Yes, didn't you know a baseball bat tends to me more gradual?

>Implying we actually wait till we're 21 to drink.

Well shit, it's true. People over here drink anyway.

It does, 20 and the perpetual designated driver.

I wish MFW

If your parents give it to you, you can drink at age 5 in the UK.
My jimmies remain unrustled.

Same here in Panama.

But nobody knows about this tiny country so meh.

That feel when you can get alcohol and cigarettes at the age of 10 in my country

also in Venezuela...

Dat feel when you can drink at 16 in the Netherlands

And Canada, Eh?

Canada as well? Wow. Must suck to be american.

>Implying we actually wait till we're 21 to drink.

Well shit, it's true. People over here drink anyway.

It does, 20 and the perpetual designated driver.

I wish MFW

True, fair enough.

LET THE GALAXY DROOOOOOWN IN IT!

It's something like "How much time is one light-year?"

Blood vessels.

Well of course that's what it's supposed to say, but it doesn't.

True, fair enough.

yeah, well, you europeans have slightly smarter politicians than we do. And by that I mean we have bible thumping retards while you have actual politicians

He is not claiming that this is wrong he is simply stating that some of complications that this posts suggests are avoidable.

just think about it. if separating people because of their race is wrong, then why is separating people based on their sexual orientation wrong?

You posted as anonymous which means several things:

1. Your fear of red thumbs is greater than how much you stand by your opinion.
2. You're unwilling to defend your position because you'll have no way to know whether or not I replied to you unless you keep refreshing your comment on a separate tab
3. It'd be a waste of time for me to reply to your comment.

Marriage just like public schooling is considered a state institute recognized by the law.

I do believe his point is that homosexual couples should not have to suffer being treated differently than heterosexual couples. He's 100% right, but he's also being a bit of a dick about it.

I was just hoping he'd be able to work it out himself.

Oh, it's OK. Just got a bit painful to watch. Sorry to break your combo ;)

Do you see anything wrong with creating separate schools specifically for black people?

That doesn't apply. Religion in churches only works for christians. I'm not christian and unless my partner in the future turns out to be I don't plan on marrying in a church. I won't be segregated for it though.

Sorry what? Of course I have issues with separate schooling for black kids but what the hell does that have to do with my comment or the picture?

He is not claiming that this is wrong he is simply stating that some of complications that this posts suggests are avoidable.

just think about it. if separating people because of their race is wrong, then why is separating people based on their sexual orientation wrong?

You posted as anonymous which means several things:

1. Your fear of red thumbs is greater than how much you stand by your opinion.
2. You're unwilling to defend your position because you'll have no way to know whether or not I replied to you unless you keep refreshing your comment on a separate tab
3. It'd be a waste of time for me to reply to your comment.

Marriage just like public schooling is considered a state institute recognized by the law.

I do believe his point is that homosexual couples should not have to suffer being treated differently than heterosexual couples. He's 100% right, but he's also being a bit of a dick about it.

I was just hoping he'd be able to work it out himself.

Oh, it's OK. Just got a bit painful to watch. Sorry to break your combo ;)

"separate but equal"

Sorry I'm probably being really stupid here but you're going to have to spell it out for me.
What point are you making?

Do you see anything wrong with creating separate schools specifically for black people?

That doesn't apply. Religion in churches only works for christians. I'm not christian and unless my partner in the future turns out to be I don't plan on marrying in a church. I won't be segregated for it though.

Sorry what? Of course I have issues with separate schooling for black kids but what the hell does that have to do with my comment or the picture?

He is not claiming that this is wrong he is simply stating that some of complications that this posts suggests are avoidable.

just think about it. if separating people because of their race is wrong, then why is separating people based on their sexual orientation wrong?

You posted as anonymous which means several things:

1. Your fear of red thumbs is greater than how much you stand by your opinion.
2. You're unwilling to defend your position because you'll have no way to know whether or not I replied to you unless you keep refreshing your comment on a separate tab
3. It'd be a waste of time for me to reply to your comment.

Marriage just like public schooling is considered a state institute recognized by the law.

I do believe his point is that homosexual couples should not have to suffer being treated differently than heterosexual couples. He's 100% right, but he's also being a bit of a dick about it.

I was just hoping he'd be able to work it out himself.

Oh, it's OK. Just got a bit painful to watch. Sorry to break your combo ;)

insinuating marriage was invented by the church

...I wasnt insinuating that. I was just insinuating that today most marriages in western society take place in churches.

Do you know what segregation is?

...yes. What does my comment or the picture above have to do with segregation?

"separate but equal"

Sorry I'm probably being really stupid here but you're going to have to spell it out for me.
What point are you making?

Do you see anything wrong with creating separate schools specifically for black people?

That doesn't apply. Religion in churches only works for christians. I'm not christian and unless my partner in the future turns out to be I don't plan on marrying in a church. I won't be segregated for it though.

Sorry what? Of course I have issues with separate schooling for black kids but what the hell does that have to do with my comment or the picture?

He is not claiming that this is wrong he is simply stating that some of complications that this posts suggests are avoidable.

just think about it. if separating people because of their race is wrong, then why is separating people based on their sexual orientation wrong?

You posted as anonymous which means several things:

1. Your fear of red thumbs is greater than how much you stand by your opinion.
2. You're unwilling to defend your position because you'll have no way to know whether or not I replied to you unless you keep refreshing your comment on a separate tab
3. It'd be a waste of time for me to reply to your comment.

Marriage just like public schooling is considered a state institute recognized by the law.

I do believe his point is that homosexual couples should not have to suffer being treated differently than heterosexual couples. He's 100% right, but he's also being a bit of a dick about it.

I was just hoping he'd be able to work it out himself.

Oh, it's OK. Just got a bit painful to watch. Sorry to break your combo ;)

1. Marriages don't happen only in churches, religion is outdated by marriage
2. Civil parterships for gay couples are banned, like, almost everywhere in backwards fucking America.

actually thats wrong. marriage is an idealogy that is explicitly linked to religion. i dont know where everyone keeps getting the idea that marriage and religion are not related.

Well, you do remember the whole "separation of church and state" thing right? Pretty important part of our constitution. Well, if you want marriage to remain a solely religious institution, then it'd only be right if all marriages lost all special privledges they now have in the eyes of the law, and that they should be completely disregarded on a legal standpoint on all fronts.

But, since that's not how marriage is treated, then it is to be seen as a state institution and as a state institution, it should be expected to adhere to the same standards as all other state institutes, and last I check, bias segregation isn't something that should exist within a state institute.

Oh sorry to hear that. In the UK civil partners get full rights.

yeah, well, you europeans have slightly smarter politicians than we do. And by that I mean we have bible thumping retards while you have actual politicians

Was thinking the same. She appears to wearing the same top in the NSFW pic

hi.

forgot to ask you yesterday, derpy thread?

let's not make it too big, that's annoying for some people

one does not simply get enough derpy

derpy is cutest pony

i find this a well sized thread, abandon thread.gif

hows this?

Derpy is best pony

completely agree