Upload
Login or register

FailureToComply

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 26
Date Signed Up:8/08/2009
Last Login:9/04/2014
Location:New York
Stats
Content Thumbs: 1559 total,  1748 ,  189
Comment Thumbs: 1429 total,  1688 ,  259
Content Level Progress: 58% (58/100)
Level 115 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 116 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 29% (29/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:47364
Times Content Favorited:111 times
Total Comments Made:425
FJ Points:3030

latest user's comments

#48 - It's actually only about 10,000 US dollars, 1 Yen is approxima…  [+] (2 replies) 10/15/2012 on #Swag 0
User avatar
#69 - hyeroshi (10/15/2012) [-]
1 Yen is 1.27 cents, so she made 12.7k
User avatar
#135 - FailureToComply (10/16/2012) [-]
I didn't care enough to use a currency converter. Close enough is good for me
#292 - Or are you going to argue that the law doesn't have any idea w…  [+] (1 reply) 10/15/2012 on Amanda Todd's Boobs 0
#338 - lavoire (10/15/2012) [-]
I'm not even going to argue with you if you're going to be that stupid.

1. If you blacked out the penis then it still wouldn't be child pornography. It could be a popsicle, reasonable doubt.

2. Anything like this you'd show a cop he would say it wouldn't be okay.
2A. Cops don't write laws, nor judge them (judicial system, not executive)
#290 - I already know I'm correct, but if you'd like to argue further…  [+] (4 replies) 10/15/2012 on Amanda Todd's Boobs +1
User avatar
#297 - lavoire (10/15/2012) [-]
I say you didn't know the definition because of your example.

If you're seriously that fucking stupid I have no wish to debate it.

"So you're saying child pornography isn't pornography with children?"

No. I'm saying censored images are censored for a reason.Or should I just post the uncensored image?
User avatar
#328 - FailureToComply (10/15/2012) [-]
Regardless, it is STILL an image of a young girl, underaged, exposing herself in a sexual manner. This is true whether her nipples have been blacked out or not. If you censored the dick in the aforementioned example, it would still be an image of a child that's pornographic in nature, and thus illegal.

If you're honestly that confident in your interpretation of the law, give THAT picture to a cop and ask if that's okay to have.
User avatar
#292 - FailureToComply (10/15/2012) [-]
Or are you going to argue that the law doesn't have any idea what it's talking about either?
#338 - lavoire (10/15/2012) [-]
I'm not even going to argue with you if you're going to be that stupid.

1. If you blacked out the penis then it still wouldn't be child pornography. It could be a popsicle, reasonable doubt.

2. Anything like this you'd show a cop he would say it wouldn't be okay.
2A. Cops don't write laws, nor judge them (judicial system, not executive)
#276 - A child doesn't even have to be naked for it to be considered …  [+] (6 replies) 10/15/2012 on Amanda Todd's Boobs 0
#285 - lavoire (10/15/2012) [-]
You obviously don't understand the definition of pornography.
User avatar
#290 - FailureToComply (10/15/2012) [-]
I already know I'm correct, but if you'd like to argue further, I would direct you to

1) www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?PageId=1504

2) Go fuck yourself

3) ???????

4) Profit
User avatar
#297 - lavoire (10/15/2012) [-]
I say you didn't know the definition because of your example.

If you're seriously that fucking stupid I have no wish to debate it.

"So you're saying child pornography isn't pornography with children?"

No. I'm saying censored images are censored for a reason.Or should I just post the uncensored image?
User avatar
#328 - FailureToComply (10/15/2012) [-]
Regardless, it is STILL an image of a young girl, underaged, exposing herself in a sexual manner. This is true whether her nipples have been blacked out or not. If you censored the dick in the aforementioned example, it would still be an image of a child that's pornographic in nature, and thus illegal.

If you're honestly that confident in your interpretation of the law, give THAT picture to a cop and ask if that's okay to have.
User avatar
#292 - FailureToComply (10/15/2012) [-]
Or are you going to argue that the law doesn't have any idea what it's talking about either?
#338 - lavoire (10/15/2012) [-]
I'm not even going to argue with you if you're going to be that stupid.

1. If you blacked out the penis then it still wouldn't be child pornography. It could be a popsicle, reasonable doubt.

2. Anything like this you'd show a cop he would say it wouldn't be okay.
2A. Cops don't write laws, nor judge them (judicial system, not executive)
#288 - **FailureToComply rolled a random image posted in comment #2…  [+] (1 reply) 10/15/2012 on Achievement Unlocked +1
User avatar
#290 - FailureToComply (10/15/2012) [-]
Instructions were not clear, got dick stuck in ceiling fan