|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #5574 on CommentsLevel 247 Comments: Doinitrite
OfflineSend mail to Bloodgartham Block Bloodgartham Invite Bloodgartham to be your friend
latest user's comments
|#28 - Infinite in my opinion was ok. Not perfect, not close to as go…||03/30/2014 on WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?||+1|
|#25 - No. Don't ruin Bioshock. There is enough Pokémon already. [+] (29 new replies)||03/30/2014 on WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?||+3|
#87 - mrpavelowgrimm (03/31/2014) [-]
Well reading through your comment I knew you were too stupid to argue with. All you do is state an opinion with no foundation for an argument, so I'll live you with this.
You say gameplay is "retarded" and the only example you leave is the difficulty level Which is fine making something kill you faster rarely adds to the gameplay..
"TIME TRAVEL PARELLEL UNIVERSES GUYS WE'RE SO COMPLEX XDDD "
Solid argument there buddy bet it took you a long time to get all of your 3 brain cells to come up with it.
I hear the next call of duty is coming out next year.
#88 - turretbuddy (03/31/2014) [-]
"Which is fine making something kill you faster rarely adds to the gameplay." Jesus Christ how casual are you? le cinematic experiences r le futur!!!!
Remember in the beginning when Elizabeth said that making tears was dangerous and only to do it when necessary? Then like two hours later they were using it for practically no reason such as the ammo supply bullshit
I found the perfect game for you, you can't lose, the story is pretentious and it covers all the SJW bases infantshit does and more: store.steampowered.com/app/232430/
#90 - mrpavelowgrimm (03/31/2014) [-]
1. Gameplay is a bit slow, its not call of duty, you don't need to be in "CONSTANT DANGER!!!" throughout the entire game, is called pacing.
2. This isn't 4chan, you're not an mlg player, calling someone who enjoys games a "Causal" its the same as some weaboo calling someone a who likes good shows a "Baka gaijin". I can feel your teenage angst and edginess through my monitor.
3. " le cinematic experiences r le futur!!!! " solid argument again. You sound like that guys who said personal computers were doomed to fail. Mention a good triple A tittle without good cinematics?
4. Saying things ironically doesn't make them less stupid. It truly doesn't.
5. Well shit you found some inconsistencies in a game I bet you're the very first one. You should get some sort of reward.
6. I assume the last example is a jab at me being a "casual" player again. To that I say this. I don't devote every waking moment to one aspect of my life. You know do? Hardcore Gamers, bronies and otakus. I like games, I've been playing games since I was a kid because I enjoy them. Bioshock infinite was a great game I enjoyed.
The story was interesting, the game had good pacing, the gameplay was fun and entertaining, the dialog and cinematics were great. The characters were likable.
Don't know how to break this to you but not every one who likes games is a "Hardcore gamer". Insinuating you are one its just truly sad.
#102 - turretbuddy (04/04/2014) [-]
Do you know what pacing means?
It is so goddamn slow and easy, even on 1984 you dont need to use cover or even try kek, santa's helper throws you bullshit every 1.5 seconds to make sure your cinematic experience doesn't end.
VAs were fine but a lot of booker's dialogue is cringeworthy
Characters aka Elizabeth and you were just mannequins
I haven't seen a shittier taste since going to a gamestop
#100 - mrpavelowgrimm (04/04/2014) [-]
|#159 - Both. We have a world for survival, a world for creative, and …||03/30/2014 on Minecraft Build Compilation||+1|
|#107 - This is an earlier picture - I fixed a lot since then along th… [+] (4 new replies)||03/30/2014 on Minecraft Build Compilation||+1|
|#67 - This has no fancy shaders in it, but this is the start of my m… [+] (9 new replies)||03/30/2014 on Minecraft Build Compilation||+13|
|#78 - Tau - Space Communists, and masters of sniping your ass at ran…||03/30/2014 on Best Mass effect comic ever!||0|
|#19 - > Tough > Playing Dirty Pick one please.||03/29/2014 on And they said football was...||+11|
|#34 - Picture||03/27/2014 on No one's gay for England||-1|
|#31 - MI!||03/26/2014 on Hi cumming, I'm Dad||+10|
|#21 - I honestly thought the movies were bad **** …||03/26/2014 on Hermonie Granger everyone||0|
|#42 - Lewd||03/26/2014 on Slutty llamas||0|
|#256 - **Bloodgartham rolled a random image posted in comment #107 …||03/23/2014 on zebras make good cakes||-1|
|#3 - Comment deleted||03/22/2014 on Wikipedia||+3|
|#34 - Picture||03/22/2014 on Fetish||0|
|#519 - I am neither, but Dr.Who was part of my childhood.... it reall…||03/22/2014 on Fuutuuure||-3|
|#15 - Picture||03/21/2014 on More Natalia Poklonskaya||+1|
|#344 - Picture||03/21/2014 on Natalia poklonskaya||0|
|#3 - Picture||03/20/2014 on Well...||+1|
|#144 - If they ever do, get different ******* actor for … [+] (3 new replies)||03/20/2014 on Order 66||0|
#267 - xxxsonic fanxxx (03/20/2014) [-]
He got better in Episode 3. Extremely better but he still had his shitty moments. Overall, in all the prequels, pretty much every actor blew dick at acting. Hell, even Samuel L. Jackson sucked at times. The script, rushing the movies, and many other factors prevented the acting from actually being fantastic. I thought Hayden Christenson fit the role perfectly, he just had a very hard time executing it due to time constraints or Lucas not pushing him well enough. Ewan MacGregor also had his terrible moments as well as Natalie Portman. I'm fine with the actors, I just hate that the movies were so rushed that it prevented the actors and stories from reaching their full potential.
#183 - xxxsonic fanxxx (03/20/2014) [-]
yeah,bruce willis would have played that roll much better
|#486 - ... Ok, so you give less money to the public sector, by taking… [+] (1 new reply)||03/18/2014 on Health||0|
|#191 - You take when you take 15% of the budget from the public secto… [+] (3 new replies)||03/17/2014 on Health||0|
#463 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You don't understand. You take money from the people (via taxes) to fund the public sector. If the budget for the public sector is less, you're simply not taking as much from the people. (If the government is taking the money and then giving some of it back it's still the same thing, just unnecessarily convoluted).
The government does not generate its own wealth. It must get its wealth from the people. The money doesn't belong to the government, it belongs to the people (aka, the private sector). We let the government take some of our money because we understand it to be a necessity of running a government. So even if a government is giving money to the private sector, they're really just returning some of what they took in the first place.
|#190 - Rødt is a party with multiple sides. One is socialist, one is…||03/17/2014 on Health||0|
|#12 - Yea, I was wondering about that.||03/17/2014 on (untitled)||+1|
|#29 - Commie? You will vote Red? [+] (5 new replies)||03/17/2014 on Health||-1|
|#25 - "Not if our new government gets their way" - if they… [+] (7 new replies)||03/17/2014 on Health||+3|