Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Daeiros    

Rank #788 on Comments
Daeiros Avatar Level 299 Comments: Post Master
Offline
Send mail to Daeiros Block Daeiros Invite Daeiros to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 27
Date Signed Up:11/13/2009
Last Login:9/20/2014
Location:USA
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7009
Comment Ranking:#788
Highest Content Rank:#1163
Highest Comment Rank:#710
Content Thumbs: 2710 total,  3000 ,  290
Comment Thumbs: 10885 total,  12031 ,  1146
Content Level Progress: 99% (99/100)
Level 126 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 127 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 13% (13/100)
Level 299 Comments: Post Master → Level 300 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:8
Content Views:28854
Times Content Favorited:207 times
Total Comments Made:2051
FJ Points:914

latest user's comments

#34 - it's a good business strategy. teach people to shoot… 07/04/2014 on Just something I found... +1
#19 - Picture 07/04/2014 on fact complication +1
#11 - Microsoft word is even worse. I try to highlight two words and…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/04/2014 on Conspiracy? +26
User avatar #24 - deathsn (07/04/2014) [-]
There is an option activated by default to autocomplete selection of text, you can always turn it off so don't blame the program for doings it's job correctly.
User avatar #12 - greendroid (07/04/2014) [-]
IT works good for me.
User avatar #22 - turtletroll (07/04/2014) [-]
I like your text color
User avatar #13 - Daeiros (07/04/2014) [-]
It's worst when it comes to headers
I have to have the title left aligned and the page number right aligned in the header.
I have a template file that I open and change the title, but it is impossible to select just the title without it also selecting the page number.
#212 - Oh god, I played an all for one match with garen once. We all …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/29/2014 on Best Hydration NA +1
User avatar #271 - kyrozor (06/29/2014) [-]
How can you call it spin to win if someone loses.
#208 - Really, because I main taric and unless the lee has a SIGNIFIC…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/29/2014 on Best Hydration NA 0
User avatar #308 - taric (06/30/2014) [-]
The blind monk can't see the power of gems.
User avatar #216 - klina (06/29/2014) [-]
yeah I don't have the time or the nerve to explain to 4 people what to do and how to play in solo queue vs lee sin

yeah sure, I'll win my lane, but when I see that the enemy lee sin is 7/1 because ziggs uses satchel before lee re-casts his Q and he just dies 4 times on mid to akali, I think it's unfair to me and to others that play skill based champions rather than pubstomers like lee
#201 - oh **** , how do I hydrate? 06/29/2014 on Best Hydration NA +1
#62 - Maryland, it's not the only one though, there are a few states… 06/27/2014 on You no fuck with me! 0
#48 - there are many places, including my home state, where self def…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/27/2014 on You no fuck with me! 0
#56 - LocoJoe (06/27/2014) [-]
What shit state do you live in?
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
Maryland, it's not the only one though, there are a few states with no self defense laws
#45 - it looks like the guy has a weapon, if you attack an unarmed p… 06/27/2014 on You no fuck with me! +1
#26 - oh, I see well, in response to your original question, yes…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/27/2014 on When No-Fap November is done 0
User avatar #27 - shogg (06/27/2014) [-]
Holy shit
#62 - from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultu…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/27/2014 on its kinda hot 0
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#24 - ... this comment is 2 years old, how did you get here?  [+] (3 new replies) 06/27/2014 on When No-Fap November is done 0
User avatar #25 - shogg (06/27/2014) [-]
This is my content bro
User avatar #26 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
oh, I see
well, in response to your original question, yes, I used to, but I have gotten out of shape, and I'm not that flexible anymore
User avatar #27 - shogg (06/27/2014) [-]
Holy shit
#55 - gen·der ˈjendər/ noun 1. the state of being ma…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/27/2014 on its kinda hot 0
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

Your feelings are invalid.

In any case, even if you WERE right; there would still only be two sexes and gender would be completely arbitrary because it would just devolve down to personal preference and fetishes, which we've already discussed. So instead of saying "I like women with big breasts" it would become "I like big breasted genders of the female sex". Congratulations, you've changed nothing.
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Women with big breasts is not a gender, big breasts is a physical trait
Women who like power lifting and monster trucks is a gender
Women who like makeup and barbie dolls is a gender
They are two very different women personality-wise

Yes the lines are a bit arbitrary and yes classifying people in this way would be tedious, hence why I specifically said "While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous"

There are people who act like lumberjacks and people who act like ballerinas and everything in between, regardless of what is or isn't between their legs and people typically need there to be an agreement between both physical attraction to their body type and physiological attraction to their personality type.
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#52 - omnisexual? 06/27/2014 on its kinda hot 0
#51 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 06/27/2014 on its kinda hot 0
#50 - Okay, I didn't say every pansexual person on earth would …  [+] (5 new replies) 06/27/2014 on its kinda hot 0
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there's ALREADY a sexual term for people who ONLY have sex with those they develop emotional attachments to, and it's not Pansexual. Whatever it is, it's still stupid though.

Because it's not. If I change my genitals and hormones to a female, I become a girl; not a third gender. Even getting BOTH hormones and genitals for whatever awful reason still wouldn't make me a third gender, it would just mean I have aspects of both created artificially (as there are no 'natural' occurrences of people with both genders that happen on a regular basis. Even the incredibly small amounts it has happened has usually happened because of extreme circumstances or complications). Just as well, nothing could convince you of MY view, so we're in the same boat, aren't we? It's just like religion. If you were an Atheist, very little would convince you of the existence of a deity outside of seeing them, and likewise, if you were religious, very little would convince you that your god was a false one, or that there were no gods at all. You're trying very hard to make me sound like this old intolerant bigot, but really we're both just opposite ends of the same extremes. We both believe something and don't WANT to believe anything else because it sounds silly to us. Simple.

Just as well, even IF gender is subjective, sex still isn't. I can believe I'm a woman all I want, but it doesn't make me one any more than believing I'm a dragon makes me a dragon. There is no third gender, and you WANTING there to be one doesn't make it so.

Very well, then let me ask. Why? What's so absurd about there only being two genders?
User avatar #55 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
1. the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).

gender =/= sex
gender is not biological
all your biological arguments are invalid
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

Your feelings are invalid.

In any case, even if you WERE right; there would still only be two sexes and gender would be completely arbitrary because it would just devolve down to personal preference and fetishes, which we've already discussed. So instead of saying "I like women with big breasts" it would become "I like big breasted genders of the female sex". Congratulations, you've changed nothing.
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Women with big breasts is not a gender, big breasts is a physical trait
Women who like power lifting and monster trucks is a gender
Women who like makeup and barbie dolls is a gender
They are two very different women personality-wise

Yes the lines are a bit arbitrary and yes classifying people in this way would be tedious, hence why I specifically said "While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous"

There are people who act like lumberjacks and people who act like ballerinas and everything in between, regardless of what is or isn't between their legs and people typically need there to be an agreement between both physical attraction to their body type and physiological attraction to their personality type.
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#36 - To put it into your ice cream analogy, nobody is saying that i…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/27/2014 on its kinda hot +1
User avatar #37 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
You don't seem to understand. For starters, YOU were the one operating in black and white, insisting that Pansexuals would be the only class that would consistently fuck your example; completely ignoring personal preferences between all different types of people.

Second, Indeed you can make certain distinct flavours, but that's where fetishes come from. I like women, but I PREFER women with bigger breasts, and I enjoy leggings more than I enjoy high heels. See? Other men, while straight, would totally disagree; that doesn't make them any less straight.

In any case, to your term of "not caring about the ice-cream", please see comment #24
User avatar #50 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, I didn't say every pansexual person on earth would fuck Buck, I said that any pansexual who liked buck as a person would be willing to have sex with him. That does not hold true with other sexualities because they distinguish between friendship and attraction based on other criteria, to a pansexual, being friends with someone is the basically the ONLY criteria. That makes it distinct from a bisexual who could still be friends with a guy or a girl but have no sexual attraction to them because they are not their type, they don't fit the personal preference.

In the end, this argument is pointless because there is apparently nothing anyone can say that will convince you that a transsexual or a hermaphrodite is neither a boy nor a girl, but another distinct option. Your belief is that there are only two distinct and separate options, and that the shades in between are merely matters of personal preference and not their own distinct categories. You refuse to acknowledge that sex and gender are different things, and you won't let anyone change that.

While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous, saying that there are only 2 and no more is just as ridiculous.
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there's ALREADY a sexual term for people who ONLY have sex with those they develop emotional attachments to, and it's not Pansexual. Whatever it is, it's still stupid though.

Because it's not. If I change my genitals and hormones to a female, I become a girl; not a third gender. Even getting BOTH hormones and genitals for whatever awful reason still wouldn't make me a third gender, it would just mean I have aspects of both created artificially (as there are no 'natural' occurrences of people with both genders that happen on a regular basis. Even the incredibly small amounts it has happened has usually happened because of extreme circumstances or complications). Just as well, nothing could convince you of MY view, so we're in the same boat, aren't we? It's just like religion. If you were an Atheist, very little would convince you of the existence of a deity outside of seeing them, and likewise, if you were religious, very little would convince you that your god was a false one, or that there were no gods at all. You're trying very hard to make me sound like this old intolerant bigot, but really we're both just opposite ends of the same extremes. We both believe something and don't WANT to believe anything else because it sounds silly to us. Simple.

Just as well, even IF gender is subjective, sex still isn't. I can believe I'm a woman all I want, but it doesn't make me one any more than believing I'm a dragon makes me a dragon. There is no third gender, and you WANTING there to be one doesn't make it so.

Very well, then let me ask. Why? What's so absurd about there only being two genders?
User avatar #55 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
1. the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).

gender =/= sex
gender is not biological
all your biological arguments are invalid
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

Your feelings are invalid.

In any case, even if you WERE right; there would still only be two sexes and gender would be completely arbitrary because it would just devolve down to personal preference and fetishes, which we've already discussed. So instead of saying "I like women with big breasts" it would become "I like big breasted genders of the female sex". Congratulations, you've changed nothing.
User avatar #62 - Daeiros (06/27/2014) [-]
from your own link, definition 2B: "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Women with big breasts is not a gender, big breasts is a physical trait
Women who like power lifting and monster trucks is a gender
Women who like makeup and barbie dolls is a gender
They are two very different women personality-wise

Yes the lines are a bit arbitrary and yes classifying people in this way would be tedious, hence why I specifically said "While I do agree with you that coming up with hundreds of redundant labels for every little thing is ridiculous"

There are people who act like lumberjacks and people who act like ballerinas and everything in between, regardless of what is or isn't between their legs and people typically need there to be an agreement between both physical attraction to their body type and physiological attraction to their personality type.
User avatar #63 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
My point was that there are different definitions for it that anyone can bring up to make a point. My country's definition of it, my personal definition of it, and your country's definition of it, might very well be different from your own. And while it is true that our feelings do not decide definitions, we as people would have to decide ON a definition to use before we can use it in an argument.

See, this is what I mean. To you, a Tom-Boy, or just a regular woman that enjoyed something off the beaten path, would classify as an entirely different gender. No fucking thank you. I'd much rather stick to 'personality traits'. YOU can think gender is subjective and changes based upon the most minute details of what you enjoy, but I do not, and will never think that way, because it is pointless and only serves to waste time (given the fact we already have a word for personality..."Personality". We don't need another).

I'm glad we can see that it's both useless though. Really, that does ease my heart.

But just because they act a certain way or enjoy a certain thing doesn't mean they are an entirely different gender. This isn't Tumblr, this is real life, it's a fucking personality trait, that's the extent of it. Just because some other asshole likes a certain kind of food doesn't make him the mysterious 45th parallel to the classified man-monkey-boy toy of the 23rd male dominant.
#33 - This is Buck Angel Buck Angel has a vagina Would …  [+] (3 new replies) 06/27/2014 on its kinda hot +3
User avatar #77 - hellomynameisbill (06/27/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure that a lot of gays would fuck that.
User avatar #35 - captainfuckitall (06/27/2014) [-]
Indeed some Bisexuals might, but saying ALL Pansexuals would is a bit of a stretch too, isn't it. See, there's something called 'personal preference' and it's the same reason why a straight man is unwilling to fuck ALL women, or why a gay man is unwilling to fuck ALL men, or why a bisexual person is unwilling to fuck ALL people.

It's just just Bisexual. And all things considered, most straight women probably WOULD have sex with him, because most 'attraction' is based off of features and characteristics rather than genitals themselves.
User avatar #59 - dornarruda (06/27/2014) [-]
he meant in general as an example, obviously people have preferences, that's a given lol
#21 - try e-stim no erection required a decent unit is prett…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/25/2014 on When You're Feeling Down +1
#32 - xwhitewingx (06/25/2014) [-]
googled e-stim, it was a good read.
#60 - It means one of your other characters will be underleveled whe… 06/25/2014 on I can relate to this. 60 0
#38 - Picture 06/24/2014 on Hope he has lolly insurance 0
#175 - Honestly, I think that alarm is fantastic because it lets you …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/24/2014 on Good Idea Chicken 0
User avatar #176 - damping (06/24/2014) [-]
Just try to do a dead lift there without setting off the alarm. My friend couldn't do it and he has been lifting for years. He was only dead lifting 135 pounds too, so not exactly like he was exerting himself.
#173 - you don't have to grunt and drop things to get a good workout.…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/24/2014 on Good Idea Chicken 0
User avatar #174 - damping (06/24/2014) [-]
Dead Lifts and squats are similar, but Squats won't work your hips or back as well. Even the clank of putting the weights down and back up is enough to sound that dumb alarm. Planet fitness is for the people who go to the gym, sit on the bikes and text people about how they are working out.

At least planet fitness keeps those people away from other gyms.
User avatar #175 - Daeiros (06/24/2014) [-]
Honestly, I think that alarm is fantastic because it lets you know when you are failing. If you can't sit a weight down without sounding the alarm, you don't have proper control of the weight. Your form is most likely bad because you are only focused on lifting as much as you can, instead of doing it correctly. Lifting more than you can correctly control does more harm than good. You can still gain strength just as fast with a little less weight and a smoother, more controlled motion.

I also don't know of any other gyms in my area that are open 24/7
User avatar #176 - damping (06/24/2014) [-]
Just try to do a dead lift there without setting off the alarm. My friend couldn't do it and he has been lifting for years. He was only dead lifting 135 pounds too, so not exactly like he was exerting himself.
#171 - you can "actually work out" without even going to a …  [+] (5 new replies) 06/24/2014 on Good Idea Chicken 0
User avatar #172 - damping (06/24/2014) [-]
Can't do dead lifts because they make too much noise. If you can't do dead lifts, you can't work out.
User avatar #173 - Daeiros (06/24/2014) [-]
you don't have to grunt and drop things to get a good workout. Making tons of noise does not help muscle development.
showing off =/= working out
While deadlifts are a great workout, squats work pretty well to, and you can do those.
User avatar #174 - damping (06/24/2014) [-]
Dead Lifts and squats are similar, but Squats won't work your hips or back as well. Even the clank of putting the weights down and back up is enough to sound that dumb alarm. Planet fitness is for the people who go to the gym, sit on the bikes and text people about how they are working out.

At least planet fitness keeps those people away from other gyms.
User avatar #175 - Daeiros (06/24/2014) [-]
Honestly, I think that alarm is fantastic because it lets you know when you are failing. If you can't sit a weight down without sounding the alarm, you don't have proper control of the weight. Your form is most likely bad because you are only focused on lifting as much as you can, instead of doing it correctly. Lifting more than you can correctly control does more harm than good. You can still gain strength just as fast with a little less weight and a smoother, more controlled motion.

I also don't know of any other gyms in my area that are open 24/7
User avatar #176 - damping (06/24/2014) [-]
Just try to do a dead lift there without setting off the alarm. My friend couldn't do it and he has been lifting for years. He was only dead lifting 135 pounds too, so not exactly like he was exerting himself.
#11 - Picture 06/24/2014 on Stunning Whiskers +1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#4 - blartonfairweather (07/17/2012) [-]
Heya, mate.   
   
What is up?
Heya, mate.

What is up?
#3 - xLovableLoserx (03/15/2012) [-]
Just wanted to say hey.. hope you're finding the lolz. Hit me up some time when you've got a chance.
Just wanted to say hey.. hope you're finding the lolz. Hit me up some time when you've got a chance.
 Friends (0)