Upload
Login or register

DashDashTS

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:2/27/2010
Last Login:5/06/2010
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 252 total,  381 ,  129
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 125 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 126 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:152
FJ Points:1

latest user's comments

#151 - You're attempting to argue with the dredges of society. 05/06/2010 on My first and only rant. 0
#23 - That's a common misconception. 05/04/2010 on SUP NIGGA +9
#251 - "i apologized. at least i have that capability" -…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/04/2010 on 25 Random Facts 1 -1
User avatar
#252 - InsaneMainframe (05/05/2010) [-]
i think im in love
#263 - anon (11/12/2010) [-]
Jeez people, Armstrong has stepped on it before, why can't you cite that instead of making a big argument half the page long?
#249 - "I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally&quo…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/04/2010 on 25 Random Facts 1 -1
User avatar
#250 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
now you're in a digression much farther than i've ever been. way to out do yourself. i apologized. at least i have that capability. This is all I have to say. I overreacted when i assumed,when you were telling him he "failed at physics", that you thought there was no atmosphere, when there was, and that is why i responded the way i did and attempted to correct the thought process of what i, admittidly unjustifiably, saw to be idiotic and angrily ignorant. that is why i said what i said. because i knew there was an atmosphere. i read his "15 is wrong" and your retaliation, and assumed you thought otherwise. sure he's a moron, but the first 3 words of his sentence are correct.
#251 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"i apologized. at least i have that capability"
-Do you normally preface and end your apologies with "You're a jerk" and "get over it?" Sorry if i took it as disingenuous, I'm not used to apologies being laced with insults. Is thumbing down all of my comments part of the apology as well?
User avatar
#252 - InsaneMainframe (05/05/2010) [-]
i think im in love
#263 - anon (11/12/2010) [-]
Jeez people, Armstrong has stepped on it before, why can't you cite that instead of making a big argument half the page long?
#247 - I'm pretty sure the only thing I said was "You fail physi…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/04/2010 on 25 Random Facts 1 -1
User avatar
#248 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
read number 15. i was disproving that. i just happened to reply to YOURS because it was at the end of the group attacking the true idiot here. you are a jerk. I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally. call me "mind-numbingly stupid". you are a jerk. get over it. sorry i misappropriated the "fail at research". i'd assumed you were talking about the lack of atmosphere, not the correlation between atmosphere and gravity. and i apologize for that and any other insult resulting from my misconstruement of your blatant "you fail" quote
#249 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally"
-I'm pretty sure calling me a retard qualifies as attacking me personally especially considering I hadn't even said anything to you yet.

"you are a jerk, you are a jerk, get over it, you are jerk"
-Yeah...
User avatar
#250 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
now you're in a digression much farther than i've ever been. way to out do yourself. i apologized. at least i have that capability. This is all I have to say. I overreacted when i assumed,when you were telling him he "failed at physics", that you thought there was no atmosphere, when there was, and that is why i responded the way i did and attempted to correct the thought process of what i, admittidly unjustifiably, saw to be idiotic and angrily ignorant. that is why i said what i said. because i knew there was an atmosphere. i read his "15 is wrong" and your retaliation, and assumed you thought otherwise. sure he's a moron, but the first 3 words of his sentence are correct.
#251 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"i apologized. at least i have that capability"
-Do you normally preface and end your apologies with "You're a jerk" and "get over it?" Sorry if i took it as disingenuous, I'm not used to apologies being laced with insults. Is thumbing down all of my comments part of the apology as well?
User avatar
#252 - InsaneMainframe (05/05/2010) [-]
i think im in love
#263 - anon (11/12/2010) [-]
Jeez people, Armstrong has stepped on it before, why can't you cite that instead of making a big argument half the page long?
#432 - It was funnier the first time I saw this.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/03/2010 on The way I see it +1
User avatar
#450 - Xedan (05/03/2010) [-]
yup.
#244 - Are you seriously that mind-numbingly stupid? For the sake of…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/03/2010 on 25 Random Facts 1 -1
User avatar
#246 - InsaneMainframe (05/03/2010) [-]
no, i was actually adressing the original basis of his argument, that, and i quote "15 is false". Did i ever say "the moon has an atmosphere and that is why there is gravity?" no, I said "there is an atmosphere" after many said there wasn't one. Because there is. sure, he's an idiot and has no idea how gravity lies in relation to the atmosphere of a planet, but i expect you're not equally mind-numbingly stupid as you assume i am, and should realise im just adressing a fact, not proving you wrong. jerk
#247 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
I'm pretty sure the only thing I said was "You fail physics forever." This was the first comment posted in reference to him and there was no follow-up by me so how you translated "you fail physics forever" into "The moon doesn't have an atmosphere" is beyond me. You then want off on some rant regarding atmospheric chemistry and called me a retard with a follow-up condescending "google it" comment. Then YOU called ME a jerk. Awesome.
User avatar
#248 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
read number 15. i was disproving that. i just happened to reply to YOURS because it was at the end of the group attacking the true idiot here. you are a jerk. I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally. call me "mind-numbingly stupid". you are a jerk. get over it. sorry i misappropriated the "fail at research". i'd assumed you were talking about the lack of atmosphere, not the correlation between atmosphere and gravity. and i apologize for that and any other insult resulting from my misconstruement of your blatant "you fail" quote
#249 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally"
-I'm pretty sure calling me a retard qualifies as attacking me personally especially considering I hadn't even said anything to you yet.

"you are a jerk, you are a jerk, get over it, you are jerk"
-Yeah...
User avatar
#250 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
now you're in a digression much farther than i've ever been. way to out do yourself. i apologized. at least i have that capability. This is all I have to say. I overreacted when i assumed,when you were telling him he "failed at physics", that you thought there was no atmosphere, when there was, and that is why i responded the way i did and attempted to correct the thought process of what i, admittidly unjustifiably, saw to be idiotic and angrily ignorant. that is why i said what i said. because i knew there was an atmosphere. i read his "15 is wrong" and your retaliation, and assumed you thought otherwise. sure he's a moron, but the first 3 words of his sentence are correct.
#251 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"i apologized. at least i have that capability"
-Do you normally preface and end your apologies with "You're a jerk" and "get over it?" Sorry if i took it as disingenuous, I'm not used to apologies being laced with insults. Is thumbing down all of my comments part of the apology as well?
User avatar
#252 - InsaneMainframe (05/05/2010) [-]
i think im in love
#263 - anon (11/12/2010) [-]
Jeez people, Armstrong has stepped on it before, why can't you cite that instead of making a big argument half the page long?
#84 - Not impressed, he clearly used gameshark.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/03/2010 on Epic Jump +1
#85 - anon (05/03/2010) [-]
i miss gameshark, wish they could make one for xbox 360 or ps3 for offline only. gaming without cheating isnt gaming
#203 - tan(90) is the same thing as dividing by zero...  [+] (5 new replies) 05/03/2010 on Close Enough +3
User avatar
#208 - LadyAnon (05/03/2010) [-]
NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!
User avatar
#213 - Aurora (05/03/2010) [-]
We need to know these things so we do not make the epic mistake of dividing by zero, these nerds are saving us! Only Chuck Norris can safely divide by zero.
User avatar
#215 - LadyAnon (05/03/2010) [-]
I didn't say there was a problem, lol. I was just saying, he IS a nerd.
User avatar
#212 - Pedosnake (05/03/2010) [-]
*slap* Get back in the muthafuckin KITCHEN!
User avatar
#214 - LadyAnon (05/03/2010) [-]
I already finished making the motherfucking sammiches!!!
#213 - You fail physics forever.  [+] (10 new replies) 05/02/2010 on 25 Random Facts 1 +10
User avatar
#239 - InsaneMainframe (05/03/2010) [-]
actually..."Okay... that's not exactly true. The Moon does have a tiny atmosphere." quoted from [url deleted] and its subsection "Atmosphere of the moon"

replace (dot) with an actual period. I've also researched other sources dictating that the moon does have a slight modicum of atmosphere, almost completely insignificant, but it does have one.

so it in fact doesn't fail physics forever, you fail at research forever

look up "moon atmosphere" in google for christs sake. its there retard :P
#244 - DashDashTS (05/03/2010) [-]
Are you seriously that mind-numbingly stupid? For the sake of my own sanity I'm just going to assume you're tolling but I'll bite anyway. The moon having an atmosphere is irrelevant to this discussion. He claimed that without atmosphere the moon's gravity would be unable to pull anything towards its center of mass which is a complete failure in understand of how gravity works. The formula is well known, why don't you google it?
User avatar
#246 - InsaneMainframe (05/03/2010) [-]
no, i was actually adressing the original basis of his argument, that, and i quote "15 is false". Did i ever say "the moon has an atmosphere and that is why there is gravity?" no, I said "there is an atmosphere" after many said there wasn't one. Because there is. sure, he's an idiot and has no idea how gravity lies in relation to the atmosphere of a planet, but i expect you're not equally mind-numbingly stupid as you assume i am, and should realise im just adressing a fact, not proving you wrong. jerk
#247 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
I'm pretty sure the only thing I said was "You fail physics forever." This was the first comment posted in reference to him and there was no follow-up by me so how you translated "you fail physics forever" into "The moon doesn't have an atmosphere" is beyond me. You then want off on some rant regarding atmospheric chemistry and called me a retard with a follow-up condescending "google it" comment. Then YOU called ME a jerk. Awesome.
User avatar
#248 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
read number 15. i was disproving that. i just happened to reply to YOURS because it was at the end of the group attacking the true idiot here. you are a jerk. I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally. call me "mind-numbingly stupid". you are a jerk. get over it. sorry i misappropriated the "fail at research". i'd assumed you were talking about the lack of atmosphere, not the correlation between atmosphere and gravity. and i apologize for that and any other insult resulting from my misconstruement of your blatant "you fail" quote
#249 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally"
-I'm pretty sure calling me a retard qualifies as attacking me personally especially considering I hadn't even said anything to you yet.

"you are a jerk, you are a jerk, get over it, you are jerk"
-Yeah...
User avatar
#250 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
now you're in a digression much farther than i've ever been. way to out do yourself. i apologized. at least i have that capability. This is all I have to say. I overreacted when i assumed,when you were telling him he "failed at physics", that you thought there was no atmosphere, when there was, and that is why i responded the way i did and attempted to correct the thought process of what i, admittidly unjustifiably, saw to be idiotic and angrily ignorant. that is why i said what i said. because i knew there was an atmosphere. i read his "15 is wrong" and your retaliation, and assumed you thought otherwise. sure he's a moron, but the first 3 words of his sentence are correct.
#251 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"i apologized. at least i have that capability"
-Do you normally preface and end your apologies with "You're a jerk" and "get over it?" Sorry if i took it as disingenuous, I'm not used to apologies being laced with insults. Is thumbing down all of my comments part of the apology as well?
User avatar
#252 - InsaneMainframe (05/05/2010) [-]
i think im in love
#263 - anon (11/12/2010) [-]
Jeez people, Armstrong has stepped on it before, why can't you cite that instead of making a big argument half the page long?
[ 119 Total ]