Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Bloodgartham    

Rank #5962 on Comments
no avatar Level 245 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to Bloodgartham Block Bloodgartham Invite Bloodgartham to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 18
Steam Profile: Bloodgartham (WARP)
Consoles Owned: PS3,Wii
PSN: Fluffy
Interests: Martial Arts, Drawing, Reading, Painting
Date Signed Up:1/09/2010
Last Login:7/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9834
Comment Ranking:#5962
Highest Content Rank:#6775
Highest Comment Rank:#1939
Content Thumbs: 398 total,  521 ,  123
Comment Thumbs: 4801 total,  5771 ,  970
Content Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 39 Content: Peasant → Level 40 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 33% (33/100)
Level 245 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:1
Content Views:39588
Times Content Favorited:30 times
Total Comments Made:1301
FJ Points:1031
Favorite Tags: creative (2) | Minecraft (2) | survival (2)

latest user's comments

#3 - Comment deleted 03/22/2014 on Wikipedia +3
#34 - Picture 03/22/2014 on Fetish 0
#519 - I am neither, but Dr.Who was part of my childhood.... it reall… 03/22/2014 on Fuutuuure -3
#15 - Picture 03/21/2014 on More Natalia Poklonskaya +1
#344 - Picture 03/21/2014 on Natalia poklonskaya 0
#3 - Picture 03/20/2014 on Well... +1
#144 - If they ever do, get different fucking actor for Anakin... God…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Order 66 0
#267 - anonymous (03/20/2014) [-]
He got better in Episode 3. Extremely better but he still had his shitty moments. Overall, in all the prequels, pretty much every actor blew dick at acting. Hell, even Samuel L. Jackson sucked at times. The script, rushing the movies, and many other factors prevented the acting from actually being fantastic. I thought Hayden Christenson fit the role perfectly, he just had a very hard time executing it due to time constraints or Lucas not pushing him well enough. Ewan MacGregor also had his terrible moments as well as Natalie Portman. I'm fine with the actors, I just hate that the movies were so rushed that it prevented the actors and stories from reaching their full potential.
User avatar #268 - kazene (03/20/2014) [-]
fuck, forgot to log in.
#183 - anonymous (03/20/2014) [-]
yeah,bruce willis would have played that roll much better
#486 - ... Ok, so you give less money to the public sector, by taking…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/18/2014 on Health 0
User avatar #490 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You're working from the assumption that the money belongs to the public sector.
#191 - You take when you take 15% of the budget from the public secto…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/17/2014 on Health 0
User avatar #463 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You don't understand. You take money from the people (via taxes) to fund the public sector. If the budget for the public sector is less, you're simply not taking as much from the people. (If the government is taking the money and then giving some of it back it's still the same thing, just unnecessarily convoluted).

The government does not generate its own wealth. It must get its wealth from the people. The money doesn't belong to the government, it belongs to the people (aka, the private sector). We let the government take some of our money because we understand it to be a necessity of running a government. So even if a government is giving money to the private sector, they're really just returning some of what they took in the first place.
#486 - Bloodgartham (03/18/2014) [-]
... Ok, so you give less money to the public sector, by taking less taxes; How is that not "taking money" from the public sector and prioritizing the private sector with it?
User avatar #490 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You're working from the assumption that the money belongs to the public sector.
#190 - Rødt is a party with multiple sides. One is socialist, one is… 03/17/2014 on Health 0
#12 - Yea, I was wondering about that. 03/17/2014 on (untitled) +1
#29 - Commie? You will vote Red?  [+] (5 new replies) 03/17/2014 on Health -1
#53 - roughy (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt isn´t a communist party though; they're sosialists. After the fall of AKP-ml, the only communist parties in Norway are NKP and Tjen Folket.
User avatar #251 - simmen (03/17/2014) [-]
Tjen Folket isn't an actual political party if I'm not wrong. Actually they tell people to Boicot the elections, so if that's their strategy to win the election, I wish them good luck!
#190 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt is a party with multiple sides. One is socialist, one is communist. I was a member there for 3 years, but most of the "communists" are idiots who thinks its cool to be part of the group that is "underground".
#136 - anonymous (03/17/2014) [-]
And Tjen Folket is corrupt as tits already.
User avatar #31 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
maybe, we'll see how the new government fairs first
#25 - "Not if our new government gets their way" - if they…  [+] (7 new replies) 03/17/2014 on Health +3
User avatar #26 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
yeah, we will see. hope it's not happening anyway, and if they fuck up, im voting full commie next time.
#29 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Commie? You will vote Red?
#53 - roughy (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt isn´t a communist party though; they're sosialists. After the fall of AKP-ml, the only communist parties in Norway are NKP and Tjen Folket.
User avatar #251 - simmen (03/17/2014) [-]
Tjen Folket isn't an actual political party if I'm not wrong. Actually they tell people to Boicot the elections, so if that's their strategy to win the election, I wish them good luck!
#190 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt is a party with multiple sides. One is socialist, one is communist. I was a member there for 3 years, but most of the "communists" are idiots who thinks its cool to be part of the group that is "underground".
#136 - anonymous (03/17/2014) [-]
And Tjen Folket is corrupt as tits already.
User avatar #31 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
maybe, we'll see how the new government fairs first
#23 - MOST LIKELY the right wing will stop them. Hopefully. And hope… 03/17/2014 on Health 0
#22 - Yea... so when you take money from the public sector, to priva…  [+] (14 new replies) 03/17/2014 on Health +8
User avatar #86 - durkadurka (03/17/2014) [-]
You don't "take money from the public sector". It only works the other way around: you must take from the private sector to fund the public sector. The money belongs to the people who are taxed.

#191 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
You take when you take 15% of the budget from the public sector (example) and hand it to the private sector.
User avatar #463 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You don't understand. You take money from the people (via taxes) to fund the public sector. If the budget for the public sector is less, you're simply not taking as much from the people. (If the government is taking the money and then giving some of it back it's still the same thing, just unnecessarily convoluted).

The government does not generate its own wealth. It must get its wealth from the people. The money doesn't belong to the government, it belongs to the people (aka, the private sector). We let the government take some of our money because we understand it to be a necessity of running a government. So even if a government is giving money to the private sector, they're really just returning some of what they took in the first place.
#486 - Bloodgartham (03/18/2014) [-]
... Ok, so you give less money to the public sector, by taking less taxes; How is that not "taking money" from the public sector and prioritizing the private sector with it?
User avatar #490 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You're working from the assumption that the money belongs to the public sector.
User avatar #24 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
you have to consider that the current government is a minority government, that means; they need outside parties to support them, and it's unlikeley that the other parties will accept anything of the sorts. essecialy when the only party likley to try this, is also the smallest of the two parties in government.
#25 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
"Not if our new government gets their way" - if they get their way.
User avatar #26 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
yeah, we will see. hope it's not happening anyway, and if they fuck up, im voting full commie next time.
#29 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Commie? You will vote Red?
#53 - roughy (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt isn´t a communist party though; they're sosialists. After the fall of AKP-ml, the only communist parties in Norway are NKP and Tjen Folket.
User avatar #251 - simmen (03/17/2014) [-]
Tjen Folket isn't an actual political party if I'm not wrong. Actually they tell people to Boicot the elections, so if that's their strategy to win the election, I wish them good luck!
#190 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt is a party with multiple sides. One is socialist, one is communist. I was a member there for 3 years, but most of the "communists" are idiots who thinks its cool to be part of the group that is "underground".
#136 - anonymous (03/17/2014) [-]
And Tjen Folket is corrupt as tits already.
User avatar #31 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
maybe, we'll see how the new government fairs first
#20 - Not for long if our new government gets their way.  [+] (20 new replies) 03/17/2014 on Health +14
#378 - publicpubic (03/17/2014) [-]
Could you explain further what you mean? Last time I checked, no political party (maybe except DLF) want to abandon the free healthcare system we have in Norway atm. True, they want to use more of the available private hospitals and clinics to reduce the long queue of patients we have, waiting to get treatment. This is also paid by the public. When the queues are reduced, the need for private clinics to take the load of the public hospitals gets reduced. No one pays anything except for their taxes.
User avatar #240 - chrispoot (03/17/2014) [-]
Fuckings Siv Jensen man
User avatar #21 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
they only want to increase the private sector, not make everything private. i ought to know i voted for them.
#134 - anonymous (03/17/2014) [-]
I like how our liberal parties are increasing the cost of having a business outside the big cities.
#23 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
MOST LIKELY the right wing will stop them. Hopefully. And hopefully we will change government next time ^^
#22 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Yea... so when you take money from the public sector, to private sectors, private sectors become better paid jobs, better paid jobs, less workers in the public sector, public sector gets less used - welcome "The Progress Party" thought pattern. Thatcher in Britain did, the Swedish right winged government did it.



User avatar #86 - durkadurka (03/17/2014) [-]
You don't "take money from the public sector". It only works the other way around: you must take from the private sector to fund the public sector. The money belongs to the people who are taxed.

#191 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
You take when you take 15% of the budget from the public sector (example) and hand it to the private sector.
User avatar #463 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You don't understand. You take money from the people (via taxes) to fund the public sector. If the budget for the public sector is less, you're simply not taking as much from the people. (If the government is taking the money and then giving some of it back it's still the same thing, just unnecessarily convoluted).

The government does not generate its own wealth. It must get its wealth from the people. The money doesn't belong to the government, it belongs to the people (aka, the private sector). We let the government take some of our money because we understand it to be a necessity of running a government. So even if a government is giving money to the private sector, they're really just returning some of what they took in the first place.
#486 - Bloodgartham (03/18/2014) [-]
... Ok, so you give less money to the public sector, by taking less taxes; How is that not "taking money" from the public sector and prioritizing the private sector with it?
User avatar #490 - durkadurka (03/18/2014) [-]
You're working from the assumption that the money belongs to the public sector.
User avatar #24 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
you have to consider that the current government is a minority government, that means; they need outside parties to support them, and it's unlikeley that the other parties will accept anything of the sorts. essecialy when the only party likley to try this, is also the smallest of the two parties in government.
#25 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
"Not if our new government gets their way" - if they get their way.
User avatar #26 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
yeah, we will see. hope it's not happening anyway, and if they fuck up, im voting full commie next time.
#29 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Commie? You will vote Red?
#53 - roughy (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt isn´t a communist party though; they're sosialists. After the fall of AKP-ml, the only communist parties in Norway are NKP and Tjen Folket.
User avatar #251 - simmen (03/17/2014) [-]
Tjen Folket isn't an actual political party if I'm not wrong. Actually they tell people to Boicot the elections, so if that's their strategy to win the election, I wish them good luck!
#190 - Bloodgartham (03/17/2014) [-]
Rødt is a party with multiple sides. One is socialist, one is communist. I was a member there for 3 years, but most of the "communists" are idiots who thinks its cool to be part of the group that is "underground".
#136 - anonymous (03/17/2014) [-]
And Tjen Folket is corrupt as tits already.
User avatar #31 - scandaldog (03/17/2014) [-]
maybe, we'll see how the new government fairs first
#17 - How dare you... 03/17/2014 on Protective Mother 0
#98 - Picture 03/11/2014 on sick burns +1
#54 - So if everyone jumped off a cliff, would you? M…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/10/2014 on Delicious! 0
User avatar #55 - captainfuckitall (03/10/2014) [-]
I might after you stop taking vaccines.
#162 - Well fuck me... a paranoid bastard who will most likely knife … 03/10/2014 on Roomates? 0
#52 - Just because he has something special, you cant just take that…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/10/2014 on Delicious! 0
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (03/10/2014) [-]
Sure I can. I've heard plenty of people complain "Naruto isn't that strong, it's just the fox!" or "Gaara isn't that tough, he needs the sand too much". If people can knit-pick about what makes who strongest, I can knit-pick about the eyes. Besides, that's how most people judge the characters anyways; take away any natural advantages they have and judge them on base power alone.
#54 - Bloodgartham (03/10/2014) [-]
So if everyone jumped off a cliff, would you?

Man that never gets old.
User avatar #55 - captainfuckitall (03/10/2014) [-]
I might after you stop taking vaccines.
#96 - Land of Snow and Sorrow - wintersun 03/09/2014 on Fucked by a knife 0
#17 - ... and his diplomatic abilities: "Y'all motherfuckers a… 03/09/2014 on Mace Windu 0
#33 - Uhm... if you read around the subject instead of just watching… 03/09/2014 on The United States of America 0
#31 - Yeeeaaah... no. 03/09/2014 on The United States of America -3

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#11 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/22/2014) [-]
#12 to #11 - Bloodgartham (06/22/2014) [-]
Holy crap you actually delivered?

How can you even be bothered with so many people requesting bread?
 Friends (0)