Are you certain for a fact that lightning occurs on other planets? And I meant him, in his home. Not lightning in general.

this is a photo of lightning on mars
can't find statistics on lightning strikes on homes, but they are actually more likely because lighting hits the tallest thing around. if not properly grounded, lighting will travel into anything that is plugged in if your house is struck, including your computer, so yes to both, although I'm not sure what lightning on other planets has to do with anything.

if the odds of him being struck by lightning twice in the next 10 seconds indoors at his computer and surviving both strikes are 100 times greater then the odds of life on other planets, then mathematically, there are hundreds of thousands of planets with life.

I misspoke in my original comment. I meant to aid in the idea that there HAS to be other life in the universe, my mistake made it seem the opposite.

Sorry, I meant EVERY other planet. I knew it occured on some. And you know I just made up that statistic right? I actually have no idea.

May i know what specific part on the show it is from?

Sorry if im being demanding D:

no clue bro, I've never seen it, just remembered the post you were describing and searched it for ya, it was titled handsorship, might be more info in the comments section there

Ow may gawd sauce

To Love Ru

forgot pic

The only problem is whenever there is a video game (I've already been to 2 events with this theme for Stugo), There are at least 5 other schools with Mario. And this is a state-wide event so probably like 15 schools

You do realise that Xyz Summoning isn't just done with 2 monsters. 2 is just the minimum. For example:
Number 34: Terror-Byte requires 3 Level 3 monsters.
Number 91: Thunder Spark Dragon requires 3 Level 4 Monsters (5 Level 4 Monsters in the Manga)
Haze-Beast Basilicok requires 2 or more Level 6 Monsters.

i play chaos dragons, but best decks atm are mermail agents and wind up, wind ups require some thought as the deck has soooo many plays, it can seemingly combo out of anything. magician/shark is too stronk.

This is why I run Darkworld. I have a good match up against mermails and I can special summon as much as Wind-ups plus I also have skill drain, and gozen match which can easily take em out.

dragons have got very good match ups vs most of the meta, but its a bit more luck based in the sense that you have to get your mills off the lightsworns and have a graveyard or you get very slow. but i have OTK'd on the first or 2nd turn several times, dumping BLS, black rose dragon, dark armed dragon, red-eyes darkness metal and lightpulsar in turn 2.

A good friend of mine runs a complete Chaos dragon but Darkworld is more consistent but chaos can have one hell of a match up if all goes well but in my opinion it is to luck based

yeah, it's definitely true that it wasn't written by god, just by men. they were followers of god , and there were many other writings considered to be in the bible that they left out. one that i want to look up is jesus as a kid, because it only mentions that once really in the bible.
i also believe that in the new testament, many of the requirements were dropped with the coming of Jesus (such as kosher food and not mixing cloths) because Jesus was sent to forgive our sins, you know?
basically i believe that it's best to commit as few sins as possible, but as long as you believe in god ans that Jesus died for you, then you go to heaven.
no one's perfect, so if someone went to hell only because they sinned (i.e. being gay) then all of us would be in hell after we died.

I mean, i'm not gay, but it doesn't affect me if someone else is. i have lots of gay friends, and even have lived with a gay guy.
It's in the bible, even. "Judge not, lest ye be judged."

that's good, i have no problem with religion, it's cool and all but when people start thinking that a book was penned personally by the hand of god and that every word contained in it must be obeyed exactly as it is written(except the parts about peace and love, fuck those) then it kinda becomes a problem. god should never be used as an excuse to hate. I am religious, i just create my own religion that grows and changes as i do, my concept of god is constantly evolving with every new thing i learn. in my opinion that beats the hell out of following a stagnating god who lives only on the pages of a book, never changing.

yeah, it's definitely true that it wasn't written by god, just by men. they were followers of god , and there were many other writings considered to be in the bible that they left out. one that i want to look up is jesus as a kid, because it only mentions that once really in the bible.
i also believe that in the new testament, many of the requirements were dropped with the coming of Jesus (such as kosher food and not mixing cloths) because Jesus was sent to forgive our sins, you know?
basically i believe that it's best to commit as few sins as possible, but as long as you believe in god ans that Jesus died for you, then you go to heaven.
no one's perfect, so if someone went to hell only because they sinned (i.e. being gay) then all of us would be in hell after we died.

i don't have a problem with gay marriage really. they're going to be gay whether or not they get married.
i'm christian, so in my mind God wouldn't want them to commit two sins (being gay, and sex out of marriage) so why not take one of those two out of the equation by letting them get married?

You clearly don't understand your religion very well. No remaining Christian denominations, save for certain select Pentecostal churches or more conservative Baptist churches believe that the sin lies in the nature of homosexuality itself. Now some of them argue that Homosexual sex is a sin, and that is the root of the current debate, but being gay in itself is nearly universally tolerated by the church. This includes the Catholics, Eastern Orthodox churches, and nearly all of the Protestant churches. Hence the phrase “Hate the sin, not the sinner,” used by the Catholics. If you’re going to try to enter into a debate like this, at least try to be well informed on your side. I’m an agnostic, I disagree with the idea that homosexuality is wrong, and I still know enough to realize that you have no idea what you’re talking about

i'm not in a debate. i'm in a conversation.
no one here is trying to prove themselves right but you.

the phrase "hate the sin not the sinner" is not only used by the catholic church, and more closely means that God hates sin, but he loves all people and so we should "hate the sin, not the sinner"

and also, many churches think of homosexuality itself is a sin, and some even offer therapy to people to try to "cure" their homosexuality so they can "get into heaven."

however, what i believe is basically what you said, that homosexual feelings may not be a sin, but the act on those feelings.
i feel like homosexual feelings are the temptation, and temptation isn't a sin. even Jesus was tempted.

if you'd actually read the conversation and/or paid attention to what was said, maybe you'd realize i'm neither debating nor judging people.

true, i didn't really think about that case.

but see, here's the thing, nobody should have to think of any cases because there is no acceptable reason why gay marriage is illegal

---"jebus sez it's a bomaration"

marriage was invented and become a common practice long before christianity came around. it is a matter of the state and concerns legal, medical, and tax issues and has jack shit to do with your imaginary friend, you didn't invent it, you don't own it, fuck off

---"marriage is all about makin babies to stimulate the economy and grow the population and all the benefits are rewards for that"

then why are infertile couples allowed to get/stay married? people who have had a sex change can also get married despite not being able to bear children. marriage is two people legally declaring their intention to function as a unit, the benefits serve that purpose, to allow them to better work together towards their goals. there are further benefits for having children, and unmarried people can receive those benefits. you aren't being rewarded twice for the same thing.

there's several other common bullshit excuses even less reasonable.
half the rhetoric of anti-gay enthusiasts is the same shit spewed by anti-women's rights and anti-black rights people. how many times to we as a society need to make the same mistakes before we learn from them?

I mean, i'm not gay, but it doesn't affect me if someone else is. i have lots of gay friends, and even have lived with a gay guy.
It's in the bible, even. "Judge not, lest ye be judged."

that's good, i have no problem with religion, it's cool and all but when people start thinking that a book was penned personally by the hand of god and that every word contained in it must be obeyed exactly as it is written(except the parts about peace and love, fuck those) then it kinda becomes a problem. god should never be used as an excuse to hate. I am religious, i just create my own religion that grows and changes as i do, my concept of god is constantly evolving with every new thing i learn. in my opinion that beats the hell out of following a stagnating god who lives only on the pages of a book, never changing.

yeah, it's definitely true that it wasn't written by god, just by men. they were followers of god , and there were many other writings considered to be in the bible that they left out. one that i want to look up is jesus as a kid, because it only mentions that once really in the bible.
i also believe that in the new testament, many of the requirements were dropped with the coming of Jesus (such as kosher food and not mixing cloths) because Jesus was sent to forgive our sins, you know?
basically i believe that it's best to commit as few sins as possible, but as long as you believe in god ans that Jesus died for you, then you go to heaven.
no one's perfect, so if someone went to hell only because they sinned (i.e. being gay) then all of us would be in hell after we died.

i don't have a problem with gay marriage really. they're going to be gay whether or not they get married.
i'm christian, so in my mind God wouldn't want them to commit two sins (being gay, and sex out of marriage) so why not take one of those two out of the equation by letting them get married?

You clearly don't understand your religion very well. No remaining Christian denominations, save for certain select Pentecostal churches or more conservative Baptist churches believe that the sin lies in the nature of homosexuality itself. Now some of them argue that Homosexual sex is a sin, and that is the root of the current debate, but being gay in itself is nearly universally tolerated by the church. This includes the Catholics, Eastern Orthodox churches, and nearly all of the Protestant churches. Hence the phrase “Hate the sin, not the sinner,” used by the Catholics. If you’re going to try to enter into a debate like this, at least try to be well informed on your side. I’m an agnostic, I disagree with the idea that homosexuality is wrong, and I still know enough to realize that you have no idea what you’re talking about

i'm not in a debate. i'm in a conversation.
no one here is trying to prove themselves right but you.

the phrase "hate the sin not the sinner" is not only used by the catholic church, and more closely means that God hates sin, but he loves all people and so we should "hate the sin, not the sinner"

and also, many churches think of homosexuality itself is a sin, and some even offer therapy to people to try to "cure" their homosexuality so they can "get into heaven."

however, what i believe is basically what you said, that homosexual feelings may not be a sin, but the act on those feelings.
i feel like homosexual feelings are the temptation, and temptation isn't a sin. even Jesus was tempted.

if you'd actually read the conversation and/or paid attention to what was said, maybe you'd realize i'm neither debating nor judging people.

Your profile pic was so relevant

was that in Majora's Mask or Ocarina of Time?

both

awesome thank you

Then you find out she has a penis.

why thank you

Wrong meme

it was in reference to the eye of truth how its witchcraft

Sorry i thought he meant it as a responce

it happens

Haha i just tought that you can put steves face on it and write MINECRAFT!

There are 2 main arguments to the pitt defense side. One is amount of dogs, and the other is blaming the owners. The first can be addressed simply by looking up registered breed statistics. The second can be negated by pointing out that bad owners exist, but they are spread out across the breeds equally. Pitt bulls would not magically have a ridiculously higher amount o bad owners versus other breeds, even figuring in dog fighting owners. I am not saying that Pitts are a bad dog, my neighbor owns one and it is a nice friendly dog. But the statistics themselves do not lie. Pitt supporters like to say that statistics are wrong, and are lies. Why? What benefit does a company or organization get out of blaming pitts and making them look universally guilty? The fact is they just plain have a higher chance to cause injury. It sucks but its a fact. I have nothing against the breed and I am sure there are some statistics on othr sites that say pitts are less likely to attack. Thats great, but why take the risk? Any breed can cause damage but some do it more.

http://www.dogsbite.org/dogsbite-recent-dog-bite-statistics.php http://blog.dogsbite.org/2012/01/2011-us-dog-bite-fatality-statistics.html http://blog.dogsbite.org/2011/01/2010-us-dog-bite-fatality-statistics.html http://blog.dogsbite.org/2010/03/us-dog-bite-fatalities-january-1-2005.html http://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics.php http://www.dogforums.com/general-dog-forum/8689-dog-bite-statistics-breed.html www.forbes.com/sites/cateyhill/2012/05/30/11-riskiest-dog-breeds-for-homeowners-and-renters/ www.blanelaw.com/library/dangerous-california-pit-bull-dog-bite-statistic s-fatal-dog-pit-bull-attacks.cfm www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387261/ I will aslo explain my view on it in the next post.

Hey, Cheif!

Holy shit, I nearly spat my drink out