Click to expand


Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 27
Date Signed Up:7/06/2009
Last Login:3/01/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#29197
Highest Content Rank:#12385
Highest Comment Rank:#5458
Content Thumbs: 1 total,  5 ,  4
Comment Thumbs: 1106 total,  1200 ,  94
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 194 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 195 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Content Views:1792
Total Comments Made:93
FJ Points:958

YouTube Videos

  • Views: 1789
    Thumbs Up 5 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +1
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/21/14
    Sleep tight... Sleep tight...

latest user's comments

#54 - You dun goofed, son 02/02/2015 on God is watching -1
#12 - Picture 01/31/2015 on a stitch in time +3
#42 - sorry 11/22/2014 on This is sausage to me +1
#43 - These posts crop up every few weeks and I don't usually commen… 11/20/2014 on But seriously guys, tone it... 0
#59 - MFW "your location" is actually my location... >_> 11/14/2014 on Richard 0
#3 - What if you were walking along that side of the street to begi…  [+] (33 new replies) 10/24/2014 on You're So Close +143
User avatar #26 - RiflemanFunny (10/25/2014) [-]
I can just see programmers fucking jumping over the fence forever.
#28 - applecrash (10/25/2014) [-]
int one = 1
When (one = 1){
(boolBanner = True){
BoolJumpFence = True
User avatar #71 - honkan (10/25/2014) [-]
The fuck's that code supposed to do? It's just assigning values, and using when (which I haven't seen before, is it like if?)., with a single "=" sign, although to be fair I'm sure there are languages that actually only use one to compare values.
#72 - applecrash (10/25/2014) [-]
Use VB for reference. Shit's so wack you wouldn't want to get it yo. Again, why is everyone expecting code that makes sense so late at night. Just adding to the joke man, no need to get so butt-blistered over it.
User avatar #73 - honkan (10/25/2014) [-]
You made that comment 4 hours ago. Either you don't sleep a lot, or you really need to get the fuck to bed, if it was so late at night you couldn't think properly four hours ago.

It was more that I was curious if that actually could do anything, in whatever fucked up language it was. That, and I kinda dislike seeing stuff that just look like code but really isn't.
#74 - applecrash (10/25/2014) [-]
My mornings are normal peoples nights lately, sadly. I feel you, but my only real experience with programming is Visual Basic which kinda lets you just do what I did and Java which has you sacrifice your first born son and then makes only half the booleans' intended functions work, so that could attribute to the fact that i forgot to initialize the boolean first.
User avatar #31 - copperonic (10/25/2014) [-]
>That moment with beginner programs start practicing over the FJ comments
#41 - applecrash (10/25/2014) [-]
Nigga this aint SJWchan and why do you expect good code in 40 seconds?
User avatar #77 - copperonic (10/25/2014) [-]
Because, its 4 lines, most people who have been coding for longer than 5 months can easily create good short code in 40 seconds. All i was saying was you are not the first FJ user to randomly and without any reason, start posting VB/Java all over the fucking place, trying to explain content. I don't know if you are just looking for somewhere to practice or you think we think you are an UBER HAXXOR because you code in visual basic, but its not the first time i've seen it.
#83 - applecrash (10/26/2014) [-]
Neither of the two actually, im just adding to the joke. If you want someone to explain content make a progexplain account or some shit, but getting shitter-shattered over seeing some code is the wrong thing to do man.
#27 - applecrash has deleted their comment.
#25 - anonexplains (10/25/2014) [-]
grass is always greener on the other side
#24 - enduranceathlete (10/25/2014) [-]
#48 - cabbagemayhem (10/25/2014) [-]
#54 - enduranceathlete (10/25/2014) [-]
#75 - cabbagemayhem (10/25/2014) [-]
Sure, and I bet a single horse is stronger than he is, but how smart is he? Strength isn't what put us at the top of the food chain. It was intelligence, and meat is what made it possible to sustain our brain mass. Vegetarianism is known for its nutrient deficiencies and mental disorders. Animals don't have rights equal to humans. We are the stewards of the Earth, and first we will eat, and second we will salvage life itself. Take your imaginary moral standard somewhere you can fool more people.
#76 - enduranceathlete (10/25/2014) [-]
the brain runs on glucose found in plants.

Not saturated animal fat you dumb fuck.

#78 - cabbagemayhem (10/25/2014) [-]
The brain is nearly 60% fat. What are you talking about?
#79 - enduranceathlete (10/25/2014) [-]
cars are made out of metal...

So their fuel should be metal right?????

its not easy being that dumb.
#84 - cabbagemayhem (10/26/2014) [-]
Cars run on gasoline, therefore they do not need oil. How do you get by calling other people dumb? Anyway, I never said fats were the reason meat is important to sustain brain mass, though I'm sure they are quite important. I was referring to the various studies that support the overall theory that it would have been virtually impossible to develop our dense brain mass without the ability to eat meat. For example: www.livescience.com/24875-meat-human-brain.html
#85 - enduranceathlete (10/26/2014) [-]
eating a decomposing corpse heated at extremely high temperatures caused us to devolve and become diseased.

fruit is what gave birth to higher consciousness.

#86 - cabbagemayhem (10/26/2014) [-]
Eating cooked meat is what caused us to sidestep various lifelong-debilitating parasitic and bacterial infections. However, you don't have to cook your meat if you don't want to. Many people eat raw meat and enjoy many health benefits.

"fruit is what gave birth to higher consciousness."
You have no sources to support your arbitrary claim? What I believe, actually, is that meat and fruit are both likely to be responsible for our brain mass, as they are both commonly found in the diets of intelligent species, but fruit alone will not do it. Nearly 70% of the diet of gorillas are fruit, and they still don't have the nutrient intake to sustain our relative brain mass.

I like to eat freshly decomposing corpses of animals, so don't waste your time with loquacity. The word for it is "meat".
#87 - enduranceathlete (10/26/2014) [-]
you are next level delusional.
#88 - cabbagemayhem (10/26/2014) [-]
So far, my position is based on fact and reason. Do you have anything left except name calling? What's delusional is thinking animals are somehow equivalent to humans. One benefit to being Christian is you can refute arbitrarily created moral systems that make no objective sense and have no positive outcome, without getting existential.

"Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything."
- Genesis 9:3
User avatar #17 - hockeycrazysteve (10/25/2014) [-]
i think you just changed my perspective on life
#55 - enduranceathlete (10/25/2014) [-]
#57 - upyoursnumbnuts (10/25/2014) [-]
If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of tasty meat?
#58 - enduranceathlete (10/25/2014) [-]
why do they feel pain and suffer?

User avatar #63 - captainrattrap (10/25/2014) [-]
Post mroe becuz u r good at posting nah yeah you aren't complete garbage.
#59 - upyoursnumbnuts (10/25/2014) [-]
#60 - enduranceathlete (10/25/2014) [-]
User avatar #62 - zelyx (10/25/2014) [-]

- upyoursnumbnuts
#61 - gedab (10/25/2014) [-]
#12 - Don't know what this is, but it ain't no damn Charizard  [+] (3 new replies) 10/23/2014 on Behold +77
#32 - zetsuboukamina (10/23/2014) [-]
Gen wun maybe?
#22 - upfordownsyndrome (10/23/2014) [-]
#13 - thingexplain (10/23/2014) [-]
It's Cera from Land Before Time
#15 - It's the way he maintains eye contact... it broke me 10/21/2014 on Fuck Yo Pancake, Bitch! +9
#38 - While those statistics may be true, they could very well be a …  [+] (15 new replies) 09/24/2014 on Westboro church +9
User avatar #74 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
The statistics like most persuasive statistics are based off of a deliberately skewed perspective. They are certainly not true because they are misleading. They are 'strong', however they are not cogent. It's an invalid argument because it is a fallacious inductive due to statistics.
#113 - anonexplains (09/24/2014) [-]
the fallacy fallacy you see a fallacy in the argument and the entire argument must be thrown out.
#123 - grantyboy (09/24/2014) [-]
The fallacy fallacy fallacy where you see the fallacy fallacy and the entire argument must be thrown out.

User avatar #73 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
You understand that you're talking to a /pol/tist, right?
User avatar #81 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
Uh, /pol/ is a cancer but the denizens of 4chons dystopian /pol/ know how to make a logically cogent inductive falsehoods. This isn't from /pol/ it's just bigotry.
User avatar #85 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
I generally use the term /pol/tist to describe people that ignore every fallacy in existence except for the ones that support a neo-nazi agenda, and call a person a JIDF or shill when someone disagrees with them.
User avatar #92 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah, so you are referring to the average reader of /pol/ not the average /pol/ OP?

I honestly think that board is just churning out paranoid schizophrenics.
User avatar #93 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
moreso the reader, yeah
User avatar #101 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
I've recognized you as someone who has argued against me on FJ when I've spread some of the bigoted opinions that I have. Thank you for setting me straight those couple of times. Anyway's carry on your purification of the interwebs.
User avatar #114 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
I don't recall these encounters, but you're welcome anyways

the only pure interwebs is inpure interwebs
#51 - anonexplains (09/24/2014) [-]
"Minority stress" "patriarchy" and other phantoms of the Left are all social constructs created to take the responsibility from those so-called "victim" demographics and the horrific consequences of their own unsustainable behaviors and lifestyles, and project it on the healthy/ier more functional so-called "oppressor" demographics.

Pretty much every major civilization or nation in history has understood that homosexuality is hideously unsustainable with zero or near-zero birthrates and sky-high STD rates. Yet today's society is so sick they insist on not seeing this.

What if I told you that as acceptance of homosexuality has increased, STD and AIDS rates have ~increased~, not decreased, which is exactly what you would expect when homosexuality becomes increasingly culturally and legally sanctioned; and exactly what you would expect if you were a skeptic of the BS the homosexual lobby spouts.
#64 - shadowgandalf (09/24/2014) [-]
Alright, i'll bite---

1. Minority stress, in the case of homosexuals, is not a construct. They are literally persecuted the world over. In Russia, there was a gang that baited gays via dating sites, and would beat them almost to death, steal their belongings and destroy their homes.
In USA, gays can be denied jobs, have their homes thrashed, and be attack by gangs and religious zealots.
I'd think that this would add a considerable ammount of stress to the average person.

2. Patriachy, while not existant in the west today, HAVE existed for millenia. Don't know if you meant in this age, or just overall.

3. They aren't projecting their "lifestyle" onto us hetrosexuals. I don't even understand how you could come to that conclusion... Acceptance =! conversion.

4. By "pretty much every major nation", do you mean a few of the more know? Cause the egyptians, greeks and romans didn't seem to care much.

5. What if i told you, that you could avoid STD spreading, by havingg proper sexual education at a young age? Give them a full course in sex, prevention & protection and STD's at age 12, and keep referencing to it in other subjects now and then. for a year or two.

6. A skeptic have to be skeptical towards all information, not just what he/she disagree with. Unfortunally, both sides use a sad mix of propaganda, facts about human biology, religon(why the fuck is this one even in here?!), and cherry picked statistics.
#170 - anonexplains (09/25/2014) [-]
1. Minority stress may exist but not as an excuse for their sky-high STD rates. So you get a beating from a bunch of dudes and that gives you AIDS how / makes your groups AIDS rates shoot thru the roof how?
Also, you ignored what I said about how as acceptance of homosexuality has increased, their outcomes have worsened and STD rates have increased.

2. Patriarchy is not what you think it is: a hetero nuclear family headed by the man. It is a social setup meant to unfairly advantage men at the expense of women. Most alleged patriarchies were trying to protect women in ages before modern states and police forces and safe, non-physical jobs.

3. I didn't say they were projecting the lifestyle itself, numbskull, but the CONSEQUENCES of their lifestyle. The effects which are inherent to their behaviors get attributed to a mythical "spirit of discrimination/oppression".

4. What they forget to mention in your liberal history material is that those nations weren't tolerant of homo[cont]
#171 - anonexplains (09/25/2014) [-]
[cont]homosexuality or increased their tolerance of homosexuality until a generation or two before they had a societal collapse and/or were conquered from a neighboring civlization.

5. Yes, yes. The whole disembodied, generic education solution to all ills that takes into account exactly zero data into which lifestyles and sexual activities have dozens of times the STD rates of healthy heteros. Homosexuals are specially targeted for sex ed and still they have sky-high STD rates. In San Francisco, they have classes that teach them how to not kill their partner when engaging in BDSM. But there's only so much shit you can shovel vs the avalanche of shit that is homosexuals' hundreds of sexual partners over their lifetime.

6. Then walk the walk of skepticism. Examine both sides and try to look at from both sides. Look at the data (not just the cherry-picked, manipulated data endlessly parroted in MSM) and make up your mind.
#115 - anonexplains (09/24/2014) [-]
>patriarchy exists
>in the television indoctrination era
Check any family sitcom and tell me the mom isn't god herself who can do no wrong and the father isn't a bumbling idiot who can do no right.

#74 - Picture 09/23/2014 on awkward zombie's skyrim comics +51
[ 93 Total ]


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)