(untitled). In Epic Games's documentation of the Unreal Development Kit's AI, they state that, in their games, (the Unreal series and Gears of War) they have to Why Stroud is be
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

(untitled)

In Epic Games's documentation of the Unreal Development Kit's AI, they state that, in their games, (the Unreal series and Gears of War) they have to balance artificial stupidity and artificial intelligence to make their bots feel human; too much intelligence and it's obvious you're playing against a flawless machine ("Perfect aim is easy, but missing like a human player is hard."), too much stupidity, even if it would be realistic for a human player, and people think the AI is just dumb. They said that, during the playtesting for Unreal Tournament III, one of their designers complained about how poorly the AI was faring on a particular map, not realising he'd been facing humans.

that, let' s Mt This **** Straight.
V. Bear (mills.
he isa .
Mt Heath! "
Strand has , k"
sometimes in net the shot Itt him III] III cntent the
he haste he II twice, so tmt he can an his
camera hack.
Is Taig Maine. V
It he tucks uh. has vulture moat.
Nils. on the other MM...
has an Entire crew that
up Follow Him Around.
he actively fuels Mil an ,
he .' MS has hill actually in
any real thinner.
strum! huts himself In situations that
actual petunia mill themselve.
with limited Resources but an
Knowledge.
Immense.
havant.
Meanwhile. Hills, men takes the Int,
Misleading his audience.
survives the elements with
limits has heen known to stag t
gt I nearby off
Mlle while he might entertain these at I MSW!
intelligence Whih unseen: television, in the end,
Bear mulls is a charlatan.
the aims to teach you summing.
Ill shewing we it real excellence.
Les Strand is the Genuine.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+781
Views: 42085
Favorited: 95
Submitted: 05/03/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to ecalycptus E-mail to friend submit to reddit

Comments(266):

[ 266 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 - beren (05/03/2014) [+] (10 replies)
This is ******* retarded. First of all, there is no good reason that the two should be compared; their shows are not intended to be the same. The whole point of Man vs. Wild was to educate people and show them awesome and crazy **** , not to survive.

Re-tracing your steps to get a camera shot doesn't make you tough, it just makes for tedious work. Sure, there are times when he probably has to retrace some pretty rough terrain, but Bear does **** that is equally as crazy, and though he has people there to help him if he gets hurt, he still does it and has come close on several occasions to getting seriously hurt.

I'm not saying anything against Les, but stop acting like Bear's incompetent in comparison. In fact, just don't compare them, or, more accurately, their shows, when they're not even supposed to be the same.
#14 - tomahawkkit (05/03/2014) [+] (3 replies)
I thought these were shows on how to survive in the wild, not a contest on whoever can be the "most surviverer"
User avatar #16 - brainix (05/03/2014) [+] (2 replies)
I'm kinda tired of the Grylls hating. First of all, in Man vs Wild, he shows what to do if caught in specific situations, like falling in freezing water and so on. I don't give **** about what happens behind camera.
Also Grylls is an ex-SAS soldier, he has been in the French Foreign Legion, also a TV show, before Grylls had his own and it wasn't focused on him. On the show you saw people whine, cry and seriously went through some **** , while Grylls motivated them and kept the spirits up.
He is the youngest guy ever to be on the top of Mount Everes.
Grylls is ******* awesome, and also seems like a ******* cool guy.
/opinion off
English is not my native language, so sorry for bad grammar/spelling
#39 - pomm (05/03/2014) [+] (1 reply)
honestly i think bear is more entertaining to watch
#60 - lirfy (05/03/2014) [+] (3 replies)
Comment Picture
#40 - maxoutmoore (05/03/2014) [-]
Bear can do things that are more dangerous because he has a crew, he can show you what to do when worst comes to worst. I enjoy both though
#206 - mezzjuc (05/04/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Thumbed down like a ************ .
Bashing on a show for not being similar to another, when it's not even meant to be similar.

Here's an example of what you are saying:

Breaking Bad IS the worst show ever, IT'S ALL ACTING, there is a filmcrew and stuntmen. If you want REAL meth-cooking, you should check out the documentary about a prostitute who got sucked into a drugcircle and raped every night, as a slave for the drugkings. That is REAL, she didn't have any fancy filmcrew with her...

I'm not expecting OP to understand this example, as he have made very clear that his skull is too thick.
But let's face it, a guy like Bear Grylls shows how to get out of tough situations, he teaches people on how to survive. That's why I watch it.
If I want to watch someone REALLY get into those exact situations Bear has shown, I watch Les Stroud.
#84 - tiles (05/04/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Although I highly prefer Survivor Man over Man Vs. Wild, I have to say that these shouldn't be compared because, well, they just aren't the same thing.   
   
Les documents legitimate survival, but Bear documents certain actions that should be taken and fills the viewer in on basic survival. It's learn versus witness. It isn't the same. Bear is a badass, too. Have you heard of the 						****					 he's done? Sure you have.
Although I highly prefer Survivor Man over Man Vs. Wild, I have to say that these shouldn't be compared because, well, they just aren't the same thing.

Les documents legitimate survival, but Bear documents certain actions that should be taken and fills the viewer in on basic survival. It's learn versus witness. It isn't the same. Bear is a badass, too. Have you heard of the **** he's done? Sure you have.
User avatar #137 - chuckstein (05/04/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Bear Grylls' show isn't "Watch me make it out a live", it's "this is how someone would make it out alive". He purposely puts himself in dangerous positions because that's the entire plot of the show.
#123 - SPEK (05/04/2014) [+] (1 reply)
#36 - krizzzzz (05/03/2014) [+] (2 replies)
u havent heard about Lars Monsen then?
#96 - doomeythekink (05/04/2014) [+] (7 replies)
MvW is for educational purposes. Survivor is for entertainment. Stop comparing them.
#100 to #96 - juter (05/04/2014) [-]
I think you've got your shows mixed up.
User avatar #37 - dreigamos ONLINE (05/03/2014) [+] (1 reply)
well bear tend s to take more dangerous routes, but yeah he takes it easier but so what? i enjoy his show more seeing a guy drink his own piss and jump into cesspits of rotting carcasses etc.

But do not call bear a pansy-assed schoolboy. The guy is an ex-SAS for starters, know what that means? he was a part of one of the world's toughest and most elite teams there is. Not to mention he set record within the SAS itself. he is in no way a pansy, he is a man, he is a bear ALL THE PUNS INTENDED
User avatar #124 - goondas (05/04/2014) [+] (4 replies)
The whole point of Man vs Wild is to show how to handle more extreme situations. As stated at the beginning of EVERY episode, Bear will sometimes intentionally put himself into these dangerous situations to show you how to handle them.

Les on the other hand stears clear of any dangerous situation he might encounter (as you should), however this doesnt help any one who might one day find themself in a dangerous situation they cant avoid.

Id take Man vs Wild any day, not only is Bear showing you the little things like how to make a shelter and what foods you can eat, he's showing how to handle the more dangerous ones as well just in case they happen to you.

Watching Les forage for food, build a shelter and then play it safe bunkering down in that shelter for a week doesn't teach me a hell of a lot.
#31 - xsap (05/03/2014) [+] (4 replies)
you people are stupid. I watch them both and because bear has a camera crew doesn't mean him less of a bad ass... that's just how his show is done... if you were to drop him off without a camera crew he would still survive just as well as Les
#220 - pigeonontheceiling (05/04/2014) [+] (5 replies)
If he is all alone then who took the last photo?
If he is all alone then who took the last photo?
User avatar #180 - zourch ONLINE (05/04/2014) [-]
Bears is demonstrating what happens when you screw up in nature thats why he
" ***** up on purpose"
#77 - xcoreyx (05/04/2014) [-]
You're a ******* idiot. The premises of the shows are entirely different. Bear Grylls's entire goal is simply to show the audience how to survive. And that's a lot easier to do when he has resources at hand, doesn't have to carry his own cameras, and can have situations brought upon him on purpose. Neither one of these guys is better than the other, they're just different. Grylls is about informing people, and Les Stroud is about entertaining people by surviving on his own.
[ 266 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)