Wait, is that Mordekaiser?

Yes

My dad was a poor farmer from a different country, in a small town that just 10 years ago had only one "town telephone". and the government had documentation of his birth.

I highly doubt hipsters driving a fiat would be so under the radar in their homecountry that they have no documentation. OP litterally said himself he knew they came from mexico, yet shipped him eslewhere.

like i said, i can reason with enforcing the law...but this is an obvious abuse and misuse of power.

"OP litterally said himself he knew they came from mexico"

Yes, as in they were coming from the direction of Mexico, not that their country of origin is Mexico. There's a very distinct difference.

As was said earlier, they were trying to illegally enter the U.S. Without papers. Which means if they turned around and tried to reenter Mexico, they'd be illegally entering Mexico. Without papers.

no. read it again,it says they were originally brought from mexico when they were kids. its in the black text at the top.

they have papers from mexico, it says they were originally from there in the same quote im referencing to.

If they have papers from Mexico, then they have a known Country of Origin that would have been found by Homeland Security or told by the immigrants themselves.

That means the second half of the story couldn't have happened, because by law they would have to be sent to Mexico, not file paperwork to send them somewhere that is different from their Country of Origin.

That's why i started to doubt the story all together.

it does actually....it means that they knew where they were coming from, yet sent them to a different country than that of which they came from. This is obviously an abuse, and misuse of power.

>But they still have no paperwork. Nothing whatsoever not even finger prints or dental records.

It's entirely possible that people living so under the radar that they have no papers, despite living in the country for many years, don't have birth certificates in their country of origin. If their place of origin cannot be determined, border patrol will send them somewhere they will not cause issue again. Word of mouth with no physical proof combined with the fact that they were uncooperative means they're going wherever the big bad border patrol officer feels like sending them.

If you're going to break the law, don't flaunt it in front of the people who can punish you for it.

My dad was a poor farmer from a different country, in a small town that just 10 years ago had only one "town telephone". and the government had documentation of his birth.

I highly doubt hipsters driving a fiat would be so under the radar in their homecountry that they have no documentation. OP litterally said himself he knew they came from mexico, yet shipped him eslewhere.

like i said, i can reason with enforcing the law...but this is an obvious abuse and misuse of power.

"OP litterally said himself he knew they came from mexico"

Yes, as in they were coming from the direction of Mexico, not that their country of origin is Mexico. There's a very distinct difference.

As was said earlier, they were trying to illegally enter the U.S. Without papers. Which means if they turned around and tried to reenter Mexico, they'd be illegally entering Mexico. Without papers.

no. read it again,it says they were originally brought from mexico when they were kids. its in the black text at the top.

they have papers from mexico, it says they were originally from there in the same quote im referencing to.

If they have papers from Mexico, then they have a known Country of Origin that would have been found by Homeland Security or told by the immigrants themselves.

That means the second half of the story couldn't have happened, because by law they would have to be sent to Mexico, not file paperwork to send them somewhere that is different from their Country of Origin.

That's why i started to doubt the story all together.

uhhh...you do realize the he meant through the united states right? Of course a united states government worker isnt going to have access on another countries documentation (such as birth certificates). it states " they were originally from mexico, but brought to the united states at a young age".

Yes, he meant the Homeland Security guy had to pry that out of them after they refused to comment twice already. It doesn't change what I'm saying.

it does actually....it means that they knew where they were coming from, yet sent them to a different country than that of which they came from. This is obviously an abuse, and misuse of power.

>But they still have no paperwork. Nothing whatsoever not even finger prints or dental records.

It's entirely possible that people living so under the radar that they have no papers, despite living in the country for many years, don't have birth certificates in their country of origin. If their place of origin cannot be determined, border patrol will send them somewhere they will not cause issue again. Word of mouth with no physical proof combined with the fact that they were uncooperative means they're going wherever the big bad border patrol officer feels like sending them.

If you're going to break the law, don't flaunt it in front of the people who can punish you for it.

My dad was a poor farmer from a different country, in a small town that just 10 years ago had only one "town telephone". and the government had documentation of his birth.

I highly doubt hipsters driving a fiat would be so under the radar in their homecountry that they have no documentation. OP litterally said himself he knew they came from mexico, yet shipped him eslewhere.

like i said, i can reason with enforcing the law...but this is an obvious abuse and misuse of power.

"OP litterally said himself he knew they came from mexico"

Yes, as in they were coming from the direction of Mexico, not that their country of origin is Mexico. There's a very distinct difference.

As was said earlier, they were trying to illegally enter the U.S. Without papers. Which means if they turned around and tried to reenter Mexico, they'd be illegally entering Mexico. Without papers.

no. read it again,it says they were originally brought from mexico when they were kids. its in the black text at the top.

they have papers from mexico, it says they were originally from there in the same quote im referencing to.

If they have papers from Mexico, then they have a known Country of Origin that would have been found by Homeland Security or told by the immigrants themselves.

That means the second half of the story couldn't have happened, because by law they would have to be sent to Mexico, not file paperwork to send them somewhere that is different from their Country of Origin.

That's why i started to doubt the story all together.

Careful with that edge.