [-]
They give people job's, don't they? They don't ask for the help, people do it cause that's what they want to do in life.
User avatar #23 - Ruspanic (02/27/2013) [-]
Well, yes. And we should, in my opinion. That's why we have social safety nets. Hell, that's why we have society at all - so that individuals can have a higher quality of life and achieve greater success than they'd be able to on their own.

The nice thing about capitalism is that it achieves societal progress without really intending to. In such a system everyone seeks primarily to advance their own self-interest, and they're better off because of their own efforts, which also indirectly contributes to the betterment of society. So individuals benefit from their own labor (an option that disabled people do not have), and everyone benefits from everyone's collective pursuit of happiness.
User avatar #21 - monsieurtimeywimey (02/27/2013) [-]
I second that. I feel heartless saying it, but society would be better off without them.
User avatar #24 - Ruspanic (02/27/2013) [-]
Society would be better off without them, but that's unimportant. Individuals do not exist to serve or benefit society, society exists for the benefit of individuals.
"Society" is simply a faceless collective entity. It has no rights and is secondary in importance to the welfare of the individuals in it.
#53 - anonymous (02/27/2013) [-]
I value a persons life as how much they can contribute to their society. A common criminal's life is not equal to a doctor's who has saved countless lives. I'd sacrifice the criminals life in a heart beat in order to save the doctor. The mentally challenged are useless and are nothing but parasites. If a person can not function in a society, they do not belong in that society. Their existence is meaningless and they contribute nothing. We should deny these parasites the benefits so many of them receive. They leech off the taxpayer-funded services. They are not rightfully entitled to them. These disability services are intended for people who worked and payed taxes and for what ever reason can no longer contribute. They're the ones who deserve the benefits, not the useless members of society.
#97 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
Gotta say, I dislike people like you who view others only as 'tools' which can only be valued by how much use they are to you or 'society' as you prefer to call it and if a 'tool' is no longer of use, you believe it is right for you to toss it away even though they were never yours to begin with, they have their own seperate identities.
#103 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
If they're not contributing anything back to the society they live in then they're just being a parasite. They're taking everything it has to offer and gives nothing in return.
User avatar #165 - Ruspanic (02/28/2013) [-]
It's not like they're stealing from you. Those programs are set up by non-disabled people to help the disabled. They're not entitled to receive those benefits, nor are you or your society entitled to receive their labor. But taking care of the least fortunate among us is an act of kindness and humanity that I feel is worthwhile and affordable.
Of course, charity is preferable to taxes in accomplishing these goals because charity is voluntary, but the government does have a duty to promote the general welfare and thus should have policies aimed at maintaining a minimal standard of living and supporting those who cannot support themselves.

It is an accident of chance that you were born with all your limbs and with full capacity of mind. Likewise it is their misfortune - not their fair and just punishment - that they are physically or mentally disabled.
#214 - anonymous (02/28/2013) [-]
They are stealing from me actually. Ever since I started paying taxes they have been. My tax money should be going to help properly functioning member of societies, not some fucking retards. If I want to help the least fortunate I'd help the ones who actually have a future like the homeless or poor. They could actually profit from the help, a retard will always be a retard.
User avatar #231 - Ruspanic (03/01/2013) [-]
If you think taxes are thievery, take it up with your government. The government is the one taking your money. Whoever happens to benefit from that money are not themselves thieves.

You're free to spend your own money as you wish, and donate it to whatever charities you want. When you pay taxes, you lose control over how that money is spent and who it benefits, except indirectly by voting for legislators. Most of the money you pay to the government is not going to benefit you directly, and a lot of it will go to programs or people you do not support. That's just how taxes work.
#233 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
I'm perfectly fine with my tax money going to help others. Just not those creatures. I don't even want to call them humans. Humans have a developed brain, they do not. They're some sub humanoid species more like it.
User avatar #234 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
Then you're a massive fucking cunt with an irrational hatred for the disabled and a willful ignorance of basic biology.

Do you also hate children, whose brains are not developed to full capacity? What about animals?
#236 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
Kids will one day develop a fully capable brain, a fucking retarded subhuman will not. And yeah I do not consider animals human either... but that goes without saying...
User avatar #238 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
There's no such thing as a subhuman, that's a term people like you use to make themselves feel superior. And I didn't ask if you thought animals were human, I asked it you hated them as you do the mentally disabled.
#242 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
Subhuman is a word, it's in the dictionary.
1. less than or not quite human.
2. almost human.

They have the mental capacity of animals. Actually I don't even know about that... at least some monkeys can learn sign language and use tools.
User avatar #244 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
The word has no objective or scientific meaning. There's no such thing as "less than" or "almost" human. One is either human or not. It's indisputable that mentally disabled people are biologically human.

You don't have to be in a vegetative state to require intensive full-time care. Let's suppose you're only talking about profound mental retardation, which represents an IQ below 20-25 and is the most severe level in medical classification of retardation.
"They may be able to develop basic self-care and communication skills with appropriate support and training."
medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Profound+mental+retardation
#251 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
If we could put all of them on an island and completely separate them from the general public then I could care less. Just get them out of society. Get them the fuck away from me and everyone else. Let them have a retarded "society" there. And i'm using the word society very loosely.
#246 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
They're definitely less than normal people. You believe someone with profound mental retardation is equal to a doctor who has saved many lifes? He's not. At all.
User avatar #249 - Ruspanic (03/02/2013) [-]
You are talking about utilitarian value. I am talking about biological reality, natural rights, and humane treatment. Completely different and unrelated things.

Mental retardation is an accident. Sometimes it's an accident of heredity, but more often it's an accident caused by environmental agents inside and outside the womb that affect development. Meaning that you could as easily have been born with or developed severe mental disabilities. Your rights in this case are affected only to the extent that you become less able to exercise them: you are not less deserving of rights, and you certainly don't deserve contempt from the more fortunate majority.

Here is a hypothetical question for you: If you could magically provide for the mentally disabled, enable them to live happy and reasonably long lives WITHOUT any extra expenditure of time and resources on society's part, would you do it?
#197 - Almost all of these apply to me and now I feel really good lol 02/27/2013 on Haphazard facts 0
#5 - I still went to school with that guy. 02/25/2013 on Shat pants running man 0
#73 - I read the whole thing outloud 02/23/2013 on I quit 0
#91 - What is actually wrong with you people?  [+] (1 new reply) 02/22/2013 on ' +1
#93 - anonymous (02/23/2013) [-]
...TAKE A LOOK AT THE FIRST COMMENT:-)
#68 - That's a good argument for almost every gun that the majority … 02/22/2013 on AR15 -4

user's channels

Join Subscribe vocaloids

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #10 - tittentei (01/03/2014) [-]
You alive brah?
#5 - alphajesus (08/12/2012) [-]
ill just leave this here
User avatar #6 to #5 - Leyf (08/12/2012) [-]
Why
User avatar #7 to #6 - alphajesus (08/12/2012) [-]
not sure
User avatar #8 to #7 - alphajesus (08/12/2012) [-]
just felt like it
ya know?
too is OoT backwards
User avatar #9 to #8 - Leyf (08/13/2012) [-]
o-okay.
User avatar #2 - ihasapie (04/30/2011) [-]
if you speak your mind on FJ people thumb you down...just saying, it doesn't go very well for you :P
User avatar #3 to #3 - Leyf (04/30/2011) [-]
Oh i know haha, i just laugh when I see my comments regarding how memes aren't artistic OR funny with -40 thumbs.
User avatar #4 to #4 - ihasapie (04/30/2011) [-]
well i agree with you :D
 Friends (0)