x
Click to expand

Customer Services

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:2/05/2009
Last Login:7/05/2015
Location:Quebec
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1964
Highest Content Rank:#4406
Highest Comment Rank:#1007
Content Thumbs: 2743 total,  2999 ,  256
Comment Thumbs: 9144 total,  10494 ,  1350
Content Level Progress: 44% (44/100)
Level 127 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 128 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 52% (52/100)
Level 273 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 274 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:4
Content Views:80626
Times Content Favorited:169 times
Total Comments Made:1764
FJ Points:10204
Favorite Tags: lol (2)

latest user's comments

#5 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 05/29/2015 on Player 3 has entered +23
#7 - gruntmastr Comment deleted by Customer Services
#63 - Picture 05/29/2015 on Doll for sale +21
#22 - I'm an olfdag.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/27/2015 on Customer Service 0
#23 - chefboyardeezy (05/27/2015) [-]
I was a pretty oldfag too until I got banned for not noticing a naked dude chlling in the background of a post I made.
#57 - Like if most of the PC gamers weren't paying. GTFO  [+] (2 new replies) 05/26/2015 on Witcher 3 +20
User avatar #62 - Shramin (05/26/2015) [-]
I also like how people think there are no piracy on consoles, modding community and all.
User avatar #85 - paintt (05/26/2015) [-]
There is but compared to PC its a micro percentage. Its not as easy.
#34 - Picture 05/26/2015 on *Le tips fedora* +1
#6 - What the **** do you guys want?  [+] (5 new replies) 05/26/2015 on Customer Service +33
#19 - tarabostes (05/26/2015) [-]
A pepsi
#13 - chefboyardeezy (05/26/2015) [-]
y- your name...

It's got a space
User avatar #22 - Customer Services (05/27/2015) [-]
I'm an olfdag.
#23 - chefboyardeezy (05/27/2015) [-]
I was a pretty oldfag too until I got banned for not noticing a naked dude chlling in the background of a post I made.
#7 - yugiohkris (05/26/2015) [-]
#27 - Picture 05/26/2015 on An immortal price +11
#83 - Shoo. Shoo. 05/26/2015 on F is for FUCK 0
#609 - Picture 05/25/2015 on GIF thread? 0
#148 - Despite being the only black dude in the whole sequels. 05/25/2015 on Fact comp #11 +2
#312 - Picture 05/25/2015 on Heard that you were talkin... +1
#275 - Richard Keister? 05/25/2015 on What's in the chest? 0
#4 - Quota is one ticket per day of service. So if they work 20 day…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/24/2015 on Ticket +1
User avatar #7 - bigguyuuuu (05/24/2015) [-]
I don't know how many but it's the same where I live. The last week of every month is when I see them everywhere.
#3 - Don't worry, they do as well in Canada. Source: Frien…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/24/2015 on Ticket +1
User avatar #4 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
Quota is one ticket per day of service. So if they work 20 days a month, they gotta have handed 20 tickets by the end on the month.
User avatar #7 - bigguyuuuu (05/24/2015) [-]
I don't know how many but it's the same where I live. The last week of every month is when I see them everywhere.
#27 - IQ is made to fit a system with access to education. Most (if … 05/24/2015 on Progress +1
#19 - Like if it was the first show to ever have a rape scene. Some … 05/24/2015 on George RR Martin +1
#30 - Never though i could be sad and laughing at the same time. Don… 05/24/2015 on rekt 0
#7 - Picture 05/24/2015 on Sexagintuple Vanilla Bean... +37
#158 - Well, social science studies like this almost never come to a …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/24/2015 on Ha Straight 0
User avatar #161 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Again, this isn't a matter of opinion. At all.
And second, the obligation for these sources shouldn't be on me, you're the one who is doubting a source. The burden of proof is on you
But fine:
Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation. - www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/health-survey-gives-government-its-first-large-scale-data-on-gay-bisexual-population/2014/07/14/2db9f4b0-092f-11e4-bbf1-cc51275e7f8f_story.html
Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT. Inaugural Gallup findings based on more than 120,000 interviews - www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx
In a nationally representative telephone survey of 35,071 Americans, Pew Research found that 1,604, or 4.6%, of the sample identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual - www.pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-05-08-full-report.pdf
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys interviewed a nationally representative sample of 11,744 adults aged 20 to 59 between 2003 and 2010. One hundred and eighty (1.5%) self-reported a homosexual orientation and 273 (2.5%) a bisexual one. - I can't find an online source for this, but it's in the American Journal of Public Health
CNN exit polling showed self-identified gay, lesbian, and bisexual voters at 4% of the voting population in the United States presidential election, 2008. - www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p3

And finally here's the source the posts mentioned: williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/how-many-people-are-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender/
#156 - That's the problem with "soft" sciences. Since a sch… 05/24/2015 on Ha Straight 0
#154 - I assumed it was anonymous. But even in this case, a lot of pe…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/24/2015 on Ha Straight 0
User avatar #162 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
But then we have the others who are the opposite too like teenagers who are either lying to themselves to be unique or are confused in their sexuality.
#153 - Ok, so according to you we should believe without a doubt ever…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/24/2015 on Ha Straight +3
#194 - John Cena (05/24/2015) [-]
That's the beauty of correctly obtained and interpreted statistics. They are never wrong.
User avatar #155 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Yeah honestly, when MANY studies are ALL saying the same thing, you should probably believe what the study are saying. I mean I'd at least give you/him some credit if you found ONE major study that supported his claims, but he didn't. Either way, even if his doubt was reasonable, it's based on a fallacy. He's stupid on multiple levels.

"Also, we doesn't have the right of being wrong on FJ without being judged?"
No, we don't. That's fucking stupid. To have the right to "Not be judged" would mean others lack the right to judge them. That couldn't be much further from how this site operates.
I'm starting to think you might like sites that aren't Funnyjunk a little bit better. Ever try Reddit? When you get an account it comes with a complimentary hug.
User avatar #158 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
Well, social science studies like this almost never come to a total consensus, so i still think that many other scholars did found significantly different numbers. otherwise just link me all these studies you're talking about, and then we'll see.

Also, i don't like reddit, but i still think we can debate without being dicks to eachothers, just because we don't share the same opinion.
User avatar #161 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Again, this isn't a matter of opinion. At all.
And second, the obligation for these sources shouldn't be on me, you're the one who is doubting a source. The burden of proof is on you
But fine:
Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation. - www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/health-survey-gives-government-its-first-large-scale-data-on-gay-bisexual-population/2014/07/14/2db9f4b0-092f-11e4-bbf1-cc51275e7f8f_story.html
Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT. Inaugural Gallup findings based on more than 120,000 interviews - www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx
In a nationally representative telephone survey of 35,071 Americans, Pew Research found that 1,604, or 4.6%, of the sample identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual - www.pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-05-08-full-report.pdf
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys interviewed a nationally representative sample of 11,744 adults aged 20 to 59 between 2003 and 2010. One hundred and eighty (1.5%) self-reported a homosexual orientation and 273 (2.5%) a bisexual one. - I can't find an online source for this, but it's in the American Journal of Public Health
CNN exit polling showed self-identified gay, lesbian, and bisexual voters at 4% of the voting population in the United States presidential election, 2008. - www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p3

And finally here's the source the posts mentioned: williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/how-many-people-are-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender/
#150 - It's even more stupid to believe an actual study at 100% just …  [+] (4 new replies) 05/24/2015 on Ha Straight 0
User avatar #152 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
It's most likely an anonymous, I think the researchers knows that there's a fair share of gays in the closet who would lie if it wasn't anonymous.
User avatar #156 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
That's the problem with "soft" sciences. Since a scholar cannot happen to get the same results twice due to an infinite amount of possible reasons, we just gonna make assumptions.
User avatar #154 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
I assumed it was anonymous. But even in this case, a lot of people does lie about it, or doesn't want to admit it to themselves.
User avatar #162 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
But then we have the others who are the opposite too like teenagers who are either lying to themselves to be unique or are confused in their sexuality.
#145 - He just demonstrated a doubt. Since many people are been told …  [+] (12 new replies) 05/24/2015 on Ha Straight +2
User avatar #149 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Because doubting a study done by a law school because "I know a lot of gay people" is stupid. And then he goes on to say "I bet the results vary greatly depending on the circumstance", as if the study that likely had that in mind when questioning a large number of people, as opposed to the limited number of people he knows who probably aren't nearly as diverse a group. And on top of that, if he genuinely doubted it he could have just googled it. They aren't the only people who have ever done a study on this, and I think you'd have troubles finding a study that says more than 4%.

This isn't a matter of Funnyjunk having a problem with his opinion, this is a matter of him being wrong. He isn't expressing an opinion, he's expressing a provably false doubt.
User avatar #153 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
Ok, so according to you we should believe without a doubt every studies that cames out just because it's a study?

Also, we doesn't have the right of being wrong on FJ without being judged?
#194 - John Cena (05/24/2015) [-]
That's the beauty of correctly obtained and interpreted statistics. They are never wrong.
User avatar #155 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Yeah honestly, when MANY studies are ALL saying the same thing, you should probably believe what the study are saying. I mean I'd at least give you/him some credit if you found ONE major study that supported his claims, but he didn't. Either way, even if his doubt was reasonable, it's based on a fallacy. He's stupid on multiple levels.

"Also, we doesn't have the right of being wrong on FJ without being judged?"
No, we don't. That's fucking stupid. To have the right to "Not be judged" would mean others lack the right to judge them. That couldn't be much further from how this site operates.
I'm starting to think you might like sites that aren't Funnyjunk a little bit better. Ever try Reddit? When you get an account it comes with a complimentary hug.
User avatar #158 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
Well, social science studies like this almost never come to a total consensus, so i still think that many other scholars did found significantly different numbers. otherwise just link me all these studies you're talking about, and then we'll see.

Also, i don't like reddit, but i still think we can debate without being dicks to eachothers, just because we don't share the same opinion.
User avatar #161 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Again, this isn't a matter of opinion. At all.
And second, the obligation for these sources shouldn't be on me, you're the one who is doubting a source. The burden of proof is on you
But fine:
Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation. - www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/health-survey-gives-government-its-first-large-scale-data-on-gay-bisexual-population/2014/07/14/2db9f4b0-092f-11e4-bbf1-cc51275e7f8f_story.html
Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT. Inaugural Gallup findings based on more than 120,000 interviews - www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx
In a nationally representative telephone survey of 35,071 Americans, Pew Research found that 1,604, or 4.6%, of the sample identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual - www.pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-05-08-full-report.pdf
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys interviewed a nationally representative sample of 11,744 adults aged 20 to 59 between 2003 and 2010. One hundred and eighty (1.5%) self-reported a homosexual orientation and 273 (2.5%) a bisexual one. - I can't find an online source for this, but it's in the American Journal of Public Health
CNN exit polling showed self-identified gay, lesbian, and bisexual voters at 4% of the voting population in the United States presidential election, 2008. - www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p3

And finally here's the source the posts mentioned: williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/how-many-people-are-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender/
User avatar #148 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
It's stupid to doubt an actual study by just basing your facts on your own experience, by that logic I could say that smoking isn't bad because I don't any smokers who have died because of it. Same goes for the homosexuality study, I personally don't know any gay person (As far as I know.) other than my bi-curious cousin so I might as well just claim that according to my experience gay people don't exist.
User avatar #150 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
It's even more stupid to believe an actual study at 100% just because it's a study, especially a study about the % of the population that are gay. Many people could have no told they are gay, because of many reasons (didn't came out of the closet, don't want people around them to know, etc.), making the poll biaised. It is not a bad thing to always keep a doubt about a study results. it's called "critical thinking" (or i think so, my translation to english aren't perfect). It is how science progress.
User avatar #152 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
It's most likely an anonymous, I think the researchers knows that there's a fair share of gays in the closet who would lie if it wasn't anonymous.
User avatar #156 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
That's the problem with "soft" sciences. Since a scholar cannot happen to get the same results twice due to an infinite amount of possible reasons, we just gonna make assumptions.
User avatar #154 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
I assumed it was anonymous. But even in this case, a lot of people does lie about it, or doesn't want to admit it to themselves.
User avatar #162 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
But then we have the others who are the opposite too like teenagers who are either lying to themselves to be unique or are confused in their sexuality.
#139 - Why the **** is he thumbed down to death's doors for ex…  [+] (24 new replies) 05/24/2015 on Ha Straight -1
User avatar #229 - xtrim (05/24/2015) [-]
People just don't get that I never even questioned the study. I really just expressed my disbelief, because yes, I happen to have personal experience (shocker, I know) and I only thought it was strange.
Before all this shitstorm happened, I even responded again to a reply I'd got saying I support 100% the validity of the study, minus the range or the demographic it was based on. And that's because I happen to not be part of it, so it's only natural to have questions on whether or not this indeed stands in the US.

But I forget, FunnyJunk is indeed a place where having an unpopular opinion results in getting verbally attacked (not that I care, otherwise I'd have backtracked on my comments). Like being wrong is a bad thing, at least I never tried to attack anyone or shove my opinion down people's throats, which is why I won't ever be bothered to reply to everyone here blabbering or hopelessly trying to prove their point when in fact my doubts were explicitly not towards the study itself (see comment #12) but rather a surprised remark on the study's results.

Anyway, sorry I've ranted. I just hope you got my intentions correctly, 'cause you're one of the (very few) people who understands that personal opinion =/= factual assumptions and that I didn't mean to come off attacking the study but rather I exclaimed my bewilderment in written (looking back, perhaps I did come off as ignorant and a know-it-all, which later I tried to amend).

Have a great day : )
User avatar #246 - factual (05/24/2015) [-]
it's a fact
User avatar #173 - truesmokewolf (05/24/2015) [-]
The Cherry-Picking fallacy. Out of 100+ people I associate with, 2 are bisexual. That would be equivalent to me claiming that less than 2 percent of all people are bisexual and absolutely nobody is gay.
#163 - artjunk (05/24/2015) [-]
Because he used his personal observation about a few friends to call bullshit on a study done by a University of Law....
User avatar #141 - factual (05/24/2015) [-]
it's a fact
User avatar #140 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
"Factual opinion"
lol

He's getting thumbed down because he thinks his INCREDIBLY anecdotal evidence someone how makes major studies null and void.
User avatar #145 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
He just demonstrated a doubt. Since many people are been told it's around 10%, 4 can indeed seems a bit small. He's not going like "DURR DURR IM RITE U ALL WRONG". Since when this fucking site did became the Opinion Gestapo? Are we gonna call it "Tumblr 2" from now?
User avatar #149 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Because doubting a study done by a law school because "I know a lot of gay people" is stupid. And then he goes on to say "I bet the results vary greatly depending on the circumstance", as if the study that likely had that in mind when questioning a large number of people, as opposed to the limited number of people he knows who probably aren't nearly as diverse a group. And on top of that, if he genuinely doubted it he could have just googled it. They aren't the only people who have ever done a study on this, and I think you'd have troubles finding a study that says more than 4%.

This isn't a matter of Funnyjunk having a problem with his opinion, this is a matter of him being wrong. He isn't expressing an opinion, he's expressing a provably false doubt.
User avatar #153 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
Ok, so according to you we should believe without a doubt every studies that cames out just because it's a study?

Also, we doesn't have the right of being wrong on FJ without being judged?
#194 - John Cena (05/24/2015) [-]
That's the beauty of correctly obtained and interpreted statistics. They are never wrong.
User avatar #155 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Yeah honestly, when MANY studies are ALL saying the same thing, you should probably believe what the study are saying. I mean I'd at least give you/him some credit if you found ONE major study that supported his claims, but he didn't. Either way, even if his doubt was reasonable, it's based on a fallacy. He's stupid on multiple levels.

"Also, we doesn't have the right of being wrong on FJ without being judged?"
No, we don't. That's fucking stupid. To have the right to "Not be judged" would mean others lack the right to judge them. That couldn't be much further from how this site operates.
I'm starting to think you might like sites that aren't Funnyjunk a little bit better. Ever try Reddit? When you get an account it comes with a complimentary hug.
User avatar #158 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
Well, social science studies like this almost never come to a total consensus, so i still think that many other scholars did found significantly different numbers. otherwise just link me all these studies you're talking about, and then we'll see.

Also, i don't like reddit, but i still think we can debate without being dicks to eachothers, just because we don't share the same opinion.
User avatar #161 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Again, this isn't a matter of opinion. At all.
And second, the obligation for these sources shouldn't be on me, you're the one who is doubting a source. The burden of proof is on you
But fine:
Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation. - www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/health-survey-gives-government-its-first-large-scale-data-on-gay-bisexual-population/2014/07/14/2db9f4b0-092f-11e4-bbf1-cc51275e7f8f_story.html
Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT. Inaugural Gallup findings based on more than 120,000 interviews - www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx
In a nationally representative telephone survey of 35,071 Americans, Pew Research found that 1,604, or 4.6%, of the sample identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual - www.pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-05-08-full-report.pdf
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys interviewed a nationally representative sample of 11,744 adults aged 20 to 59 between 2003 and 2010. One hundred and eighty (1.5%) self-reported a homosexual orientation and 273 (2.5%) a bisexual one. - I can't find an online source for this, but it's in the American Journal of Public Health
CNN exit polling showed self-identified gay, lesbian, and bisexual voters at 4% of the voting population in the United States presidential election, 2008. - www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p3

And finally here's the source the posts mentioned: williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/how-many-people-are-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender/
User avatar #148 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
It's stupid to doubt an actual study by just basing your facts on your own experience, by that logic I could say that smoking isn't bad because I don't any smokers who have died because of it. Same goes for the homosexuality study, I personally don't know any gay person (As far as I know.) other than my bi-curious cousin so I might as well just claim that according to my experience gay people don't exist.
User avatar #150 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
It's even more stupid to believe an actual study at 100% just because it's a study, especially a study about the % of the population that are gay. Many people could have no told they are gay, because of many reasons (didn't came out of the closet, don't want people around them to know, etc.), making the poll biaised. It is not a bad thing to always keep a doubt about a study results. it's called "critical thinking" (or i think so, my translation to english aren't perfect). It is how science progress.
User avatar #152 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
It's most likely an anonymous, I think the researchers knows that there's a fair share of gays in the closet who would lie if it wasn't anonymous.
User avatar #156 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
That's the problem with "soft" sciences. Since a scholar cannot happen to get the same results twice due to an infinite amount of possible reasons, we just gonna make assumptions.
User avatar #154 - Customer Services (05/24/2015) [-]
I assumed it was anonymous. But even in this case, a lot of people does lie about it, or doesn't want to admit it to themselves.
User avatar #162 - cannibalvegan (05/24/2015) [-]
But then we have the others who are the opposite too like teenagers who are either lying to themselves to be unique or are confused in their sexuality.
User avatar #142 - factual (05/24/2015) [-]
it's a fact
User avatar #143 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
Your persistence with this thing is an inspiration to me.
User avatar #144 - factual (05/24/2015) [-]
every time man
User avatar #147 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/24/2015) [-]
I don't know how you do it. It'd get tired of that shit in a day
User avatar #160 - factual (05/24/2015) [-]
it's pretty easy honestly

items

Total unique items point value: 570 / Total items point value: 960

Comments(41):

[ 41 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#41 - John Cena (05/26/2015) [-]
I require your strongest service
User avatar #35 - gentlemantoast (05/01/2015) [-]
help
User avatar #36 to #35 - Customer Services (05/01/2015) [-]
Sup bruh
User avatar #37 to #36 - gentlemantoast (05/01/2015) [-]
why do you get a space and capitals in your name, are you the boyfriend of admin?
User avatar #38 to #37 - Customer Services (05/01/2015) [-]
I'm an oldfag. Don't look further
User avatar #39 to #38 - gentlemantoast (05/01/2015) [-]
oo thanks bruv
User avatar #34 - walhor (03/24/2015) [-]
God damn, that name is just awesome
User avatar #32 - moisture (12/07/2014) [-]
I REQUIRE YOUR SERVICES.
User avatar #31 - lolninjakik (09/07/2014) [-]
nice name m8 u seem pretty old
User avatar #30 - ied (07/21/2014) [-]
pretty rad name bro
User avatar #29 - posttwo (07/21/2014) [-]
I cant stop loving your name
User avatar #27 - chewythewolftwo (06/26/2014) [-]
I am here purely to tell you that I ******* love your username.
#24 - syrianassassin (05/13/2014) [-]
i was searching for holy fedora, do you have one?? i must attend in the synagogue immediately!!!

#25 to #24 - Customer Services (05/13/2014) [-]
Here you go, sir! Paint skills master race
#26 to #25 - syrianassassin (05/13/2014) [-]
**syrianassassin rolls 5**/11
#21 - walcorn (04/25/2014) [-]
Serve me like one of your French Customers.
#22 to #21 - Customer Services (04/26/2014) [-]
Bien sûr, voudriez-vous un drapeau blanc avec votre baguette française?
User avatar #23 to #22 - walcorn (04/26/2014) [-]
Hon hon le baguette croissant au revoir oui oui mon ami
User avatar #18 - theporkwhisperer (02/03/2014) [-]
You didn't need to delete that comment. It looked like it was going to get a lot of thumbs.
User avatar #19 to #18 - Customer Services (02/03/2014) [-]
I realized after that it was pretty much the same that you did . So it was quite pointless =S
User avatar #15 - shitdickinator (11/04/2013) [-]
nice name
User avatar #13 - topanga (10/17/2013) [-]
I need assistance
User avatar #14 to #13 - Customer Services (10/24/2013) [-]
How can i help you?
User avatar #16 to #14 - topanga (11/21/2013) [-]
help me by being afirfiorgojro
#12 - topanga has deleted their comment [-]
#11 - mudkipfucker (10/16/2013) [-]
I know many of said this, but i like your name
User avatar #8 - mayormilkman (08/23/2013) [-]
As seen on FunnyJunk's Brony Board!
User avatar #10 to #9 - mayormilkman (08/23/2013) [-]
Blame Phanphan down there. He posted the link to here.
User avatar #5 - phanact (08/23/2013) [-]
What a beautiful username
User avatar #6 to #5 - Customer Services (08/23/2013) [-]
So is yours, gentleman.
User avatar #7 to #6 - phanact (08/23/2013) [-]
Mine would be better if it was capitalized
User avatar #3 - Katzie (04/29/2013) [-]
I'm curious to know whether you're really Customer Services.
I actually think I asked you this exact same question a couple years ago.
User avatar #4 to #3 - Customer Services (04/29/2013) [-]
Well, i'm having this account since a few years ago, so i guess its really me ^^.
#2 - Katzie has deleted their comment [-]
[ 41 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)