Intelligence isn't toxic, as you should well know. Or are you unable to understand chemistry and the fact that intelligence is a mental ability, not an actual object?

please... this is really not helpful in you're cease... you made a "mr. obvious" comment and showed lack of social inelligence.. you're probably like the guy in rainman... not souted to join sites like funny junk.. please delete you're account : )

Please fix that comment, I can't understand it due to such a lack of coherence.

sooo true :D

I don't have to be funny; I'm not posting any content. I do have a personal requirement, however, to conduct myself in a mature and intelligent manner anywhere, whether it be in school, on the Internet, or at home.

I suggest you stop being so mad, "bro".

intelligent manner? You take sides of a bully just because the kid getting bullied fights back in self defense. your a fucking idiot with no common knowlegde.

and holy fuck your not writing an essay for college; dont be using "quotation" marks in every sentence;

I'm not taking the side of the bully because he's using self defense. I'm saying that the kid who responded did it too violently. He basically dropped down to the bully's level, being that violent. Instead, he should have used less force than the bully did, because it's obvious that the bully requires less force to be subdued.

Also, if you dislike proper English, why use the language? I respect the language I use, and you, apparently, do not.

what did you want the guy to do? Gently push the bully aside and hope that he stops, the only way he could get away is to hit him hard enough so he had time to escape. Also i bet now that no one will buly him anymore as he showed that hes not putting up with them anymore. If you havent noticed he was being videotaped by friends of the bully, to add insult to injury.You still think he did the wrong thing?

I said less, not none at all. A punch to the face is less than the force the bully used; the bully himself punched Casey in the face, and other times. I never said nor thought he did the wrong thing, I said that he did what he did in the wrong way. He definitely should defend himself in that situation, but not with so much violence that he could possibly cripple and/or kill someone.

he tossed him down? the kid wasnt even hurt he got right up after it. Even if he did get hurt he would of deserevd it

No, he slammed the kid onto a concrete sidewalk. The kid was obviously hurt; he was staggering around, coughing violently, and relied on the wall to stay up once he was fully on his feet and without forward momentum. I wouldn't be surprised if he, at the very least, had a large amount of bruises the next day. Concrete's rather hard, you know.

How do you know that the kid being bullied has not been bullied for his entire life and he finally choses to stick up for himself. He sticks up for himself ONE TIME and your all against him, thats just plain unfar.Also the fat kid could of had brusies his entire life from being constantly bullied, that kid having bruises for one time is no big deal and he deserved it.

It's not unfair when there's no punishment that I give to the kid. I merely point out that he's not some amazing heroic figure for being overly violent when the situation does not call for it. I'm pretty sure that no one deserves to be slammed onto concrete, though that's just a personal opinion. And, yes, I do realize that the kid was a bully. That doesn't mean I agree that the bully was in the right, but I don't think that the situation was "no big deal." It's actually quite serious, because it shows that the fat kid was, in fact, being bullied.

You may think that you have to resort to violence to get a point across, but I know from experience that the exact same point can be made with words.