Quite right good sir.

The Al Queda had been working before the USA entered the middle east, but never targeted anyone in the UN. Only when we interfered did they target us, because we posed a greater threat. They are attacking us because their goal is to eliminate all non-muslim, but the catalyst for the attacks on UN, was the invasion.

Even though your grammar makes educated people cry, you've brought up a good point. Thanks for the attempt at a decent rebuttal.

lol Looking at that sentence now I should have added a semi colon or at least finished the sentence. My bad lol

Sorry. If I were not on the internet I would put more time and effort in my sentencing. However, seeing that this is funny junk I am only half paying attention to this debate, due to me going on funny junk for the Lulz. I shall forever make sure my grammar is proper from now on. And thank you on the compliment about my point. I am trying to show that the US is not the only victim of terrorism, we just make a big deal out of it because we are Americans.

Quite right good sir.

They didn't attack the USA, and later, other countries because they weren't muslims. They did it, and still does it, because they know they can't win in conventional warfare. Therefore they seek out some of the most effective military strategies: Terrorism and suicide attacks.

well ya i am not talking about strategy wise, even though what they did was horrendous it was done very effectively, but the US did not provoke Al Qaeda in any way that what I am saying. I am saying that terrorist attacked the US because of our different ideals the same reason why they attacked our brothers in London and around the world.

The Al Queda had been working before the USA entered the middle east, but never targeted anyone in the UN. Only when we interfered did they target us, because we posed a greater threat. They are attacking us because their goal is to eliminate all non-muslim, but the catalyst for the attacks on UN, was the invasion.

Even though your grammar makes educated people cry, you've brought up a good point. Thanks for the attempt at a decent rebuttal.

lol Looking at that sentence now I should have added a semi colon or at least finished the sentence. My bad lol

Sorry. If I were not on the internet I would put more time and effort in my sentencing. However, seeing that this is funny junk I am only half paying attention to this debate, due to me going on funny junk for the Lulz. I shall forever make sure my grammar is proper from now on. And thank you on the compliment about my point. I am trying to show that the US is not the only victim of terrorism, we just make a big deal out of it because we are Americans.

Quite right good sir.

me sy, pec tim in da US, bt der r war goin on in da meddel east.

I wouldn't say it was unprovoked by any means. The US was not very kind to the middle east throughout the 80's and early 90's. Yes in the late 90's and early 2000's, the US was at 'peace' with the middle east, but they still had a grudge.
But you're right, Japan was actually willing to fight to the last child, they were arming children. Japanese citizens would rather die than surrender, as they believed in honor... And backed into a corner, faced with defeat, they became more dangerous as they were willing to die to kill allied forces. Even after Japan did surrender, Japanese in the pacific still fought Allied forces for years afterwards.

Thank you for seeing my point :) and ya I can concede to that. I mean with the US helping Al Qaeda against the Soviet Union, which in retrospect was kind of stupid. Also there was the problems in Iran, the Gulf War, and pre existing anti western ideals, which I could see as some provocation.

> 9/11 was during peace time and unprovoked
> was during peace time and unprovoked
> peace time and unprovoked
> peace time
> unprovoked
> wat.

Sooo... what you're saying is that Al Queda just thought that, 'Hey, lets bomb the World Trade Center twin towers' without anyone provoking it.

I literally cannot believe that you could be so ignorant.

US wasn't in Iraq and Afghanistan. The US did not provoke Al Qaeda besides being "infidels" but everyone is so I do not really count that.

They didn't attack the USA, and later, other countries because they weren't muslims. They did it, and still does it, because they know they can't win in conventional warfare. Therefore they seek out some of the most effective military strategies: Terrorism and suicide attacks.

well ya i am not talking about strategy wise, even though what they did was horrendous it was done very effectively, but the US did not provoke Al Qaeda in any way that what I am saying. I am saying that terrorist attacked the US because of our different ideals the same reason why they attacked our brothers in London and around the world.

The Al Queda had been working before the USA entered the middle east, but never targeted anyone in the UN. Only when we interfered did they target us, because we posed a greater threat. They are attacking us because their goal is to eliminate all non-muslim, but the catalyst for the attacks on UN, was the invasion.

Even though your grammar makes educated people cry, you've brought up a good point. Thanks for the attempt at a decent rebuttal.

lol Looking at that sentence now I should have added a semi colon or at least finished the sentence. My bad lol

Sorry. If I were not on the internet I would put more time and effort in my sentencing. However, seeing that this is funny junk I am only half paying attention to this debate, due to me going on funny junk for the Lulz. I shall forever make sure my grammar is proper from now on. And thank you on the compliment about my point. I am trying to show that the US is not the only victim of terrorism, we just make a big deal out of it because we are Americans.

Quite right good sir.

y yes, pec tim in us, bt war in teh mddl east -_-

Whaattttt?

me sy, pec tim in da US, bt der r war goin on in da meddel east.

its assasins creed, the jesus christ edition

well what you really should worry about is how long it takes the average human body to decay, there is always something to eat, but from what I understand it takes about a year for a human body to completely decompose if being fed upon by animals, if not well the emergency bullet is there for a reason...

well it depends the common zombie only eats flesh but rots if it was a crazy mad cow disease then i think that they would need to eat or drink.

the best part was how everything was just silent and dramatic music was playing

Yep, but I'm searching for a way to upgrade the damage he deals. I know that you can buy items for various bonuses, but in all the videos the I've seen the Mega Inferno Bomb is described as a clone of the Big-bang and when I throw my ultimate it looks more like a firecracker, even if I'm at the same level as my enemies...

Ziggs isn't made for damage. He isn't made to excel in damage compared to other mages. His damage will always be lackluster and in most trades the enemy will outdamage you unless you are more farmed or more dmg oriented then them. Ziggs is amazing at zoning and pushing. He will zone you so hard in lane and the utility he offers is also amazing. He can clear minion waves fast and zone areas so easily making for an amazing laning phrase and team fighting in my humble opinion. Plus you can really shit on close range ap casters, with no innate gap closers.

if youre good at ziggs he can burst anything

Thats with any ap carry that snowballs to a certain point. Im saying he isn't fully made for bursting people down and works so much better as a pusher, making the enemy lose cs under tower and then slowly building your advantage and snowballing. Like apart from his q his kit isn't exactly made for single target burst is it.

im saying that if you do it right hes a machine that can kill entire teams

Wow, really ? Well, when I played as Ziggs I was playing with a friend that used Amumu and we done some combos with him stunning everyone and me making everything explode. Besides, I'm looking for some others good champions, because I love Ziggs, but sometimes it's better to pick another champion. I've considered Moakai, but I'm not sure.

Maokai is more for the jungle and then probably top lane, I don't think his kit works too well in mid lane. If you are looking for mid lane champions, currently the strongest mid lane champions in the game are (in no particular order): ahri, twisted fate, karthus, morgana, ryze, gragas and orianna. But don't play champions because people tell you they are the best, its better if you just play what you enjoy and if you enjoy the champion you will most likely play better with them. I'm guessing you don't play ranked, so if you want someone that stomps solo queue hard and racks up a tonne of kills, your best bet is ahri. Charm, w, q and ulti to close the gap and you rape anything that moves.

Ok (sorry for this reply 7 hours later). I've got a friend that has more experience than me in League of Legends and helps me with the champions, but I hate when I see a champion that I could like and ask him what he thinks and he answers "No, this champion sucks !" or "No no no no, it's too difficult for you to use". I really like Ziggs, but I'm searching for some other champions, maybe like him (ok ok, there isn't another explosive expert in the champions list, I know)

lol, if you can play ziggs well i doubt "its to hard for you"

you forgot katarina and lux mid lane,

also teemo is nice mid lane

Yeah you should try annie, katarina and lux, they are good for beginning mid play and are solid ap casters. In my opinion annie is one of the best mages in the game, lux is ok and katarina is alright too, but she stomps low elo.

Ap runes are what i go for and i just solely focus on an Ap build. and ya the mega inferno bomb is best used as a finisher or if your want to aid your team, in a fight half way across the map, open with that so they can clean it up. Key is to get that AP as high as you can.

**wutrudoin rolled user lieutenantpansy **

I tried :(

its the thought that counts :)

mine were stolen.. :'c I don't know if you can buy them anywhere, but they are really kickass.

damn man im sorry :( check the samsung store, cause honestly i love these headphones more than skull candies since skull candies break in a month of use for me.

who says it's bamboo? what if its some kind of aquatic cane grass

Since those Pandas came to Edinburgh, Aye.. Probably.

oh haaaay, it's you again!

Oh hey there dude, how's it going? :D

it's going good, you?

Pretty good too thanks.

good good, well, I got to go now. Nice seeing you again. I hope our paths cross another time one day. Farewell!