Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Hashenmier    

Hashenmier Avatar Level 243 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to Hashenmier Block Hashenmier Invite Hashenmier to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/16/2010
Last Login:4/08/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 6403 total,  7315 ,  912
Comment Thumbs: 4374 total,  5059 ,  685
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/100)
Level 164 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 165 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 43% (43/100)
Level 243 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 244 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:0
Content Views:213870
Times Content Favorited:243 times
Total Comments Made:1175
FJ Points:2961

latest user's comments

#35 - yeah, as great as this tech is, it does concern me. Y… 01/31/2014 on All kinds of want 0
#868 - Hello, half indian person here. I'm neither white or … 01/29/2014 on I'm sorry, did I rape you... 0
#201 - Do I get mixed race pride? No. Only purebloods get pride. …  [+] (3 new replies) 01/28/2014 on I'm sorry, did I rape you... +1
User avatar #249 - alimais (01/28/2014) [-]
Well, if you mix white & black you mostly get black and black pride.
Too bad that race mixing doesn't make blue,red or purple people but rather adopts one of the colors.
User avatar #868 - Hashenmier (01/29/2014) [-]
Hello, half indian person here.

I'm neither white or brown, just a weird beige.

If people get pissed off about a lack of "white pride", nobody has beige pride
User avatar #213 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
Keep rolling.
#82 - I'm just replying with a large image to make yours more visibl… 01/26/2014 on too cold 0
#12 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 01/25/2014 on Morbid +92
#16 - hedman (01/25/2014) [-]
This is what makes the site - the fact that people get this
GJ FJ. Keep it up
#3 - Picture 01/25/2014 on Dentist Student Problems 0
#2 - Picture 01/25/2014 on Mystery Solved +7
#7 - Picture 01/25/2014 on well, shit +1
#347 - Then I apologise for not seeing that 01/22/2014 on shape 0
#343 - from that point of agreement, would you not say that the uppe…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/22/2014 on shape 0
#346 - amuzen (01/22/2014) [-]
thats exactly what I'm saying
the difference I pointed out is that the one they're saying 'should be attractive' is the one that's healthier and more functional while in the female versions of the this the one that 'should be attractive' is the one thats easier to obtain, getting a body like the one in the picture below is actually harder than getting a body like the one in the picture above because you have to more carefully regulate your diet and work out harder while the one above you just work out an average amount and starve yourself.
Thats why I menionted that I also agree when the posts for the female one are going for body types that are more healthy and functional but I don't agree with the female posts when they're just saying looks shouldn't be an issue at all and it should be whatevers easier.
User avatar #347 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
Then I apologise for not seeing that
#327 - Probably, although the point i'm trying to make …  [+] (4 new replies) 01/22/2014 on shape 0
#341 - amuzen (01/22/2014) [-]
They're indeed very similar the fact that both of them are talking as though we should change our definition of what is physically attractive towards something that is more healthy is extremely similar to the idea of changing our definition of what is physically attractive towards something that is more natural (Or easier to obtain like being overweight).

Although the difference's, slight as they are, are still worthy enough for me to agree with this type of post while disagreeing with the other form of post.
Although it should be noted that when I see the posts that are against the barbie/anorexic type body type for girls I always agree with those two, the ones I usually disagree with are the ones that say guys should just accept girls for who they are and appearences shouldn't be a factor at all! are the ones usually bug people because they're usually just sour grapes or an excuse.
User avatar #343 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
from that point of agreement, would you not say that the upper image could be likened to the "attractive", and the lower image likened to "what should be attractive"?

I know its about function, but the parallel exists. if you see that, then you can see why I think this post is so monumentally stupid.
#346 - amuzen (01/22/2014) [-]
thats exactly what I'm saying
the difference I pointed out is that the one they're saying 'should be attractive' is the one that's healthier and more functional while in the female versions of the this the one that 'should be attractive' is the one thats easier to obtain, getting a body like the one in the picture below is actually harder than getting a body like the one in the picture above because you have to more carefully regulate your diet and work out harder while the one above you just work out an average amount and starve yourself.
Thats why I menionted that I also agree when the posts for the female one are going for body types that are more healthy and functional but I don't agree with the female posts when they're just saying looks shouldn't be an issue at all and it should be whatevers easier.
User avatar #347 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
Then I apologise for not seeing that
#324 - with all due respect to you (only you bear in mind), i would h…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/22/2014 on shape 0
User avatar #326 - capslockrage (01/22/2014) [-]
Well when you're tubby you are flabby and compared to your size, weak. (though fat people are generally stronger than skinny people from having to carry around their weight)

While the strongman isn't tubby, he is just thick like a tree, and very hard. The type of guy that it would hurt you more if you punched him in the gut.
User avatar #327 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
Probably,


although the point i'm trying to make is that this post reads ~like~ the whiny feminist posts. Do you not see the parallel between the two?

yes it is a petty point, but if people don't see how the two types of post are similar then its a tad hypocritical
#341 - amuzen (01/22/2014) [-]
They're indeed very similar the fact that both of them are talking as though we should change our definition of what is physically attractive towards something that is more healthy is extremely similar to the idea of changing our definition of what is physically attractive towards something that is more natural (Or easier to obtain like being overweight).

Although the difference's, slight as they are, are still worthy enough for me to agree with this type of post while disagreeing with the other form of post.
Although it should be noted that when I see the posts that are against the barbie/anorexic type body type for girls I always agree with those two, the ones I usually disagree with are the ones that say guys should just accept girls for who they are and appearences shouldn't be a factor at all! are the ones usually bug people because they're usually just sour grapes or an excuse.
User avatar #343 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
from that point of agreement, would you not say that the upper image could be likened to the "attractive", and the lower image likened to "what should be attractive"?

I know its about function, but the parallel exists. if you see that, then you can see why I think this post is so monumentally stupid.
#346 - amuzen (01/22/2014) [-]
thats exactly what I'm saying
the difference I pointed out is that the one they're saying 'should be attractive' is the one that's healthier and more functional while in the female versions of the this the one that 'should be attractive' is the one thats easier to obtain, getting a body like the one in the picture below is actually harder than getting a body like the one in the picture above because you have to more carefully regulate your diet and work out harder while the one above you just work out an average amount and starve yourself.
Thats why I menionted that I also agree when the posts for the female one are going for body types that are more healthy and functional but I don't agree with the female posts when they're just saying looks shouldn't be an issue at all and it should be whatevers easier.
User avatar #347 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
Then I apologise for not seeing that
#314 - This seems like the male version of those whiny feminist posts…  [+] (9 new replies) 01/22/2014 on shape +2
User avatar #320 - Shiny (01/22/2014) [-]
But everything in this pic that isn't an obvious joke is factually correct.
User avatar #319 - capslockrage (01/22/2014) [-]
Nah, this is talking about how one is pretty and less useful and how one is uglier but gets the job done, it may be similar, but the feminist ones are just for defending ugly women.
User avatar #324 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
with all due respect to you (only you bear in mind), i would have to disagree. I may not be a strong person myself, and I don't lift at the gym (cardio only), but i fail to see any substantial difference between the genuinely strong man and being tubby. apart from some toning it seems like there is little difference, hence my parallell

( and Shiny who also replied to the comment, this is also directed at you. its laid out and presented and drawn like one of the whiny posts defending fat women. The facts may be in this post's favour, but that doesn't stop it sounding like the stuff i despise)
User avatar #326 - capslockrage (01/22/2014) [-]
Well when you're tubby you are flabby and compared to your size, weak. (though fat people are generally stronger than skinny people from having to carry around their weight)

While the strongman isn't tubby, he is just thick like a tree, and very hard. The type of guy that it would hurt you more if you punched him in the gut.
User avatar #327 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
Probably,


although the point i'm trying to make is that this post reads ~like~ the whiny feminist posts. Do you not see the parallel between the two?

yes it is a petty point, but if people don't see how the two types of post are similar then its a tad hypocritical
#341 - amuzen (01/22/2014) [-]
They're indeed very similar the fact that both of them are talking as though we should change our definition of what is physically attractive towards something that is more healthy is extremely similar to the idea of changing our definition of what is physically attractive towards something that is more natural (Or easier to obtain like being overweight).

Although the difference's, slight as they are, are still worthy enough for me to agree with this type of post while disagreeing with the other form of post.
Although it should be noted that when I see the posts that are against the barbie/anorexic type body type for girls I always agree with those two, the ones I usually disagree with are the ones that say guys should just accept girls for who they are and appearences shouldn't be a factor at all! are the ones usually bug people because they're usually just sour grapes or an excuse.
User avatar #343 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
from that point of agreement, would you not say that the upper image could be likened to the "attractive", and the lower image likened to "what should be attractive"?

I know its about function, but the parallel exists. if you see that, then you can see why I think this post is so monumentally stupid.
#346 - amuzen (01/22/2014) [-]
thats exactly what I'm saying
the difference I pointed out is that the one they're saying 'should be attractive' is the one that's healthier and more functional while in the female versions of the this the one that 'should be attractive' is the one thats easier to obtain, getting a body like the one in the picture below is actually harder than getting a body like the one in the picture above because you have to more carefully regulate your diet and work out harder while the one above you just work out an average amount and starve yourself.
Thats why I menionted that I also agree when the posts for the female one are going for body types that are more healthy and functional but I don't agree with the female posts when they're just saying looks shouldn't be an issue at all and it should be whatevers easier.
User avatar #347 - Hashenmier (01/22/2014) [-]
Then I apologise for not seeing that
#14 - MASH THE BLUE BUTTON! 01/20/2014 on fuck your controller +22
#34 - Nah, I hold that UNO is more evil than monopoly. The spite in … 01/20/2014 on Monopoly 0
#15 - promtly deleting my comment in shame  [+] (1 new reply) 01/19/2014 on I actually like playing... -1
#16 - anonymous (01/19/2014) [-]
sorry for the red, i just hate to see deleted comments
#15 - The Twilight Saga 01/19/2014 on you too +1
#9 - There are people who honestly think that. I'm not one of them.… 01/19/2014 on Disney princesses... +2
#12 - Comment deleted  [+] (3 new replies) 01/19/2014 on I actually like playing... 0
User avatar #14 - shadowstepone (01/19/2014) [-]
um, the game he posted is DOTA
User avatar #15 - Hashenmier (01/19/2014) [-]
promtly deleting my comment in shame
#16 - anonymous (01/19/2014) [-]
sorry for the red, i just hate to see deleted comments
#137 - it is rather funny actually 01/17/2014 on political content of the day 0
#109 - here is why you defend yourself against something that is not …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/17/2014 on This man +3
#171 - anonymous (01/17/2014) [-]
What a load of crap.
#3 - not enough love for the tomato. He looks so down when he lacks… 01/11/2014 on Funneh 0
#8 - This is what happened to me. about 9 months ago, me and a …  [+] (8 new replies) 01/11/2014 on for you guys with low... +15
#27 - anonymous (01/11/2014) [-]
Similar thing with me.
User avatar #21 - joeyliquid (01/11/2014) [-]
well, that was casual.
User avatar #11 - drastronomy (01/11/2014) [-]
tfw still no gf here
User avatar #10 - shmochra (01/11/2014) [-]
Sounds awesome. My gf is not a fan of videogames but I can watch series with her. She knows comics,videogames,movies and series are a part of me and she is interested what it's all about. When she goes to sleep she tells me to play a few rounds (currently smite) because she knows I really want to.
User avatar #17 - nebuchadnezzaurus (01/11/2014) [-]
sounds like you got a great gf
User avatar #26 - shmochra (01/11/2014) [-]
Thanks. She really is. It kinda proves to me that I don't need a gamergirl as long as I can have a loving and caring gf who actually gives a shit about me and the stuff I'm passionate about. The same goes for her as well. You don't need to have the exact same hobbies. It's kinda stupid. But if the person likes exactly the same stuff as you and has other redeeming qualities. Well, you're lucky. ^^
#9 - nebuchadnezzaurus (01/11/2014) [-]
wait so both of you were already in a relationship? then how would she be your "first" gf?
User avatar #16 - FunkMastaNickyNick (01/11/2014) [-]
Yeah, I misread it too, makes more sense if you read it again.
#626 - 20 male UK mixed (british/indian) straight … 01/10/2014 on FJ poll 0
#52 - agreed with the latter statement. I dunno, I thought it was mo… 01/08/2014 on This bitch was cyber bullying 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 943 / Total items point value: 5903

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - adriano **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#8 to #6 - Hashenmier (09/14/2012) [-]
However, if you wanted to know what my most recent deleted comment was, which is the only reason I can think of for you actually coming onto my profile to say that, it was a picture of slowpoke declaring the cake to be a lie.

The humour was intended to lie with the use of the typically slow pokemon slowpoke, and the use of a very old joke to create a positive response in people.

As shown by the thumbs down, it did not have the intended effect, and so was deleted to save people from having to view it.
#9 to #8 - adriano **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #10 to #9 - Hashenmier (09/14/2012) [-]
Then I'm glad I was able to share the comment with you
User avatar #7 to #6 - Hashenmier (09/14/2012) [-]
I comment in attempt to entertain others. The thumb down shows that people are not entertained, thus I delete them
#4 - Hashenmier (10/23/2011) [-]
**Hashenmier rolled a random image**
#2 - taaj (07/19/2011) [-]
IMPRESSED!
User avatar #1 - mrmalicious (03/03/2011) [-]
Hey there - Mind thumbing this for me?

http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1754334/Music/

Much appreciated!
 Friends (0)