Jowi
Rank #4618 on Comments
Level 310 Comments: Wizard Offline
Send mail to Jowi Block Jowi Invite Jowi to be your friend 
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 8/20/2010 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #4618 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #5499 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #1362 |
| Content Thumbs: | 612 total,
857 ,
245 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 12089 total,
14771 ,
2682 |
| Content Level Progress: | 60% (6/10) Level 58 Content: Sammich eater → Level 59 Content: Sammich eater |
| Comment Level Progress: | 35.2% (176/500) Level 310 Comments: Wizard → Level 311 Comments: Wizard |
| Subscribers: | 2 |
| Content Views: | 63685 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 33 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 3605 |
| FJ Points: | 11825 |
latest user's comments
| #13 - To be non sexist you say actor for everyone now [+] (4 new replies) | 11/20/2012 on Maximum overfeel.. | +13 |
| #40 -
goblingang (11/20/2012) [-]   You can still say actress, it's just that actor is gender neutral nowadays. | ||
| #12 - I don't know if it's just because I'm high but I can read thos… [+] (2 new replies) | 11/20/2012 on Want to play a game? | +2 |
| | ||
| #3 - It's Farmville! [+] (1 new reply) | 11/20/2012 on Pizza Farm | -2 |
| #9 - Maybe she's just a better actor and could fake the tears [+] (6 new replies) | 11/20/2012 on Maximum overfeel.. | +18 |
| #40 -
goblingang (11/20/2012) [-] You can still say actress, it's just that actor is gender neutral nowadays. | ||
| #755 - No you missed my point. I'm not saying that England isn't a co… [+] (1 new reply) | 11/15/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
 England is not a principality. A principality has princes and princes as the monarch instead of kings and queens. Scotland and England have kings and queens. As such are not principalities. | ||
| #43 - Fun fact. Every time that Ibrah has been sold, the team that s… | 11/15/2012 on Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Ladies... | +2 |
| #42 - Yeah I know, I'm not saying it's increased it's just as bad as… [+] (2 new replies) | 11/15/2012 on Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Ladies... | -9 |
| #58 -
bouletje (11/15/2012) [-] He was awesome at inter, single-handedly made them league champion. Awesome at barca, but he didn't really fit in because barca revolves around messi. And he and guardiola hated each other. He was also awesome at AC milan. Like my friend anonymous said 28 goals in 32 games. And now he's awesome at psg, where he earns the ridiculous amount of 10 million euros a year.. #45 -
anon (11/15/2012) [-] you can't be serious about him being "meh" at ac milan, he scored 28 goals in 32 games in the 2011 12 season | ||
| #37 - I'll get red thumbed for saying it, but he's sooooo over-rated… [+] (13 new replies) | 11/15/2012 on Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Ladies... | -16 |
| #81 -
cpjt (11/15/2012) [-] that kind of goal is one in the same vein of peter crouch's against man city last season, in the respect that he just took a complete punt and it happened to go in. BUT, the fact that he was able to do it is incredible, to get even a small degree of accuracy on a kick like that is insanely difficult, the technique and athleticism involved is at such a high level i am certain c ronaldo or messi would not be able to do that. (not saying ibra's better though, im sure there are plenty of things they can do but he cant!) #73 -
infernosponge (11/15/2012) [-] I can kind of see where you're coming from but you can not dispute the fact that he is a great finisher #54 -
anon (11/15/2012) [-] Clearly you don't know anything about ibrahimovic or even about football. He scores that ONE goal?? Seriously? Just type in "ibrahimovic best goals" in youtube and you can watch tons of awesome goals. (remember his last goal in the euro 2012??) And another thing: he became league champion 8(!) years in a row with 5 different clubs. It's not even a matter of opinion, he is one of the best players of his generation. Over-rated, what a ridiculously stupid thing to say. #41 -
ilikespoonandfork (11/15/2012) [-] Have you not watched football the last years? He has been just as "over-rated" for a long time now, not just after that goal. #202 -
ilikespoonandfork (11/15/2012) [-] Lol, seems like everyone missunderstood my comment. I was trying to say I do not think he is over-rated. #58 -
bouletje (11/15/2012) [-] He was awesome at inter, single-handedly made them league champion. Awesome at barca, but he didn't really fit in because barca revolves around messi. And he and guardiola hated each other. He was also awesome at AC milan. Like my friend anonymous said 28 goals in 32 games. And now he's awesome at psg, where he earns the ridiculous amount of 10 million euros a year.. #45 -
anon (11/15/2012) [-] you can't be serious about him being "meh" at ac milan, he scored 28 goals in 32 games in the 2011 12 season | ||
| #749 - No. United King of Great Britain and Northern Island is one co… [+] (1 new reply) | 11/15/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
| *Ireland And no, it's not one country at all. It's a United Kingdom. Jesus christ you're ignorant. Italy Romano joined the Kingdom of Spain after the collapse of the Roman Empire, many countries joined the Holy Roman Empire, because they asked, and Austria (or whoever was in charge of it at the time) said "yes". | ||
| #748 - You mentioned the EU first when you said "The British Emp… [+] (3 new replies) | 11/15/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
| I meant Britain would. I used the British Emprie as an exampel of how we have been losing power. Also, are you retarded? Our monarchs are kings and queens, not princes and princesses. We're a county, and it is entirely possible for one country to become a kingdom- such as Spain and Sweden. Britian isn't the same as England. Britain is the uniting of kingdoms. Wales is a principality, it's still a country. The type of sovereignty doesn't dictate if a nation is a country or not- the united states is not a kingdom, does that mean it's not a country? Asian countries have emporers, does that mean they are not countries, because they are not kingdoms? I'm saying it would, hypothetically, become a sole kingdom. #755 -
Jowi (11/15/2012) [-] No you missed my point. I'm not saying that England isn't a country because it's a kingdom, or that it isn't a kingdom because it's a country. I'm saying it's neither. England is solely a principality. Wales is also a principality, not a kingdom or a country. Same for Scotland (though this will change if they leave the UK). All three are part of the kingdom of Great Britain (which is a kingdom, not a country) and are part of the country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island. Also the United Kingdom is singular, it's one kingdom. It's not the United KingdomS which would imply a union of Kingdoms. Such as the United Arab EmirateS, or United StateS which are unions of Emirates and states respectively England is not a principality. A principality has princes and princes as the monarch instead of kings and queens. Scotland and England have kings and queens. As such are not principalities. | ||
| #230 - You can't just join Britain. It's a country, another country c… [+] (3 new replies) | 11/14/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
| If Wales, Scotland and England wanted to let in another country, they can. Britain is not a country, it's a United Kingdom. United. As in, multiple countries are part of it. *Ireland And no, it's not one country at all. It's a United Kingdom. Jesus christ you're ignorant. Italy Romano joined the Kingdom of Spain after the collapse of the Roman Empire, many countries joined the Holy Roman Empire, because they asked, and Austria (or whoever was in charge of it at the time) said "yes". | ||
| #228 - Yeah then why say it? [+] (5 new replies) | 11/14/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
| I never did. I merely said that the British Empire will have lost everything in 130 years. We will merely be the Kingdom of England, in the same way Sweden is a lone kingdom. India and Canada cannot join the EU because they are not in Europe, I don't knwo why you mentioned the EU in the first place. #748 -
Jowi (11/15/2012) [-] You mentioned the EU first when you said "The British Empire has been losing countries and will soon be completely absorbed in the EU" and that implies you meant the nations that were part of the Empire which included Canada and India. It will not be the Kingdom of England as England isn't a Kingdom, it's not even a country, it's a principality. It's the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island I meant Britain would. I used the British Emprie as an exampel of how we have been losing power. Also, are you retarded? Our monarchs are kings and queens, not princes and princesses. We're a county, and it is entirely possible for one country to become a kingdom- such as Spain and Sweden. Britian isn't the same as England. Britain is the uniting of kingdoms. Wales is a principality, it's still a country. The type of sovereignty doesn't dictate if a nation is a country or not- the united states is not a kingdom, does that mean it's not a country? Asian countries have emporers, does that mean they are not countries, because they are not kingdoms? I'm saying it would, hypothetically, become a sole kingdom. #755 -
Jowi (11/15/2012) [-] No you missed my point. I'm not saying that England isn't a country because it's a kingdom, or that it isn't a kingdom because it's a country. I'm saying it's neither. England is solely a principality. Wales is also a principality, not a kingdom or a country. Same for Scotland (though this will change if they leave the UK). All three are part of the kingdom of Great Britain (which is a kingdom, not a country) and are part of the country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island. Also the United Kingdom is singular, it's one kingdom. It's not the United KingdomS which would imply a union of Kingdoms. Such as the United Arab EmirateS, or United StateS which are unions of Emirates and states respectively England is not a principality. A principality has princes and princes as the monarch instead of kings and queens. Scotland and England have kings and queens. As such are not principalities. | ||
| #3 - Comment deleted [+] (1 new reply) | 11/14/2012 on Spiderman for president! | +1 |
| #4 -
lazyvoltage Comment deleted by Jowi | ||
| #86 - Why would Scotland join Scandanavia? That's not even a thing y… [+] (5 new replies) | 11/14/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
| Because the countries of Scandinavia like Scotland. And if they want you in, you can join. Just like you can join Britain (one day, Sealand, one day...) or the baltics. If Wales, Scotland and England wanted to let in another country, they can. Britain is not a country, it's a United Kingdom. United. As in, multiple countries are part of it. *Ireland And no, it's not one country at all. It's a United Kingdom. Jesus christ you're ignorant. Italy Romano joined the Kingdom of Spain after the collapse of the Roman Empire, many countries joined the Holy Roman Empire, because they asked, and Austria (or whoever was in charge of it at the time) said "yes". | ||
| #85 - The British Empire was disbanded in the 50s and became several… [+] (7 new replies) | 11/14/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
| I never did. I merely said that the British Empire will have lost everything in 130 years. We will merely be the Kingdom of England, in the same way Sweden is a lone kingdom. India and Canada cannot join the EU because they are not in Europe, I don't knwo why you mentioned the EU in the first place. #748 -
Jowi (11/15/2012) [-] You mentioned the EU first when you said "The British Empire has been losing countries and will soon be completely absorbed in the EU" and that implies you meant the nations that were part of the Empire which included Canada and India. It will not be the Kingdom of England as England isn't a Kingdom, it's not even a country, it's a principality. It's the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island I meant Britain would. I used the British Emprie as an exampel of how we have been losing power. Also, are you retarded? Our monarchs are kings and queens, not princes and princesses. We're a county, and it is entirely possible for one country to become a kingdom- such as Spain and Sweden. Britian isn't the same as England. Britain is the uniting of kingdoms. Wales is a principality, it's still a country. The type of sovereignty doesn't dictate if a nation is a country or not- the united states is not a kingdom, does that mean it's not a country? Asian countries have emporers, does that mean they are not countries, because they are not kingdoms? I'm saying it would, hypothetically, become a sole kingdom. #755 -
Jowi (11/15/2012) [-] No you missed my point. I'm not saying that England isn't a country because it's a kingdom, or that it isn't a kingdom because it's a country. I'm saying it's neither. England is solely a principality. Wales is also a principality, not a kingdom or a country. Same for Scotland (though this will change if they leave the UK). All three are part of the kingdom of Great Britain (which is a kingdom, not a country) and are part of the country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island. Also the United Kingdom is singular, it's one kingdom. It's not the United KingdomS which would imply a union of Kingdoms. Such as the United Arab EmirateS, or United StateS which are unions of Emirates and states respectively England is not a principality. A principality has princes and princes as the monarch instead of kings and queens. Scotland and England have kings and queens. As such are not principalities. | ||
| #84 - Not really true | 11/14/2012 on 130 years from now. | 0 |
| #138 - This guy clearly knows his **** , look at his DP! | 11/14/2012 on communist beard | +6 |
| #6 - To be fair, my dates don't do that | 11/13/2012 on Just realized this today... | 0 |
| #72 - I think the point this guys is making is that there is a woman… [+] (1 new reply) | 11/13/2012 on Is I in heaven? | 0 |
 No my point is that I amk a banana and have no fucking clue what the hell I am talking about. | ||
| #708 - Once I was double fisted..... And apparently I was pr… | 11/12/2012 on HA. | 0 |
| #126 - Thank god you highlighted those comments or I might not have s… | 11/11/2012 on One-Handed Skill | +3 |
| #3 - I got it on the 3rd line, still good though | 11/03/2012 on storytiiiime | 0 |
| #6 - I guess you could say the rest of Canada is getting NUN-AV-IT! | 11/03/2012 on oh canada... | +7 |
| #11 - At this point when he is looking up her skirt and then the nex… [+] (3 new replies) | 11/03/2012 on My hat | +13 |
| | ||
| #12 - I think he's making the point that you wouldn't have to leave … | 11/03/2012 on holiday time | +5 |
Anonymous comments allowed.
11 comments displayed.
#4
-
satrenkotheone ONLINE (03/18/2014) [-] Lol I'll say it here.
Is cuz I trans and I know FJ ain't too hyped about that now
Is cuz I trans and I know FJ ain't too hyped about that now
#5 to #4
-
Jowi (03/18/2014) [-]
That's cool. And I'm not so sure about that. FJ, despite everything, is quite accepting of the more taboo aspects of life. For example there is a delicately named account of faggitboy who is also transgender and is on the **** page who has quite a lot of thumbs from butt-plug related photos and she also posted a picture of herself on that content about posting attractive guys photos to increase the amount of women that come to the site, you may have seen it. Anyway she openly came out as transgender then and all the replies I saw were glowingly positive ranging from "boner what are you doing" to just openly saying "dude, you're ******* hot".
You don't have to do anything as brash as that I'm just saying you don't need to be afraid around here, we're all comrades when it comes down to it. For a lot of us we're the family and friends that we lack in the real world and some of the nicest things I've ever seen have happened on this site.
Anyway all the best with it
You don't have to do anything as brash as that I'm just saying you don't need to be afraid around here, we're all comrades when it comes down to it. For a lot of us we're the family and friends that we lack in the real world and some of the nicest things I've ever seen have happened on this site.
Anyway all the best with it
#6 to #5
-
satrenkotheone ONLINE (03/18/2014) [-] Oh thanks. And I haven't seen this, but sounds cool.
Old account is old. Must've been here forever.
Old account is old. Must've been here forever.
#9 to #8
-
satrenkotheone ONLINE (03/18/2014) [-] Oh lol.
Well I created mine in 2011 back when the brony rush sorta started, jumped that fandom but I've fallen out it so to speak.
Hmm... I'll try finding it.
Well I created mine in 2011 back when the brony rush sorta started, jumped that fandom but I've fallen out it so to speak.
Hmm... I'll try finding it.
