Rank #49362 on SubscribersLevel 256 Comments: Contaminated Win
OfflineSend mail to LazyPuppy Block LazyPuppy Invite LazyPuppy to be your friend flag avatar
THIS IS... A DISCRIPTION!!!
- Views: 39475Time travel!
1777 162 Total: +1615
- Views: 28791Black troll?
696 52 Total: +644
- Views: 17943pokepuns!
391 30 Total: +361
- Views: 9022brawlinthefamily compilation part 2
288 7 Total: +281
- Views: 15349pokepuns 2!
297 35 Total: +262
- Views: 5348Funnyjunk Monopoly!
124 9 Total: +115
- Views: 850Did I win?
12 2 Total: +10
- Views: 14209Cuz F you!
375 13 Total: +362
- Views: 5682Who won?
120 1 Total: +119
- Views: 4398Those were the days
55 1 Total: +54
- Views: 3440Best item ever
53 4 Total: +49
- Views: 3333Batman
49 1 Total: +48
- Views: 3464ouch
46 2 Total: +44
latest user's comments
|#33 - That study is pointless and it doesn't mean anything. And stop… [+] (2 new replies)||03/08/2014 on No more||-1|
#56 - raddaraddaradda (03/09/2014) [-]
Ok, so using studies for information is pointless (especially if they seem to correlate with the propaganda/conspiracy by the mass media), and the government shouldn't try to restrict/regulate things that are potentially dangerous, because other things are also dangerous.
You should hold a conference each year, with the friends and families of those 11k people that die each year, and explain to them that the lives that were lost weren't worth protecting, because there are so many more people still left. I'm sure they'd understand.
I can agree that owning a firearm for practical purposes (like hunting, or if you are a police officer) is a legitimate reason for owning a gun. "Enjoyment" is not a practical purpose.
You act as if the government is trying to ban gun ownership altogether, while in reality its goal is to increase regulation. Strict control over who gets to buy/sell guns decreases the chance that a gun becomes available to someone who shouldn't have guns.
The government is capable of focusing on more than one issue at once. Just because other issues are important to solve, doesn't mean this issue should just be ignored and forgotten.
Lastly, I am the one acting smug? Have you read your own posts?
Your posts are filled with derogatory remarks and ad hominem attacks, coupled smoothly together with straw man arguments.
Am I "acting smug" because I don't call people stupid when I argue with them, or because I don't type enough profanities in all caps?
#62 - iloveburzum (03/09/2014) [-]
While guns seem more dangerous than knives (one is designed to be a weapon, the other can be simply for buttering bread) both are capable of killing people rather easily. Sometimes the anti gun propaganda that is thrown about seems a little on the extreme side. Yes people get shot, because guns are available. But people get stabbed because knives are available. People get in fist fights because they have hands.
I'm getting a little distracted from my point. Possibly more regulation isn't needed so much as more education? Or keeping guns from gang members? Fuck knows, just relax a little. People are going to kill each other no matter what they've got access to.
|#31 - If you want numbers from somewhere, lets do that yeah? CDC Cen…||03/08/2014 on No more||+1|
|#39 - Why the hell would you pray? I thought two heads wer…||05/25/2012 on Facebook (1)||+5|
|#16 - I had girl issues when I was 14 too. Don't worry bro. The more…||04/20/2012 on Girl logic||+5|
|#89 - Officer Dick and I believe Spiderman was in that one. …||04/20/2012 on Too young man||+1|
|#67 - Why are there marshmallows in my cat food? [+] (2 new replies)||04/19/2012 on Willpower||+14|
|#3 - Picture||04/15/2012 on Gang wars||+1|
|#16 - If I had a Ps3 or 360 I might play it. But for the PC its terrible. [+] (2 new replies)||04/15/2012 on Call Of Duty Logic||+1|
|#493 - I agree with you. I'm a christian fag and its not right to see… [+] (1 new reply)||04/14/2012 on William Lane Craig pwns...||0|
|#277 - I like to argue, but I suppose you're right,||04/13/2012 on True||+6|