| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
GhandisPimpCane
| Rank #12547 on Comments Offline Send mail to GhandisPimpCane Block GhandisPimpCane Invite GhandisPimpCane to be your friend flag avatar |
|
Hey im seth nice to meet you. hows it goin
latest user's comments
| #13 - ps im thumbing up all comments in appreciation thanks again! | 03/30/2012 on Why I love the Internet | 0 |
| #12 - Thanks guys i really appreciate the thumbs :) First time e… [+] (1 new reply) | 03/30/2012 on Why I love the Internet | 0 |
| | ||
| #134 - Was anyone else cringing the whole entire time like they were … | 03/27/2012 on Mario level: 100 | +31 |
| #21 - **GhandisPimpCane rolls 81** | 03/24/2012 on Tara Strong, your furture self | 0 |
| #145 - Ya its been to long I remember a year ago my friend showed me … [+] (1 new reply) | 03/23/2012 on Listen up. | 0 |
| Yeah, I hadn't been on here in ages, then a friend was posting stuff from here on facebook. I was freaking out because I was so excited that Funnyjunk was still up. That was in about... July I think. Then I stayed as an anon for a while. Then made this account. | ||
| #136 - I'm trying to remember it had the classic scare video of the m… [+] (3 new replies) | 03/23/2012 on Listen up. | +1 |
| Lol yeah, then I remember... hmmm... It's been so long... Uhhh... dude, I'm drawing so many blanks right now. But yeah, the cat dance video was on there forever, that was one of the first videos I saw on here, and that was 1 or 2 years before you came on here. Ya its been to long I remember a year ago my friend showed me life hacks on here and was surprised this place was still around and kicking. that's how i rediscovered funnyjunk for myself. Yeah, I hadn't been on here in ages, then a friend was posting stuff from here on facebook. I was freaking out because I was so excited that Funnyjunk was still up. That was in about... July I think. Then I stayed as an anon for a while. Then made this account. | ||
| #128 - My first funnyjunk experience was the Cat dance song maybe 7 y… [+] (5 new replies) | 03/23/2012 on Listen up. | +3 |
| I remember those too! :O That was when I was in... third grade. Let's see... that's... 9 or 8 years. Jeez I've been here forever. O_o I'm trying to remember it had the classic scare video of the meadow with the car and then the chick screams right? Lol yeah, then I remember... hmmm... It's been so long... Uhhh... dude, I'm drawing so many blanks right now. But yeah, the cat dance video was on there forever, that was one of the first videos I saw on here, and that was 1 or 2 years before you came on here. Ya its been to long I remember a year ago my friend showed me life hacks on here and was surprised this place was still around and kicking. that's how i rediscovered funnyjunk for myself. Yeah, I hadn't been on here in ages, then a friend was posting stuff from here on facebook. I was freaking out because I was so excited that Funnyjunk was still up. That was in about... July I think. Then I stayed as an anon for a while. Then made this account. | ||
| #44 - Never going to be a brony but I think Fluttershy is pretty ado… | 03/15/2012 on Ponycomp 47 | 0 |
| #11 - Personally I like the Rolling stones more than the Beatles (if… | 03/15/2012 on The Beatles.. | 0 |
| #271 - It's funny my friends back at home were talking about playing … | 03/13/2012 on Never Forget | 0 |
| #217 - **GhandisPimpCane rolls 34** For NARNIA!!! | 03/09/2012 on Roll *evil smirk* | 0 |
| #83 - This year entering college my room mate was obsessed with Yip … | 03/06/2012 on Yip Man | 0 |
| #54 - Haha that's what happened to me at the UCR Heat Concert this w… | 03/05/2012 on Just to clear things a bit... | +4 |
| #1355 - **GhandisPimpCane rolled a random image posted in comment #2… | 02/28/2012 on Epic Win | 0 |
| #297 - where can i find the actual video of this? | 02/22/2012 on Every Morning | 0 |
| #739 - **GhandisPimpCane rolls 960,922,006** FOR NAHNIA!! | 02/22/2012 on FunnyJunk Sorcery | 0 |
| #38 - O how i loved that speech. If you changed the difficulty you p… | 02/21/2012 on Destiny | +3 |
| #95 - When did the Japanese military sign a surrender though? If i r… [+] (2 new replies) | 02/16/2012 on USA vs. Europe | +10 |
| #100
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] looked it up, you got a point there. the citizens of japan still wanted to keep up the war, while the politics tried to stop it.. point is, the politicians controlled the army. #96
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] wait ill try to find a source. it was written in a dialect that was only spoken in the emperors court, quite idiotic to write a capitulation in that language. | ||
| #89 - and toenail clipping me down I forgot a guy can't defend his… [+] (5 new replies) | 02/16/2012 on USA vs. Europe | +5 |
| To the rest of the world, we will also be a bunch of assholes. japan punched america, america shot japan with a shotgun in the face twice as a payback. (as a comparison) #530
-
N. Korean citizen (02/16/2012) [-] It was much less a retaliation to Pearl Harbor as it was a quick way to end the war. It did end up saving total lives (it was estimated 250,000 American Soldiers would have died, not to mention many more Japanesse Soldiers before the war would be over.) Japan was given time to Surrender before the first and second nuke, but they did not. I DO think we should have attacked military bases instead of civilians and that Japan would have seen the extent of our power without harming innocent civilians, but what's done is done. And nobody talks about 9/11 anymore except on the internet. #139
-
valki (02/16/2012) [-] Oh please, you should know that you are safe now, and whatever our military does there will be a tomorrow. Thats why now we focus on how little collateral damage our weapons do. Back in the 1940's, we were fighting for our lives, back then we cared about how much damage our weapons did. the irony of how fighting for our lives could kill us all... | ||
| #88 - Broski you pretty much HUURRR DUUUUREED in your post. America … [+] (5 new replies) | 02/16/2012 on USA vs. Europe | +3 |
| #94
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] by the way i didnt even say, america would have attacked first. seems like you just didnt get my point. #92
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] dude, get your facts straight. the first nuke (the hiroshima one) was thrown on 6/8/1945. the emperor of japan had signed and sent the official capitulation on 3/8/1945. it was written in a japanese dialect that the US translators didnt understand. so, yep, it was not the USAs fault that the bombs were thrown.. but saying that it would have saved lives or that japan would have continued is just dumb then. When did the Japanese military sign a surrender though? If i remember correctly the Emperor wanted to end the war but the Military was acting separately. And by saving lives I mean only a hundred thousand died, instead of millions of American troops and millions of civilian livesthat would have happened in an invasion scenario. How could they not translate the dialect though they had many translators? #100
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] looked it up, you got a point there. the citizens of japan still wanted to keep up the war, while the politics tried to stop it.. point is, the politicians controlled the army. #96
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] wait ill try to find a source. it was written in a dialect that was only spoken in the emperors court, quite idiotic to write a capitulation in that language. | ||
| #86 - I agree they should have attacked military sites but they didn… [+] (5 new replies) | 02/16/2012 on USA vs. Europe | +29 |
| Not to be an smart ass but Hiroshima and Nagasaki where industrial cities that produced tanks, air planes, and guns. It wasn't just senseless killing but you were right that it was good in the long run and saved thousands of Amer.ican and Japanese lives. If we didn't bomb japan and had asked them to surrender, they would not have and we would have had to invade which, as you know, would have costed many more lives than just nuking those two cities. To address what "infer" said about the u.s. attacking Germany first ... you are a fucking retard. When the Roosevelt adopted the lend-lease act to send britfat military aid , Hitler was sending U-boat wolf packs to the north Atlantic to take out ships sending to supplies to britfat, that and Hitler knew he shouldn't declare war on the u.s yet but, being an ally of japan was almost forced to declare war when the u.s was attacked at pearl harbor Abso-fucking-lutely. Does everyone forget that we were at WAR with Japan? The bombs weren't for fucking shits and giggles. Dropping the bombs was the toughest decision of the Pacific portion of the war - regardless of if it was right. America had to end the war ASAP. I can't believe people think an INVASION UNTIL SUBMISSION would lead to less civilian deaths than two bombs. As you said, the brainwashed civilians would have attacked U.S invaders mercilessly, and then reporters turn it into a war crime when the soldiers fight back. While I think it was wrong that we used nukes on japan, japan attacked citizens too. Rape of Nanking is a prime example of this #91
-
N. Korean citizen (02/16/2012) [-] This guy's right. End of story. Right doesn't awlways mean good you know. The choices we made in that war may not have been GOOD per say but they were the right choices to LIMIT our own casualties and end the war. | ||
| #79 - Actually i think our country know we are fucked up just to laz… | 02/16/2012 on USA vs. Europe | +2 |
| #75 - Cool story bro not like Japan attacked us first. This meme alw… [+] (28 new replies) | 02/16/2012 on USA vs. Europe | -20 |
| i think you'll find that america also attacked the middle east first and toenail clipping me down I forgot a guy can't defend his own country when he wants because its America the evil country of the west. It's funnyjunk toenail clippings don't do anything in real life for me any way. To the rest of the world, we will also be a bunch of assholes. japan punched america, america shot japan with a shotgun in the face twice as a payback. (as a comparison) #530
-
N. Korean citizen (02/16/2012) [-] It was much less a retaliation to Pearl Harbor as it was a quick way to end the war. It did end up saving total lives (it was estimated 250,000 American Soldiers would have died, not to mention many more Japanesse Soldiers before the war would be over.) Japan was given time to Surrender before the first and second nuke, but they did not. I DO think we should have attacked military bases instead of civilians and that Japan would have seen the extent of our power without harming innocent civilians, but what's done is done. And nobody talks about 9/11 anymore except on the internet. #139
-
valki (02/16/2012) [-] Oh please, you should know that you are safe now, and whatever our military does there will be a tomorrow. Thats why now we focus on how little collateral damage our weapons do. Back in the 1940's, we were fighting for our lives, back then we cared about how much damage our weapons did. the irony of how fighting for our lives could kill us all... #85
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] ah yeah, america saved millions of lives by attacking japan.. japan capitulated 3 days before the first nuke was thrown, but yeah, millions of lives were saved. just like millions of lifes are saved in afghanistan, because afghanistan would totally attack the us if the army wasnt there.. HUURRRR DURRRRRR Broski you pretty much HUURRR DUUUUREED in your post. America never attacked Japan first thay attacked America. as explained in my post to the fine fellow bellow me who can actually put up and argument unlike you, you will see that Japan was going to sacrifice every one of their civilians so their Emperor could stay in power. #94
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] by the way i didnt even say, america would have attacked first. seems like you just didnt get my point. #92
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] dude, get your facts straight. the first nuke (the hiroshima one) was thrown on 6/8/1945. the emperor of japan had signed and sent the official capitulation on 3/8/1945. it was written in a japanese dialect that the US translators didnt understand. so, yep, it was not the USAs fault that the bombs were thrown.. but saying that it would have saved lives or that japan would have continued is just dumb then. When did the Japanese military sign a surrender though? If i remember correctly the Emperor wanted to end the war but the Military was acting separately. And by saving lives I mean only a hundred thousand died, instead of millions of American troops and millions of civilian livesthat would have happened in an invasion scenario. How could they not translate the dialect though they had many translators? #100
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] looked it up, you got a point there. the citizens of japan still wanted to keep up the war, while the politics tried to stop it.. point is, the politicians controlled the army. #96
-
theamazingmaze (02/16/2012) [-] wait ill try to find a source. it was written in a dialect that was only spoken in the emperors court, quite idiotic to write a capitulation in that language. #80
-
infer (02/16/2012) [-] dafuq dude? Japan attacked a military base of yours and you used NUCLEAR BOMBS on cities without any fuckin military ground on them. While in Pearl Harbor, there were 2403 killed (only aproximately ofcourse), the bodys on the japanese site were - depending on sources - between 150.000 and 300.000 - about 100 times as much (!). oh and to get back to that poster, 3000 people died on 9/11. ofcourse there is no way to make up to what happend on 9/11 and ofcourse i do not want to hurt any ones feelings but there is no way you can compare or reason hiroshima/nagasaki on pearl harbor. and btw you attacked germany first and germany and japan were allies. you must have known that. and to say something more, i am german and there is no way i can thank amerifats enough for getting rid of the NS regime in germany, and there is no way to justify anything the japanese or the german government did during these times. but thats still the government, not the civilians. no nation with any respect to itself and to human rights should attack civilians, not even the US. #442
-
jakeinghram (02/16/2012) [-] I don't think America attacked first. I was informed that Germany sank an amerifat ship bringing supplies to britfat or France. I agree they should have attacked military sites but they didn't. However, do you know the war crimes committed by the Japanese during World War II? A nuclear explosion was more humane than what the Japanese did to civilians in neighboring asian countries. China has hundreds of massacres. We also did not attack Germany first. America was brought into the war because of Pearl Harbor. We initial attacked Normandy first because America thought Hitler was more important to take down first. Don't know were you got America attacking Germany first. All civilians in Japan were brain washed in following their holy emperor and would fight to that last woman and child to prevent losing the war. You can see this in many videos of them preparing for the American invasion. If we had sent in troops casualty reports were predicted to be in the millions for both sides. Not to be an smart ass but Hiroshima and Nagasaki where industrial cities that produced tanks, air planes, and guns. It wasn't just senseless killing but you were right that it was good in the long run and saved thousands of Amer.ican and Japanese lives. If we didn't bomb japan and had asked them to surrender, they would not have and we would have had to invade which, as you know, would have costed many more lives than just nuking those two cities. To address what "infer" said about the u.s. attacking Germany first ... you are a fucking retard. When the Roosevelt adopted the lend-lease act to send britfat military aid , Hitler was sending U-boat wolf packs to the north Atlantic to take out ships sending to supplies to britfat, that and Hitler knew he shouldn't declare war on the u.s yet but, being an ally of japan was almost forced to declare war when the u.s was attacked at pearl harbor Abso-fucking-lutely. Does everyone forget that we were at WAR with Japan? The bombs weren't for fucking shits and giggles. Dropping the bombs was the toughest decision of the Pacific portion of the war - regardless of if it was right. America had to end the war ASAP. I can't believe people think an INVASION UNTIL SUBMISSION would lead to less civilian deaths than two bombs. As you said, the brainwashed civilians would have attacked U.S invaders mercilessly, and then reporters turn it into a war crime when the soldiers fight back. While I think it was wrong that we used nukes on japan, japan attacked citizens too. Rape of Nanking is a prime example of this #91
-
N. Korean citizen (02/16/2012) [-] This guy's right. End of story. Right doesn't awlways mean good you know. The choices we made in that war may not have been GOOD per say but they were the right choices to LIMIT our own casualties and end the war. | ||
| #4 - Hmm kinda weird when we have anti marijuana laws yet can still… [+] (6 new replies) | 02/15/2012 on Stoner future | +33 |
| If they fucking come for my red meat, I'll... curl up in a corner and cry. #24
-
N. Korean citizen (02/16/2012) [-] You say that now, but that's what people said about the NDSAA passing. They will continue to slowly take away our rights until people decide to stand up and stop them. I say that day should be today. I say we should hang corrupt politicians in the streets. I say that we should demand the rights that our forefathers founded this country on. But who cares what an anon has to say? | ||
| #7 - So true may a thousand green toenail clipping s descend upon you | 02/15/2012 on B-e-a-utiful | +6 |
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
items
That comment you got -12 toenail clippings on? You were completely right. +1

