Are you really this stupid?
There is nothing stronger in science than a theory, bitch.
There are no facts.

You are all pretty dense. I simply used each one of the methods described all in my comment at once. I used poor english, made fun of evolution and mispronounced Porche.

actually, there are facts.

in science, a "fact" is an observable phenomenon

evolution is observable, and therefore a scientific fact. the theory of evolution is an explanation for why evolution occurs

It rains on tuesdays.
So that is a fact until it is disproven?
No, it is not.

dude, what.

are you fucking retarded?
"it rains"
that's a fact. it's an objective and observable phenomenon. rain falls from the sky.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact#Fact_in_science

Jesus Christ, pay attention in class you fucking autist.

if you're trolling, and not really an imbecile, 10/10 I mad

No, he's not. He's just an idiot

lol faggot
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory

I highly doubt you're an English major when your grammar is such shit.

Obviously you did not pick up on the fact that I simply used all the things listed in the content and it worked.

-a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena
youtu.be/6RLg0xw_4bo

Read the content, read my comment. You can clearly see I simply put those three things into practice.

You win
You are the only person to comment without being rude
or downright aggressive and I respect you for that
You didnt let your feelings effect the way you talked to me.
I hope you have a good day

Well what if they are those faggot kids who make fun of you everyday about your mom dyeing, or those kids who make fun of you for not doing drugs or those kids that are like "Lol fagit 1v1 me u pusy as fag u wun du notin'

And what if they are kids growing up with good parents who will one day grow up to be productive members of society and one of them ends up curing cancer? The argument goes both ways.

Still says 5 kids i would end the life of those no good retards!

If I'm misinterpreting what you're saying, then I apologize. But people are supposed to spread the word, but does that mean everyone that is a Christian does? Sure God could have just skipped all the sin, good/bad, our Universe, etc. and just MADE us love Him. But these things that seem pointless/counter productive are in place to allow for a fair choice. If by some chance someone never hears anything about a "God" or a "Jesus," then I believe they go to Heaven when they die.

I'm a Christian and I've studied Religion and Science for a while now. God appears very logical in all that He does. And it would be very illogical to send someone that didn't know any better, to hell.

You misunderstood. I was saying what you are, sort of. I responded to dabron who said his friend told him that those who do not hear the gospel are automatically saved. My statement was pointing out the fallacies of that argument. If everyone who does not hear the gospel is automatically guaranteed heaven, then it would be better for us to keep it a secret from the entire world, not preach it and condemn people who decide not to believe. Jesus would not have sent out disciples and God would not send Jesus because only some would be saved instead of everyone. The bible says that faith without works is dead. You must know and you must act. Perhaps a man who has lived a good life can be saved but if Jesus says that the only way to the Father is through Him then it would not make sense for someone who knows nothing of Jesus to be saved.

Good to hear you study your topic of debate though. Keep up the good fight.

No your friends are wrong and you are right. It's just a math demonstration, not an optic illusion

Oh. Good then!

you know what they say about big hands...
big gloves.

oh no, i wasn't talking about content, i meant the posts in the comments, and no you still don't grasp what i'm saying, you used christianity even though i only said religion.

"Incredibly accurate" is a bit of a stretch. It's gotten dates of when kings start or end ruling wrong by over fifty years, in some cases.

I would also like to know which kings in particular so I could look further into that and see what resources say what about it.

You aren't taking into consideration the resources at hand for the authors. Considering the next town over wouldn't hear news from their "neighbor" for days and 100 miles was practically space travel, the information given in text from the few dozen authors is really impressive.

X button.

wait what are talking about? did you recently read the comments section yet, there seems to be more people standing up against religion bashers....also i said religion, christianity isn't every religion

Comment section always turns out that way. Every topic of debate from religion to politics is an argument down the whole comment thread. I am talking about posts. When I read your comment it sounded as if you meant one day atheist bash religion and the next day religious posts bash atheism.
Also the average "christian" of today treats it as a religion, whether correct or not.

oh no, i wasn't talking about content, i meant the posts in the comments, and no you still don't grasp what i'm saying, you used christianity even though i only said religion.