Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Bloodgartham

Rank #7950 on Comments
no avatar Level 248 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to Bloodgartham Block Bloodgartham Invite Bloodgartham to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 19
Steam Profile: Bloodgartham (WARP)
Consoles Owned: PS3,Wii
PSN: Fluffy
Interests: Martial Arts, Drawing, Reading, Painting
Date Signed Up:1/09/2010
Last Login:12/19/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#7950
Highest Content Rank:#6775
Highest Comment Rank:#1939
Content Thumbs: 400 total,  523 ,  123
Comment Thumbs: 5244 total,  6260 ,  1016
Content Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 39 Content: Peasant → Level 40 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 40% (40/100)
Level 248 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:1
Content Views:40221
Times Content Favorited:30 times
Total Comments Made:1415
FJ Points:1339
Favorite Tags: creative (2) | Minecraft (2) | survival (2)

latest user's comments

#6 - Oooh the metaphores... 05/28/2014 on Now that’s metal 0
#306 - Oh thank you. Sorry man, at my university, haven't got any mor… 05/27/2014 on Ingland +1
#148 - Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern co… 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
#136 - Ajperry, #98  [+] (2 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #142 - reginleif (05/27/2014) [-]
Scotland can't possibly have more oil than places like Norway or Saudi Arabia can it?

If so does Scotland have democracy? 0.o
User avatar #170 - CNBrown (05/27/2014) [-]
It depends on where you look, there is supposedly oil off the west coast in the Atlantic, but since its deeper it will cost more to survey and drill.
#135 - Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#129 - Pft, like resources isn¨t what the war will be started for.  [+] (4 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #132 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
In that case Scotland will be invaded first, then UK gets free oil
#135 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between two western powers would be "outragous". The fact that Urkaine is being invaded is more due to it being an Eastern European country.
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#126 - If taxation goes up, they wont have much of a choice once a ne…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #128 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
A new war won't be started if it is too expensive, Resources are the first things considered in a war, not if the fight is right
#129 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Pft, like resources isn¨t what the war will be started for.

User avatar #132 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
In that case Scotland will be invaded first, then UK gets free oil
#135 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between two western powers would be "outragous". The fact that Urkaine is being invaded is more due to it being an Eastern European country.
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#125 - Fair enough - Telegraph is a very biased newspaper t…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/27/2014 on Ingland -1
User avatar #127 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
Being born in Aberdeen i would say that Scottish Independence would be a historic Disaster and will be the most humiliating thing for the Scotland thing to do.
#121 - Yes, that is correct, but I mentioned earlier the amount of su…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #124 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, people buy less, thats how it works, we don't spend more for the same amount, we spend the same amount for less, especially while recovering from a recession
#126 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, they wont have much of a choice once a new war starts in the middle east or Angola sells too much though.
User avatar #128 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
A new war won't be started if it is too expensive, Resources are the first things considered in a war, not if the fight is right
#129 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Pft, like resources isn¨t what the war will be started for.

User avatar #132 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
In that case Scotland will be invaded first, then UK gets free oil
#135 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between two western powers would be "outragous". The fact that Urkaine is being invaded is more due to it being an Eastern European country.
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#119 - Not to you, some other guy. 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
#118 - Comment deleted 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
#112 - Things I read outsid…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
#125 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Fair enough -

Telegraph is a very biased newspaper though (family in Ireland and England).

Whatever the outcome is, I hope scottland goes independent, for the sake of making it historical.
User avatar #127 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
Being born in Aberdeen i would say that Scottish Independence would be a historic Disaster and will be the most humiliating thing for the Scotland thing to do.
#110 - No, I study international politics.  [+] (12 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #114 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
According to your source

"However, the Better Together campaign said the idea required additional borrowing which made "no sense"."

"because Scotland spends more than it raises in taxes the creation of an oil fund would rely on borrowed money."

"Mr Darling underlined that while oil revenues currently accounted for about 15% of Scotland's tax income, the North Sea's reserves were in decline."

Nice arguement when your source for is an opinion and against is figures from government officials.

Ok, was just confused at your interest in the subject.
#121 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Yes, that is correct, but I mentioned earlier the amount of success they have internationaly, where a lot of the money end up with the Parliament in London.

And if it required more borrowing, its worth starting it now for the prospect of an oil fund now that the oil is wroth lots, and the taxartion will most likely go up due to oil shortage later.
User avatar #124 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, people buy less, thats how it works, we don't spend more for the same amount, we spend the same amount for less, especially while recovering from a recession
#126 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, they wont have much of a choice once a new war starts in the middle east or Angola sells too much though.
User avatar #128 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
A new war won't be started if it is too expensive, Resources are the first things considered in a war, not if the fight is right
#129 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Pft, like resources isn¨t what the war will be started for.

User avatar #132 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
In that case Scotland will be invaded first, then UK gets free oil
#135 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between two western powers would be "outragous". The fact that Urkaine is being invaded is more due to it being an Eastern European country.
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#119 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Not to you, some other guy.
#118 - Bloodgartham has deleted their comment.
#107 - Comment deleted  [+] (18 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #108 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
source please, also you are swiss? you live in Scotland?
#125 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Fair enough -

Telegraph is a very biased newspaper though (family in Ireland and England).

Whatever the outcome is, I hope scottland goes independent, for the sake of making it historical.
User avatar #127 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
Being born in Aberdeen i would say that Scottish Independence would be a historic Disaster and will be the most humiliating thing for the Scotland thing to do.
#110 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-27565691

No, I study international politics.
User avatar #114 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
According to your source

"However, the Better Together campaign said the idea required additional borrowing which made "no sense"."

"because Scotland spends more than it raises in taxes the creation of an oil fund would rely on borrowed money."

"Mr Darling underlined that while oil revenues currently accounted for about 15% of Scotland's tax income, the North Sea's reserves were in decline."

Nice arguement when your source for is an opinion and against is figures from government officials.

Ok, was just confused at your interest in the subject.
#121 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Yes, that is correct, but I mentioned earlier the amount of success they have internationaly, where a lot of the money end up with the Parliament in London.

And if it required more borrowing, its worth starting it now for the prospect of an oil fund now that the oil is wroth lots, and the taxartion will most likely go up due to oil shortage later.
User avatar #124 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, people buy less, thats how it works, we don't spend more for the same amount, we spend the same amount for less, especially while recovering from a recession
#126 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, they wont have much of a choice once a new war starts in the middle east or Angola sells too much though.
User avatar #128 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
A new war won't be started if it is too expensive, Resources are the first things considered in a war, not if the fight is right
#129 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Pft, like resources isn¨t what the war will be started for.

User avatar #132 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
In that case Scotland will be invaded first, then UK gets free oil
#135 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between two western powers would be "outragous". The fact that Urkaine is being invaded is more due to it being an Eastern European country.
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#119 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Not to you, some other guy.
#118 - Bloodgartham has deleted their comment.
#104 - "which you wont actually get" - I am Swizz... And it…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland -1
User avatar #106 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
ok can we get this one thing out the way

IT IS NOT SCOTLANDS OIL

SCOTLAND CANNOT INTO THAT OIL

It would be massively illegal to nationalise the oil without buying it first
#107 - Bloodgartham has deleted their comment.
User avatar #108 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
source please, also you are swiss? you live in Scotland?
#125 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Fair enough -

Telegraph is a very biased newspaper though (family in Ireland and England).

Whatever the outcome is, I hope scottland goes independent, for the sake of making it historical.
User avatar #127 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
Being born in Aberdeen i would say that Scottish Independence would be a historic Disaster and will be the most humiliating thing for the Scotland thing to do.
#110 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-27565691

No, I study international politics.
User avatar #114 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
According to your source

"However, the Better Together campaign said the idea required additional borrowing which made "no sense"."

"because Scotland spends more than it raises in taxes the creation of an oil fund would rely on borrowed money."

"Mr Darling underlined that while oil revenues currently accounted for about 15% of Scotland's tax income, the North Sea's reserves were in decline."

Nice arguement when your source for is an opinion and against is figures from government officials.

Ok, was just confused at your interest in the subject.
#121 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Yes, that is correct, but I mentioned earlier the amount of success they have internationaly, where a lot of the money end up with the Parliament in London.

And if it required more borrowing, its worth starting it now for the prospect of an oil fund now that the oil is wroth lots, and the taxartion will most likely go up due to oil shortage later.
User avatar #124 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, people buy less, thats how it works, we don't spend more for the same amount, we spend the same amount for less, especially while recovering from a recession
#126 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, they wont have much of a choice once a new war starts in the middle east or Angola sells too much though.
User avatar #128 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
A new war won't be started if it is too expensive, Resources are the first things considered in a war, not if the fight is right
#129 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Pft, like resources isn¨t what the war will be started for.

User avatar #132 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
In that case Scotland will be invaded first, then UK gets free oil
#135 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between two western powers would be "outragous". The fact that Urkaine is being invaded is more due to it being an Eastern European country.
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#119 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Not to you, some other guy.
#118 - Bloodgartham has deleted their comment.
#97 - First - they have the oil near enough to them so they can nati…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland 0
User avatar #105 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
They will not be able to Nationalise the Oil, that is so illegal on so many levels, the best they can do is BUY the oil rigs, putting their already indebted country into another HUGE recession while the rest of the world recovers because they wanted to do it on their own.

If Scotland wants Independence, it should wait for when it is strong enough, not cripple itself and ruin any chance it has
#100 - anonymous (05/27/2014) [-]
So Scotlands first independant actions would be akin to those of Gaddafi, stealing oil rights in order to fuel petty government ambitions.
#92 - Great speech really. Puts things into perspective. 05/27/2014 on Ingland +1
#91 - Picture 05/27/2014 on Ingland +1
#90 - And they will do fine. They have more industrial power and res…  [+] (22 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland -1
#99 - anonymous (05/27/2014) [-]
You realise the SNP budget has been torn apart because they have huge gaps that they can't explain?

Scotland is currently propped up by English money (You're welcome for your free education btw.) The only hope an independant Scotland has is the North Sea reserves, which you won't actually get because it's all been developed and owned by private companies. It will be hilarious to watch the country implode though.
#104 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
"which you wont actually get" - I am Swizz... And it¨s not "free education", they have the potential resources to fix their mess. At the moment they are the poorest oil country in Europe due to giving all their resources to England.

Let's say they nationalise their oil, which will eventually happend if the become independent - they have a 5million population, which is tiny.
The amount of gass and eventually oil they have will easily make it a country that has a high rate of a "per capita" basis.

Outside oil and gass, they have an extreme amount of international engineers, inventions, industry and financial based sectors.
User avatar #106 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
ok can we get this one thing out the way

IT IS NOT SCOTLANDS OIL

SCOTLAND CANNOT INTO THAT OIL

It would be massively illegal to nationalise the oil without buying it first
#107 - Bloodgartham has deleted their comment.
User avatar #108 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
source please, also you are swiss? you live in Scotland?
#125 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Fair enough -

Telegraph is a very biased newspaper though (family in Ireland and England).

Whatever the outcome is, I hope scottland goes independent, for the sake of making it historical.
User avatar #127 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
Being born in Aberdeen i would say that Scottish Independence would be a historic Disaster and will be the most humiliating thing for the Scotland thing to do.
#110 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-27565691

No, I study international politics.
User avatar #114 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
According to your source

"However, the Better Together campaign said the idea required additional borrowing which made "no sense"."

"because Scotland spends more than it raises in taxes the creation of an oil fund would rely on borrowed money."

"Mr Darling underlined that while oil revenues currently accounted for about 15% of Scotland's tax income, the North Sea's reserves were in decline."

Nice arguement when your source for is an opinion and against is figures from government officials.

Ok, was just confused at your interest in the subject.
#121 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Yes, that is correct, but I mentioned earlier the amount of success they have internationaly, where a lot of the money end up with the Parliament in London.

And if it required more borrowing, its worth starting it now for the prospect of an oil fund now that the oil is wroth lots, and the taxartion will most likely go up due to oil shortage later.
User avatar #124 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, people buy less, thats how it works, we don't spend more for the same amount, we spend the same amount for less, especially while recovering from a recession
#126 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
If taxation goes up, they wont have much of a choice once a new war starts in the middle east or Angola sells too much though.
User avatar #128 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
A new war won't be started if it is too expensive, Resources are the first things considered in a war, not if the fight is right
#129 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Pft, like resources isn¨t what the war will be started for.

User avatar #132 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
In that case Scotland will be invaded first, then UK gets free oil
#135 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Dobut it unless world war 3 has just broken out. A war between two western powers would be "outragous". The fact that Urkaine is being invaded is more due to it being an Eastern European country.
User avatar #140 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
the Oil in Scotland can only have a tax on transportation through the waters, which will also put up the price for any country entering Scottish waters for anything (I.E Fishing, which will probably start another fishing war (yes Fishing war (yes ANOTHER)) with Iceland)

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm
#148 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Northern countries and fish.. you do not mess with northern countries and fish.
#119 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Not to you, some other guy.
#118 - Bloodgartham has deleted their comment.
#89 - UN has estimated that Scottland with their oilresouces could b…  [+] (21 new replies) 05/27/2014 on Ingland +2
#221 - anonymous (05/27/2014) [-]
Good joke. The North sea oil reserves or more than 50% empty now. The oil is running out big time
User avatar #211 - Gandalfthewhite (05/27/2014) [-]
if you achieved independence in the 70's or so, then you would be in a similar position to norway, but now it's too late and the oil isn't owned by the Scottish parliament
User avatar #134 - reginleif (05/27/2014) [-]
Scotland second richest country in the world? Listen man, I'm American, and therefore don't really have a horse in this race other than watching England become even smaller and more irrelevant, but c'mon you don't actually believe that do you? 0.o

#235 - anonymous (05/27/2014) [-]
> England
> Irrelevant

Good one.
#136 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Ajperry, #98
User avatar #142 - reginleif (05/27/2014) [-]
Scotland can't possibly have more oil than places like Norway or Saudi Arabia can it?

If so does Scotland have democracy? 0.o
User avatar #170 - CNBrown (05/27/2014) [-]
It depends on where you look, there is supposedly oil off the west coast in the Atlantic, but since its deeper it will cost more to survey and drill.
User avatar #94 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
Scotland has no Oil, the Oil in the north sea on the scottish coast is a Private companies, based in England and some in Denmark, you have no major Ports or Airports to export or import ANYTHING, Scotland will be paying the English Taxes just to feed its populace because the closest cheapest ports/Airports are in the UK. Also source on the UN thing please?
User avatar #98 - ajperry (05/27/2014) [-]
Well, I'm not trying to argue here dude but Scotland controls a lot of oil. In order for England to get to THEIR oil fields, they have to pass through Scottish water, that's the only way to get there, as an independent country we'd have the power to say no.

Again, not trying to argue, but your facts are wrong.
#103 - anonymous (05/27/2014) [-]
It would be treated as an embargo so you'd be forced to negatiate a rate, which would still be less than the value of the oil (So not enough to save your economy.) If you didn't agree on access then you'd be condemned internationally (Because stopping people getting at their own reserves for petty sake is frowned upon) and your 3 goats and a rifle which would constitute your army would then be rolled over as we forcefully took a chunk to secur access.

The whole independant Scotland thing is a joke. "We want independance! Except we still want your strong currency...and we still want the government systems you've put in place...and the military...and our trade agreements...and...WHAT HAVE THE BLOODY ROMANS BRITISH EVER DONE FOR US! MUH FREEDOOOOOOM"
User avatar #101 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
yeah understand, not arguing either but hey

The Oil IS in Scottish waters, but it is not owned by Scotland, it is owned by Companies Based in London, USA and Canada, so very little if any actually goes to Scotland
www.corporatewatch.org.uk/?q=node/1312%3F
User avatar #145 - reginleif (05/27/2014) [-]
While this is true..... Scotland COULD go Latin America on your asses and nationalize.... pretty sure that wouldn't end well at all for the Scots, but it's a possibility.
User avatar #147 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
That is so illegal is so many ways, its not their Oil, they would be stealing it from Private companies, who would be well within their rights to hire Mercenaries, who will win because Scotland will not have a full Army, only a couple of Battalions.

Thats if Scotland Nationalise them, which they won't, because, you know, Illegal
User avatar #150 - reginleif (05/27/2014) [-]
Wouldn't be the first time that happened though. :/ We're also severely underestimating what intense nationalism can do to things like common sense and respect for the law.

Although seeing the dangerous distance between England and Scotland, I don't think they'd pull it off as well as any Latin American country.
User avatar #152 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
I want to say this as a Scottish born, English Living unbiased person.

Becoming Independent will be Incredibly and internationally Humiliating for Scotland at this point in time.

If Scotland really, and i mean REALLY wants to be independent, it should wait until the Global market has stabilised and there is a renewable source of Energy
User avatar #154 - reginleif (05/27/2014) [-]
Personally I don't get why Scotland would want independence, by all accounts even by Scots, it seems that they get a decent deal fiscally speaking and they're properly represented.

But then again FunnyJunk and American media might not be the best sources on the matter.
User avatar #164 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
hey if you want sources and good arguments, i was having one with Bloodgartham who does how his/her shit and made some very good points in the comments below
#306 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
Oh thank you. Sorry man, at my university, haven't got any more breaks after these 5min, nice having a civilized chat with you at least. Very seldom you get that on FJ.
#97 - Bloodgartham (05/27/2014) [-]
First - they have the oil near enough to them so they can nationalize it, which was have been thought over, so the fact that it is privatized would not ba problem. Second they have massive gass resources as well as their could be nationalized oil.

I will try and find the article - There is loads about it ouside the UN source, or maybe I am translating wrong (English is not my first language, so I might be mixing short names up).
User avatar #105 - BenniEGHR (05/27/2014) [-]
They will not be able to Nationalise the Oil, that is so illegal on so many levels, the best they can do is BUY the oil rigs, putting their already indebted country into another HUGE recession while the rest of the world recovers because they wanted to do it on their own.

If Scotland wants Independence, it should wait for when it is strong enough, not cripple itself and ruin any chance it has
#100 - anonymous (05/27/2014) [-]
So Scotlands first independant actions would be akin to those of Gaddafi, stealing oil rights in order to fuel petty government ambitions.
#15 - Picture 05/26/2014 on Pigs vs. Tards +25
#195 - Oh deer lord! 05/26/2014 on Oh god, why 0
#151 - Name: Queensland local government area amalgamation plebiscite… 05/24/2014 on Your band in 3 steps! Game +1
#12 - Picture  [+] (9 new replies) 05/24/2014 on it could save your life +12
User avatar #25 - Ombra (05/24/2014) [-]
I've seen this before! Where is this from?
User avatar #31 - tffan (05/24/2014) [-]
It's the pilot for this new show called Mr. Pickles. Think of it like Lassie except the dog is an asshole.

Mr. Pickles Pilot
User avatar #37 - dantemp (05/24/2014) [-]
any idea if and when there's going to be episode two? I'm actually kind of looking forward to it, but this is from almost a year ago...
#20 - colbraabb (05/24/2014) [-]
#13 - devorezz (05/24/2014) [-]
#35 - rdobet (05/24/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDa9DVuwRDc
Its a gif from this pilot
It's an awful show that's literally 99% loledgy/randumb humor.
Apparently It's going on Adult Swim this fall, so, yeah.
User avatar #57 - RisenLichen (05/24/2014) [-]
So its about a possessed dog?

The fuck
#59 - rdobet (05/24/2014) [-]
I just thought hellhound or something. Didn't really care it's dumb as shit.
User avatar #60 - RisenLichen (05/24/2014) [-]
Yea its overviolent. kinda weird.
#49 - I despise that he killed Oberyn..... I really liked him.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/20/2014 on Game Of Seats 0
User avatar #50 - tannerninja (05/20/2014) [-]
Agreed. The one character that I hope makes it thru the whole series and my person favorite story line is Arya

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#13 - albertspeer (10/22/2014) [-]
The crunchier the biscuit, the better for the cheese.
#14 to #13 - Bloodgartham (10/22/2014) [-]
Amen!
#11 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/22/2014) [-]
#12 to #11 - Bloodgartham (06/22/2014) [-]
Holy crap you actually delivered?

How can you even be bothered with so many people requesting bread?
 Friends (0)