Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

LazierThanThou

Rank #31 on Subscribers
LazierThanThou Avatar Level 310 Content: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to LazierThanThou Block LazierThanThou Invite LazierThanThou to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 29
Video Games Played: League of Legends, L.A. Noire, GTA IV
Interests: Porn, sexuality, politics, philosophy
Date Signed Up:12/18/2009
Location:Somewhere where I dont know where I am
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 118419 total,  126483 ,  8064
Comment Thumbs: 4171 total,  4590 ,  419
Content Level Progress: 25.12% (1256/5000)
Level 310 Content: Wizard → Level 311 Content: Wizard
Comment Level Progress: 38% (38/100)
Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1363
Content Views:36021249
Times Content Favorited:2382 times
Total Comments Made:1169
FJ Points:40451
Withdrawn and introverted. Infectiously perverted.

latest user's comments

#83 - What does the right of association have to do with marriage?  [+] (2 new replies) 09/08/2014 on Life priorities 0
#84 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What does a gay couple suing a bakery have to do with allowing gay marriage
User avatar #85 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.
#82 - It was a stab at their moral hypocrisy. Everywhere you look, … 09/08/2014 on Life priorities 0
#79 - Except they're not. The right of association goes both ways. …  [+] (4 new replies) 09/08/2014 on Life priorities 0
#81 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What the fuck does any of that have to do with letting them get married
User avatar #83 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
What does the right of association have to do with marriage?
#84 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What does a gay couple suing a bakery have to do with allowing gay marriage
User avatar #85 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.
#77 - You sound like such a ******* totalitarian contro…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/08/2014 on Life priorities 0
#78 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
That's not what I'm talking about. It's that you're supporting restriction on the rights of a large group based on the actions of a small number of it's members. The two problems should be completely separate issues
User avatar #79 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
Except they're not. The right of association goes both ways. Gays should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they want. If a business has an unfavorable practice towards gays, gays shouldn't be forced to shop there. Similarly, business owners should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they wan. If a business owner doesn't want to do business with gays, they shouldn't be forced to.

It's called "equality." Look into it.
#81 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What the fuck does any of that have to do with letting them get married
User avatar #83 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
What does the right of association have to do with marriage?
#84 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What does a gay couple suing a bakery have to do with allowing gay marriage
User avatar #85 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.
#76 - I've no problem with people being intolerant. Pick a type of …  [+] (2 new replies) 09/08/2014 on Life priorities 0
User avatar #80 - iwasthepapercut (09/08/2014) [-]
Well then why'd you even bother with the "They refuse to be accepting and tolerant of other peoples beliefs" part

But otherwise, alright. I still don't agree with you but you aren't contradicting yourself.
User avatar #82 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
It was a stab at their moral hypocrisy. Everywhere you look, people are condemned because they're being "intolerant" while the intolerance of the people screaming "intolerant" is not shown frequently enough.
#63 - I'm not going to support the reduction of evil for a different…  [+] (8 new replies) 09/08/2014 on Life priorities -1
#70 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
You sound like such a fucking baby.

"Some gay people got mad at businesses that were intolerant of their lifestyle, so I don't want any gay person to be viewed equally under the law."
User avatar #77 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
You sound like such a fucking totalitarian control freak.

"Some people don't like other people, so I think they should have a gun put against their head and be forced to do business with the people they don't like."
#78 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
That's not what I'm talking about. It's that you're supporting restriction on the rights of a large group based on the actions of a small number of it's members. The two problems should be completely separate issues
User avatar #79 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
Except they're not. The right of association goes both ways. Gays should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they want. If a business has an unfavorable practice towards gays, gays shouldn't be forced to shop there. Similarly, business owners should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they wan. If a business owner doesn't want to do business with gays, they shouldn't be forced to.

It's called "equality." Look into it.
#81 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What the fuck does any of that have to do with letting them get married
User avatar #83 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
What does the right of association have to do with marriage?
#84 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What does a gay couple suing a bakery have to do with allowing gay marriage
User avatar #85 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.
#56 - I'm a libertarian anarchist and I'm against gay marriage. It …  [+] (15 new replies) 09/08/2014 on Life priorities +2
User avatar #75 - iwasthepapercut (09/08/2014) [-]
Okay, let me get this straight. You believe you should be tolerant of other people's beliefs, thus one should not be intolerant of another based on their beliefs. Essentially you should not tolerate intolerance.

But when gays refuse to tolerate a business' intolerance, they're suddenly in the wrong because the business has a "right of conscience," thus you can't tolerate a gay couple's intolerance of a business' somehow magically justified intolerance?

Why is it that individuals are not allowed to be intolerant of one another based on belief, but businesses are allowed to be intolerant of individuals on the same premise?
User avatar #76 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
I've no problem with people being intolerant. Pick a type of person and be bigoted against them, I don't care. That's your problem, not mine.

I have a problem when someone introduces force into a situation. When you are forced to engage in behavior that is evil.

I'm perfectly okay with gay people going to the media or social media and saying "this business discriminated against me because I want to have a gay marriage!" I'm then okay with people looking at that discrimination and deciding for themselves if they then want to ever do business with that bakery ever again.

I'm not okay with someone putting a gun to someones head and demanding they bake them a cake. I'm further not okay with someone putting a gun to someones head and demanding they bake a cake for something they find morally objectionable.

Force is the problem, not intolerance. You'll never solve intolerance, but you can solve force.
User avatar #80 - iwasthepapercut (09/08/2014) [-]
Well then why'd you even bother with the "They refuse to be accepting and tolerant of other peoples beliefs" part

But otherwise, alright. I still don't agree with you but you aren't contradicting yourself.
User avatar #82 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
It was a stab at their moral hypocrisy. Everywhere you look, people are condemned because they're being "intolerant" while the intolerance of the people screaming "intolerant" is not shown frequently enough.
#72 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
I disagree, I don't think a business should be allowed to deny business based on sexual preference, skin color, gender, or religion unless it directly conflicts with the business itself. (ex. A shoe company should not deny business to a man who wears red shoes, but a blue shoe company should be able to deny business to a man who wants to buy red shoes.)

Here's the real question. Does the right of conscience overrule the right of liberty? If I consciously feel right or wrong about something, does that mean I have the freedom to do so or not to do so? Should the freedom of some be oppressed to protect the freedom of others?

And you are correct. Marriage has nothing to do with religious reasons anymore. Which is why it makes no sense for religion to be a discussion as to why Same-sex marriage should be illegal.
User avatar #62 - janewayunderseven (09/08/2014) [-]
While I understand what you are saying, I think you should consider that not all gay people are like this. It's a vocal minority and personally as a lesbian it upsets me that I am being denied equal rights (and that's all I want - equality NOT preferential treatment) because of a few idiots, under the guise of the gay rights movement banner, oppressing other people's right to decline business.
User avatar #63 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
I'm not going to support the reduction of evil for a different kind of evil.

Give me the right of association and I'll be behind your ability to get married.
#70 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
You sound like such a fucking baby.

"Some gay people got mad at businesses that were intolerant of their lifestyle, so I don't want any gay person to be viewed equally under the law."
User avatar #77 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
You sound like such a fucking totalitarian control freak.

"Some people don't like other people, so I think they should have a gun put against their head and be forced to do business with the people they don't like."
#78 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
That's not what I'm talking about. It's that you're supporting restriction on the rights of a large group based on the actions of a small number of it's members. The two problems should be completely separate issues
User avatar #79 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
Except they're not. The right of association goes both ways. Gays should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they want. If a business has an unfavorable practice towards gays, gays shouldn't be forced to shop there. Similarly, business owners should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they wan. If a business owner doesn't want to do business with gays, they shouldn't be forced to.

It's called "equality." Look into it.
#81 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What the fuck does any of that have to do with letting them get married
User avatar #83 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
What does the right of association have to do with marriage?
#84 - anonymous (09/08/2014) [-]
What does a gay couple suing a bakery have to do with allowing gay marriage
User avatar #85 - LazierThanThou (09/08/2014) [-]
One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.
#64 - Except she'll never see it. So... 09/06/2014 on Fat shaming Saturday? +1
#7 - You made me listen to Billy Joel. I hope you're proud… 09/06/2014 on sweet roll +2
#48 - Then who would we laugh at? 09/05/2014 on Shot Yourself In The Foot... +2
#28 - I especially liked the crack at Bill O'Reily, but I disagree w… 09/05/2014 on Double standards. It's... 0
#111 - Please don't give them terrible, horrible ideas. 09/05/2014 on man that 4chan guy 0
#148 - The term "FUBAR" springs to mind. 09/03/2014 on (untitled) 0
#41 - Right, but a significant difference between ISIS and AQ is fun…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/03/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #118 - Ashtaroth (09/03/2014) [-]
It doesn't really help matters at all that ISIS is using U.S. issue weapons that were supplied to the "rebels" in Syria by Obama's orders. We gave them everything they needed to become a super-terrorist organization, in spite of the majority of the country saying we needed to just let Syria destroy itself. Despite the warnings that half the "rebels" in Syria were in fact members of various terrorist organizations. Add to that the fact that ISIS also has captured Iraqi military stations, armories, and supply depots, and they have an army equipped to fight anything any middle eastern nation could bring against them.
User avatar #148 - LazierThanThou (09/03/2014) [-]
The term "FUBAR" springs to mind.
#24 - It actually gets worse, because they're rich terrorists. Wh…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/03/2014 on (untitled) +3
#34 - Jowi (09/03/2014) [-]
Hmm it will and it won't. Armies cost a hell of a lot to upkeep.
I mean I know they're not buying 65000000 fighter jets at 60 a pop but food, medicine, ammunition, combat clothing is pretty expensive and distribution and logistics add on to that.

1.2 bill is a start but I imagine they're being funded from elsewhere, like the hyper-religious Sheikhs in the UAE and Saudi Arabia.
In the end, mostly this war is about the control of oil and people in the region and the Sheikhs are the people that have had a taste for both and want more
User avatar #41 - LazierThanThou (09/03/2014) [-]
Right, but a significant difference between ISIS and AQ is funding. Granted, AQ didn't have a standing army(that I'm aware of), but if you're just talking about threats, ISIS is more of one because they have more money, which translates into power.
User avatar #118 - Ashtaroth (09/03/2014) [-]
It doesn't really help matters at all that ISIS is using U.S. issue weapons that were supplied to the "rebels" in Syria by Obama's orders. We gave them everything they needed to become a super-terrorist organization, in spite of the majority of the country saying we needed to just let Syria destroy itself. Despite the warnings that half the "rebels" in Syria were in fact members of various terrorist organizations. Add to that the fact that ISIS also has captured Iraqi military stations, armories, and supply depots, and they have an army equipped to fight anything any middle eastern nation could bring against them.
User avatar #148 - LazierThanThou (09/03/2014) [-]
The term "FUBAR" springs to mind.
#45 - Journalists have been sleeping with politicians for a long tim… 09/03/2014 on Rabbit hole? More like the... 0
#18 - I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for subscribers. It in… 09/03/2014 on trying to hook up with... 0
#17 - Hitler hated Christians. "Christianity…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/03/2014 on (untitled) +2
User avatar #26 - toensix (09/03/2014) [-]
That was actually e very nice passage to read. I especially liked the last part about other planets.

But if Christianity is an invention of the Jews then wouldn't Islam be the same?
User avatar #22 - anonymoose (09/03/2014) [-]
He DID however use Christianity to get peoples favour, leading people to think he was Christian.
#62 - Just tried it again and it worked. Went through without a hitch. 09/03/2014 on Massive upload form update 0
#55 - I tried uploading about 20 pictures in **** twice…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/03/2014 on Massive upload form update 0
User avatar #61 - admin (09/03/2014) [-]
User avatar #62 - LazierThanThou (09/03/2014) [-]
Just tried it again and it worked. Went through without a hitch.
#78 - Social Justice Warrior  [+] (1 new reply) 09/02/2014 on #GamerGate censorship +3
#86 - anonymous (09/02/2014) [-]
oh, thank you kindly. thumb for you!
#83 - Muslims are against gays and I honestly don't know about Jews …  [+] (1 new reply) 09/02/2014 on fuck yeah 0
#84 - ripinkill (09/02/2014) [-]
thanks
#63 - The state was intended to be separated from the church, but th…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/02/2014 on fuck yeah +3
#75 - anonymous (09/02/2014) [-]
Marridge isn't simply a religious thing anymore, it's sealed in law, and who governs law?
The goverment.

Marridge isn't purely a christian thing either, so it's bullshit they get to monopoly it like they try to.
#78 - ripinkill (09/02/2014) [-]
since when is the christian religion the only religion that says gayness is wrong? legitimate question here im curious. do all other major religions accept gayness as normal, or even mention it? all I hear is that it is christians who are against it.
User avatar #83 - LazierThanThou (09/02/2014) [-]
Muslims are against gays and I honestly don't know about Jews or any of the other major religions.
#84 - ripinkill (09/02/2014) [-]
thanks
#114 - They weren't "accidentally&… 09/01/2014 on a hero to us all +1
#63 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 09/01/2014 on What a Twist 0
User avatar #64 - iamrealfancy (09/01/2014) [-]
Sweeeeeet.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0
  • x71

Comments(28):

LazierThanThou has disabled anonymous comments.
 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
#598 - LazierThanThou (07/22/2014) [-]
Well that escalated quickly.
User avatar #599 to #598 - joshlol (07/22/2014) [-]
god damn and I thought I got a lot of those things
User avatar #600 to #599 - LazierThanThou (07/22/2014) [-]
In retrospect, I'm betting it was just a bug or something. I probably didn't earn all of them.

I'm curious, though. How many did you get?
User avatar #601 to #600 - joshlol (07/22/2014) [-]
I only got 2 from **** but I have 39 atm from reposting **** and have probably had close to 50 in total, it seems easier to get them like that than **** though since I don't often see many **** content's with over 150 thumbs unless it's some camwhore
User avatar #602 to #601 - LazierThanThou (07/22/2014) [-]
Yeah, the amount of thumbs you can get in **** seems to have dropped somewhat. I remember a back when you could get 200-300 thumbs pretty easy. Perhaps people just didn't thumb down as much back then, though.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. See ya around.
User avatar #603 to #602 - joshlol (07/22/2014) [-]
bye
User avatar #593 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
Actually sorry it's.
SS-Obersturmbannführer Lazier.
User avatar #594 to #593 - LazierThanThou (06/30/2014) [-]
That's quite the title. Any particular reason you're giving it to me?
User avatar #595 to #594 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
No particular reason Fuhrer Lazier you just seem awesome as fak.
User avatar #596 to #595 - LazierThanThou (06/30/2014) [-]
One does ones best.
User avatar #597 to #596 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
As always Obersturmbannführer, of course.
User avatar #592 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
Heil UberFruher Lazier
#590 to #589 - LazierThanThou (06/19/2014) [-]
It was everything I dreamed it would be.
User avatar #591 to #590 - soundofwinter (06/19/2014) [-]
This is everything I feared it would be
User avatar #587 - finalrendition (05/27/2014) [-]
HE'S BACK
User avatar #588 to #587 - LazierThanThou (05/28/2014) [-]
Indeed I am.
User avatar #576 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Fresh start.

Maybe this time I wont get banned.
User avatar #577 to #576 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
HEY!
User avatar #578 to #577 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Hello.
User avatar #579 to #578 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
how've you been?
User avatar #580 to #579 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Well enough.

Yourself?
User avatar #581 to #580 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
better. gonna go to college, getting a job soon hopefully
User avatar #582 to #581 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Congratulations. Sounds like things are going well for you.
User avatar #583 to #582 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
they are! things are probably the best they've ever been for me now
User avatar #584 to #583 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
That's really good to hear.

Hate to be a downer, but I was about to get to bed when you contacted me. I'm really beat, so I'm gonna get to sleep.

I'll talk to you later.
User avatar #585 to #584 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
night man. nice to see you around again
User avatar #586 to #585 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Same here. Have a good one.
 
 Friends (0)