x
Click to expand

HonkIfIDriveWell

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/07/2010
Last Login:4/15/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#11544
Highest Content Rank:#2022
Highest Comment Rank:#3809
Content Thumbs: 1624 total,  1818 ,  194
Comment Thumbs: 2787 total,  3818 ,  1031
Content Level Progress: 25% (25/100)
Level 116 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 93% (93/100)
Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 227 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:1
Content Views:13717
Times Content Favorited:146 times
Total Comments Made:2155
FJ Points:3961
Favorite Tags: funny (15) | tits (13) | fail (12) | win (6) | chat (4) | omegle (4) | sex (4) | a (3) | FUNNYJUNK (3) | i (3) | Bacon (2) | down (2) | FJ (2) | fuck (2) | Gay (2) | her (2) | Junk (2) | kill (2) | Love (2) | man (2)

latest user's comments

#51 - Yeah but you were chastising him for the wrong reason. Sure, h…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/09/2014 on thinking ahead 0
#52 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
If you go into every relationship with the mindset that it will likely fail, then you have my sympathy has that is a very cynical way to date people. What kind of effort are you going to put into the relationship if you already expect it to fail before it's even started?
User avatar #54 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Jesus, you are like a brick wall. Knowing that my relationship will likely fail at some point, if anything, makes me cherish it all the more. My girlfriend feels the same way about this. We don't have any delusions about dying in each others arms like Romeo and Juliet. Life is fleeting, and the experiences, feelings and relationships that make it up are equally transient. Stop being a child. There is no forever, only the here and now.
#55 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
And I'd like to thank you for taking the time to write that, because to be honest with you I'm screencaping it. The only question I'm left with is whether to save it in my edgy or cringe folder.
User avatar #56 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Cringe is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. I've been cringing at every single you've said, so there's that. In terms of edginess, I'm not sure anything I've said qualifies. It's not like I've offended anybody. Out of curiosity, instead of responding with a shitty reaction picture and evasive remark, how about actually telling me what part of what I said you disagree with.
User avatar #57 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Hey now, that was uncalled for. I don't use shitty reaction pics. They're pretty good usually.

As for being evasive, I really don't see how I was. I didn't evade any question directed at me because there was none to ignore.

And for what you said that I disagree with... pretty much everything. But if I had to point out one thing I cringed the most at:

>There is no forever, only the here and now.

Well sneeze at my cock and call me Margret, isn't that "deep" of you. You're an atheist, fantastic, whatever floats your boat and tips your fedora.

To end, I'm gonna quote willys, because honestly it's the thing that comes to my mind the most. And this is how I know you've never felt love in your life.

If either you or your girlfriend were in love, neither of you would be okay with the idea of it ending at any time. If either of you were in love, the idea of it ending would be one of the worst things you could imagine.
User avatar #58 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
I do love my girlfriend, and I would do almost anything to prevent our relationship from ending, but part of being a grown up is accepting that just like anything is this world, eventually it will end. Even if it is by death.

What I said about "forever" had nothing to do with atheism. It's a necessary reality that everything has its time. If you believe in an afterlife, that's fine. Everybody should retain a spark of childlike wonder, lest we lose our humanity and become logic machines. But that's all it is. An afterlife. An encore. I don't need my reward to be eternal, and I certainly don't want to have to be dead to claim it.

Every motivation I need to love my girlfriend is right here in this life. Why bother? You ask, if its going to be over before I know it. Well, that is the reason. It won't last forever, so I'm going to make the most of it while I have it.
#66 - With the huge number of adult women that shave themselves nowa… 11/09/2014 on She looked 17 0
#49 - Mate, you're the one who originally replied to the guy who cl…  [+] (8 new replies) 11/09/2014 on thinking ahead 0
#50 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Except that the person I originally replied to was forgetting to breathe an appropriate amount and as such was implying that all relationships end with separation.

>But such a statement would be liberating, because it would remind you that the relationship will infact, end at some point

This is literally implying all relationships end by breaking up. Just a refresher of the image.
<"When" not "if" When implies intent on breaking up, if would imply the acknowledgement of the possibility.
User avatar #51 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Yeah but you were chastising him for the wrong reason. Sure, he was saying he just assumes that all relationships will fail, but you basically said that you should assume that all relationships will work. He's still wrong, but much closer to being right than you are.
#52 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
If you go into every relationship with the mindset that it will likely fail, then you have my sympathy has that is a very cynical way to date people. What kind of effort are you going to put into the relationship if you already expect it to fail before it's even started?
User avatar #54 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Jesus, you are like a brick wall. Knowing that my relationship will likely fail at some point, if anything, makes me cherish it all the more. My girlfriend feels the same way about this. We don't have any delusions about dying in each others arms like Romeo and Juliet. Life is fleeting, and the experiences, feelings and relationships that make it up are equally transient. Stop being a child. There is no forever, only the here and now.
#55 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
And I'd like to thank you for taking the time to write that, because to be honest with you I'm screencaping it. The only question I'm left with is whether to save it in my edgy or cringe folder.
User avatar #56 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Cringe is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. I've been cringing at every single you've said, so there's that. In terms of edginess, I'm not sure anything I've said qualifies. It's not like I've offended anybody. Out of curiosity, instead of responding with a shitty reaction picture and evasive remark, how about actually telling me what part of what I said you disagree with.
User avatar #57 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Hey now, that was uncalled for. I don't use shitty reaction pics. They're pretty good usually.

As for being evasive, I really don't see how I was. I didn't evade any question directed at me because there was none to ignore.

And for what you said that I disagree with... pretty much everything. But if I had to point out one thing I cringed the most at:

>There is no forever, only the here and now.

Well sneeze at my cock and call me Margret, isn't that "deep" of you. You're an atheist, fantastic, whatever floats your boat and tips your fedora.

To end, I'm gonna quote willys, because honestly it's the thing that comes to my mind the most. And this is how I know you've never felt love in your life.

If either you or your girlfriend were in love, neither of you would be okay with the idea of it ending at any time. If either of you were in love, the idea of it ending would be one of the worst things you could imagine.
User avatar #58 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
I do love my girlfriend, and I would do almost anything to prevent our relationship from ending, but part of being a grown up is accepting that just like anything is this world, eventually it will end. Even if it is by death.

What I said about "forever" had nothing to do with atheism. It's a necessary reality that everything has its time. If you believe in an afterlife, that's fine. Everybody should retain a spark of childlike wonder, lest we lose our humanity and become logic machines. But that's all it is. An afterlife. An encore. I don't need my reward to be eternal, and I certainly don't want to have to be dead to claim it.

Every motivation I need to love my girlfriend is right here in this life. Why bother? You ask, if its going to be over before I know it. Well, that is the reason. It won't last forever, so I'm going to make the most of it while I have it.
#47 - Yes, but you're quite obviously equating intent to break up wi…  [+] (10 new replies) 11/09/2014 on thinking ahead 0
#48 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
This is... literally the opposite of the truth. You're the one 'equating intent to break up with knowledge that it's probably going to happen.'
User avatar #49 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Mate, you're the one who originally replied to the guy who clearly wasn't talking about intent, but rather knowledge. You immediately started talking about intent and how it makes him a shitty person.
#50 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Except that the person I originally replied to was forgetting to breathe an appropriate amount and as such was implying that all relationships end with separation.

>But such a statement would be liberating, because it would remind you that the relationship will infact, end at some point

This is literally implying all relationships end by breaking up. Just a refresher of the image.
<"When" not "if" When implies intent on breaking up, if would imply the acknowledgement of the possibility.
User avatar #51 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Yeah but you were chastising him for the wrong reason. Sure, he was saying he just assumes that all relationships will fail, but you basically said that you should assume that all relationships will work. He's still wrong, but much closer to being right than you are.
#52 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
If you go into every relationship with the mindset that it will likely fail, then you have my sympathy has that is a very cynical way to date people. What kind of effort are you going to put into the relationship if you already expect it to fail before it's even started?
User avatar #54 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Jesus, you are like a brick wall. Knowing that my relationship will likely fail at some point, if anything, makes me cherish it all the more. My girlfriend feels the same way about this. We don't have any delusions about dying in each others arms like Romeo and Juliet. Life is fleeting, and the experiences, feelings and relationships that make it up are equally transient. Stop being a child. There is no forever, only the here and now.
#55 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
And I'd like to thank you for taking the time to write that, because to be honest with you I'm screencaping it. The only question I'm left with is whether to save it in my edgy or cringe folder.
User avatar #56 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Cringe is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. I've been cringing at every single you've said, so there's that. In terms of edginess, I'm not sure anything I've said qualifies. It's not like I've offended anybody. Out of curiosity, instead of responding with a shitty reaction picture and evasive remark, how about actually telling me what part of what I said you disagree with.
User avatar #57 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Hey now, that was uncalled for. I don't use shitty reaction pics. They're pretty good usually.

As for being evasive, I really don't see how I was. I didn't evade any question directed at me because there was none to ignore.

And for what you said that I disagree with... pretty much everything. But if I had to point out one thing I cringed the most at:

>There is no forever, only the here and now.

Well sneeze at my cock and call me Margret, isn't that "deep" of you. You're an atheist, fantastic, whatever floats your boat and tips your fedora.

To end, I'm gonna quote willys, because honestly it's the thing that comes to my mind the most. And this is how I know you've never felt love in your life.

If either you or your girlfriend were in love, neither of you would be okay with the idea of it ending at any time. If either of you were in love, the idea of it ending would be one of the worst things you could imagine.
User avatar #58 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
I do love my girlfriend, and I would do almost anything to prevent our relationship from ending, but part of being a grown up is accepting that just like anything is this world, eventually it will end. Even if it is by death.

What I said about "forever" had nothing to do with atheism. It's a necessary reality that everything has its time. If you believe in an afterlife, that's fine. Everybody should retain a spark of childlike wonder, lest we lose our humanity and become logic machines. But that's all it is. An afterlife. An encore. I don't need my reward to be eternal, and I certainly don't want to have to be dead to claim it.

Every motivation I need to love my girlfriend is right here in this life. Why bother? You ask, if its going to be over before I know it. Well, that is the reason. It won't last forever, so I'm going to make the most of it while I have it.
#73 - If it's a post-genocide-of-muslims world, then you may be righ…  [+] (19 new replies) 11/09/2014 on IMAO +3
User avatar #98 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Yes, great people did great things, but there's no reason to assume that they needed their religion to do it. I'll grant you, I did misspeak. A world without anyone who was ever a Muslim would be problematic. A world without Islam, however, would not.
User avatar #100 - schrutebucks (11/09/2014) [-]
I'm so glad you said that. Using your logic; terrible people can do terrible things, and they may not need their religion to do it. Faith can assist people in doing wonderful or terrible things, but you're blaming the religion, not the people that carry out the misdoings. I implore you, take a better look at the teachings of Islam and you'll see that they promote peace. Islam is a religion with over one billion followers, but people will usually only see the radicals splayed all over the news and that's what they'll perceive a Muslim to be.
User avatar #114 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
"Using your logic; terrible people can do terrible things, and they may not need their religion to do it."

That's absolutely correct. However, only with religion can good people do terrible things.

"I implore you, take a better look at the teachings of Islam and you'll see that they promote peace. Islam is a religion with over one billion followers, but people will usually only see the radicals splayed all over the news and that's what they'll perceive a Muslim to be."

Most Muslims are undoubtedly peaceful, but just because their religion doesn't conflict with their peaceful nature, doesn't mean that its necessary for it.

Islam, like all major religions, is imbued with genuinely truthful philosophy, and that's great. But for some reason, people think that its their unnecessary faith in the supernatural that allows them to be good people, rather than the much more important underlying philosophy.

And it's the faith that makes the religion, not the philosophy. Those radicals can toss aside the philosophy and substitute their own, as long as they keep the faith. They can still call themselves Muslims because they still believe in the same god.

Yes, the peaceful teachings are good. The philosophy is good. The faith, however, is the core that allows it to be defined as a religion. That is the bad. Remove that, and you no longer have a religion, but you still have the good. And there's nothing the radicals can do with it. They cannot kill people in the name of peace. So, instead of having to deal with a million radicals, all you have to deal with is a handful of terrible people.
User avatar #121 - schrutebucks (11/09/2014) [-]
"However, only with religion can good people do terrible things"

This argument is very flawed, I hope I don't need to explain why.
What I'm gathering from what you're saying is that you acknowledge that
Islam is a religion that promotes peace, but it's the faith in a God that makes it "bad"?(there are a few other religions out there with this whole faith concept) Either way, nothing you've said so far could justify saying the world would have been a better place without Muslims ever existing.


User avatar #144 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
"This argument is very flawed, I hope I don't need to explain why."

The only flaw with it is that faith would be a better word to use than religion in that instance. The reason I say this is because religion is not the only ideology that can be built around faith. Faith in an almighty, omnipotent being is not the only type of faith, but it is the most powerful, and the most malleable.

"What I'm gathering from what you're saying is that you acknowledge that
Islam is a religion that promotes peace, but it's the faith in a God that makes it "bad"?"

No, it's the faith in a God that gives it the potential to be used for bad. It's the reason it has been used for bad.

"nothing you've said so far could justify saying the world would have been a better place without Muslims ever existing."

It wouldn't have been. There have been Muslims who were great people, but they would have been great people regardless. The Islamic Faith had nothing to do with it.
User avatar #149 - schrutebucks (11/09/2014) [-]
No, the argument in itself is flawed. "Only with faith/religion can good people do terrible things"? You're really putting yourself in a box there with that kind of overreaching statement. How could you possibly know what these people would have done if they didn't follow the same religion? I'm sure you're familiar with the butterfly effect? Not only would a single moment of their lives be changed, but millions of countless ones as well, considering these Muslim scholars were incredibly devout followers of Islam. So for you to say their religion wouldn't have played any part is a bit shallow in thinking. This all started with you promoting a world in which billions of people didn't exist, because of their religion, regardless of whether they were innocent or not. This to me is reminiscent of the ideologies of the Nazi party, so I don't think we'll really reach any common ground. Good day
User avatar #152 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Alright motherfucker, we've been over this several times. I already admitted I misspoke when I said that the world would be better without Muslims. That isn't what I meant, and you know that, so stop being that guy. A world without Muslims =/= A world without Islam. Nobody is promoting genocide here.

"I'm sure you're familiar with the butterfly effect? Not only would a single moment of their lives be changed, but millions of countless ones as well, considering these Muslim scholars were incredibly devout followers of Islam."

Yes, but the point is not that they would have done those great things without Islam, but that they could have. Their faith had nothing to do with their brilliance. It didn't make them smarter or wiser or more inventive. The philosophies and teachings that they grew up with may have shaped them as people, but none of those teachings or philosophies were inherently religious. Their faith is what made them Muslim, and they didn't need it at all. If anything it lessened their potential. Made them less open-minded. When you've been indoctrinated into thinking you have the answer, you stop asking the question, and that's never a good thing.
#118 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
"only with religion can good people do terrible things."

Only a retard would think that. Only terrible people do terrible things, period. You might have once been good, but you are no longer good anymore.

Long story short, you say that some people use religion as an excuse to do bad things, therefore religion is bad. Guess what, pretty much everything in the world has a good and bad side.
Fire can be used to cook a meal and bring the whole family together, or burn the house down and kill everyone, that doesn't mean we should stop using just because someone can misuse it.
User avatar #142 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
"Only terrible people do terrible things, period."

So just because someone is susceptible to manipulation, that makes them a terrible person? That little girl with explosives strapped to her body who gleefully blows up a school because she's been totally convinced by her parents that she is doing the right thing by Allah? Oh, yeah, she's a terrible person. She would have done that even if her parents hadn't indoctrinated her. Some little girls just like blowing up schools and murdering hundreds of people for the thrill of it, you know?

"Long story short, you say that some people use religion as an excuse to do bad things, therefore religion is bad. Guess what, pretty much everything in the world has a good and bad side.
Fire can be used to cook a meal and bring the whole family together, or burn the house down and kill everyone, that doesn't mean we should stop using just because someone can misuse it."

Rage, hatred, malice. If someone burns a house down and murders a bunch of people for any of those reasons, they're not under the delusion that they're doing the right thing. They know it's bad. Most people would subsequently be consumed by guilt, and rightfully so, because they are at fault, and only them.

If it was faith that caused this person to burn that house down, then it's not just them at fault. If that faith can be taken and fitted into a destructive ideology with almost no effort, then whomever is responsible for that faith is equally, if not more at fault.

A truly omnipotent being would be fully capable of actually defining (or even changing) the very essence of what is right and what is wrong, so having faith in the existence of such an entity means that any philosophy, regardless of it's moral implications, has the potential to be not only acceptable, but good in the eyes of the faithful.

So, to elaborate on what I said before, faith is the only thing that can make truly good people do truly terrible things.
User avatar #90 - theladystrangler (11/09/2014) [-]
I just don't understand how you can go from the educated center of the world full of riches to a shithole with mud houses.
#93 - schrutebucks (11/09/2014) [-]
This is Saudi Arabia.
User avatar #205 - schnizel (11/09/2014) [-]
5%~10% of it is nice to a degree but the rest is a shithole.
User avatar #113 - theladystrangler (11/09/2014) [-]
Yeah, the capital city, and a place that sells massive amounts of oil and is funded by the U.S. The rest of the country is still a shithole due to a bad monarch.
#122 - schrutebucks (11/09/2014) [-]
This is Dubai
User avatar #209 - theladystrangler (11/10/2014) [-]
Dubai is an oil rich area with a temporary growth, a city built almost exclusively by German engineers. A city, I might add, with no sewage system.
#170 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
Dubai isn't Saudi, you illiterate nigger.
User avatar #186 - schrutebucks (11/09/2014) [-]
If you were reading more than one post at a time, (difficult for someone with low intelligence I'm sure) you'd see that originally the person I was talking to called the entire Middle East a shithole. But good input pal
#129 - pookahootycreeks (11/09/2014) [-]
Did someone say dubai? I swear I heard someone say dubai.
#45 - Except nobody's talking about planning. I don't plan on dying …  [+] (12 new replies) 11/09/2014 on thinking ahead 0
#46 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
That analogy doesn't work. You really don't seem to understand where I'm coming from.

If you're in a relationship, and you specifically intend on breaking up with them in the future, and you still continue dating them, you're a shitty person, end of story.
User avatar #47 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Yes, but you're quite obviously equating intent to break up with knowledge that it's probably going to happen. They're two different things.
#48 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
This is... literally the opposite of the truth. You're the one 'equating intent to break up with knowledge that it's probably going to happen.'
User avatar #49 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Mate, you're the one who originally replied to the guy who clearly wasn't talking about intent, but rather knowledge. You immediately started talking about intent and how it makes him a shitty person.
#50 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Except that the person I originally replied to was forgetting to breathe an appropriate amount and as such was implying that all relationships end with separation.

>But such a statement would be liberating, because it would remind you that the relationship will infact, end at some point

This is literally implying all relationships end by breaking up. Just a refresher of the image.
<"When" not "if" When implies intent on breaking up, if would imply the acknowledgement of the possibility.
User avatar #51 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Yeah but you were chastising him for the wrong reason. Sure, he was saying he just assumes that all relationships will fail, but you basically said that you should assume that all relationships will work. He's still wrong, but much closer to being right than you are.
#52 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
If you go into every relationship with the mindset that it will likely fail, then you have my sympathy has that is a very cynical way to date people. What kind of effort are you going to put into the relationship if you already expect it to fail before it's even started?
User avatar #54 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Jesus, you are like a brick wall. Knowing that my relationship will likely fail at some point, if anything, makes me cherish it all the more. My girlfriend feels the same way about this. We don't have any delusions about dying in each others arms like Romeo and Juliet. Life is fleeting, and the experiences, feelings and relationships that make it up are equally transient. Stop being a child. There is no forever, only the here and now.
#55 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
And I'd like to thank you for taking the time to write that, because to be honest with you I'm screencaping it. The only question I'm left with is whether to save it in my edgy or cringe folder.
User avatar #56 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Cringe is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. I've been cringing at every single you've said, so there's that. In terms of edginess, I'm not sure anything I've said qualifies. It's not like I've offended anybody. Out of curiosity, instead of responding with a shitty reaction picture and evasive remark, how about actually telling me what part of what I said you disagree with.
User avatar #57 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Hey now, that was uncalled for. I don't use shitty reaction pics. They're pretty good usually.

As for being evasive, I really don't see how I was. I didn't evade any question directed at me because there was none to ignore.

And for what you said that I disagree with... pretty much everything. But if I had to point out one thing I cringed the most at:

>There is no forever, only the here and now.

Well sneeze at my cock and call me Margret, isn't that "deep" of you. You're an atheist, fantastic, whatever floats your boat and tips your fedora.

To end, I'm gonna quote willys, because honestly it's the thing that comes to my mind the most. And this is how I know you've never felt love in your life.

If either you or your girlfriend were in love, neither of you would be okay with the idea of it ending at any time. If either of you were in love, the idea of it ending would be one of the worst things you could imagine.
User avatar #58 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
I do love my girlfriend, and I would do almost anything to prevent our relationship from ending, but part of being a grown up is accepting that just like anything is this world, eventually it will end. Even if it is by death.

What I said about "forever" had nothing to do with atheism. It's a necessary reality that everything has its time. If you believe in an afterlife, that's fine. Everybody should retain a spark of childlike wonder, lest we lose our humanity and become logic machines. But that's all it is. An afterlife. An encore. I don't need my reward to be eternal, and I certainly don't want to have to be dead to claim it.

Every motivation I need to love my girlfriend is right here in this life. Why bother? You ask, if its going to be over before I know it. Well, that is the reason. It won't last forever, so I'm going to make the most of it while I have it.
#99 - They're a minority though. For the most part, the acknowledgin… 11/09/2014 on The ignorance is strong... 0
#43 - That's dumb. There's a difference between fully intending to b…  [+] (14 new replies) 11/09/2014 on thinking ahead 0
User avatar #44 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Wow ok r00d.

I stand by what I say. If you don't plan on staying with a person and you haven't discussed it being a casual relationship, then you're just being shitty.
User avatar #45 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Except nobody's talking about planning. I don't plan on dying before the year 2100, but I know its almost certainly going to happen. Young people in the 21st century are picky, fickle cunts, and 99% of relationships don't last. Unless you're extremely lucky, assuming that the person you're with is "the one" is just setting yourself up for unnecessary heartbreak later on.
#46 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
That analogy doesn't work. You really don't seem to understand where I'm coming from.

If you're in a relationship, and you specifically intend on breaking up with them in the future, and you still continue dating them, you're a shitty person, end of story.
User avatar #47 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Yes, but you're quite obviously equating intent to break up with knowledge that it's probably going to happen. They're two different things.
#48 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
This is... literally the opposite of the truth. You're the one 'equating intent to break up with knowledge that it's probably going to happen.'
User avatar #49 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Mate, you're the one who originally replied to the guy who clearly wasn't talking about intent, but rather knowledge. You immediately started talking about intent and how it makes him a shitty person.
#50 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Except that the person I originally replied to was forgetting to breathe an appropriate amount and as such was implying that all relationships end with separation.

>But such a statement would be liberating, because it would remind you that the relationship will infact, end at some point

This is literally implying all relationships end by breaking up. Just a refresher of the image.
<"When" not "if" When implies intent on breaking up, if would imply the acknowledgement of the possibility.
User avatar #51 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Yeah but you were chastising him for the wrong reason. Sure, he was saying he just assumes that all relationships will fail, but you basically said that you should assume that all relationships will work. He's still wrong, but much closer to being right than you are.
#52 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
If you go into every relationship with the mindset that it will likely fail, then you have my sympathy has that is a very cynical way to date people. What kind of effort are you going to put into the relationship if you already expect it to fail before it's even started?
User avatar #54 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Jesus, you are like a brick wall. Knowing that my relationship will likely fail at some point, if anything, makes me cherish it all the more. My girlfriend feels the same way about this. We don't have any delusions about dying in each others arms like Romeo and Juliet. Life is fleeting, and the experiences, feelings and relationships that make it up are equally transient. Stop being a child. There is no forever, only the here and now.
#55 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
And I'd like to thank you for taking the time to write that, because to be honest with you I'm screencaping it. The only question I'm left with is whether to save it in my edgy or cringe folder.
User avatar #56 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
Cringe is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. I've been cringing at every single you've said, so there's that. In terms of edginess, I'm not sure anything I've said qualifies. It's not like I've offended anybody. Out of curiosity, instead of responding with a shitty reaction picture and evasive remark, how about actually telling me what part of what I said you disagree with.
User avatar #57 - thewulfman (11/09/2014) [-]
Hey now, that was uncalled for. I don't use shitty reaction pics. They're pretty good usually.

As for being evasive, I really don't see how I was. I didn't evade any question directed at me because there was none to ignore.

And for what you said that I disagree with... pretty much everything. But if I had to point out one thing I cringed the most at:

>There is no forever, only the here and now.

Well sneeze at my cock and call me Margret, isn't that "deep" of you. You're an atheist, fantastic, whatever floats your boat and tips your fedora.

To end, I'm gonna quote willys, because honestly it's the thing that comes to my mind the most. And this is how I know you've never felt love in your life.

If either you or your girlfriend were in love, neither of you would be okay with the idea of it ending at any time. If either of you were in love, the idea of it ending would be one of the worst things you could imagine.
User avatar #58 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/09/2014) [-]
I do love my girlfriend, and I would do almost anything to prevent our relationship from ending, but part of being a grown up is accepting that just like anything is this world, eventually it will end. Even if it is by death.

What I said about "forever" had nothing to do with atheism. It's a necessary reality that everything has its time. If you believe in an afterlife, that's fine. Everybody should retain a spark of childlike wonder, lest we lose our humanity and become logic machines. But that's all it is. An afterlife. An encore. I don't need my reward to be eternal, and I certainly don't want to have to be dead to claim it.

Every motivation I need to love my girlfriend is right here in this life. Why bother? You ask, if its going to be over before I know it. Well, that is the reason. It won't last forever, so I'm going to make the most of it while I have it.
#26 - Ah, but you see, if they asked for that, people might get suspicious. 11/06/2014 on Even more reliable than... 0
#137 - Alright, Mr Hyper-Aggressive Hipster, give me an example of th… 11/05/2014 on Law and Order +5
#127 - How can it have a cycle when there's 20 completely different s…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/05/2014 on Law and Order +3
#131 - anonymous (11/05/2014) [-]
HENCE, you fucking moron, "WELL EXECUTED"

fuck.. you sheeple will find anything non-linear and amazing, as long as it is made slightly complicated
User avatar #137 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/05/2014) [-]
Alright, Mr Hyper-Aggressive Hipster, give me an example of this "cycle" occurring in GoT.
#195 - Nope. Although it seems fitting that America would be the coun…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/05/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #280 - dungledoo (11/09/2014) [-]
Not so much "fitting" as it is "stuffing."

That's a joke for all my American homies.
#108 - Game of Thrones? I don't think so.  [+] (5 new replies) 11/05/2014 on Law and Order +10
#130 - anonymous (11/05/2014) [-]
.. no it does.
User avatar #110 - thechosentroll (11/05/2014) [-]
It doesn't do every episode the same way, but it has a cycle, kind of like The Walking Dead - meet character, character's a cunt, character does something unexpected, character is no longer a complete cunt, someone dies, rinse, repeat.
User avatar #127 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/05/2014) [-]
How can it have a cycle when there's 20 completely different stories starting, continuing and finishing at the same time?
#131 - anonymous (11/05/2014) [-]
HENCE, you fucking moron, "WELL EXECUTED"

fuck.. you sheeple will find anything non-linear and amazing, as long as it is made slightly complicated
User avatar #137 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/05/2014) [-]
Alright, Mr Hyper-Aggressive Hipster, give me an example of this "cycle" occurring in GoT.
#146 - Really? I thought Natalie Portman day was in March?  [+] (3 new replies) 11/05/2014 on (untitled) +1
User avatar #164 - dungledoo (11/05/2014) [-]
I don't get it, it's just our national eat-a-shitload day. Doesn't every country have something like that?

except for Africa...?
User avatar #195 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/05/2014) [-]
Nope. Although it seems fitting that America would be the country to celebrate Gluttony Day.
User avatar #280 - dungledoo (11/09/2014) [-]
Not so much "fitting" as it is "stuffing."

That's a joke for all my American homies.
#144 - I don't know, but I hear it involves thanking the malevolent m…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/05/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #145 - TwiztidNinja (11/05/2014) [-]
i thought it had something to do with pilgrims and natalie portman?
User avatar #146 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/05/2014) [-]
Really? I thought Natalie Portman day was in March?
User avatar #164 - dungledoo (11/05/2014) [-]
I don't get it, it's just our national eat-a-shitload day. Doesn't every country have something like that?

except for Africa...?
User avatar #195 - HonkIfIDriveWell (11/05/2014) [-]
Nope. Although it seems fitting that America would be the country to celebrate Gluttony Day.
User avatar #280 - dungledoo (11/09/2014) [-]
Not so much "fitting" as it is "stuffing."

That's a joke for all my American homies.
#117 - Yeah, not gonna lie. I'd rage **** her.  [+] (1 new reply) 11/04/2014 on HA! Better have a Burn Heal! 0
User avatar #130 - dehnoobshow (11/04/2014) [-]
Hate sex is best sex.
#22 - Why only dozens? Why not a high velocity, heat-seeking pair of… 11/03/2014 on humanity's last hope 0
#39 - He never specified what difficulty.  [+] (4 new replies) 11/03/2014 on When you dont upgrade your... 0
#40 - tacoperson (11/03/2014) [-]
I suppose you're right, but as mentioned below all the higher difficulties do is give the AI free advantages like more science, money, and production.

Also, why would you play against high difficulty AI if you've never won a game of civ?
User avatar #59 - muthsera (11/03/2014) [-]
Civ IV fag here. Is it seriously not worth upgrading?
#74 - tacoperson (11/03/2014) [-]
oh don't get me wrong, civ V is great. It's just a bit too easy on normal difficulty and the way they balance it is dumb as fuck. It's still fun to play, and honestly most the fun isn't even really in winning. It's in building an empire. the fun is in the journey, not the destination.

Also some AI's are better than others. You have trash AI that doesn't do shit after they reach industrial era like montezuma, and then you have AI like william of orange and ramkamhaeng of siam that play like complete ASSHOLES but manage to at least do well for themselves most the time.
User avatar #78 - muthsera (11/03/2014) [-]
Right, thanks for that. Might be worth that $28 they're charging for the game + official addons
#45 - MAKIN MY WAY DOWNTOWN 11/03/2014 on Raw footage of gta vi +3
#224 - No you misunderstand. It's talking about midgets. Those little… 11/03/2014 on Six-Word Stories 0
#14 - Comment deleted 11/02/2014 on Chivalry Ain't Dead +3
#81 - This may blow your mind, but not everybody is as dumb as you are. 11/02/2014 on Pet Peeve of Mine 0
#118 - Or your mother zero times because she's ******* hideous. 10/28/2014 on Anon builds his army 0
#219 - I'm not saying she should have winged it. For the $20 million … 10/28/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... 0
#131 - If Scarlett Johansson was really serious about the part, you'd…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/28/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... +15
#215 - anonymous (10/28/2014) [-]
It would probably sound terrible, better no Russian accent at all then a bad one. A super spy could easily disguise their accent and might think it advantageous to use an american accent when speaking with and interacting with americans, so even though it's not like in the comics it makes sense nonetheless.
User avatar #219 - HonkIfIDriveWell (10/28/2014) [-]
I'm not saying she should have winged it. For the $20 million she was paid, she could have spent the time to learn the accent well.

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 850
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 - kirkbot ONLINE (01/29/2014) [-]
psst, check back on the German that I had posted. There are some more monstrosities in that thread
User avatar #2 - lorenrachel (12/24/2011) [-]
Hey. I was just reading you're argument on the Ignorance post and I'd just like to say well done for sticking up for yourself and I agree with everything you put across. :)
User avatar #3 to #2 - HonkIfIDriveWell (12/24/2011) [-]
Thank you :) I do try my best when it comes subjects such as religion on which I feel so strongly.
User avatar #1 - OriginallyContent (07/22/2010) [-]
Honk
 Friends (0)