Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/23/2010
Last Login:6/27/2014
Content Thumbs: 1641 total,  1847 ,  206
Comment Thumbs: 828 total,  1126 ,  298
Content Level Progress: 41% (41/100)
Level 116 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 182 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 183 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Content Views:14521
Times Content Favorited:208 times
Total Comments Made:413
FJ Points:2465
Favorite Tags: funny (2)

latest user's comments

#115 - One of my friend made a status "OBAAAAMMMAAA!!!! The STRU…  [+] (9 replies) 11/07/2012 on Every Democrat Today +20
User avatar
#225 - Pikachuuu (11/08/2012) [-]
Well, he did promise Russia that during his second term he'll have "more flexibility".... wonder that means, I guess we'll soon find out.
#135 - anon (11/07/2012) [-]
second term presidents tend to take more risks in terms of controversial policies , wars etc. since they don't need to worry about being re-elected
User avatar
#131 - vilememory (11/07/2012) [-]
Obama trying to do things and the republicans throwing a huge temper tantrum stopping anything from happening? Even things that they wanted to? Responding to any attempt at working together by cutting off the offered hand? As they don't want to work with the democrats, they want them all dead. The entire political party dead, their families dead and their supporters dead.
User avatar
#140 - Marker (11/07/2012) [-]
Think about it this way. Over the past two years, the House has done everything they could to try and make Obama look bad, as to try and make him lose in 2012 ("Our top priority is to deny President Obama a second term" -- Mitch McConnell). Now, Obama's in his second term. He won't be running in 2016, he has nothing to lose. Maybe that means the idiots in the House will actually start to try and cooperate.
#149 - magneticmonopole (11/08/2012) [-]
Careful you seem to be referring to logic when talking about politics.
User avatar
#150 - Marker (11/08/2012) [-]
Yeah, I tend to do that..... I should really stop.
#132 - anon (11/07/2012) [-]
I guess the republican party really forced his hand to sign the NDAA?
User avatar
#134 - vilememory (11/07/2012) [-]
That was more of a a political move, they changed it that bill slightly to appease some of his concerns but still if he didn't they would have bashed him on it. It was a lose lose situation.
User avatar
#133 - Marker (11/07/2012) [-]
Any president would have signed the NDAA. And contrary to what people claim, it does not let any officer arrest you and put you in jail without due process. The NDAA is made for people who have been proven Al'Quaeda, Taliban, Hammas, and similar groups supporters.