Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Deeticky    

Rank #8163 on Comments
Deeticky Avatar Level 283 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to Deeticky Block Deeticky Invite Deeticky to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/29/2010
Last Login:9/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#8163
Highest Content Rank:#4157
Highest Comment Rank:#416
Content Thumbs: 2398 total,  2748 ,  350
Comment Thumbs: 8478 total,  9541 ,  1063
Content Level Progress: 96% (96/100)
Level 123 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 124 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 37% (37/100)
Level 283 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 284 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:0
Content Views:107720
Times Content Favorited:164 times
Total Comments Made:2181
FJ Points:668
Favorite Tags: lol (8) | troll (5) | chan (3) | Four (3) | anonymous (2) | black (2) | Christianity (2) | comic (2) | forever (2) | murder (2)

latest user's comments

#459 - They don't have to raise their prices. Again, as I said earl…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/26/2014 on Good ol' U.S.A. 0
User avatar #465 - scowler (01/26/2014) [-]
Communists like to cut corners in an effort to nationalize vital infrastructure.

Healthcare is no exception to this…

Marxism's like Asprin. It's marketed under a million different names...
User avatar #473 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
First, you're oversimplifying communism. I don't support communism, but I also appreciate history and understand what communism was meant to do and why it didn't work.

Second, even if we follow your definition and say that communists like to cut corners and nationalize vital infrastructure, that's not what happened with healthcare reform in the U.S. It was an expensive program and it didn't nationalize healthcare. It only created a government plan and brought some new regulations on private insurers. The government competing with private industry is not the same as the government nationalizing a private industry.

Finally, even if we say that cutting corners and nationalizing vital infrastructure is what communists like to do, and even if we say that's what the government did, doing something that a group likes to do does not make you part of that group. Communism is a very specific economic theory, and the capitalism practiced here in the U.S. is extremely far from it.
User avatar #486 - scowler (01/26/2014) [-]
It doesn't work because it deprives enterprising men and women of the incentives needed to make any form of advancement. Why invent something if the State will take credit for it and leave you where you've always been? No incentive, no advancement.

Communism is not an economic theory, it has been proven to be impractical on a grand scale. Now Uncle Sam's inching closer and closer to it…

Lovely.
#97 - If you want to see what life was like in the prehistoric times…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/26/2014 on Ancient Greece Compilation +4
#281 - stalini (01/26/2014) [-]
Ancient Greece/Rome/Mesopotamia was more advanced than modern African tribes, so nah.
User avatar #116 - hoponthefeelstrain (01/26/2014) [-]
you took us back to prehistoric times with the use of le troll face.
#322 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
Well, damn. Looks like my comment may have backfired a bit.
#53 - It has evolved into more than that. 01/26/2014 on may the force be with you -... +1
#120 - I guess I forgot that he was a Mormon. I always try to avoid d… 01/26/2014 on dead horse 0
#51 - I actually prefer that term. 01/26/2014 on may the force be with you -... +2
#223 - Assuming the kid is yours, and assuming your fiance plans to k… 01/26/2014 on Don't Do it 0
#46 - "Found the feminist" is usually a funny joke, but I … 01/26/2014 on may the force be with you -... +3
#154 - Because those are periods and not question marks. 01/26/2014 on Gaming Couple FTW 0
#42 - t's not just about how they look. It's how they're acting. …  [+] (4 new replies) 01/26/2014 on may the force be with you -... 0
User avatar #70 - helenwheels (01/26/2014) [-]
You're saying this based on a picture of them.
User avatar #95 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
Yes I am. As I said earlier, they're popping gang signs in the picture. I was never saying that these kids are in a gang, I was only saying they're glorifying gang life.
#44 - 4chan refugee (01/26/2014) [-]
Found the feminist
User avatar #46 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
"Found the feminist" is usually a funny joke, but I don't think you're using it right.

The guy above me is making a much more feminist comment. Perhaps you meant to reply to him?
#41 - It's not just about how they look. It's how they're acting. …  [+] (6 new replies) 01/26/2014 on may the force be with you -... +3
User avatar #86 - envinite (01/26/2014) [-]
Indeed. But the content only show how they look, so since we both have no idea about how they act, I think it's safe to say they're just an ordinary 'cool' young adult who loves the way they wear clothes.
User avatar #93 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
That was what I was trying to address with what I said about the gang signs. Gang signs are more than just looks. Popping gang signs, like the kid in the content is doing, is an action worthy of my judgement, I think.
User avatar #55 - calawesome (01/26/2014) [-]
anyone who uses 'swag' as a term for anything but pirate treasure is a faggot.
User avatar #56 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
Then we're both faggots.
User avatar #48 - inuares (01/26/2014) [-]
they're Swaggots.
User avatar #51 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
I actually prefer that term.
#96 - Damn. Admitting your biases. I respect that. Just cur…  [+] (13 new replies) 01/26/2014 on dead horse +1
User avatar #163 - douevensax (01/26/2014) [-]
He seemed experienced in running things.
User avatar #117 - rocksteady (01/26/2014) [-]
it was because he was Mormon and they believe crazy shit, for example that black people have black skin because God burned it I supported Romney though
User avatar #162 - douevensax (01/26/2014) [-]
Never heard of that before.
User avatar #164 - rocksteady (01/27/2014) [-]
its in the book of mormon.
User avatar #165 - mormon (01/27/2014) [-]
IF you're going to point out a flaw in how mormon's used to talk of the past, do it right. Although its way more bastardized that it actually is in the BoM, the whole "black people were burned and got dark skin" was the lamanite people, and they didn't become black. They became Native American.
User avatar #166 - rocksteady (01/27/2014) [-]
Wrong.

User avatar #167 - mormon (01/27/2014) [-]
I went to the askmormon thing the LDS church hosts and this fellow name Spencer told me that around 2 weeks ago. What makes you certain?
User avatar #168 - rocksteady (01/27/2014) [-]
I read the book.

Mormon's are groomed to be little politician's, so don't be surprised if Spencer wasn't exactly truthful.
User avatar #169 - mormon (01/27/2014) [-]
True, the people on that askmormon site tend to be nubs.
I'm not actually mormon, my friend who sometimes comes on this website is the mormon, maybe he'll talk about it with ya if he checks up.

If ya read the book, you know more than me. I don't read anything no matter what motivation i have.
#170 - rocksteady (01/27/2014) [-]
The book was targeting Native American's and African American's; basically anyone who's not white gets slammed pretty hard in The Book of Mormon; however, every religion has messed up shit in it. The Bible has a section that explains how owning slaves is a good thing... I would hope your Mormon friend picks and chooses what to believe. See the problem with the Mormon religion is that it's so young that most Mormon's I meet at Latter Day Saints Churches believe the entire book, which proves to be a problem, and is why someone like Romney wouldn't talk about his religious affiliation publicly.


This picture of Joseph Smith pretty much sums up how I felt about the book after I finished it.
User avatar #172 - douevensax (01/27/2014) [-]
Everyone has interpretations of the BoM. I must tell you, you seem rocksteady that your's is rights.
User avatar #171 - mormon (01/27/2014) [-]
Naw he's cool. He has tons of issues with what they think and do, yet agrees with alot and vouches for the belief and validity of it. His issues mainly consist of the people.

If he was like the people he's shown me at his churches and their activities let me tell you I would not be in support of the religion. He showed me more about the religion itself and not how people represent it.

The mormon username i use used to be user to mock mormons on FJ before me and him met at school.
User avatar #120 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
I guess I forgot that he was a Mormon. I always try to avoid delving into candidate's religions unless it has an obvious effect on their policy. Thanks for the clarification.
#397 - No, it's both. Regulations drive up the cost in certa…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/26/2014 on Good ol' U.S.A. +2
User avatar #449 - scowler (01/26/2014) [-]
Corporations have to raise their prices because government entities tax them extensively in an effort to supplant quality care with state care, but why?

I hate Communists...
User avatar #459 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
They don't have to raise their prices. Again, as I said earlier, prices are driven up by both factors. Corporations usually offer higher-quality products, especially here in the U.S. because of all the regulation, but the prices are driven way up by both the increased expense of regulation and the corporation's drive to maximize profit.

How is you hating communists relevant to this conversation? Government healthcare and communism are two very different things.
User avatar #465 - scowler (01/26/2014) [-]
Communists like to cut corners in an effort to nationalize vital infrastructure.

Healthcare is no exception to this…

Marxism's like Asprin. It's marketed under a million different names...
User avatar #473 - Deeticky (01/26/2014) [-]
First, you're oversimplifying communism. I don't support communism, but I also appreciate history and understand what communism was meant to do and why it didn't work.

Second, even if we follow your definition and say that communists like to cut corners and nationalize vital infrastructure, that's not what happened with healthcare reform in the U.S. It was an expensive program and it didn't nationalize healthcare. It only created a government plan and brought some new regulations on private insurers. The government competing with private industry is not the same as the government nationalizing a private industry.

Finally, even if we say that cutting corners and nationalizing vital infrastructure is what communists like to do, and even if we say that's what the government did, doing something that a group likes to do does not make you part of that group. Communism is a very specific economic theory, and the capitalism practiced here in the U.S. is extremely far from it.
User avatar #486 - scowler (01/26/2014) [-]
It doesn't work because it deprives enterprising men and women of the incentives needed to make any form of advancement. Why invent something if the State will take credit for it and leave you where you've always been? No incentive, no advancement.

Communism is not an economic theory, it has been proven to be impractical on a grand scale. Now Uncle Sam's inching closer and closer to it…

Lovely.
#146 - Thanks for the reply, troll. I'll be sure to consider it when … 01/24/2014 on Dyel 0
#105 - I suppose I was being lazy in using the term "nothing&quo…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/23/2014 on Dyel -1
User avatar #114 - KEpToK (01/23/2014) [-]
Thank you for the novel Charles Dickins, i'll be sure to peruse it when I have the chance.
#146 - Deeticky (01/24/2014) [-]
Thanks for the reply, troll. I'll be sure to consider it when you decide to add something relevant.
#134 - I appreciate the clarification on the technical aspect, but I … 01/23/2014 on Just thought it was funny. 0
#32 - Having muscles doesn't have anything to do with preventing you…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/23/2014 on Dyel 0
User avatar #79 - nebuchadnezzaurus (01/23/2014) [-]
You're wrong. Muscles consume energy by simply existing, even if you don't exercise them at all. A really huge bodybuilder may lie on a couch all day and burn more calories than you would if you went to work, all because his muscles require energy to function. One pound of muscle burns approximately 5-6 calories per day at rest. You can look it up on the internet, but I don't think you will, so you can trust me on that, I did research.
He was absolutely correct, that's why he said muscular women don't need to watch out for fatty foods and carbs as much as skinny women do: the extra muscle can burn the excess energy.
User avatar #105 - Deeticky (01/23/2014) [-]
I suppose I was being lazy in using the term "nothing" I apologize for that. Obviously the body burns calories through simple metabolic functions, and you're right that muscles use up energy. I don't dispute that. What I do disagree with is how much you seem to believe it helps.

We're talking about women here, my friend. So your bodybuilder example doesn't help your case as much as you think it does either. Female muscle has nowhere near as much bulk as male muscle. The only females who can come close are those who use TRT. The calories burned per day due to muscle simply existing would be less in women than men on average.

Also, the amount of calories a person burns is very dependent on their metabolic rate, and that tends to make a giant difference. I would pose that the "5-6 calories per hour" would vary greatly among different people. Finally, it's incredibly rare, when doing studies on bodybuilders and athletes, to find one who doesn't have incredible diet and exercise habits which would be raising their metabolic rates. Those rates would become lower if these people ditched their good habits. That was my point: The good habits are what make the difference, muscular or not.

Finally, a quick note: When you mention a specific number as an argument in a debate, ("5-6 calories per day") you really should cite your source. That's good form and it allows the other person to review the source of your data. Also, there's no need for snide comments like "You can look that up on the internet, but I don't think you will." Comments like that don't add anything to the debate and only serve, whether intentionally or not, to frustrate the other person. You're obviously intelligent enough to debate someone without remarks like that.
User avatar #114 - KEpToK (01/23/2014) [-]
Thank you for the novel Charles Dickins, i'll be sure to peruse it when I have the chance.
#146 - Deeticky (01/24/2014) [-]
Thanks for the reply, troll. I'll be sure to consider it when you decide to add something relevant.
#27 - I certainly am not a fan of women with 6 packs. Some guys like… 01/23/2014 on Dyel +1
#65 - I'm pretty sure backwards compatibility was removed mainly to …  [+] (3 new replies) 01/22/2014 on Just thought it was funny. +1
User avatar #123 - lifesavers (01/23/2014) [-]
Backwards compatibility was removed because it is too difficult to emulate the Cell processor and much too expensive to integrate one into the circuit. So, not really to just lower the price, but to avoid marketing a $1000 console. Same for the XBO.
To be fair, the consoles could play Xbox, PSX and PS2 games with barely any CPU strain, but I guess we can't have nice thing, can we?
User avatar #134 - Deeticky (01/23/2014) [-]
I appreciate the clarification on the technical aspect, but I don't understand how that makes it not about lowering the price. Obviously the tech is there, but it's just too expensive to be viable when consumers want the console to cost $300.
User avatar #66 - dumbassvtwo (01/22/2014) [-]
Ah right. You're probably right. I'm not entirely sure all I know is that I think I heard someone/read that it was removed due to it straining the blu-ray laser or it damaging something.
#60 - What exclusives does the Xbox have out that look good? I found…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/22/2014 on Just thought it was funny. +2
User avatar #71 - squillium (01/22/2014) [-]
I personally enjoyed Dead Rising 3, and Killer Instinct is fun as well. Plus Titanfall will be released soon.
User avatar #82 - funferret (01/23/2014) [-]
Titanfall will also be available for PC if I remember correctly.
User avatar #104 - autoflame (01/23/2014) [-]
Project Spark is PC and Xbone, Quantum Break is exclusive to Xbone, The next Halo is Xbone, and Peggle 2.
#146 - The reasons usually come down to one or more of these. … 01/22/2014 on Incoming genocide +2
#262 - Being successful ain't easy, there are a lot of steps. (Unless… 01/21/2014 on fuck ITT Tech for not taken me +1
#146 - Liberals call conservatives stupid, conservatives call liberal… 01/18/2014 on History +3
#144 - I guarantee you that this content is not trying to say that …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/18/2014 on History +1
User avatar #169 - Greevon (01/18/2014) [-]
This, man. A thousand times this.
#118 - I slaughtered everybody at the high class party. 01/18/2014 on VG Logic Comp 0
#110 - The fact that you've identified your own faults makes you stro…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/17/2014 on how to get the ladies +1
User avatar #111 - atomicman (01/17/2014) [-]
I guess you're very right. But then again, the asperges part. I mentioned in last message(it was right? I've written so many to you in so little time lol) I was capable of saving a friend from cutting himself letally by talking to him(it were the longest 4 hours in my life, but they were also incredibly beautiful).

I'm a very convincing person actually. It's something that doesn't really fit the rest of my charachter and sometimes confuses myself.

For the expection-part when it comes to school. My school is absolutely not willing to help me in such way. And I really dont want to turn down these guys for they've tried to help me so much. I'll probably just finish this school with borderline grades(like they're expecting from me at this point).

I do think I'll be having to talk to proffesionals indeed. Even though it'll be incredibly hard, for it's against some of my principes. And my principes saved me myself from committing suicide(I've been unhappy for a very long time) and also my friend.

For the unhappy part. My first girlfriend was kinda messed up like I was. Every boy in our class had their eyes on her. She was absolutely stunningly beautiful. Now I, as half beta/half alpha was exremely suprises when she told me she liked me.

When she went abroad for reasons still uknown to me I was broken. She really was something at least very near my soulmate. I've from then on sworn to some principes. Including not to masturbate for my entire life long(which worked, 4 years ago now) and not to be manipulated by others. Last part is for the other kids in class trying to make her fall in love with them instead of me by trying to 'prove' how inferior I am. I even beat one up really bad at one point.
User avatar #112 - atomicman (01/17/2014) [-]
*exception part I meant at the school thingy.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1870 / Total items point value: 2370

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#8 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
User avatar #7 - atomicman (01/17/2014) [-]
If only we got to meet each other in person. I'm sure we'd be become great friends.
#4 - traffy (01/02/2014) [-]
**traffy rolls 65**
**traffy rolls 65**
User avatar #1 - CannonFodder (10/26/2012) [-]
I hadn't been on FJ for ~ 1.5 years so I don't know what has/hasn't been done. Just couldn't be ****** studying so drew that instead. Didn't mean to annoy peeps but cheers for the feedback man
User avatar #5 to #1 - traffy (01/02/2014) [-]
you should shut the **** up
User avatar #6 to #5 - CannonFodder (01/04/2014) [-]
Lol care
 Friends (0)