Upload
Login or register

EnemySpy

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/14/2010
Last Login:7/22/2016
Location:FJ Island
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#6170
Highest Content Rank:#8501
Highest Comment Rank:#2450
Content Thumbs: 49 total,  62 ,  13
Comment Thumbs: 2752 total,  3102 ,  350
Content Level Progress: 88.13% (52/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 50% (50/100)
Level 223 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:1
Content Views:3131
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:568
FJ Points:2338
Been an anon for the longest time, finally made an account. Probably wont be posting many pics.

  • Views: 1718
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +10
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 08/10/14
    Punchline Punchline

latest user's comments

#45 - **EnemySpy used "*roll picture*"** **EnemySpy rolled image… 07/15/2016 on powerful mememagic is at... +1
#10 - **EnemySpy used "*roll picture*"** **EnemySpy rolled image…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/09/2016 on Walrus doing situps +3
User avatar
#11 - guardianatreyu (07/09/2016) [-]
I don't have cute asian women to motivate me.
#20 - Not really a fair comparison with hate crime laws though, imo.…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/05/2016 on Hate Crimes +8
#50 - anon (07/06/2016) [-]
It depends case by case. For example

Say a man "A" killed man "B's" son and man B walk in on it happening. (Reason: Man B's son owed man A money ,beat him to death) man A happens to be a different race. Man B sees this and goes into a rage and Kills man A. I'm not a lawyer but I believe this would be called Justafiable rage and it shows that the Intent was in defence of his son.

Normally if say Man A had not seen Man B do this but "Knew" that he did and went after him. It would be vigilantism.

Now when it comes to hate crimes lets go through this again Man A kills Man B's son. (Reason:Man B and his son were a different race then man A and he hated looking at them, they lived close by) Man B doesnt see it happen but wants justice and calls the police. The crime happened somewhere where there was cameras ,man A was a know Racist with evidence backing this up.

Looking at the different cases here we see that Man B in the first case didnt have outright hate for man A for his race and wouldnt target others of that race.

Man be in the second senario has shown that he is willing to kill someone just for being a different race and thus is punished more harshly to keep him off the streets so that more harm wouldnt come to others of that race.

Why does this matter? Intent is everything. Now say that in the second scenario man A wasnt a racist but simpily hated Man B's son for his personality (say Man B's son was a rude person and wronged man A) the intent wouldnt be race related but be a single incident. If Man A had no prior incidents then Man A would recieve a less harsh punishment. He'd still be punished for Homicide and likely get 20-Life but he wouldnt be an unpredictable danger to others and other races.
The shitty thing about this is that many people no matter what if both partys are different race will say that it was race motivated.
#63 - C'mon man, his username is literally buckymcbadbait.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/03/2016 on bugs +28
#66 - nikentakadisker (07/03/2016) [-]
I give no fucks
#99 - prozack (07/03/2016) [-]
>gets caught arguing with a troll
>plays it off as if that wasn't the coolest shit you've ever seen
#46 - Not that you could name any of those arguments, or their rebut… 06/25/2016 on Hahaha Christians, right? +6
#73 - Speculation has caused the value of the pound to plummet. …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/25/2016 on Referendum Twits Pt 2 +1
User avatar
#99 - cheatman (06/25/2016) [-]
You call me willfully ignorant, but what about the people who were blinded on either side by false propaganda. 'Uk will be more stable in the EU.' Yeah, for now, but the EU is starting to falter and crumble, it's the entire reason Cameron put it to a vote in the first place, there's no guarantee in 5 years time the EU would still have been as stable and we'd be up shit creak without a paddle if it wasn't.

At least now we have the option to start doing business with countries we couldn't before and sell products we wouldn't be allowed to due to whatever reason the EU enforced. It's pretty much 50/50 chance of whether things would've panned out if we were in OR out of the EU, now we have the freedom to decide the law upon our own country.

As for trading, there's not been many places that have refused to stop trading with Britain now that we're out, in fact Germany had guaranteed that they wanted to set up a fair trade system with us, as did the US.
#87 - Or abandon ship. 06/25/2016 on Referendum Twits Pt 3 0
#250 - #3 06/25/2016 on Ellen calls out cait 0
#249 - >>#3 06/25/2016 on Ellen calls out cait 0
#117 - I just realized I replied to the wrong post. Gdi. 06/25/2016 on Referendum Twits Pt 1 0

user's friends