Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

IsaacH

Rank #28034 on Subscribers
IsaacH Avatar Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to IsaacH Block IsaacH Invite IsaacH to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:12/27/2009
Last Login:11/07/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 859 total,  1029 ,  170
Comment Thumbs: 1688 total,  2653 ,  965
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 85 Content: Srs Business → Level 86 Content: Srs Business
Comment Level Progress: 88% (88/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:2
Content Views:127190
Times Content Favorited:163 times
Total Comments Made:1555
FJ Points:1164
Favorite Tags: chan (5) | Pokemon (4) | lol (3) | Balls (2) | Face (2) | facepalm (2) | gary (2) | girls (2) | is (2) | it (2) | palm (2) | shit (2) | that (2) | You (2)

latest user's comments

#197 - **IsaacH rolled a random image posted in comment #2942948 a… 02/08/2013 on This is what you wake up to... 0
#61 - Really restored? I would just say that police officer is one h…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/01/2013 on Restored +13
User avatar #96 - pureevil (02/01/2013) [-]
Society does not want to, the government want to. The laws were not made by the people, but by the government, sadly.
User avatar #69 - kikx (02/01/2013) [-]
Should put it this way then:
Faith in humanity - restored
Faith in society - plummeted
#119 - I'm not exactly saying don't help others, I'm just saying help…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/28/2013 on Be a man +1
User avatar #121 - leobreacker (01/28/2013) [-]
Thanks but nah, I'm more into longer relationships. I never broke up with my ex so I don't know how it really feels to break up. Kinda scared.
#115 - Stop thinking about a bunch of other assholes who are just out…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/28/2013 on Be a man +1
User avatar #117 - leobreacker (01/28/2013) [-]
I can't help it, I wasn't raised that way. My parents and teachers always taught me to help others. I don't even know how I should change all these behaviors or whatever.
I'll try, I tried before, but failed. I'll try again.

Not helping someone fucking kills me inside.
User avatar #119 - IsaacH (01/28/2013) [-]
I'm not exactly saying don't help others, I'm just saying help yourself more. Rather then hooking up one of your friends, you hook yourself up with that girl, even if it's just a one night thing why not right? Enjoy yourself.
User avatar #121 - leobreacker (01/28/2013) [-]
Thanks but nah, I'm more into longer relationships. I never broke up with my ex so I don't know how it really feels to break up. Kinda scared.
#110 - I am wondering if you realize how much of a bitch you're being…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/28/2013 on Be a man +2
User avatar #114 - leobreacker (01/28/2013) [-]
I know myself, I am no 'bitch' to anyone, I have never let my anger out on anyone but the bully when I was in middle school. I spend most of the time hooking people up rather then going for it myself. For some reason, I like seeing my friends enjoying and having fun with their new 'mate'. I was always the shoulder to cry on, and when I need help, there's no one.

Anyyywaays, I didn't expect someone to reply to me, I just felt like I should type in something since it reminded me a bit of my past. Thanks bro ^^
User avatar #115 - IsaacH (01/28/2013) [-]
Stop thinking about a bunch of other assholes who are just out to help themselves and help yourself. Just letting you know man no one in this world is going to help you everyone is a self righteous asshole. Do what you need to do for yourself so YOU can excel in your life rather then helping people excel in theirs.
User avatar #117 - leobreacker (01/28/2013) [-]
I can't help it, I wasn't raised that way. My parents and teachers always taught me to help others. I don't even know how I should change all these behaviors or whatever.
I'll try, I tried before, but failed. I'll try again.

Not helping someone fucking kills me inside.
User avatar #119 - IsaacH (01/28/2013) [-]
I'm not exactly saying don't help others, I'm just saying help yourself more. Rather then hooking up one of your friends, you hook yourself up with that girl, even if it's just a one night thing why not right? Enjoy yourself.
User avatar #121 - leobreacker (01/28/2013) [-]
Thanks but nah, I'm more into longer relationships. I never broke up with my ex so I don't know how it really feels to break up. Kinda scared.
#108 - Ahh I see gotcha lol. 12/06/2012 on World Of Warcraft 0
#106 - How.....How did you even find this comment? Or this content? I…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/05/2012 on World Of Warcraft 0
User avatar #107 - chafrador (12/05/2012) [-]
nothing to do, was looking for WoW posts
User avatar #108 - IsaacH (12/06/2012) [-]
Ahh I see gotcha lol.
#29 - Or you know, you could not be as dumb as the bitch who was dri… 12/02/2012 on We all know 'em, we all... 0
#131 - **** that those assholes always make me leave ear… 11/19/2012 on Going home early from work +4
#53 - It's funny that you feel the need to judge people who slam on … 08/11/2012 on Pump the plane 0
#369 - Yes it is common logic, you're an idiot and now you're just pr… 08/10/2012 on I hate IE, and I don't know... 0
#426 - Faith in humanity is lost and unobtainable from this point on. 08/09/2012 on This is what's wrong with... +1
#367 - You're an idiot and you're not using any type of common logic.…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/09/2012 on I hate IE, and I don't know... 0
User avatar #368 - noblexfenrir (08/09/2012) [-]
No, "Immortality isn't possible" is not common logic. Why is it impossible? What physical evidence do you have that makes it impossible, or are you just implying that because we have never seen immortality and that we have never experienced it, mean it doesn't exist and is not possible. But that would mean you are applying observation and knowledge to your reasoning, which when applied to god give the same results.

Proof of what?...

Yeah the bible can teach me that to get in god good graces I have to commit genocide, kill many people, kill children, enslave women, oh and that incest is perfectly fine.


The bible is an over-loved fairytale, nothing more. Sorry.

User avatar #369 - IsaacH (08/10/2012) [-]
Yes it is common logic, you're an idiot and now you're just pretending to be blissfully ignorant because you can no longer make a logical argument.

Yeah exactly rofl.

Wow you're an idiot. I've heard a lot of things about the bible, but not that, you've obviously never actually read the bible.

Hahahahahaha my work here is done.
#365 - Okay when you get some kind of education please try and make a…  [+] (4 new replies) 08/08/2012 on I hate IE, and I don't know... 0
User avatar #366 - noblexfenrir (08/08/2012) [-]
But santa claus is a being with immortality, it's not impossible because santa has it. And it's not impossible to deliver to every kid in the world, santa can do it.

Even so, all of your evidence was a refuting statement to an already pre-existing claim for the existence of santa.

Claim: Santa is immortal.
You said immortality is impossible, why? Because we've never witnessed it and so far see no possibility of it. So your evidence is directly correlated to the lack of evidence for immortality.

Both of your claims were things that had no supporting evidence.


Claim: God created everything.
We have direct proof of evolution proving the biblical account of genesis is just horribly false. As well as every other creation myth out there, and pretty much god is support to be able to do everything possible and impossible. Well we have never viewed any of these happening and it is supposed to be impossible to do anything impossible. Meaning by your logic, god doesn't exist.

I'm glad this was so easy for you because you made my job of making you look like an idiot so much simpler.
User avatar #367 - IsaacH (08/09/2012) [-]
You're an idiot and you're not using any type of common logic. So when you get a brain let me know when you want to make an actual argument.

Well immortality is impossible, again common logic. Now you are just being ignorant to try and prove your point but it's failing.

Lol my God you are stupid I feel bad for you. Let me ask, what ACTUAL proof do you have? None, it's all a fucking THEORY WITH NO EVIDENCE. I understand this is a hard concept for you to understand. Also it's called the bible, every try reading it? It's an amazing thing that can actually teach you a lot!

I'm glad you think you have made any sense so far and thank you for making my job of making you like an idiot so much simpler!
User avatar #368 - noblexfenrir (08/09/2012) [-]
No, "Immortality isn't possible" is not common logic. Why is it impossible? What physical evidence do you have that makes it impossible, or are you just implying that because we have never seen immortality and that we have never experienced it, mean it doesn't exist and is not possible. But that would mean you are applying observation and knowledge to your reasoning, which when applied to god give the same results.

Proof of what?...

Yeah the bible can teach me that to get in god good graces I have to commit genocide, kill many people, kill children, enslave women, oh and that incest is perfectly fine.


The bible is an over-loved fairytale, nothing more. Sorry.

User avatar #369 - IsaacH (08/10/2012) [-]
Yes it is common logic, you're an idiot and now you're just pretending to be blissfully ignorant because you can no longer make a logical argument.

Yeah exactly rofl.

Wow you're an idiot. I've heard a lot of things about the bible, but not that, you've obviously never actually read the bible.

Hahahahahaha my work here is done.
#363 - Lol you're a moron who can't even make a relevant statement wh…  [+] (6 new replies) 08/07/2012 on I hate IE, and I don't know... 0
User avatar #364 - noblexfenrir (08/07/2012) [-]
Because I haven't been proven wrong yet.

OH MY FUCKING GOD, IF YOU'RE A TROLL 10/10 BECAUSE YOU HAVE ME THINKING YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT

"The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics)...One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed."
^
This is what a fucking theory is in science you goddamn imbecile. A theory is the highest point in science, that means that it had surpassed numerous tests meant to prove it wrong, it has gone against peer review, by scientists calling it a theory, it is the best explanation for whatever you are using it for. (The definition of theory you are using would be "hypothesis" in science)

Really? You can prove a negative?
Okay give me the evidence that santa claus doesn't exist (and don't be cute and say "well a real life santa did blah blah..." tell me why the jolly man who rides around the world in a single night and gives presents to kids and is immortal isn't real and why you don't believe in him. What "evidence' do you use to disprove him?)

and are you stupid? the big bang is supported by just the basic workings of particles....wait a minute, do you think the big bang says how the universe was formed or how it was created? Because the big bang only explains how it was formed.

User avatar #365 - IsaacH (08/08/2012) [-]
Okay when you get some kind of education please try and make a logical statement and I'll humor you, Santa Clause isn't real, it is impossible to go to every kids house in the world and give them presents in just a single night there is no where near enough time. Immortality is impossible. There is your evidence, simple logic, but you're clearly too fucking stupid to figure that out on your own now aren't you?

Again you're a complete idiot, no proof behind it whatsoever. You know this is the easiest time I've ever had proving someone wrong on the internet before. You sir are a bitch.
User avatar #366 - noblexfenrir (08/08/2012) [-]
But santa claus is a being with immortality, it's not impossible because santa has it. And it's not impossible to deliver to every kid in the world, santa can do it.

Even so, all of your evidence was a refuting statement to an already pre-existing claim for the existence of santa.

Claim: Santa is immortal.
You said immortality is impossible, why? Because we've never witnessed it and so far see no possibility of it. So your evidence is directly correlated to the lack of evidence for immortality.

Both of your claims were things that had no supporting evidence.


Claim: God created everything.
We have direct proof of evolution proving the biblical account of genesis is just horribly false. As well as every other creation myth out there, and pretty much god is support to be able to do everything possible and impossible. Well we have never viewed any of these happening and it is supposed to be impossible to do anything impossible. Meaning by your logic, god doesn't exist.

I'm glad this was so easy for you because you made my job of making you look like an idiot so much simpler.
User avatar #367 - IsaacH (08/09/2012) [-]
You're an idiot and you're not using any type of common logic. So when you get a brain let me know when you want to make an actual argument.

Well immortality is impossible, again common logic. Now you are just being ignorant to try and prove your point but it's failing.

Lol my God you are stupid I feel bad for you. Let me ask, what ACTUAL proof do you have? None, it's all a fucking THEORY WITH NO EVIDENCE. I understand this is a hard concept for you to understand. Also it's called the bible, every try reading it? It's an amazing thing that can actually teach you a lot!

I'm glad you think you have made any sense so far and thank you for making my job of making you like an idiot so much simpler!
User avatar #368 - noblexfenrir (08/09/2012) [-]
No, "Immortality isn't possible" is not common logic. Why is it impossible? What physical evidence do you have that makes it impossible, or are you just implying that because we have never seen immortality and that we have never experienced it, mean it doesn't exist and is not possible. But that would mean you are applying observation and knowledge to your reasoning, which when applied to god give the same results.

Proof of what?...

Yeah the bible can teach me that to get in god good graces I have to commit genocide, kill many people, kill children, enslave women, oh and that incest is perfectly fine.


The bible is an over-loved fairytale, nothing more. Sorry.

User avatar #369 - IsaacH (08/10/2012) [-]
Yes it is common logic, you're an idiot and now you're just pretending to be blissfully ignorant because you can no longer make a logical argument.

Yeah exactly rofl.

Wow you're an idiot. I've heard a lot of things about the bible, but not that, you've obviously never actually read the bible.

Hahahahahaha my work here is done.
#322 - You're ******* stupid, you are beyond ****…  [+] (8 new replies) 08/01/2012 on I hate IE, and I don't know... 0
User avatar #338 - noblexfenrir (08/02/2012) [-]
Wow...you really have no clue what you are talking about are you. Please tell me you're a troll, otherwise...seriously go back to school kid.

Do you know what a theory is in science? It is something that has enough evidence and is proven through experimentation and peer review. A theory is the highest point for a hypothesis in science. So it does have evidence you fucking imbecile.

.............YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE, holy shit are you seriously this idiotic? How much glue did you ingest in kindergarten? I explained the reasoning behind why god doesn't exist.
(Basically it's like this: Give me all the reasons you don't believe in the loch ness monester, and I mean it, give me all the evidence to disprove the loch ness monster to you. I will not respond further until you give this 'evidence')\

..................................................................
..............................................
...
...
...
...
...
THE BIG BANG THEORY HAS FUCKING EVIDENCE! WE OBSERVE HOW THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF THE UNIVERSE WORK AND REACT AND HOW THE BASIC LAWS OF PHYSICS WORK WITH MATTER AND PARTICLES TO SEE IF WE CAN SEE THE PROCESS BEHIND WHICH THE BIG BANG COULD OCCUR.
We wouldn't call something a theory if it didn't have evidence, to be a theory in science you absolutely NEED evidence.

Please research your definition of a theory in the field of science and please don't respond if you cannot provide your evidence against the loch ness monster.
User avatar #363 - IsaacH (08/07/2012) [-]
Lol you're a moron who can't even make a relevant statement when you're proven wrong so how about you get back to school, "kid."

WOW you're a moron, a theory does not have evidence or very little not enough to prove anything, it's a guess you fucking idiot.

Shut up, please shut the fuck up, that is the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard, you can prove a negative. That statement was so astronomically stupid I actually lost brain cells reading it.

.................................You're so fucken stupid it's ridiculous and I don't even know if I'm being trolled at this point or not, the big bang theory doesn't have evidence IT'S A FUCKING EDUCATED GUESS YOU MORON!

Damn you have to be the dumbest fucker on Funnyjunk and I've seen some stupid mother fuckers on this site before. I've met a kid with down's that smarter then you are.
User avatar #364 - noblexfenrir (08/07/2012) [-]
Because I haven't been proven wrong yet.

OH MY FUCKING GOD, IF YOU'RE A TROLL 10/10 BECAUSE YOU HAVE ME THINKING YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT

"The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics)...One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed."
^
This is what a fucking theory is in science you goddamn imbecile. A theory is the highest point in science, that means that it had surpassed numerous tests meant to prove it wrong, it has gone against peer review, by scientists calling it a theory, it is the best explanation for whatever you are using it for. (The definition of theory you are using would be "hypothesis" in science)

Really? You can prove a negative?
Okay give me the evidence that santa claus doesn't exist (and don't be cute and say "well a real life santa did blah blah..." tell me why the jolly man who rides around the world in a single night and gives presents to kids and is immortal isn't real and why you don't believe in him. What "evidence' do you use to disprove him?)

and are you stupid? the big bang is supported by just the basic workings of particles....wait a minute, do you think the big bang says how the universe was formed or how it was created? Because the big bang only explains how it was formed.

User avatar #365 - IsaacH (08/08/2012) [-]
Okay when you get some kind of education please try and make a logical statement and I'll humor you, Santa Clause isn't real, it is impossible to go to every kids house in the world and give them presents in just a single night there is no where near enough time. Immortality is impossible. There is your evidence, simple logic, but you're clearly too fucking stupid to figure that out on your own now aren't you?

Again you're a complete idiot, no proof behind it whatsoever. You know this is the easiest time I've ever had proving someone wrong on the internet before. You sir are a bitch.
User avatar #366 - noblexfenrir (08/08/2012) [-]
But santa claus is a being with immortality, it's not impossible because santa has it. And it's not impossible to deliver to every kid in the world, santa can do it.

Even so, all of your evidence was a refuting statement to an already pre-existing claim for the existence of santa.

Claim: Santa is immortal.
You said immortality is impossible, why? Because we've never witnessed it and so far see no possibility of it. So your evidence is directly correlated to the lack of evidence for immortality.

Both of your claims were things that had no supporting evidence.


Claim: God created everything.
We have direct proof of evolution proving the biblical account of genesis is just horribly false. As well as every other creation myth out there, and pretty much god is support to be able to do everything possible and impossible. Well we have never viewed any of these happening and it is supposed to be impossible to do anything impossible. Meaning by your logic, god doesn't exist.

I'm glad this was so easy for you because you made my job of making you look like an idiot so much simpler.
User avatar #367 - IsaacH (08/09/2012) [-]
You're an idiot and you're not using any type of common logic. So when you get a brain let me know when you want to make an actual argument.

Well immortality is impossible, again common logic. Now you are just being ignorant to try and prove your point but it's failing.

Lol my God you are stupid I feel bad for you. Let me ask, what ACTUAL proof do you have? None, it's all a fucking THEORY WITH NO EVIDENCE. I understand this is a hard concept for you to understand. Also it's called the bible, every try reading it? It's an amazing thing that can actually teach you a lot!

I'm glad you think you have made any sense so far and thank you for making my job of making you like an idiot so much simpler!
User avatar #368 - noblexfenrir (08/09/2012) [-]
No, "Immortality isn't possible" is not common logic. Why is it impossible? What physical evidence do you have that makes it impossible, or are you just implying that because we have never seen immortality and that we have never experienced it, mean it doesn't exist and is not possible. But that would mean you are applying observation and knowledge to your reasoning, which when applied to god give the same results.

Proof of what?...

Yeah the bible can teach me that to get in god good graces I have to commit genocide, kill many people, kill children, enslave women, oh and that incest is perfectly fine.


The bible is an over-loved fairytale, nothing more. Sorry.

User avatar #369 - IsaacH (08/10/2012) [-]
Yes it is common logic, you're an idiot and now you're just pretending to be blissfully ignorant because you can no longer make a logical argument.

Yeah exactly rofl.

Wow you're an idiot. I've heard a lot of things about the bible, but not that, you've obviously never actually read the bible.

Hahahahahaha my work here is done.
#195 - 1. It's not ignorant, can you please prove to me that it's wro…  [+] (10 new replies) 08/01/2012 on I hate IE, and I don't know... -1
User avatar #202 - noblexfenrir (08/01/2012) [-]
Wow the "Nobody knows" argument, people still use that?

1.) Believing something with no evidence is ignorant.
and as for the proving you wrong thing: (it's really sad that I have to resort to copy and fucking pasting this same damn thing because I would not write it up for the twentieth time)

"Okay fine I go through with explaining this shit alot so one more time can't hurt.

First of all, humans are not omniscient creatures, we base our determination of existence on evidence and knowledge. It is subjective, but we have no other possibility of claiming knowledge is everything is based on an objective universe in relation to ourselves.

So, why exactly is asking "Prove god doesn't exist" a REALLY fucking retarded question? Because you cannot prove a negative, all evidence for proving a negative is in direct correlation with the LACK of evidence for the affirmative. Humans use this process for EVERYTHING (unicorns, aliens, big foot, loch ness monster, slenderman, etc etc etc) EXCEPT GOD. Why? Because they WANT it to be true. This doesn't make it true though now does it?

Also it's funny because god can only be real through absolute evidence because he is not possible through probability since he is given the wonderful attribute of creating the universe. Meaning no evidence=No god."


"For the most part science is theory"
Actually yes, because science doesn't claim absolute knowledge, only peer reviewed, experimented, and confirmed assumptions that are the best answer given the evidence. So no we don't guess how the world was made, we are taking the answer with the best evidence, if something comes along that is a better answer we will adjust our view. THIS IS PROGRESS.

2.) Not really assuming things, considering there is no evidence for a god yet all of these things (evolution, abiogenesis, etc etc) contradict religious accounts, yet people still believe in religion, ignorance and blind faith are not positive things.
User avatar #322 - IsaacH (08/01/2012) [-]
You're fucking stupid, you are beyond fucking stupid, "Believing something with no evidence is ignorant." Most of science is a theory, a guess, no evidence behind it, so you seem to be the ignorant one.

You're a fucking idiot and you're only saying, "Because you cannot prove a negative." Because you have in no way to prove that God doesn't exist, you're simply using that as an excuse to justify your own ignorance.

Well lets see what happens with that stupid fucking logic, Big Bang Theory has no evidence behind it=No universe. Hur dur you're so fucking smart. You're contradicting yourself and you're REALLY not aware that science is mostly THEORY but you're too fucking stupid to know that, you simply cannot grasp the idea of a higher power and reject it instantly without a second though.

2. I'm going to refer you to my previous comment for this part. You're too stupid to comprehend try a second time.
User avatar #338 - noblexfenrir (08/02/2012) [-]
Wow...you really have no clue what you are talking about are you. Please tell me you're a troll, otherwise...seriously go back to school kid.

Do you know what a theory is in science? It is something that has enough evidence and is proven through experimentation and peer review. A theory is the highest point for a hypothesis in science. So it does have evidence you fucking imbecile.

.............YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE, holy shit are you seriously this idiotic? How much glue did you ingest in kindergarten? I explained the reasoning behind why god doesn't exist.
(Basically it's like this: Give me all the reasons you don't believe in the loch ness monester, and I mean it, give me all the evidence to disprove the loch ness monster to you. I will not respond further until you give this 'evidence')\

..................................................................
..............................................
...
...
...
...
...
THE BIG BANG THEORY HAS FUCKING EVIDENCE! WE OBSERVE HOW THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF THE UNIVERSE WORK AND REACT AND HOW THE BASIC LAWS OF PHYSICS WORK WITH MATTER AND PARTICLES TO SEE IF WE CAN SEE THE PROCESS BEHIND WHICH THE BIG BANG COULD OCCUR.
We wouldn't call something a theory if it didn't have evidence, to be a theory in science you absolutely NEED evidence.

Please research your definition of a theory in the field of science and please don't respond if you cannot provide your evidence against the loch ness monster.
User avatar #363 - IsaacH (08/07/2012) [-]
Lol you're a moron who can't even make a relevant statement when you're proven wrong so how about you get back to school, "kid."

WOW you're a moron, a theory does not have evidence or very little not enough to prove anything, it's a guess you fucking idiot.

Shut up, please shut the fuck up, that is the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard, you can prove a negative. That statement was so astronomically stupid I actually lost brain cells reading it.

.................................You're so fucken stupid it's ridiculous and I don't even know if I'm being trolled at this point or not, the big bang theory doesn't have evidence IT'S A FUCKING EDUCATED GUESS YOU MORON!

Damn you have to be the dumbest fucker on Funnyjunk and I've seen some stupid mother fuckers on this site before. I've met a kid with down's that smarter then you are.
User avatar #364 - noblexfenrir (08/07/2012) [-]
Because I haven't been proven wrong yet.

OH MY FUCKING GOD, IF YOU'RE A TROLL 10/10 BECAUSE YOU HAVE ME THINKING YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT

"The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics)...One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed."
^
This is what a fucking theory is in science you goddamn imbecile. A theory is the highest point in science, that means that it had surpassed numerous tests meant to prove it wrong, it has gone against peer review, by scientists calling it a theory, it is the best explanation for whatever you are using it for. (The definition of theory you are using would be "hypothesis" in science)

Really? You can prove a negative?
Okay give me the evidence that santa claus doesn't exist (and don't be cute and say "well a real life santa did blah blah..." tell me why the jolly man who rides around the world in a single night and gives presents to kids and is immortal isn't real and why you don't believe in him. What "evidence' do you use to disprove him?)

and are you stupid? the big bang is supported by just the basic workings of particles....wait a minute, do you think the big bang says how the universe was formed or how it was created? Because the big bang only explains how it was formed.

User avatar #365 - IsaacH (08/08/2012) [-]
Okay when you get some kind of education please try and make a logical statement and I'll humor you, Santa Clause isn't real, it is impossible to go to every kids house in the world and give them presents in just a single night there is no where near enough time. Immortality is impossible. There is your evidence, simple logic, but you're clearly too fucking stupid to figure that out on your own now aren't you?

Again you're a complete idiot, no proof behind it whatsoever. You know this is the easiest time I've ever had proving someone wrong on the internet before. You sir are a bitch.
User avatar #366 - noblexfenrir (08/08/2012) [-]
But santa claus is a being with immortality, it's not impossible because santa has it. And it's not impossible to deliver to every kid in the world, santa can do it.

Even so, all of your evidence was a refuting statement to an already pre-existing claim for the existence of santa.

Claim: Santa is immortal.
You said immortality is impossible, why? Because we've never witnessed it and so far see no possibility of it. So your evidence is directly correlated to the lack of evidence for immortality.

Both of your claims were things that had no supporting evidence.


Claim: God created everything.
We have direct proof of evolution proving the biblical account of genesis is just horribly false. As well as every other creation myth out there, and pretty much god is support to be able to do everything possible and impossible. Well we have never viewed any of these happening and it is supposed to be impossible to do anything impossible. Meaning by your logic, god doesn't exist.

I'm glad this was so easy for you because you made my job of making you look like an idiot so much simpler.
User avatar #367 - IsaacH (08/09/2012) [-]
You're an idiot and you're not using any type of common logic. So when you get a brain let me know when you want to make an actual argument.

Well immortality is impossible, again common logic. Now you are just being ignorant to try and prove your point but it's failing.

Lol my God you are stupid I feel bad for you. Let me ask, what ACTUAL proof do you have? None, it's all a fucking THEORY WITH NO EVIDENCE. I understand this is a hard concept for you to understand. Also it's called the bible, every try reading it? It's an amazing thing that can actually teach you a lot!

I'm glad you think you have made any sense so far and thank you for making my job of making you like an idiot so much simpler!
User avatar #368 - noblexfenrir (08/09/2012) [-]
No, "Immortality isn't possible" is not common logic. Why is it impossible? What physical evidence do you have that makes it impossible, or are you just implying that because we have never seen immortality and that we have never experienced it, mean it doesn't exist and is not possible. But that would mean you are applying observation and knowledge to your reasoning, which when applied to god give the same results.

Proof of what?...

Yeah the bible can teach me that to get in god good graces I have to commit genocide, kill many people, kill children, enslave women, oh and that incest is perfectly fine.


The bible is an over-loved fairytale, nothing more. Sorry.

User avatar #369 - IsaacH (08/10/2012) [-]
Yes it is common logic, you're an idiot and now you're just pretending to be blissfully ignorant because you can no longer make a logical argument.

Yeah exactly rofl.

Wow you're an idiot. I've heard a lot of things about the bible, but not that, you've obviously never actually read the bible.

Hahahahahaha my work here is done.
#172 - 1 and 3 on why you're a complete moron. 1. Saying that peo…  [+] (12 new replies) 08/01/2012 on I hate IE, and I don't know... -1
User avatar #179 - noblexfenrir (08/01/2012) [-]
Cute.

1.) Yes it is being ignorant, they are using faith as a determination for existence which is accepting ignorance. Also atheist isn't a religion, it's a lack thereof, and yes people can hop back and forth from atheism to theism this doesn't change how each side equivocates evidence with belief.

2.) Um I got that from not accepting new information and applying it. I did however extend on that idea but the premise is the same. Not hard to figure that out.
User avatar #195 - IsaacH (08/01/2012) [-]
1. It's not ignorant, can you please prove to me that it's wrong? No? O that's right because NO ONE ACTUALLY FUCKING KNOWS! So honestly, faggots like you should learn to keep to themselves, there are more fuckers like you then there are bible smacking Christians in today's world. Religion is supposed to be what happened and for the most part science is theory. So based on your logic you're just going to go ahead and guess that the world was made how it was! Now that sounds pretty ignorant to me.

2. Again not even relevant, you're just a retard trying to fluff up your argument. The original comment was saying that they are afraid to accept something new, you are taking it a step further and saying that they are afraid to look at new information, which is not what is said in OP's picture, most know the, "new information" but don't accept it. Now you just like to assume things about people as a whole which is as stupid as OP's post.
User avatar #202 - noblexfenrir (08/01/2012) [-]
Wow the "Nobody knows" argument, people still use that?

1.) Believing something with no evidence is ignorant.
and as for the proving you wrong thing: (it's really sad that I have to resort to copy and fucking pasting this same damn thing because I would not write it up for the twentieth time)

"Okay fine I go through with explaining this shit alot so one more time can't hurt.

First of all, humans are not omniscient creatures, we base our determination of existence on evidence and knowledge. It is subjective, but we have no other possibility of claiming knowledge is everything is based on an objective universe in relation to ourselves.

So, why exactly is asking "Prove god doesn't exist" a REALLY fucking retarded question? Because you cannot prove a negative, all evidence for proving a negative is in direct correlation with the LACK of evidence for the affirmative. Humans use this process for EVERYTHING (unicorns, aliens, big foot, loch ness monster, slenderman, etc etc etc) EXCEPT GOD. Why? Because they WANT it to be true. This doesn't make it true though now does it?

Also it's funny because god can only be real through absolute evidence because he is not possible through probability since he is given the wonderful attribute of creating the universe. Meaning no evidence=No god."


"For the most part science is theory"
Actually yes, because science doesn't claim absolute knowledge, only peer reviewed, experimented, and confirmed assumptions that are the best answer given the evidence. So no we don't guess how the world was made, we are taking the answer with the best evidence, if something comes along that is a better answer we will adjust our view. THIS IS PROGRESS.

2.) Not really assuming things, considering there is no evidence for a god yet all of these things (evolution, abiogenesis, etc etc) contradict religious accounts, yet people still believe in religion, ignorance and blind faith are not positive things.
User avatar #322 - IsaacH (08/01/2012) [-]
You're fucking stupid, you are beyond fucking stupid, "Believing something with no evidence is ignorant." Most of science is a theory, a guess, no evidence behind it, so you seem to be the ignorant one.

You're a fucking idiot and you're only saying, "Because you cannot prove a negative." Because you have in no way to prove that God doesn't exist, you're simply using that as an excuse to justify your own ignorance.

Well lets see what happens with that stupid fucking logic, Big Bang Theory has no evidence behind it=No universe. Hur dur you're so fucking smart. You're contradicting yourself and you're REALLY not aware that science is mostly THEORY but you're too fucking stupid to know that, you simply cannot grasp the idea of a higher power and reject it instantly without a second though.

2. I'm going to refer you to my previous comment for this part. You're too stupid to comprehend try a second time.
User avatar #338 - noblexfenrir (08/02/2012) [-]
Wow...you really have no clue what you are talking about are you. Please tell me you're a troll, otherwise...seriously go back to school kid.

Do you know what a theory is in science? It is something that has enough evidence and is proven through experimentation and peer review. A theory is the highest point for a hypothesis in science. So it does have evidence you fucking imbecile.

.............YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE, holy shit are you seriously this idiotic? How much glue did you ingest in kindergarten? I explained the reasoning behind why god doesn't exist.
(Basically it's like this: Give me all the reasons you don't believe in the loch ness monester, and I mean it, give me all the evidence to disprove the loch ness monster to you. I will not respond further until you give this 'evidence')\

..................................................................
..............................................
...
...
...
...
...
THE BIG BANG THEORY HAS FUCKING EVIDENCE! WE OBSERVE HOW THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF THE UNIVERSE WORK AND REACT AND HOW THE BASIC LAWS OF PHYSICS WORK WITH MATTER AND PARTICLES TO SEE IF WE CAN SEE THE PROCESS BEHIND WHICH THE BIG BANG COULD OCCUR.
We wouldn't call something a theory if it didn't have evidence, to be a theory in science you absolutely NEED evidence.

Please research your definition of a theory in the field of science and please don't respond if you cannot provide your evidence against the loch ness monster.
User avatar #363 - IsaacH (08/07/2012) [-]
Lol you're a moron who can't even make a relevant statement when you're proven wrong so how about you get back to school, "kid."

WOW you're a moron, a theory does not have evidence or very little not enough to prove anything, it's a guess you fucking idiot.

Shut up, please shut the fuck up, that is the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard, you can prove a negative. That statement was so astronomically stupid I actually lost brain cells reading it.

.................................You're so fucken stupid it's ridiculous and I don't even know if I'm being trolled at this point or not, the big bang theory doesn't have evidence IT'S A FUCKING EDUCATED GUESS YOU MORON!

Damn you have to be the dumbest fucker on Funnyjunk and I've seen some stupid mother fuckers on this site before. I've met a kid with down's that smarter then you are.
User avatar #364 - noblexfenrir (08/07/2012) [-]
Because I haven't been proven wrong yet.

OH MY FUCKING GOD, IF YOU'RE A TROLL 10/10 BECAUSE YOU HAVE ME THINKING YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT

"The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics)...One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed."
^
This is what a fucking theory is in science you goddamn imbecile. A theory is the highest point in science, that means that it had surpassed numerous tests meant to prove it wrong, it has gone against peer review, by scientists calling it a theory, it is the best explanation for whatever you are using it for. (The definition of theory you are using would be "hypothesis" in science)

Really? You can prove a negative?
Okay give me the evidence that santa claus doesn't exist (and don't be cute and say "well a real life santa did blah blah..." tell me why the jolly man who rides around the world in a single night and gives presents to kids and is immortal isn't real and why you don't believe in him. What "evidence' do you use to disprove him?)

and are you stupid? the big bang is supported by just the basic workings of particles....wait a minute, do you think the big bang says how the universe was formed or how it was created? Because the big bang only explains how it was formed.

User avatar #365 - IsaacH (08/08/2012) [-]
Okay when you get some kind of education please try and make a logical statement and I'll humor you, Santa Clause isn't real, it is impossible to go to every kids house in the world and give them presents in just a single night there is no where near enough time. Immortality is impossible. There is your evidence, simple logic, but you're clearly too fucking stupid to figure that out on your own now aren't you?

Again you're a complete idiot, no proof behind it whatsoever. You know this is the easiest time I've ever had proving someone wrong on the internet before. You sir are a bitch.
User avatar #366 - noblexfenrir (08/08/2012) [-]
But santa claus is a being with immortality, it's not impossible because santa has it. And it's not impossible to deliver to every kid in the world, santa can do it.

Even so, all of your evidence was a refuting statement to an already pre-existing claim for the existence of santa.

Claim: Santa is immortal.
You said immortality is impossible, why? Because we've never witnessed it and so far see no possibility of it. So your evidence is directly correlated to the lack of evidence for immortality.

Both of your claims were things that had no supporting evidence.


Claim: God created everything.
We have direct proof of evolution proving the biblical account of genesis is just horribly false. As well as every other creation myth out there, and pretty much god is support to be able to do everything possible and impossible. Well we have never viewed any of these happening and it is supposed to be impossible to do anything impossible. Meaning by your logic, god doesn't exist.

I'm glad this was so easy for you because you made my job of making you look like an idiot so much simpler.
User avatar #367 - IsaacH (08/09/2012) [-]
You're an idiot and you're not using any type of common logic. So when you get a brain let me know when you want to make an actual argument.

Well immortality is impossible, again common logic. Now you are just being ignorant to try and prove your point but it's failing.

Lol my God you are stupid I feel bad for you. Let me ask, what ACTUAL proof do you have? None, it's all a fucking THEORY WITH NO EVIDENCE. I understand this is a hard concept for you to understand. Also it's called the bible, every try reading it? It's an amazing thing that can actually teach you a lot!

I'm glad you think you have made any sense so far and thank you for making my job of making you like an idiot so much simpler!
User avatar #368 - noblexfenrir (08/09/2012) [-]
No, "Immortality isn't possible" is not common logic. Why is it impossible? What physical evidence do you have that makes it impossible, or are you just implying that because we have never seen immortality and that we have never experienced it, mean it doesn't exist and is not possible. But that would mean you are applying observation and knowledge to your reasoning, which when applied to god give the same results.

Proof of what?...

Yeah the bible can teach me that to get in god good graces I have to commit genocide, kill many people, kill children, enslave women, oh and that incest is perfectly fine.


The bible is an over-loved fairytale, nothing more. Sorry.

User avatar #369 - IsaacH (08/10/2012) [-]
Yes it is common logic, you're an idiot and now you're just pretending to be blissfully ignorant because you can no longer make a logical argument.

Yeah exactly rofl.

Wow you're an idiot. I've heard a lot of things about the bible, but not that, you've obviously never actually read the bible.

Hahahahahaha my work here is done.
#102 - Ha good roll. 07/30/2012 on Attention +2
#1796 - Looks like I gotta fight dragons and **** in Worl…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/30/2012 on Stuck in a game... 0
User avatar #1812 - Rockaman (07/30/2012) [-]
don't worry if you die, just do a corpse run and you'll be good as new!
#134 - Full of idiots.  [+] (1 new reply) 07/30/2012 on Photo bomb. -9
#145 - Bellezwovf (07/30/2012) [-]
Although this image does seem like something that could possibly be photo shopped, (i admit it, i looked at the photo again to check if it was legit) but a couple things in this picture tell me that its not shopped.

One is the shadow on the mans forearm from the girl. Although it is possible to photoshop shadows, it is very hard to get it looking natural enough to be plausible. Also, the lighting of the girl and the man are very similar and again, lighting is a very hard concept to master in photoshop.

The only thing that looks a bit phony is how the camera is focused on the girl and blurry for the man, but since she was taking a selfie, im guessing it wasn't a proffesional grade camera. (most likely cell phone of some sort) This would focus in on the girl on depth would be hard to obtain on a device like hers.

its nothing against you sir, i just disagree. if you think differently or have proof that its fake i would be interested.
(.gif unrelated)
#129 - This looks shopped....  [+] (4 new replies) 07/30/2012 on Photo bomb. -14
#132 - npfortytwo (07/30/2012) [-]
#130 - Bellezwovf (07/30/2012) [-]
User avatar #134 - IsaacH (07/30/2012) [-]
Full of idiots.
#145 - Bellezwovf (07/30/2012) [-]
Although this image does seem like something that could possibly be photo shopped, (i admit it, i looked at the photo again to check if it was legit) but a couple things in this picture tell me that its not shopped.

One is the shadow on the mans forearm from the girl. Although it is possible to photoshop shadows, it is very hard to get it looking natural enough to be plausible. Also, the lighting of the girl and the man are very similar and again, lighting is a very hard concept to master in photoshop.

The only thing that looks a bit phony is how the camera is focused on the girl and blurry for the man, but since she was taking a selfie, im guessing it wasn't a proffesional grade camera. (most likely cell phone of some sort) This would focus in on the girl on depth would be hard to obtain on a device like hers.

its nothing against you sir, i just disagree. if you think differently or have proof that its fake i would be interested.
(.gif unrelated)
#10 - Dammit, I ******* love sushi, now I must have sushi. =| 07/23/2012 on Sushi :D +2
#31 - ******* ******* . 07/23/2012 on Saw This on Facebook -1
#41 - If I saw that ****** **** in a store… 07/23/2012 on How the hell 0

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #24 - Skrufymunky (09/06/2010) [-]
Why did you get all those thumbs down?? lamesauce
User avatar #25 to #26 - IsaacH (09/07/2010) [-]
Dude I seriously have no idea..... o.O
Not a big deal for me though I don't care about thumbs lol.
User avatar #15 - TheBlindBandit (08/23/2010) [-]
yeah. but i havent had a computer fast enough to play it. and it was never really my type of game. i tried d and d with some friends but i got bored really fast so i quit. i just saw it as a way to spend more time with my boyfriend. back with ps was the latest thing, i was a pro at frogger. i could beat any level without dying. but i tried it again a few months ago and i couldnt even beat the first levels... i failed so hard.. i love frogger.
User avatar #16 to #17 - IsaacH (08/23/2010) [-]
Lol no idea what D and D is and I hate that lol! When your really good at a game and stop playing then magically lose all your talent lol.
User avatar #17 to #18 - TheBlindBandit (08/23/2010) [-]
d and d is dungeons and dragons. surely you have heard of it. and i didnt lose my cod skills. played a little campaign a week ago with a new friend. i hadnt played sense last year.
User avatar #18 to #19 - IsaacH (08/23/2010) [-]
O okay I gotcha now lol, I've heard of it never played it though. I was talking about frogger haha, CoD is only fun for a little while honestly the only time I played it was when i went to my friends house and I don't even like to play it anymore lol. Still fun every now and again though.
User avatar #19 to #20 - TheBlindBandit (08/23/2010) [-]
its only fun for me if im playing it with someone and playing campaign.
User avatar #20 to #21 - IsaacH (08/23/2010) [-]
I know how you feel same thing with WoW these days, only fun when I'm playing with a couple friends.
User avatar #21 to #22 - TheBlindBandit (08/23/2010) [-]
yeah. im not into wow... never really cared for it.
User avatar #22 to #23 - IsaacH (08/23/2010) [-]
Yeah just using it as a reference lol, "playing with more friends is more fun" lol.
User avatar #23 to #24 - TheBlindBandit (08/23/2010) [-]
yeah. thats a good reference.
User avatar #7 - GothicPickle (05/05/2010) [-]
wheres your avatar from!? its so f*cken cool!
User avatar #8 to #9 - IsaacH (05/05/2010) [-]
It's from the anime D. Gray Man, if your into anime I'd suggest watching it, it's the best one I've ever watched. ^_^
User avatar #9 to #10 - GothicPickle (05/06/2010) [-]
haha cool whats it about though?
User avatar #10 to #11 - IsaacH (05/06/2010) [-]
O man here we go lol. A short run down, it's a fiction. Exorcists kill Akuma (demons) created by this guy called the Millenium Earl who's trying to end the world basically. Lot's of fight scenes, really funny at times too. Sorry it's a vague summary but I'm kind of tired to type out detail for detail right now lol. Give it a shot though it's really good. Especially the later episodes.
User avatar #11 to #12 - GothicPickle (05/06/2010) [-]
hmm fighting, demons, fiction... sounds like my type of anime. i'll check it out thanks
#13 to #13 - EmoPickle **User deleted account** (05/21/2010) [-]
come on pickle hunny we watched this 2 summers ago togther. *sniff* how could you forgeet * sniff, sniff*
User avatar #14 to #15 - GothicPickle (05/21/2010) [-]
we did?????!
User avatar #12 to #13 - IsaacH (05/06/2010) [-]
No problem, although do give it some time, some people are turned off by the first few episodes, trust me though it gets a lot better.
User avatar #5 - wHavens (03/28/2010) [-]
lol fag way to block me
User avatar #6 to #7 - IsaacH (03/28/2010) [-]
I didn't block anyone bitch now gtfo.
User avatar #2 - SonicTeam (03/17/2010) [-]
There you go. You should be at LV 6 now. Thanks for playing.
User avatar #3 to #3 - SonicTeam (03/17/2010) [-]
Huh, you have over 400 Content & 400 Comment. But no LV 6?
 Friends (0)