Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

GBird    

Rank #5570 on Subscribers
GBird Avatar Level 145 Comments: Faptastic
Offline
Send mail to GBird Block GBird Invite GBird to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:1/23/2010
Last Login:3/06/2014
Location:SC
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 1949 total,  2157 ,  208
Comment Thumbs: 459 total,  860 ,  401
Content Level Progress: 48% (48/100)
Level 119 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 120 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 145 Comments: Faptastic → Level 146 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:13
Content Views:9547
Times Content Favorited:202 times
Total Comments Made:708
FJ Points:2418
Hey you guys

latest user's comments

#514 - I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is …  [+] (1 new reply) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#125 - Look up on accidental geniuses, I believe. 12/19/2012 on Star Wars -1
#508 - Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward t…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#501 - It's and extremely awkward situation to explain, for I am not …  [+] (5 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #503 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Any round is lethal like I said. Rifles like the FN FAL and M1 garand use the .308 and .30-06 and those guns are considered "assault weapons"
User avatar #508 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward to express what I'm trying to say. I suppose I submit. Its just high powered round like those really shouldn't have to be in quantities of 30 or 20 or really even 10.
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#474 - A weapon used specifically for killing humans*  [+] (7 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #485 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Will guns were designed to kill humans no denying that. Like the picture I showed you. Same round relatively same magazine capacity. You could kill someone with a .22 as easily with a .223 within a 300 ft. range. And they are easy to obtain but they go through the standard background check before you buy a gun. I understand why you wouldn't want those rounds.
User avatar #501 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
It's and extremely awkward situation to explain, for I am not exceedingly knowledgeable in the field ammunition. I understand the need for larger rounds for hunting deer, elk, and bear i.e. .308, .30-6 and larger, but it is also an awkward situation that for 7.62 and 5.56/.223 rounds are just as lethal if not less.
User avatar #503 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Any round is lethal like I said. Rifles like the FN FAL and M1 garand use the .308 and .30-06 and those guns are considered "assault weapons"
User avatar #508 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward to express what I'm trying to say. I suppose I submit. Its just high powered round like those really shouldn't have to be in quantities of 30 or 20 or really even 10.
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#473 - I appreciate civility on the internet. I think that the bigges…  [+] (8 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny -1
User avatar #474 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
A weapon used specifically for killing humans*
User avatar #485 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Will guns were designed to kill humans no denying that. Like the picture I showed you. Same round relatively same magazine capacity. You could kill someone with a .22 as easily with a .223 within a 300 ft. range. And they are easy to obtain but they go through the standard background check before you buy a gun. I understand why you wouldn't want those rounds.
User avatar #501 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
It's and extremely awkward situation to explain, for I am not exceedingly knowledgeable in the field ammunition. I understand the need for larger rounds for hunting deer, elk, and bear i.e. .308, .30-6 and larger, but it is also an awkward situation that for 7.62 and 5.56/.223 rounds are just as lethal if not less.
User avatar #503 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Any round is lethal like I said. Rifles like the FN FAL and M1 garand use the .308 and .30-06 and those guns are considered "assault weapons"
User avatar #508 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward to express what I'm trying to say. I suppose I submit. Its just high powered round like those really shouldn't have to be in quantities of 30 or 20 or really even 10.
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#451 - I know gun safety. It's not that difficult to comprehend. This…  [+] (10 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny +1
User avatar #462 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
The problem with "assault weapons" is that there is a broad definition. Is it a weapon that can shoot fast? bullet caliber? When the brady campaign went into affect they banned certain features on the gun limiting to guns to 10 round mags and fixed stocks and unthreaded barrels. When the founding fathers wrote the bill of rights they were in a time were everyone had a musket. The standard civilian had the same weapon as the government. Now in today's world we can have the weapons the military has but they are a lot more expensive. I love weapons to and gun regulations will make it harder for criminals to obtain weapons but not impossible. I'm glad we can have a legitimate conversation without any butthurt. Thanks
User avatar #473 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I appreciate civility on the internet. I think that the biggest problem is just accessibility. Its just too easy to buy weapons of that grade. I would define and an assault rifle is essentially a weapon used for the killing of other humans. That would basically be those specifications. (Although I believe the telescopic stock is more for comfort than for anything else.) Its just too easy to obtain. Also the ammunition should be kept at basic rounds. Armor piercing, hollow point and anti-personal should be highly illegal.
User avatar #474 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
A weapon used specifically for killing humans*
User avatar #485 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Will guns were designed to kill humans no denying that. Like the picture I showed you. Same round relatively same magazine capacity. You could kill someone with a .22 as easily with a .223 within a 300 ft. range. And they are easy to obtain but they go through the standard background check before you buy a gun. I understand why you wouldn't want those rounds.
User avatar #501 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
It's and extremely awkward situation to explain, for I am not exceedingly knowledgeable in the field ammunition. I understand the need for larger rounds for hunting deer, elk, and bear i.e. .308, .30-6 and larger, but it is also an awkward situation that for 7.62 and 5.56/.223 rounds are just as lethal if not less.
User avatar #503 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Any round is lethal like I said. Rifles like the FN FAL and M1 garand use the .308 and .30-06 and those guns are considered "assault weapons"
User avatar #508 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward to express what I'm trying to say. I suppose I submit. Its just high powered round like those really shouldn't have to be in quantities of 30 or 20 or really even 10.
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#429 - He didn't shoot him, just threatened him. Also I realize that …  [+] (12 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
#438 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
I understand why you believe guns are bad. They look scary to someone who has never had any kind of training with them. Guns aren't the killers. It is the people using them. I agree they shouldn't be as readily available but they shouldn't be banned because of an action of a few people. I know you look at guns and think that they are nothing but trouble but for us responsible gun owners they are just our hobby. I know what happened is tragic and I am upset as anyone else in this country. The crazed gun man stole the guns from his mother. I believe that we should enforce gun safes or trigger locks on guns so as to prevent a criminal from using them.
User avatar #451 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I know gun safety. It's not that difficult to comprehend. This man knew how to safely operate firearms. I have shot an SKS on multiple occasions and a glock more times than I can count. The thing about it is, why do we need anti-personal rounds in a weapon used specifically to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time. I understand recreational shooting. It is very enjoyable, but why should these class of weapons be so very readily available to anyone the proper age and financing. I'm not anti-gun, I support the second amendment heartily, but the constitution wasn't written to be specific about weapons. The founding fathers had NO idea what weaponry would become. I love guns, but things have gotten out of hand.
User avatar #462 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
The problem with "assault weapons" is that there is a broad definition. Is it a weapon that can shoot fast? bullet caliber? When the brady campaign went into affect they banned certain features on the gun limiting to guns to 10 round mags and fixed stocks and unthreaded barrels. When the founding fathers wrote the bill of rights they were in a time were everyone had a musket. The standard civilian had the same weapon as the government. Now in today's world we can have the weapons the military has but they are a lot more expensive. I love weapons to and gun regulations will make it harder for criminals to obtain weapons but not impossible. I'm glad we can have a legitimate conversation without any butthurt. Thanks
User avatar #473 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I appreciate civility on the internet. I think that the biggest problem is just accessibility. Its just too easy to buy weapons of that grade. I would define and an assault rifle is essentially a weapon used for the killing of other humans. That would basically be those specifications. (Although I believe the telescopic stock is more for comfort than for anything else.) Its just too easy to obtain. Also the ammunition should be kept at basic rounds. Armor piercing, hollow point and anti-personal should be highly illegal.
User avatar #474 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
A weapon used specifically for killing humans*
User avatar #485 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Will guns were designed to kill humans no denying that. Like the picture I showed you. Same round relatively same magazine capacity. You could kill someone with a .22 as easily with a .223 within a 300 ft. range. And they are easy to obtain but they go through the standard background check before you buy a gun. I understand why you wouldn't want those rounds.
User avatar #501 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
It's and extremely awkward situation to explain, for I am not exceedingly knowledgeable in the field ammunition. I understand the need for larger rounds for hunting deer, elk, and bear i.e. .308, .30-6 and larger, but it is also an awkward situation that for 7.62 and 5.56/.223 rounds are just as lethal if not less.
User avatar #503 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Any round is lethal like I said. Rifles like the FN FAL and M1 garand use the .308 and .30-06 and those guns are considered "assault weapons"
User avatar #508 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward to express what I'm trying to say. I suppose I submit. Its just high powered round like those really shouldn't have to be in quantities of 30 or 20 or really even 10.
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#408 - Meh. 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
#406 - The asst. principal could have stopped him with most things th…  [+] (14 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #416 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
like? he was in his car when the principal shot him. tasers and pepper spray don't go through windshields.
User avatar #429 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
He didn't shoot him, just threatened him. Also I realize that what I said made no sense. I just believe the right to bear arms should be taken as the right to own rifles and shotguns for hunting and in some cases of self defense. I don't think high-powered military grade sniper rifles and assault rifles should be readily available to anyone. Handguns are a gray are for me.
#438 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
I understand why you believe guns are bad. They look scary to someone who has never had any kind of training with them. Guns aren't the killers. It is the people using them. I agree they shouldn't be as readily available but they shouldn't be banned because of an action of a few people. I know you look at guns and think that they are nothing but trouble but for us responsible gun owners they are just our hobby. I know what happened is tragic and I am upset as anyone else in this country. The crazed gun man stole the guns from his mother. I believe that we should enforce gun safes or trigger locks on guns so as to prevent a criminal from using them.
User avatar #451 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I know gun safety. It's not that difficult to comprehend. This man knew how to safely operate firearms. I have shot an SKS on multiple occasions and a glock more times than I can count. The thing about it is, why do we need anti-personal rounds in a weapon used specifically to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time. I understand recreational shooting. It is very enjoyable, but why should these class of weapons be so very readily available to anyone the proper age and financing. I'm not anti-gun, I support the second amendment heartily, but the constitution wasn't written to be specific about weapons. The founding fathers had NO idea what weaponry would become. I love guns, but things have gotten out of hand.
User avatar #462 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
The problem with "assault weapons" is that there is a broad definition. Is it a weapon that can shoot fast? bullet caliber? When the brady campaign went into affect they banned certain features on the gun limiting to guns to 10 round mags and fixed stocks and unthreaded barrels. When the founding fathers wrote the bill of rights they were in a time were everyone had a musket. The standard civilian had the same weapon as the government. Now in today's world we can have the weapons the military has but they are a lot more expensive. I love weapons to and gun regulations will make it harder for criminals to obtain weapons but not impossible. I'm glad we can have a legitimate conversation without any butthurt. Thanks
User avatar #473 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I appreciate civility on the internet. I think that the biggest problem is just accessibility. Its just too easy to buy weapons of that grade. I would define and an assault rifle is essentially a weapon used for the killing of other humans. That would basically be those specifications. (Although I believe the telescopic stock is more for comfort than for anything else.) Its just too easy to obtain. Also the ammunition should be kept at basic rounds. Armor piercing, hollow point and anti-personal should be highly illegal.
User avatar #474 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
A weapon used specifically for killing humans*
User avatar #485 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Will guns were designed to kill humans no denying that. Like the picture I showed you. Same round relatively same magazine capacity. You could kill someone with a .22 as easily with a .223 within a 300 ft. range. And they are easy to obtain but they go through the standard background check before you buy a gun. I understand why you wouldn't want those rounds.
User avatar #501 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
It's and extremely awkward situation to explain, for I am not exceedingly knowledgeable in the field ammunition. I understand the need for larger rounds for hunting deer, elk, and bear i.e. .308, .30-6 and larger, but it is also an awkward situation that for 7.62 and 5.56/.223 rounds are just as lethal if not less.
User avatar #503 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Any round is lethal like I said. Rifles like the FN FAL and M1 garand use the .308 and .30-06 and those guns are considered "assault weapons"
User avatar #508 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward to express what I'm trying to say. I suppose I submit. Its just high powered round like those really shouldn't have to be in quantities of 30 or 20 or really even 10.
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#3 - Comment deleted 12/19/2012 on that wall is getting handsy 0
#11 - I'd like to think these numbers are actually inches. It makes … 12/19/2012 on Ouch.. -1
#386 - Touche. 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
#385 - Hand guns are kind of a gray area, as well. A majority of viol… 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
#380 - only  [+] (2 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #381 - misterbonzo (12/19/2012) [-]
Well, he said over 30.
User avatar #386 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Touche.
#379 - Little to none, most likely.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #546 - ellwood (12/19/2012) [-]
then what harm would come from saying that?
#376 - Range? He is an asst. principal who had a fire arm in the gray…  [+] (16 new replies) 12/19/2012 on not funny 0
User avatar #403 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
On the wikipedia page on this shooting says he had a rifle and injured 7 students and killed two. It is possible that he may have ran out or not but either way i'm sure the vice principal stopped him which allowed him to be captured.
User avatar #406 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
The asst. principal could have stopped him with most things that are legal.
User avatar #416 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
like? he was in his car when the principal shot him. tasers and pepper spray don't go through windshields.
User avatar #429 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
He didn't shoot him, just threatened him. Also I realize that what I said made no sense. I just believe the right to bear arms should be taken as the right to own rifles and shotguns for hunting and in some cases of self defense. I don't think high-powered military grade sniper rifles and assault rifles should be readily available to anyone. Handguns are a gray are for me.
#438 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
I understand why you believe guns are bad. They look scary to someone who has never had any kind of training with them. Guns aren't the killers. It is the people using them. I agree they shouldn't be as readily available but they shouldn't be banned because of an action of a few people. I know you look at guns and think that they are nothing but trouble but for us responsible gun owners they are just our hobby. I know what happened is tragic and I am upset as anyone else in this country. The crazed gun man stole the guns from his mother. I believe that we should enforce gun safes or trigger locks on guns so as to prevent a criminal from using them.
User avatar #451 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I know gun safety. It's not that difficult to comprehend. This man knew how to safely operate firearms. I have shot an SKS on multiple occasions and a glock more times than I can count. The thing about it is, why do we need anti-personal rounds in a weapon used specifically to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time. I understand recreational shooting. It is very enjoyable, but why should these class of weapons be so very readily available to anyone the proper age and financing. I'm not anti-gun, I support the second amendment heartily, but the constitution wasn't written to be specific about weapons. The founding fathers had NO idea what weaponry would become. I love guns, but things have gotten out of hand.
User avatar #462 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
The problem with "assault weapons" is that there is a broad definition. Is it a weapon that can shoot fast? bullet caliber? When the brady campaign went into affect they banned certain features on the gun limiting to guns to 10 round mags and fixed stocks and unthreaded barrels. When the founding fathers wrote the bill of rights they were in a time were everyone had a musket. The standard civilian had the same weapon as the government. Now in today's world we can have the weapons the military has but they are a lot more expensive. I love weapons to and gun regulations will make it harder for criminals to obtain weapons but not impossible. I'm glad we can have a legitimate conversation without any butthurt. Thanks
User avatar #473 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I appreciate civility on the internet. I think that the biggest problem is just accessibility. Its just too easy to buy weapons of that grade. I would define and an assault rifle is essentially a weapon used for the killing of other humans. That would basically be those specifications. (Although I believe the telescopic stock is more for comfort than for anything else.) Its just too easy to obtain. Also the ammunition should be kept at basic rounds. Armor piercing, hollow point and anti-personal should be highly illegal.
User avatar #474 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
A weapon used specifically for killing humans*
User avatar #485 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Will guns were designed to kill humans no denying that. Like the picture I showed you. Same round relatively same magazine capacity. You could kill someone with a .22 as easily with a .223 within a 300 ft. range. And they are easy to obtain but they go through the standard background check before you buy a gun. I understand why you wouldn't want those rounds.
User avatar #501 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
It's and extremely awkward situation to explain, for I am not exceedingly knowledgeable in the field ammunition. I understand the need for larger rounds for hunting deer, elk, and bear i.e. .308, .30-6 and larger, but it is also an awkward situation that for 7.62 and 5.56/.223 rounds are just as lethal if not less.
User avatar #503 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
Any round is lethal like I said. Rifles like the FN FAL and M1 garand use the .308 and .30-06 and those guns are considered "assault weapons"
User avatar #508 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
Like I said, your point being beyond valid, its just awkward to express what I'm trying to say. I suppose I submit. Its just high powered round like those really shouldn't have to be in quantities of 30 or 20 or really even 10.
User avatar #512 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
For recreational shooters like me, we just enjoy the 30 round magazine. The problem is still the person manning the gun no matter what. If guns are illegal or magazine capacity are set criminals will find a way to get those mags. Like california they are only allowed 10 round mags but criminals do not follow laws.
User avatar #514 - GBird (12/19/2012) [-]
I'm saying personally. Not legislator, but the thing of it is criminals will always pretty much always get a hold of firearms if they truly want them, but it might prevent the normal, law abiding citizen from doing something crazy, but I digress. I must be off. Thank you for the discussion and information.
User avatar #515 - bloodofthedragon (12/19/2012) [-]
peace hopefully we will argue soon enough again.
#372 - He murdered three people and wounded 7. That's murder. 20 chil… 12/19/2012 on not funny +1
#22 - Saw that too... I cried... 08/10/2012 on Mexican Culture 0
#11 - LOLOLOLOL OMFG! 08/10/2012 on Fire! Fire! Fire! -4
#9 - I threw up laughing at this... 07/23/2012 on ERMAHGERD KERMP 0
#106 - Mostly because 9gag is foreigners and 12 year olds... I don't … 07/13/2012 on Oh god, why. +1
#103 - What's wrong with lurking /b/ and browsing FJ? I do it... I do…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/13/2012 on Oh god, why. +5
User avatar #105 - CrownedClown (07/13/2012) [-]
I don't know ,there is always a stupid "War" between sites. I don't understand either why one can't visit 9gag ,reddit ,4chan and FJ altogether.


I don't go to 9gag,was just making a example.
User avatar #109 - CrownedClown (07/13/2012) [-]
I find reddit to be in a different category from FJ and /b/, it has a really wide selection of content and not all of it is meant to be funny. Some is just informative , interesting, cute or just serve for masturbatory purposes.
User avatar #106 - GBird (07/13/2012) [-]
Mostly because 9gag is foreigners and 12 year olds... I don't really enjoy Reddit but /b/ and FJ are good.
#125 - Sometimes I like to lay in my neighbor's yard and pretend I'm … 07/13/2012 on Dirty secret +1
#12 - OMFG LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL XD 07/12/2012 on I hate who I am 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1450

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)