That's kind of what I meant as in a low yield Nuke.

Dat username relevence..........

Disregard that, I missed the "only kidding" frame somehow.

hes not your buddy, pal.

hes not you pal, mate

He's not your pal, guy

i got it from one of my friends on skype, so he's my friend, yes he got it from imgur... but still, my quote is correct.

1 Yen is 1.27 cents, so she made 12.7k

I didn't care enough to use a currency converter. Close enough is good for me

I'm not even going to argue with you if you're going to be that stupid.

1. If you blacked out the penis then it still wouldn't be child pornography. It could be a popsicle, reasonable doubt.

2. Anything like this you'd show a cop he would say it wouldn't be okay.
2A. Cops don't write laws, nor judge them (judicial system, not executive)

I say you didn't know the definition because of your example.

If you're seriously that fucking stupid I have no wish to debate it.

"So you're saying child pornography isn't pornography with children?"

No. I'm saying censored images are censored for a reason.Or should I just post the uncensored image?

Regardless, it is STILL an image of a young girl, underaged, exposing herself in a sexual manner. This is true whether her nipples have been blacked out or not. If you censored the dick in the aforementioned example, it would still be an image of a child that's pornographic in nature, and thus illegal.

If you're honestly that confident in your interpretation of the law, give THAT picture to a cop and ask if that's okay to have.

Or are you going to argue that the law doesn't have any idea what it's talking about either?

I'm not even going to argue with you if you're going to be that stupid.

1. If you blacked out the penis then it still wouldn't be child pornography. It could be a popsicle, reasonable doubt.

2. Anything like this you'd show a cop he would say it wouldn't be okay.
2A. Cops don't write laws, nor judge them (judicial system, not executive)

You obviously don't understand the definition of pornography.

I already know I'm correct, but if you'd like to argue further, I would direct you to

1) www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?PageId=1504

2) Go fuck yourself

3) ???????

4) Profit

I say you didn't know the definition because of your example.

If you're seriously that fucking stupid I have no wish to debate it.

"So you're saying child pornography isn't pornography with children?"

No. I'm saying censored images are censored for a reason.Or should I just post the uncensored image?

Regardless, it is STILL an image of a young girl, underaged, exposing herself in a sexual manner. This is true whether her nipples have been blacked out or not. If you censored the dick in the aforementioned example, it would still be an image of a child that's pornographic in nature, and thus illegal.

If you're honestly that confident in your interpretation of the law, give THAT picture to a cop and ask if that's okay to have.

Or are you going to argue that the law doesn't have any idea what it's talking about either?

I'm not even going to argue with you if you're going to be that stupid.

1. If you blacked out the penis then it still wouldn't be child pornography. It could be a popsicle, reasonable doubt.

2. Anything like this you'd show a cop he would say it wouldn't be okay.
2A. Cops don't write laws, nor judge them (judicial system, not executive)