x
FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!
Click to expand

ChilyCheeseFryz

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Youtube Channel: ChilyCheezeFryz
Steam Profile: ChilyCheezeFryz
Date Signed Up:1/05/2010
Last Login:2/13/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#9917
Highest Content Rank:#11863
Highest Comment Rank:#3544
Content Thumbs: 126 total,  209 ,  83
Comment Thumbs: 1861 total,  2098 ,  237
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 12 Content: New Here → Level 13 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 42% (42/100)
Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:13170
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:567
FJ Points:1891

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 6297
    Thumbs Up 142 Thumbs Down 12 Total: +130
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 10
    Uploaded: 08/14/12
    Black Metal Philosopher Black Metal Philosopher
  • Views: 580
    Thumbs Up 7 Thumbs Down 12 Total: -5
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/13/12
    ...Wait What? ...Wait What?

YouTube Videos

  • Views: 2732
    Thumbs Up 30 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +23
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 09/02/12
    Call of the WinterWrapUp Call of the WinterWrapUp
  • Views: 894
    Thumbs Up 8 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +4
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 08/03/12
    World Peace World Peace
  • Views: 733
    Thumbs Up 2 Thumbs Down 0 Total: +2
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/23/12
    ITS A TRAP!!! ITS A TRAP!!!

latest user's comments

#131 - It is one of the greatest movies of all time. Watch it and it … 01/27/2015 on Forrest Gump 0
#264 - "Come on and Slam And welcome to the Jam" 01/22/2015 on Video games +4
#254 - Because everyone knows what it is. 01/21/2015 on What level of music are you? 0
#172 - We've never observed macro-evolution of species, but that's st…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/05/2015 on Evolution 0
#177 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
We have observed it... through the fossil record...
User avatar #207 - lyiat (01/05/2015) [-]
Uh... No we haven't. There has been absolutely zero documented cases of macro-evolution, in the fossil record or elsewhere. It's the main argument of Christian scientists.

This would be because it doesn't fucking happen and if you believe that's now evolution works, you're an idiot.
#208 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
User avatar #209 - lyiat (01/05/2015) [-]
Transitional fossils are not macroevolution, you ding dong.

"Macroevolution is evolution on a scale of separated gene pools." Basically, the exact point Dinosaurs became Birds, and Apes became Humans. That shift does not suddenly happen. It's microevolutionary over millions of years. You'll never see the transition point.
#211 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
That's what macroevolution is, no one believes it happens instantaneously.
#171 - That's like going back in time to be your own grandpa. You sti… 01/05/2015 on Evolution 0
#167 - You don't have to see it, it's logic. You can't just have exis…  [+] (7 new replies) 01/05/2015 on Evolution 0
#169 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
It's just logic, based on something that you've never observed. OK then.
User avatar #172 - ChilyCheeseFryz (01/05/2015) [-]
We've never observed macro-evolution of species, but that's still the base of biological sciences.
#177 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
We have observed it... through the fossil record...
User avatar #207 - lyiat (01/05/2015) [-]
Uh... No we haven't. There has been absolutely zero documented cases of macro-evolution, in the fossil record or elsewhere. It's the main argument of Christian scientists.

This would be because it doesn't fucking happen and if you believe that's now evolution works, you're an idiot.
#208 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
User avatar #209 - lyiat (01/05/2015) [-]
Transitional fossils are not macroevolution, you ding dong.

"Macroevolution is evolution on a scale of separated gene pools." Basically, the exact point Dinosaurs became Birds, and Apes became Humans. That shift does not suddenly happen. It's microevolutionary over millions of years. You'll never see the transition point.
#211 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
That's what macroevolution is, no one believes it happens instantaneously.
#152 - Well the idea of the universe infinitely expanding then contra…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/05/2015 on Evolution 0
#170 - spish (01/05/2015) [-]
If it involves the warping of space-time and all that shit than it doesn't have to have a beggining, because time doesn't have to be in the straight line we always think of it as.
It doesn't have to start the cycle if it warps time to start itself.
User avatar #171 - ChilyCheeseFryz (01/05/2015) [-]
That's like going back in time to be your own grandpa. You still have a beginning, just one that you created.
#160 - afrosheep (01/05/2015) [-]
Of course I understand that all things (including time itself) need to have a beginning but as it stands now there is no concrete evidence that something or someone started the cycle. Therefore until new evidence presents it self, I feel confident in that the universe was always here but in a constant cycle of rebirth. My best example would be if you could reach light speed the flow of time begins to slow, until it reaches a halt at light speed. However time around would seem constant but in fact you would be moving as fast as time permits you to experience it. What this means is that there is limitations to what life or better yet objects in this reality perceive time, space, and even existence. In conclusion until we discover what binds time to our reality time will seemingly be endless and also beginning-less.
#142 - The universe OBVIOUSLY had a beginning. ALL things that exist …  [+] (14 new replies) 01/05/2015 on Evolution 0
#166 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
Why do you assume that? When in your life have you ever seen something truly created, rather than just changing form?
User avatar #167 - ChilyCheeseFryz (01/05/2015) [-]
You don't have to see it, it's logic. You can't just have existence, it has to start. Whether or not it can end doesn't matter, it just has to have a beginning.
#169 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
It's just logic, based on something that you've never observed. OK then.
User avatar #172 - ChilyCheeseFryz (01/05/2015) [-]
We've never observed macro-evolution of species, but that's still the base of biological sciences.
#177 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
We have observed it... through the fossil record...
User avatar #207 - lyiat (01/05/2015) [-]
Uh... No we haven't. There has been absolutely zero documented cases of macro-evolution, in the fossil record or elsewhere. It's the main argument of Christian scientists.

This would be because it doesn't fucking happen and if you believe that's now evolution works, you're an idiot.
#208 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
User avatar #209 - lyiat (01/05/2015) [-]
Transitional fossils are not macroevolution, you ding dong.

"Macroevolution is evolution on a scale of separated gene pools." Basically, the exact point Dinosaurs became Birds, and Apes became Humans. That shift does not suddenly happen. It's microevolutionary over millions of years. You'll never see the transition point.
#211 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (01/05/2015) [-]
That's what macroevolution is, no one believes it happens instantaneously.
#146 - afrosheep (01/05/2015) [-]
If everything has to begin then at what point does that cycle stop? In my opinion our universe recycles it self through a constant big bang to big crunch loop that never ends or really even begins.
User avatar #152 - ChilyCheeseFryz (01/05/2015) [-]
Well the idea of the universe infinitely expanding then contracting back into the infinitesimal spec it was before and then recreating itself if a fine and nifty idea.......but that is just a cycle that had to start somewhere. Excuse me if my quantum physics is sloppy, but infinitesimally small particles tend to do whatever the fuck they want, such as teleport and jump in and out of existence. Be it a cycle or not, it still needs a TRUE beginning to even START the cycle in the first place.
#170 - spish (01/05/2015) [-]
If it involves the warping of space-time and all that shit than it doesn't have to have a beggining, because time doesn't have to be in the straight line we always think of it as.
It doesn't have to start the cycle if it warps time to start itself.
User avatar #171 - ChilyCheeseFryz (01/05/2015) [-]
That's like going back in time to be your own grandpa. You still have a beginning, just one that you created.
#160 - afrosheep (01/05/2015) [-]
Of course I understand that all things (including time itself) need to have a beginning but as it stands now there is no concrete evidence that something or someone started the cycle. Therefore until new evidence presents it self, I feel confident in that the universe was always here but in a constant cycle of rebirth. My best example would be if you could reach light speed the flow of time begins to slow, until it reaches a halt at light speed. However time around would seem constant but in fact you would be moving as fast as time permits you to experience it. What this means is that there is limitations to what life or better yet objects in this reality perceive time, space, and even existence. In conclusion until we discover what binds time to our reality time will seemingly be endless and also beginning-less.
#140 - Well then he should stop having stupid beliefs. 01/05/2015 on Evolution -1
#8 - Picture 01/01/2015 on 2spooky 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe metal-time
Join Subscribe morbid-channel
Join Subscribe ponytime

user's friends

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)