Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

BobertoJoe    

BobertoJoe Avatar Level 168 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Offline
Send mail to BobertoJoe Block BobertoJoe Invite BobertoJoe to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:8/08/2010
Last Login:6/19/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 3 total,  5 ,  8
Comment Thumbs: 688 total,  759 ,  71
Content Level Progress: 1.69% (1/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 168 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 169 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:0
Content Views:5
Total Comments Made:141
FJ Points:684

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#44 - Good. You should try Canada, though. They have great...um...st…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/05/2013 on All Hail Mr.Tickle 0
User avatar #45 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I like Sweden! It's a lot like that, but less Canadian.
#39 - You should take a summer in some place that's not there. It's fun.  [+] (3 new replies) 04/05/2013 on All Hail Mr.Tickle 0
User avatar #43 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I've been all over the US and Europe.
User avatar #44 - BobertoJoe (04/05/2013) [-]
Good. You should try Canada, though. They have great...um...stuff. And snow. And mooses. And ham. I like Canada.
User avatar #45 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I like Sweden! It's a lot like that, but less Canadian.
#37 - I have 1 counterpoint to that statement: why would you want to…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/05/2013 on All Hail Mr.Tickle -3
#40 - teranin (04/05/2013) [-]
I grew up here, and was raised here. Why would someone want to live in Liberia, or Somalia? Sometimes we simply are where we are.

And now for a reaction image that is both inappropriate and valid at the same time.
User avatar #38 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I live in the southern US.
User avatar #39 - BobertoJoe (04/05/2013) [-]
You should take a summer in some place that's not there. It's fun.
User avatar #43 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I've been all over the US and Europe.
User avatar #44 - BobertoJoe (04/05/2013) [-]
Good. You should try Canada, though. They have great...um...stuff. And snow. And mooses. And ham. I like Canada.
User avatar #45 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I like Sweden! It's a lot like that, but less Canadian.
#32 - Alright, fine. Prove that there is no God. Find me proof. OR f…  [+] (27 new replies) 04/05/2013 on All Hail Mr.Tickle +8
#143 - anonymous (04/05/2013) [-]
Ok prove to me the big bang happened. Come on, prove it this 'obnoxious' individual. Your logic is so flawed from all perspectives, religious or not. You cant prove god exists or that he doesnt and arguing solves nothing. The sooner the world (and internet) learns that the happier we shall all be.
#118 - anonymous (04/05/2013) [-]
So, you're saying that because you believe in god, he is real, i believe in magical rainbow-shitting unicorns, doesn't mean they're real... Your logic doesn't make any sense in the world we live in today, with the amount of information available to you on the internet and the way information can be shared in an instant you have no reason to "believe" in things that make no logical sense.
#55 - anonymous (04/05/2013) [-]
Actually, many people try and prove God metaphysically or even empirically; some quite well. No offense, but by making the argument that your beliefs are exempt from traditional scrutiny because they're justified with- by definition- lack of evidence (faith) is almost laughable. I mean, believe what you want and all but the fact I can't disprove Mr. Tickle isn't an argument for his existence.

'A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.'
#51 - jamiemsm (04/05/2013) [-]
im okay with religions i just dont want people to telling me im going to hell if im not beliving what they belive.
what im trying to say i dont mind cool guys just dont like the assholes who makes religion look bad :)
User avatar #35 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
Religion isn't science. I wish people would stop treating it like it is, asking for proof.
#104 - anonymous (04/05/2013) [-]
So we read shit out of science books and believe them, too. I believe that the belief in science is a faith as well. I would explain more but it's 2 in the morning and I'm a fucking anon anyways so fuck it.
User avatar #146 - robertolee (04/05/2013) [-]
I think you're confused. You do not 'Believe' in science and scientific fact does not require faith. The whole basis of scientific fact is that is can be tested and proven, no faith needed.
User avatar #159 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
Well, not everything is science can be proven. There are a bunch of unproven but well-accepted theories out there. But yeah, I see your point.
User avatar #168 - robertolee (04/05/2013) [-]
Ah see I said "Scientific fact can be tested and proven"
Scientific hypothesis is untested and proven
Scientific theory has alot of evidence to prove it but cannot be called a definite fact if there is still holes in the theory
User avatar #169 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
Oh, my mistake.

Still, nothing can be proven with 100% absolute certainty in science, when you get down to the grit of it. I'll settle for 99.99%, though.
User avatar #92 - ilovehitler (04/05/2013) [-]
I really don't know much about religion, so I'm just gonna take my best guess here.

Is it because any being that created the universe could be undetectable in all forms if it so chose, so trying to find evidence would be completely pointless unless it wanted evidence to be found?
User avatar #158 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
Is what because of that?
User avatar #161 - ilovehitler (04/05/2013) [-]
Is the reason you should stop asking for proof because of that
User avatar #162 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I suppose in part. The bottom line, and the statement I was making, is that faith is not science and so people should stop asking for proof one way or another and either believe or not.
#83 - anonymous (04/05/2013) [-]
and thats your cop out
User avatar #57 - xapplemanx (04/05/2013) [-]
if we didnt have religion we would be much more advanced, thats my only thing against religion
User avatar #96 - spamalope (04/05/2013) [-]
Actually, thats literally impossible to prove what so ever.
#65 - anonymous (04/05/2013) [-]
That's not true. The Quran is more advanced than science. Scientists go to the Quran for answers when they're stumped sometimes. Things that people are just discovering now, Muslims already knew.
User avatar #85 - YllekNayr (04/05/2013) [-]
.........yeah, that's utter bullshit.
#33 - teranin (04/05/2013) [-]
Ok. I have 3 counterpoints to that statement. 1: This post was directed at people that view the bible/qu'ran/torah as INDISPUTABLE PROOF of the existence of god, not people who believe in god based on faith, and who are aware that there is no evidence for god's existence. 2: The burden of proof is always on the person making the claim, you claim there is a god, then the burden of proof is on you. If you can not prove the existence of god empirically then I have no reason to believe the claim of his existence. 3: Look up William Lane Craig if you want to see someone trying to "formulate a reasonable opinion to give you undenyable proof that god exists". It happens very often, but as a christian you don't experience the ridiculous shit we anti-theists do from our end of the spectrum, so please, do as Jesus tells you, and let your god judge me, since you do not have the relevant experience to fully understand where an anti-theist comes from. (I am basing that supposition off of the wording of your post, feel free to contest it, as I don't know you personally, but I sincerely doubt you've been kicked out of many classes when you were in school for refusing to say "under god" during the pledge or for questioning the use of the bible for teaching history. Also, I highly doubt that a gang of muslims gathered to beat you up for claiming their religion had no place as a theocratic government, and I doubt you've been fired from many jobs for not joining your co-workers in prayer. Southern United States. I fucking hate this place.)
User avatar #37 - BobertoJoe (04/05/2013) [-]
I have 1 counterpoint to that statement: why would you want to live in the southern US? That's just a bad idea all around.
#40 - teranin (04/05/2013) [-]
I grew up here, and was raised here. Why would someone want to live in Liberia, or Somalia? Sometimes we simply are where we are.

And now for a reaction image that is both inappropriate and valid at the same time.
User avatar #38 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I live in the southern US.
User avatar #39 - BobertoJoe (04/05/2013) [-]
You should take a summer in some place that's not there. It's fun.
User avatar #43 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I've been all over the US and Europe.
User avatar #44 - BobertoJoe (04/05/2013) [-]
Good. You should try Canada, though. They have great...um...stuff. And snow. And mooses. And ham. I like Canada.
User avatar #45 - draezeth (04/05/2013) [-]
I like Sweden! It's a lot like that, but less Canadian.
#1 - I agree, I hate when people are successful. We should always s… 03/12/2013 on Gotch'ya 0
#2 - Cheap and almost free, huh? What a great new way of thinking, op! 03/10/2013 on Life Hacks 0
#46 - Dhiraina. I can live with this. 03/10/2013 on Wikipedia 0
#126 - Although it does sound much cooler. "Excuse me while … 03/10/2013 on Retarded Protests +5
#5 - No, no, no. Bad, OP. Bad. Rosalind Franklin originally found t…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/01/2013 on Yeah Science +16
#9 - anonymous (03/01/2013) [-]
Yes, Franklin only discovered that DNA held a helix like pattern. She had no indication to the double helix. It was because of Watson and Crick's model work that proved the AT and CG patterns would fit on top of each other to form the double helix. So in short, it is you who must do their research.
#21 - anonymous (03/02/2013) [-]
Have you ever seen Photo 51? With the clear double helix? Or maybe, did you ever actually take a few weeks to learn about this in an AP Biology class? Yeah, I never do research or make informed decisions.
#7 - ipmules (03/01/2013) [-]
That's not right. Did Watson and Crick deserve all the credit? No, but I'm getting sick of everybody calling them a couple of assholes. Photo 51 was very important in seeing that DNA is helical, but it's not like "Oh cool, I just took this photo and it totally shows that DNA is helical!!" Wilkins took the photo on a trip to Cambridge and gave it and some lab data to Watson and Crick. They were then able to deduce the first correct model of DNA, before Rosalind was able to finish. When they were published in Nature in 1953, there accompanied papers by Wilkins, Stokes and Wilson, and then one by Franklin and Gosling.
User avatar #18 - darman (03/02/2013) [-]
Actually Watson and Crick had the papers stolen from her by a research aide. The rest of your statement is essentially accurate.
#4 - Argh...clip...gaaaah. It's not called a clip. It's a magazine.… 02/24/2013 on Random Movie Bad Guy 0
[ 136 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)