CrowbarNinja
Rank #4461 on Comments
Offline
Send mail to CrowbarNinja Block CrowbarNinja Invite CrowbarNinja to be your friend flag avatar| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Age: | 27 |
| Date Signed Up: | 4/27/2010 |
| Last Login: | 1/12/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #4461 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #2815 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #2609 |
| Content Thumbs: | 1293 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 5703 |
| Content Level Progress: | 12% (6/50) Level 110 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 111 Content: Funny Junkie |
| Comment Level Progress: | 9% (9/100) Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 251 Comments: Contaminated Win |
| Subscribers: | 7 |
| Content Views: | 41533 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 34 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 2619 |
| FJ Points: | 6496 |
latest user's comments
| #169 - ***** , i feel no rage towards your sky-blue baby attemp… [+] (2 new replies) | 11/03/2015 on It's an unpopular opinion... | -8 |
| #177 -
deathstare (11/03/2015) [-] **deathstare used "*roll picture*"** **deathstare rolled image**I am genuinely saddened. I used to have a much older account named "Epona", but I changed to this one. Little did I know, less than a month later, the coloured names popped up Its fun whipping out the name card, its like a black man calling a white one racist. | ||
| #160 - Everyones a cunt, you get used to it. respirator holdup sleepi… [+] (17 new replies) | 11/03/2015 on It's an unpopular opinion... | -6 |
| #424 -
CrowbarNinja (11/03/2015) [-] #430 -
anon (11/03/2015) [-] You know somebody has autism when they start bringing in their username color and how long they've been on FJ out of nowhere. #166 -
deathstare (11/03/2015) [-] **deathstare used "*roll picture*"** **deathstare rolled image**Oh great job, call them back to the scene of the crime, just to double your red thumbs. You should hide Nigga, i feel no rage towards your sky-blue baby attempts at showing disapproval. #177 -
deathstare (11/03/2015) [-] **deathstare used "*roll picture*"** **deathstare rolled image**I am genuinely saddened. I used to have a much older account named "Epona", but I changed to this one. Little did I know, less than a month later, the coloured names popped up Its fun whipping out the name card, its like a black man calling a white one racist. | ||
| #11 - I think they are saying that white men oppress other skin cono… | 11/03/2015 on "WE WUZ KINGZ N SHEIT" | -3 |
| #34 - China can go eat a dick. [+] (12 new replies) | 11/03/2015 on Kickass Facts Part 19 | +25 |
| Well, they are dirty ass communists, what did you expect? I said we should nuke to inbred gooks once for all. #38 -
funpunk (11/03/2015) [-] Seconded. I hear that recently they changed their one-child law to two-children. Before, whenever a woman was pregnant with her second child they'd hold her down and perform an abortion against her will if she wouldn't have it done herself. They'll keep doing it, but at least it'll happen less often. no she could have the child, but she'd be shunned for it and the child wouldn't really be treated as a person. It couldn't get a good education and the family would have to pay high taxes for having it. But if their first child was a girl then they were allowed to try again for a boy. well shit maybe what I've heard is just what the government tells people, or maybe she was on her 3rd or something. #54 -
anon (11/03/2015) [-] Its not a recent thing, they stopped being so strict on it when they realised there were going to be basically no females because everyone wanted boys. They still maintain a strict set of rules that they had from the one child policy like cutting benefits for the families etc. Whatever you say about how cruel it was its a hell of a lot better than an unsustainable population and the policy worked. They need to educate people on the dangers of overpopulation because its more deadly than global warming, for the planet. Tldr: kill yourself this planet is doomed and there are too many of us #64 -
anon (11/03/2015) [-] They also changed it because now, like many other countries, they have fucking truckloads of old people and not enough young people to take care of them. The baby boom only lasted so long, and it lead to a aged care crisis. I can kinda understand what they are thinking on that note, but it they made a few changes to their industry they would be able to sustain an even higher population. Every country is a level 40 character who wasted half of their levels on useless shit it seems. | ||
| #129 - Sometimes it is, dont be so ignorant. Its not your body nor yo… [+] (28 new replies) | 11/03/2015 on It's an unpopular opinion... | -3 |
| #152 -
deathstare (11/03/2015) [-] **deathstare rolled image**This is an example of FJ not agreeing with any side of the argument. It's this kind of stuff that confuses me. Do I really need to type out an essay about how slicing off your dick and inverting the scrotum to simulate a vagina won't make you happy in the long run? dae surgery sounds le scary when you place it in layman's terms??? #186 -
deathstare (11/03/2015) [-] **deathstare used "*roll picture*"** **deathstare rolled image**Usually the hive mind kicks in at this point. Just give it a few minutes.... any second now.... Everyones a cunt, you get used to it. respirator holdup sleepinglamia fatkidatrecess stokey confirmed for wanting to remove freedom and promote ignorance, suck a dick you non-fag faggots you and your massive stupidity is whats wrong with the world. #424 -
CrowbarNinja (11/03/2015) [-] #430 -
anon (11/03/2015) [-] You know somebody has autism when they start bringing in their username color and how long they've been on FJ out of nowhere. #166 -
deathstare (11/03/2015) [-] **deathstare used "*roll picture*"** **deathstare rolled image**Oh great job, call them back to the scene of the crime, just to double your red thumbs. You should hide Nigga, i feel no rage towards your sky-blue baby attempts at showing disapproval. #177 -
deathstare (11/03/2015) [-] **deathstare used "*roll picture*"** **deathstare rolled image**I am genuinely saddened. I used to have a much older account named "Epona", but I changed to this one. Little did I know, less than a month later, the coloured names popped up Its fun whipping out the name card, its like a black man calling a white one racist. | ||
| #281 - That kid had a ******* seizure or something. | 11/02/2015 on dank WebM compilation (pt 56) | 0 |
| #171 - It will be a bauble to gather dust on a shelf. Old Admin ran i… | 10/31/2015 on Poof | 0 |
| #41 - Ah, thank you very much. | 10/30/2015 on Ah, haha | 0 |
| #169 - HISSS, The site will be ours in due time. [+] (2 new replies) | 10/30/2015 on Poof | 0 |
| It will be a bauble to gather dust on a shelf. Old Admin ran it like it was. | ||
| #32 - I dont need sombody on here to tell me the possible circlejerk… [+] (3 new replies) | 10/29/2015 on Ah, haha | 0 |
| #34 -
sirlorge (10/29/2015) [-] Well it's really hard to word that into a google search. Using the rules of english not just a circlejerk mentality, thanks for implying that, though , we can establish that because of the way the stats are worded, that is what they convey. Now at the time of my initial response, I was busy doing homework, so I didn't look into it. Now I'm back and ready to give you your answers: www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/cancer-stats-explained/statistics-terminology-explained#heading-Ten This is about as close as I could get to finding anything that explains how these calculations work. If you are genuinely interested, click around, and see where that gets you. www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/26/bacon-ham-sausages-processed-meats-cancer-risk-smoking-says-who I find it interesting that like everyone else had commented, scientists and researchers all agree that there is a link between processed meats and cancer, but that suddenly dropping them from your diet won't necessarily reduce your risk, as it's really only present if you eat lots of red meats. They also mention that the IARC seemed pretty dead set on coming out with the result that bacon=cancer. If we exagerate everything that causes cancer that way, then we can wear yogapants, go outside in the daytime or drink wine/coffee, etc. www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2015/10/27/bacon-cancer/ Forbes is usually well researched, and this article confirms precisely what I'd explained in my previous reply, going a bit deeper into what exactly is being said about meats by both scientists and media. www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/facts/bacon-causes-cancer here's a BS half spoken truth article highlighting what forbes said they would, or even the BBC, again not explaining how the 18% works www.bbc.com/news/health-34615621 The line Forbes used in explaning the percentages is traced back to this guy ( www.mailman.columbia.edu/people/our-faculty/ain1 ) by way of this article: ( www.wired.com/2015/10/who-does-bacon-cause-cancer-sort-of-but-not-really/ ) #35 -
sirlorge (10/29/2015) [-] I seem to have fucked up the links: www.wired.com/2015/10/who-does-bacon-cause-cancer-sort-of-but-not-really/ This article attributes the explanation to www.mailman.columbia.edu/people/our-faculty/ain1 This guy. That's what the spoilers should have said | ||
| #3 - The cabinet. | 10/29/2015 on Who wore it better? | +3 |
| #17 - If its jason its 10/10 if its not 3/10 | 10/29/2015 on what do we think about this? | 0 |
| #13 - Still true though. | 10/29/2015 on Do me in this dress! | 0 |
| #8 - Little **** , i wish i had some apple juice. | 10/29/2015 on Parenting | 0 |
| #3 - Samurai Champaloo was the **** though inb4 you fa… | 10/29/2015 on wait a sec... | +2 |
| #34 - Shut up bby i know it. | 10/29/2015 on Here's why it's important | 0 |
| #17 - I agree, menism is for male privilege by definition, just how … | 10/29/2015 on You rage you lose/effects... | 0 |
| #15 - Man, if everyone on the site care about the issue that way we … [+] (2 new replies) | 10/29/2015 on You rage you lose/effects... | 0 |
| it's either called meninism or egalitarianism. i'm an egalitarian. equality for all. I agree, menism is for male privilege by definition, just how feminism is for female privilege, which we need neither/both of. Its still funny to laugh at all the buttmad people here. | ||
| #34 - Design-wise it looks fine, idgaf about what ou guys say, stop … | 10/29/2015 on Fallout 4 in a fews days | 0 |
| #33 - Jesus this is great. | 10/29/2015 on Fallout 4 in a fews days | 0 |
| #13 - MFW everyone in the comments is so rustled by feminists. We do… [+] (4 new replies) | 10/29/2015 on You rage you lose/effects... | +1 |
| well, the thing about feminism is that unlike trolls, they can fucking do something their fucking stupid ideology can influence the real world, for worse! Man, if everyone on the site care about the issue that way we would start a petition or group protest. it's either called meninism or egalitarianism. i'm an egalitarian. equality for all. I agree, menism is for male privilege by definition, just how feminism is for female privilege, which we need neither/both of. Its still funny to laugh at all the buttmad people here. | ||
| #19 - Can someone to verify this? I know well enough not to feel hop… [+] (6 new replies) | 10/29/2015 on Ah, haha | 0 |
| #38 -
anon (10/29/2015) [-] The actual percentages in the study: small amount of processed meat eaten daily: 5.6% risk of cancer. A large amount of processed meat eaten daily, 6.6.% risk of cancer. That's an 18% increase. #27 -
sirlorge (10/29/2015) [-] If it increases your chances by 18%, then what ever your current risk is would be increased by that percentage of itself. So your risk goes up by that percentage of itself. If it were an absolute risk (1/8 men who eat this food will get cancer) then it's a solid percent increase, and not relative I dont need sombody on here to tell me the possible circlejerk, i need to see proof, the media paraphrases often as does FJ blow it out of proportion, i want the studies. #34 -
sirlorge (10/29/2015) [-] Well it's really hard to word that into a google search. Using the rules of english not just a circlejerk mentality, thanks for implying that, though , we can establish that because of the way the stats are worded, that is what they convey. Now at the time of my initial response, I was busy doing homework, so I didn't look into it. Now I'm back and ready to give you your answers: www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/cancer-stats-explained/statistics-terminology-explained#heading-Ten This is about as close as I could get to finding anything that explains how these calculations work. If you are genuinely interested, click around, and see where that gets you. www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/26/bacon-ham-sausages-processed-meats-cancer-risk-smoking-says-who I find it interesting that like everyone else had commented, scientists and researchers all agree that there is a link between processed meats and cancer, but that suddenly dropping them from your diet won't necessarily reduce your risk, as it's really only present if you eat lots of red meats. They also mention that the IARC seemed pretty dead set on coming out with the result that bacon=cancer. If we exagerate everything that causes cancer that way, then we can wear yogapants, go outside in the daytime or drink wine/coffee, etc. www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2015/10/27/bacon-cancer/ Forbes is usually well researched, and this article confirms precisely what I'd explained in my previous reply, going a bit deeper into what exactly is being said about meats by both scientists and media. www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/facts/bacon-causes-cancer here's a BS half spoken truth article highlighting what forbes said they would, or even the BBC, again not explaining how the 18% works www.bbc.com/news/health-34615621 The line Forbes used in explaning the percentages is traced back to this guy ( www.mailman.columbia.edu/people/our-faculty/ain1 ) by way of this article: ( www.wired.com/2015/10/who-does-bacon-cause-cancer-sort-of-but-not-really/ ) #35 -
sirlorge (10/29/2015) [-] I seem to have fucked up the links: www.wired.com/2015/10/who-does-bacon-cause-cancer-sort-of-but-not-really/ This article attributes the explanation to www.mailman.columbia.edu/people/our-faculty/ain1 This guy. That's what the spoilers should have said | ||
| #8 - Picture | 10/29/2015 on (untitled) | 0 |
| #24 - Dude, too many of the white-sky blue named ***** are ru… [+] (2 new replies) | 10/29/2015 on Here's why it's important | 0 |
| | ||
| #9 - im on to you lizardman, you're trying too hard to fit into the… [+] (4 new replies) | 10/29/2015 on Poof | +53 |
| It will be a bauble to gather dust on a shelf. Old Admin ran it like it was. | ||
