Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

JustintheWaysian    

Rank #1463 on Comments
no avatar Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to JustintheWaysian Block JustintheWaysian Invite JustintheWaysian to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/06/2010
Last Login:10/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9663
Comment Ranking:#1463
Highest Content Rank:#6994
Highest Comment Rank:#803
Content Thumbs: 43 total,  74 ,  31
Comment Thumbs: 3353 total,  3635 ,  282
Content Level Progress: 52.54% (31/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 15% (15/100)
Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 227 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:9688
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:664
FJ Points:2643
Favorite Tags: avatar (2) | Book 3 (2) | korra (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

latest user's comments

#16 - No idea friend 10/22/2014 on Fuck you GearBoy +1
#14 - Get this to the front page. The original picture noted in the …  [+] (10 new replies) 10/22/2014 on Fuck you GearBoy +3
#23 - xxxsonic fanxxx (10/22/2014) [-]
#27 - schrodi Comment deleted by JustintheWaysian
#19 - foxlift (10/22/2014) [-]
Yes, the original post was removed. I had some comments I had there and they just came up as Deleted today.

Not fond of this shit. FunnyJunk is suposed to be a censor free site for these type of shit. Seriously, I want an explanation.
User avatar #22 - schrodi (10/22/2014) [-]
The original poster was a mod and admin didn't like him pointing it out so admin de-modded him, so op may have pulled it in hopes of getting his mod status back. Just because its gone doesn't mean it was funny junk.

Note that this is purely a guess and may or may not be what actually happened.
#25 - foxlift (10/22/2014) [-]
Yes, I am reading about it at this exact moment, as someone repplied to another comment of mine about admin updates. I still think someone should call it out, just not the mods. I understand admin's decision on this, and I kinda agree (the unmodding).

My worry is gone though, for now at least - that funnyjunk was starting to turn into a reddit by banning users and deleting posts because we can't talk about certain stuff. So I guess that's good.
#52 - hellol (10/22/2014) [-]
User avatar #53 - foxlift (10/22/2014) [-]
Yes, I know what is going on now, I have seen in other posts more explanations on what happened. Thanks for the heads up.
User avatar #26 - schrodi (10/22/2014) [-]
Over all the years I've been here (green FJ days) especially since I've made an account (2010). Admin knows how to deal with the drama here. But the one thing that Admin has that other site admins don't, is integrity. When he fucks up he apologizes, and I respect him for that. As far as the unmodding goes. My big question is if he used his mod powers to find this out and tell everyone, or was he just posting as a user?
User avatar #15 - schrodi (10/22/2014) [-]
Who pulled it?
#16 - JustintheWaysian (10/22/2014) [-]
No idea friend
#74 - armored core is best core 10/21/2014 on Wonder Core 0
#432 - This comment of yours is a great example of a sweeping general… 10/21/2014 on eSports matters! +1
#206 - Hell it's a good thing that sport stadiums project what the ca…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/21/2014 on eSports matters! +2
User avatar #331 - SteyrAUG (10/21/2014) [-]
Yeah, and you'll just need your binoculars to see the screen.
#181 - well we like what we like 10/19/2014 on when im bored +1
#175 - She actually looks a little thicker than average, but by no me…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/19/2014 on when im bored +1
User avatar #179 - capslockrage (10/19/2014) [-]
She still doesn't meet my standards of what I would fuck, due to standards and all.
#181 - JustintheWaysian (10/19/2014) [-]
well we like what we like
#71 - Now I'm gonna play devil's advocate here, because it's most ce…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/19/2014 on more proof 0
#72 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/19/2014) [-]
ok, so here's why that viewpoint doesn't make sense: the picture's first few lines say "Brianna Wu, a nonentity shitty games dev, has decided to use 8chan as her own personal strawman to gain publicity and funding. She manufactured a false twitter attack threatening her and her husband." You may have missed this.

Now there lies 2 possibilities: the people who are attacking her made this picture in advance to attacking her, or she made the picture in advance. I find the latter far more plausible because 1) If she did not make this, she has nothing to hide and wouldn't silence those who speak out against her. 2) If you think about it, it really doesn't make sense for a gamergate supporter to make it before he attacked her.

Let me explain: it is very unlikely that someone who makes death threats on twitter has the foresight to make this picture beforehand first off, they are not the most rational bunch. But even if they did possess some intellect, they would also know it would only escalate her the exact same way as zoe quinn and not do it, it is directly against their cause. Four days in waiting is quite a long time when you think about it to lie in wait. But, even if they ignored this, the only reason they would make this is because they could then say why is this made four days earlier in an attempt to discredit her. But as we know, SJWs like to silence opposing points of views and anyone who had the foresight to make a picture discrediting her probably would also have the foresight to know they would just get blocked. The last very flimsy chance that it is a GG supporter is that they made all of this just to make the picture featured in the post and... have people who have the same opinion as yours agree with you that she sucks. The info is not going to people who need it so it is really useless.

The only things I haven't checked is what this huffington post is about, and if the image was in fact made before the threats cause idk how
#9 - Yeah but what evidence here shows that she was behind this &qu…  [+] (20 new replies) 10/18/2014 on more proof +3
#29 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/18/2014) [-]
I don't know what operation falsefag is, but from what I gathered at this post is that she is pretending she is being attacked for something she posted.

-She has this picture that is supposedly proof of people attacking her.
-Said picture was made before she posted something that would make people attack her

Question: How could that picture be in existence if at the time of it's creation she had nobody that wanted to attack her?
Answer: She made this picture herself, posted the thing that made people mad, said all attacks against her were misogyny or some bullshit, then posted this picture as proof she was being attacked in order to gain sympathy when in fact she is really just attacking herself.

Now the content said she deleted her tweet, and if she did that then it would be certain without a doubt she is playing the victim, but people here have pointed out that her tweet is still up so it seems that part of the content is a lie. What you decide is the real truth is up to you.
#71 - JustintheWaysian (10/19/2014) [-]
Now I'm gonna play devil's advocate here, because it's most certainly what my anti-Gamergate friends will think.

"-She has this picture that is supposedly proof of people attacking her."
Right, this is established.

"-Said picture was made before she posted something that would make people attack her"
This furthers the anti-Gamergate agenda. This very statement conveys an unprovoked attack on Wu. Which is what anti-Gamergate people are all about...denouncing any attack, unprovoked or provoked, on individuals.

The primary factor here in determining the validity of Wu's claim is whether the "attackers" are provoked or unprovoked? This is at best speculation.

It's strange, isn't it? Gamergate supporters see an "unprovoked attack" as evidence that the claimant is lying. Gamergate opposers see an "unprovoked attack" as evidence that the gaming community is malevolent.

I really really want Wu's claim to be a lie, and I really really want to have evidence so that I can show my anti-Gamergate friends. But just saying "well, she didn't do anything to provoke the attack, therefore the attack is false and fabricated by her" will violate my own conscience, make me look like a fool, and make Gamergate look worse in the eyes of my friend.

Prove a solid connection that the image is fabricated by Wu or one of her affiliates and then we'll be going somewhere. Speculation will not help further our cause.
#72 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/19/2014) [-]
ok, so here's why that viewpoint doesn't make sense: the picture's first few lines say "Brianna Wu, a nonentity shitty games dev, has decided to use 8chan as her own personal strawman to gain publicity and funding. She manufactured a false twitter attack threatening her and her husband." You may have missed this.

Now there lies 2 possibilities: the people who are attacking her made this picture in advance to attacking her, or she made the picture in advance. I find the latter far more plausible because 1) If she did not make this, she has nothing to hide and wouldn't silence those who speak out against her. 2) If you think about it, it really doesn't make sense for a gamergate supporter to make it before he attacked her.

Let me explain: it is very unlikely that someone who makes death threats on twitter has the foresight to make this picture beforehand first off, they are not the most rational bunch. But even if they did possess some intellect, they would also know it would only escalate her the exact same way as zoe quinn and not do it, it is directly against their cause. Four days in waiting is quite a long time when you think about it to lie in wait. But, even if they ignored this, the only reason they would make this is because they could then say why is this made four days earlier in an attempt to discredit her. But as we know, SJWs like to silence opposing points of views and anyone who had the foresight to make a picture discrediting her probably would also have the foresight to know they would just get blocked. The last very flimsy chance that it is a GG supporter is that they made all of this just to make the picture featured in the post and... have people who have the same opinion as yours agree with you that she sucks. The info is not going to people who need it so it is really useless.

The only things I haven't checked is what this huffington post is about, and if the image was in fact made before the threats cause idk how
#41 - xxxsonic fanxxx (10/18/2014) [-]
Well, she certainly had been attacked by 8chan-folks, she had been in a discussion with hotwheels on huffpost and if there had not been any attack, wheels would've said so, but he never denied it.

So indeed could the image have been made by those who attacked her.
#31 - ohhitheree (10/18/2014) [-]
I checked myself, couldn't find it. Deleted it for sure. There are a few ignored comments about reverse image searches not finding it anywhere except that post though.
#32 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/18/2014) [-]
I found it, not sure how twitter works but maybe she deleted the comment that was questioning her?
#34 - ohhitheree (10/18/2014) [-]
That's the reply section at the bottom. Not her twitter feed.
#33 - ohhitheree (10/18/2014) [-]
Yes, that's why it circled where the reply questioning her was. She deleted the comment that was proving her wrong.
#36 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/18/2014) [-]
oh, that makes sense then. Thank you for the info.
#48 - xxxsonic fanxxx (10/18/2014) [-]
Someone can delete a tweet of another person entirely? I don't use Twitter, but highly doubt that. The tweet in question isn't on the tweeters acount:

twitter.com/Ghoel_Diggy

And the image with the date is not on 8chan (if I got the URL right):

8chan.co/b/src/1413498189228.jpg
#50 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/18/2014) [-]
twitter.com/Ghoel_Diggy/with_replies clearly you didn't check that hard
#49 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/18/2014) [-]
twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/523113644205555712

at the very least this was deleted
#37 - ohhitheree (10/18/2014) [-]
Would make no sense to delete her tweet which is spreading word of her game that no one had heard about before now, as well as shitting on GamerGate and making herself look good when she can just censor anyone calling her out.
#38 - mrdrprofbraeden (10/18/2014) [-]
I just posted that picture along with "Hopefully at least one person will see this before I get silenced", wasn't even up 30 seconds
#40 - ohhitheree (10/18/2014) [-]
Boom, there is your proof. Now tell the other people who can't tell the difference between the reply section and a twitter feed.
#11 - chiselbit (10/18/2014) [-]
Check out the encyclopedia dramatica page on Bruce ... er Brianna and you'll find out as much as you could ever want to know and more. Apparently the pic came from a thread on 8chan that got deleted very quickly and had almost no views. This implies the only way Bruce could've had the picture was that he had made it himself. It appears Bruce tried to bait people into trolling him and when people told him to fuck off he deleted both of his posts.
#24 - xxxsonic fanxxx (10/18/2014) [-]
Check out Encyclopedia Dramatica?

Yeah, if you want to read some mostly made-up shit by 12 year olds who think the highest form of comedy is calling every an autistic faggot and then spamming 'Over 9000!' jokes.
User avatar #27 - chiselbit (10/18/2014) [-]
Says the anon.
User avatar #53 - neokun (10/19/2014) [-]
You got him good.
#58 - chiselbit (10/19/2014) [-]
In part he is right. Alot of Encyclopedia Dramatica is written in an inflammatory fashion. Most of what I've seen hasn't been made up though. I think the reason people use it, is that it's unlikely that anything put on there will be taken off. Despite the fact it can be edited by anyone, people do their best to keep things accurate simply because facts piss off the person they're writing about even more than lies. Besides if someones going to say a place has no legitimacy whatsoever while being an anon, the embodiment of illegitimacy, then they are just being silly.
#5 - And cuz citrus is really bad for cats... 10/18/2014 on Lemon 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe bendingtime

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - spacesword (03/28/2014) [-]
still working on the rest but here is preview if yu never get to see it.
#2 to #1 - JustintheWaysian (03/29/2014) [-]
Oh that is great! You misspelled 'field' though sorry :s
User avatar #3 to #2 - spacesword (03/31/2014) [-]
yah I know I changed it the other day. I'mm have this ready by the end of the week. that way it's not so soon after the original or last post
 Friends (0)