ten years, twenty max.

It will more then likeley have a cooldown on it, that will probably only allow the jedi to block one, possibly two people shooting at them. I mean, hell, any Jedi having six actually competent people shooting at them is fucked beyond reason.

But that would suck because countless jedi block loads of fire, we need a better area of effect for the lightsaber and dynamic placement of it controlled by the players. if i block all of the fire coming at me from the front or aim shots back at people i should be vulnerable behind me, though i should be able to swap quickly because its the only way a lightsaber is effective. I shouldnt automatically block sniper fire, i should know when and where a scoped sniper looks at me, so i can try to block it. Make it skill based, because a jedi in battlefield would change everything, especially since every map (Including Mos Eisley if its is simi The only things that crippled BF2 imo was the lack of customizable loadouts Reason i mainly play TF2 now , and meh jedi up-down-left-right does not make a good 3d game tight. A lightsaber fight was jousting, that is not canon at all what the fuck.

Not so much former as it is the latter in which when its the latter they claim its because the person is the former despite anything that is said. I'm probably getting down thumbed by fanboys for Dark souls, and anti fanboys of COD series, ultimately I don't give a shit about validating what I have done or played to other people but do find it a tad bit irksome that those same people seem to be dragging shit down, not that I'm saying COD is by any means a fucking prize any more, but there is still something to be said for the fun of trouncing mr " I have 300 confirmed kills super navy seal" with a starter weapon.
Oh well

Games are games, the only reason to hate a game is your own saltiness. People are just assholes, and this site is no exception.

before I visit the website, I'd just like to say that phrases like "...this is the only way to _____ and if you don't agree you are wrong and part of the problem..." sound very much fascist to me. I mean, it's just my opinion, and it's just your opinion, and we are debating a subjective issue (the proper way to discuss), but still...

anyway man, I was just pointing out the classic left and right stereotypes: lefties are for change and righties are against it. Lefties are pretty chill because nothing bothers them and they have a loose moral code (drugs, drinking, casual sex are not a ptoblem). Righties get their panties in a knot every time some "scientist" tries to prove that the way they've been doing things for the last 100 years is wrong.

It's just a joke, mate. I know conservatives can be normal people, and not all of them are liberal-hating, backwards, gun-toting farmers. And not all liberals are ultra-politically-correct nazis looking for a reason to be upset. This site is funny junk. If it's not funny, it's probably junk.

Thanks for the site, though. I may have to start using it in future discussions

I agree totally, and i make many fallacies every day, but if we dont try hard at our system then why try at all. When it comes to arguing if you arent doing it logically you shouldnt be doing it at all. When you dont its less efficient, covers less, circlejerks or ignores good ideas, and makes stupid ideas sound ok and smart ones dumb. Its like playing WoW or Diablo without knowing your equipment stats and insisting your gear is better than that dudes, neither of you knows what good is to begin with! Also by you i mean the royal you, meaning i address anyone whome my comment applies to. I will only ever say you should only do this when it comes to using logic when arguing, and even logic itself says if you find something better than it, use it. You just have to prove its better.

what's a strawman?

I just meant that society is about freedom: it an individual wants to party or sleep naked or have gay orgies he should be able to. No group should be able to legalize morality or ciminalize certain behaviour.

Sorry, not strawman, but genetic, and black and white fallacies. If you are going to talk about politics in the future refer to this: yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ Its the only proper way to argue and if you say otherwise you are the reason out political scheme is not working.

before I visit the website, I'd just like to say that phrases like "...this is the only way to _____ and if you don't agree you are wrong and part of the problem..." sound very much fascist to me. I mean, it's just my opinion, and it's just your opinion, and we are debating a subjective issue (the proper way to discuss), but still...

anyway man, I was just pointing out the classic left and right stereotypes: lefties are for change and righties are against it. Lefties are pretty chill because nothing bothers them and they have a loose moral code (drugs, drinking, casual sex are not a ptoblem). Righties get their panties in a knot every time some "scientist" tries to prove that the way they've been doing things for the last 100 years is wrong.

It's just a joke, mate. I know conservatives can be normal people, and not all of them are liberal-hating, backwards, gun-toting farmers. And not all liberals are ultra-politically-correct nazis looking for a reason to be upset. This site is funny junk. If it's not funny, it's probably junk.

Thanks for the site, though. I may have to start using it in future discussions

I agree totally, and i make many fallacies every day, but if we dont try hard at our system then why try at all. When it comes to arguing if you arent doing it logically you shouldnt be doing it at all. When you dont its less efficient, covers less, circlejerks or ignores good ideas, and makes stupid ideas sound ok and smart ones dumb. Its like playing WoW or Diablo without knowing your equipment stats and insisting your gear is better than that dudes, neither of you knows what good is to begin with! Also by you i mean the royal you, meaning i address anyone whome my comment applies to. I will only ever say you should only do this when it comes to using logic when arguing, and even logic itself says if you find something better than it, use it. You just have to prove its better.

*high-powered semi-automatic rifle protected under the second amendment. Written at a time when slavery was OK and women couldn't vote.

Hey man why does it matter when in eighty years everyone is going to have an impactproof fully synthetic body and a cloud based brain that can never be killed or hacked because its hosted by every machine in the world simultaneously. and clothes that are bulletproof by nature and aren't impeding on fashion because they can be made at a molecular level and will still be strong enough to wear to a construction site. The only thing we will have to worry about in the early 2000's, as we have been shown in the last 15 years are; Hackers, corporations like Nestle, Murder happy countries, and nukes if things get too extreme. Moving on we are going to have to worry about the super rad tesla bombs you'll be able to make out of graphene, and the city wide blackouts that will happen due to having computerized everything. Also, even though im a very liberal person i have to say the conservative argument for gun regulations is a solid one, and that at this point resisting it is only slowing down out system even more and people need to shut the fuck up, i have seen enough videos of people being asshole while hunting to know there are assholes out there, but i have also seen enough videos of people shooting and killing home invaders who were armed to know that lives are saved. If the world was going to end or the country was going to go strait to third world status in a day, i would say yes to putting slavery back into place, so long as all of our officials are replaced by the people in the country with the highest IQ and test grades for relevant positions.Just because a bunch of tribals thought something doesnt mean its stupid, it just means a bunch of tribals thought it so you should probably do some testing before implementing it just like fucking anything else . This "Im a liberal so fuck all conservatives" and "Im conservative so fuck all liberals" bullshit is whats wrong with our country today dont you fucking understand? If we all just said "fuck the parties im going to do some independent research into what candidates there are and who has the best ideals and the best plan and vote for them like a proper fucking citizen" Stop being hostile and belligerent to your fellow american and human being, fuck.

Is it surprising?
When you're in your twenties, with next to no life experience you suddenly decide to love someone for the rest of your life?
Ridiculous

The statistics that say that don't take into account couples who have been divorced before. People who get divorced once are more likely to get divorced again. It'd be much better if you only counted 1 divorce per one person.

I have seen the studies, but i was mostly using anecdotal evidence, out of the six marriages i am around regularly, one of them has ended now, one of them is in the middle of the divorce, one of them is going well even though its their second marriage, another is doing alright, another is doing horribly though they refuse to divorce, and the last one is Not doing well. In my mind all but one of these marriages have failed. If you start a young romance without over analyzing your relationship so that you know it will work when both of you have lived in the same space for a decade and have a kid or two then you may as well make it 100% physical and just stay fuck buddies, or agree to never marry and/or have kids. tfw no gf hits like a ton of bricks, but its better than tfw no feelings for wife.

I have an alternative view of why it "fails" now as opposed to previously.

Women can actually get a divorce now and live their lives.

or you know, they get bored of their partner, divorce and get most of their shit, and then find a new more interesting guy.

You say that because it's so outlandish to you that it was ever another way. Divorce used to be frowned upon. heavily. It wasn't as easy then as it was today.

Update: Had PC with Windows 10 running all morning. Did some intensive online gaming and went back to check my RAM once the machine was good and toasty. 2.9 GB used. It does sound like your friend did install a faulty version. Maybe try reinstalling it?

Sweet im the hulk.