(untitled). . its so my nan was spouting some crap about how gay people aren' t really people because what it says h the mole so I sate "you think the only l pe (untitled) its so my nan was spouting some crap about how gay people aren' t really because what it says h the mole I sate "you think only l pe
Upload
Login or register

(untitled)

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
its so my nan was spouting some crap about how gay people aren' t really
people because what it says h the mole so I sate "you think the only l
people who are people. are the people who look: and think: like you out it it i,
you walked the footsteps of El stranger. you' ll team things you never knew" i I
and she shut the fuel: up
she no no Idiott IJBS. quoting 3 song tmm
...
+1388
Views: 57203 Submitted: 04/02/2014
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (152)
[ 152 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#3 - struttndatass
Reply +183 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
>Gay people aren't really people   
Nan what the **** were you born in another century or something
>Gay people aren't really people
Nan what the **** were you born in another century or something
#66 to #3 - anon id: e1f0b16c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Please...I wasn't even born in this Millennium.
Please...I wasn't even born in this Millennium.
User avatar #134 to #3 - niggernazi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
by another century in the future?
User avatar #137 to #3 - jokerja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
everybody who is older than 12 were born in another century...
User avatar #143 to #137 - zezenzerg
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Try again
#138 to #3 - moorgar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
how can gay people be real if sexuality is not real
#144 to #3 - phaegitt
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
uhm... people born in another century were still or will still be people...

and even other countries..
User avatar #14 to #3 - blackkid
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
I was born in another century. 18 years old, yep.
User avatar #15 to #14 - LeoBoon
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
****, I was born another millennium too.
User avatar #4 to #3 - sneleoparden
Reply +458 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
uhm... yes she most likely was...
User avatar #10 to #4 - kuchikirukia
Reply +31 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
YFW there are people on FJ right now who weren't.
#44 to #10 - HarvietheDinkle
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
b-but... you have to be 18 or older to sign up
#45 to #44 - anon id: acc7e82f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
maybe anons like me?
#46 to #45 - HarvietheDinkle
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #12 to #10 - batmanisarabbit
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
hehe
#130 to #4 - maziuscraig
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Thatsthejoke.jpg
#5 - lillolillo
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
So she's just walking around the house spouting her probaganda and expecting the whole household to become her minions of mind?
So she's just walking around the house spouting her probaganda and expecting the whole household to become her minions of mind?
User avatar #8 to #5 - hudis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
#6 is correct. It's what old people do.
User avatar #127 to #5 - lukap
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
You ******* retards are doing the exact same thing just with different sided propaganda
User avatar #17 to #5 - anonefgthree
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
So gay people just walk around spouting their probaganda and expecting the whole world to become their minions of mind?
User avatar #6 to #5 - fitemeirlbro
Reply +175 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
thats what old people do
User avatar #9 to #6 - thyminexplain
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
I don't know if I should trust somebody whose name doesn't end in 'explain'.
#118 to #9 - whargarbler
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
"oldpeoplexplain"
"oldpeoplexplain"
User avatar #7 to #6 - fitemeirlbro
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
that and shout out racist remarks
User avatar #136 to #7 - niggernazi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
who doesnt do that?
User avatar #135 to #6 - niggernazi
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
*liberals
#11 - hjklasdf
Reply +75 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
Maybe she should just read the bible...
Do not judge, or you too will be judged. Matthew 7:1
#19 to #11 - unusualember
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #20 to #11 - unusualember
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
Exactly.
User avatar #55 to #11 - popnotes
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
"Don't be a cunt" ~Buddha
User avatar #13 to #11 - insertsfunnyname
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
Even just "Love thy neighbour" which everyone knows.
User avatar #21 to #11 - psychonaut
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Judge not lest ye be judged yourself. Metallica, the black album.
#23 to #21 - anon id: 0c246644
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Acually I hate that so many people miss the point of this scripture. It's not saying not to judge. You can judge all you want, just expect to held to the same standard. In other words if you tell someone they shouldn't drink, then you need to say out of the bar yourself. What it is saying is that if you do judge someone, people will judge you by the same standard. You can't set a standard and the consider yourself an exception. That's being a hypocrite and no one likes a hypocrite.
#24 to #23 - mrbobert
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I would like to point out that everything you said is spot on, though I believe we're not supposed to hold non-Christians to the same standard as Christians. If a gay guy is gay, then okay. If a gay guy is gay and is a Christian, then we're going to have a problem.    
   
There's always more to it but ye.
I would like to point out that everything you said is spot on, though I believe we're not supposed to hold non-Christians to the same standard as Christians. If a gay guy is gay, then okay. If a gay guy is gay and is a Christian, then we're going to have a problem.

There's always more to it but ye.
#26 to #24 - anon id: 0c246644
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Well it's not a matter of not holding non-Christians to the same standard it's a matter of they have different standards and I have to respect that. It is NOT my Job as a Christian tell a person what they are doing wrong, but It is my job to tell them how great Christ is. They can get their life stright after they have accepted Christ. I mean you have to start on the first step. That's where so many christian get it wrong. They are to busy telling people what they are doing wrong then telling them about Christ.
#43 to #26 - someoneexplain **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
The gif I have for this is on another computer, but I'd just like to step in here and say that I agree with you anyways.
#16 - evebishop
Reply +73 123456789123345869
(04/02/2014) [-]
<OC's face when...
<OC's face when...
User avatar #113 to #16 - sadisticsalmon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Do you mean OP's face when?
#35 to #16 - tvfreakuk
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
**** yeah, The Prince of Egypt
**** yeah, The Prince of Egypt
User avatar #38 to #35 - thepink
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
dude, that **** is so cash
#87 to #38 - jubajubejiblets
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
So, I'm kind of curious, why do you have a gen 3 as your thumbnail?  pic completely unrelated.
So, I'm kind of curious, why do you have a gen 3 as your thumbnail? pic completely unrelated.
User avatar #146 to #87 - thepink
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
coffee's always relevant!

But asftrooper nailed it, that was probably one of my favorite episodes
#117 to #87 - asftrooper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
In a episode in the new MLP, a pinkie pie clone actually changed her face to a gen 3 face for 2 seconds before being killed. Yes, killed. She got shot by twilight's beam.
#141 to #117 - anon id: 597cec4a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Probably one of the best episodes of that season. I figured that might be it, but there is no context.
User avatar #115 to #87 - evebishop
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Unrelated but awesome!
User avatar #114 to #38 - evebishop
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Yeah that too....I need more coffee.
#33 - MercurySenshi
Reply +53 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
YFW you leave the room.
YFW you leave the room.
#97 - owmyballsack
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
pokehontas.
User avatar #140 to #97 - ashee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
BANNED.
User avatar #142 to #97 - threadcreator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I'm gonna flag this and hope I get promoted to moderator like almost every other user.
User avatar #110 to #97 - wydell
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
WAKE UP AMERICA!
#116 to #110 - anon id: 66de2f01
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
The government has you.
User avatar #56 - Schwarzenegger
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Just so you know, discriminating against gay people is totally against what Jesus taught. A lot of older Christians are prejudiced. I'm a younger one.
User avatar #61 to #56 - LloydIrving
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Yup. The many of the older Christians these days are just like the Pharisees Jesus was always criticizing. Makes me glad that my church isn't pulling this kind of crap.

Worst they say is "Yeah, homosexuality is a sin, but homosexuals are still people and should be loved and respected as such."
User avatar #120 to #61 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
This. Besides, EVERYONE is a sinner. We all **** up constantly. Who the hell are we to tell people that they're worse than us?
User avatar #92 to #61 - monsieurhonkhonk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Except that that's not bad? Homosexuality is a sin, but people shouldn't be treated badly because of it. It's definitely not an attitude unique to them.
User avatar #147 to #92 - LloydIrving
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I know, I was just making the point that they don't make any harsher statements than that.
User avatar #98 to #56 - nothingatall
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I just don't get it, more gays means more vaginas for me to not have
#50 - oborawatabinost
+12 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#53 to #50 - tacohawk
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I Corinthians 6:9
"Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men"

Corinthians is in the New Testament. It's Christian, not Jewish. Your religion is homophobic and you should feel bad.

biblehub.com/1_corinthians/6-9.htm
#63 to #53 - mrselfdestruct
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #67 to #53 - drewhenry
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Oh look, another mistranslation of what the Bible actually says
#71 to #67 - tacohawk
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
NET Bible
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual partners, practicing homosexuals,

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
Or do you not know that evil men do not inherit The Kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; no fornicators, neither worshipers of idols, neither adulterers, neither sexual molesters, neither males lying down with males,

GOD'S WORD® Translation
Don't you know that wicked people won't inherit the kingdom of God? Stop deceiving yourselves! People who continue to commit sexual sins, who worship false gods, those who commit adultery, homosexuals,

Jubilee Bible 2000
Know ye not that the unjust shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor effeminate nor homosexuals

King James 2000 Bible
Know you not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

American King James Version
Know you not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

American Standard Version
Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men,

Douay-Rheims Bible
Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers,
#123 to #71 - tomtomvdp
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I like you , and the effort you put into bringing evidence up , and corroborating it. Keep living like that. You are doing the logical world a favor.
#70 to #67 - tacohawk
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Wanna know what the link on the last line is?
It's a link to the other translations. Since you can't follow them, here they are:

New International Version
Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men

New Living Translation
Don't you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don't fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality,

English Standard Version
Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality,

New American Standard Bible
Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,

King James Bible
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Holman Christian Standard Bible
Don't you know that the unrighteous will not inherit God's kingdom? Do not be deceived: No sexually immoral people, idolaters, adulterers, or anyone practicing homosexuality,

International Standard Version
You know that wicked people will not inherit the kingdom of God, don't you? Stop deceiving yourselves! Sexually immoral people, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, homosexuals,
#73 to #70 - tacohawk
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Darby Bible Translation
Do ye not know that unrighteous [persons] shall not inherit [the] kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor those who make women of themselves, nor who abuse themselves with men,

English Revised Version
Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men,

Webster's Bible Translation
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Weymouth New Testament
Do you not know that unrighteous men will not inherit God's Kingdom? Cherish no delusion here. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor any who are guilty of unnatural crime,

World English Bible
Or don't you know that the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don't be deceived. Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes, nor homosexuals,

Young's Literal Translation
have ye not known that the unrighteous the reign of God shall not inherit? be not led astray; neither whoremongers, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor sodomites,
#75 to #73 - tacohawk
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I'm ******* tired of people crying, "Oh mistranslation!" whenever the bible doesn't say what they want.

IS THIS A GOOD ENOUGH TRANSLATION FOR YOU? I repeat, your religion is homophobic, and you should feel bad
User avatar #78 to #75 - drewhenry
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Yes, because several retranslations and simple human hate for people that are different really proves your point in this matter.

Also, I'm not even Christian, I just know ****
#81 to #78 - tacohawk
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Saying, "Yes, because A proves your point," doesn't immediately mean that A does not prove my point.
Yes, several translations actually does prove my point. This is what the Bible says. Twenty entities translate the same thing and all arrive at such similar renditions, one can assume that this is the intended translation.
User avatar #82 to #81 - drewhenry
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Several translations that are not the original proves nothing at all.
#86 to #82 - tacohawk
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
But the original was oral Aramaic. That was translated to Greek and written down not by the apostles, but their students.

So what you're saying is that none of the Bible can be trusted, because none of it is the original, verbatim words of the men it talks about. All of it is a second-hand resource.
User avatar #88 to #86 - drewhenry
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I doubt you really care anyway, and I know I don't. It is, in fact, a work of fiction intended to give comfort to people, so I say leave it be
#95 to #88 - tacohawk
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Were the rest of the world to realize that it is a work of fiction, I'd have no reason to be so butthurt. I've dealt with fandoms before, I know that if I leave them alone they'll probably leave me alone.

But this is the most pervasive fandom the world has ever seen. This fandom doesn't leave me alone. People with power seriously believe in this stuff, and make judgements and pass laws based upon the things they think are canon, judgements and laws that directly effect me and others.

I've seen no satisfactory, rationalist argument against gay marriage, no good argument for pre-marital abstinence, no good argument against contraception, etc. It's all just JudeoChristian lore trying to worm its way into real life, and it interferes with the way non-JudeoChristians wanna live. And that's where I get confrontational, when people try to push their unsubstantiated beliefs on others.

No offense to you tho, you seem like a cool guy. The way you play devil's advocate while not actually being JudeoChristian makes you sound like a fellow agnostic.
User avatar #96 to #95 - drewhenry
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Thank you ^^

I was actually raised very Christian. I had to study the Bible a lot as a kid. As you can see though, I eventually developed my own way of thinking apart from that, and here I am.
User avatar #89 to #88 - drewhenry
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Semi-fiction*
User avatar #74 to #70 - drewhenry
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Oh, I clicked that link, and I clearly said ANOTHER
#77 to #74 - tacohawk
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
What then, does the Bible actually say, if none of these +20 translations are at all indicative of what that verse said?
User avatar #79 to #77 - drewhenry
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Bring me the original script and we'll see
#83 to #79 - tacohawk
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Okay, you, "know ****"
But you do not expect me to believe that you are fluent enough in ~2000 year old Greek dialects to give a reasonable translation. Hell, though the New Testament was written in Greek, the men who the authors are recording (none of the apostles were learned enough to read and write, their students took notes) Aramaic and translating to Greek in order to write it down, so you'll never have the untranslated version.
User avatar #85 to #83 - drewhenry
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
True, I'll just give up here, no need to continue, I doubt either of us will change their mind, so yeah. Don't want to take up too much of your time.
User avatar #101 to #85 - alecbaldwinning
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
That's what I'd say too if I were proven wrong and wanted to escape a conversation.
User avatar #102 to #101 - drewhenry
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
If you continued reading, you'd see we ended on a fairly decent note. In the end, I feel pretty good about this whole conversation.
User avatar #103 to #102 - alecbaldwinning
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I read it all.

You two getting along has zero effect on me.
User avatar #104 to #103 - drewhenry
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I still stand by what I said. A few guy could have just decided to include homosexuality when being told what to write
User avatar #105 to #104 - alecbaldwinning
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
"I still stand by what I said."
-That's because you're an idiot.


>"A few guy could have just decided to include homosexuality when being told what to write"
>"A few guy could have just decided to include"
>"A few guy could have just"
>"few guy could have
>"guy could have"
>"could have"
>"could"

-Using hypothetical "coulds" pulled out of your ass and based on nothing to justify being an idiot.
-And that's why you're an idiot.
User avatar #106 to #105 - drewhenry
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
It is more likely than not that something like that happened at some points in the creation of the written Bible
User avatar #107 to #106 - alecbaldwinning
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
>Pretending to be an authority on what is likely and what is unlikely to have historically happened, on a topic shrouded in unknowns and heresay.

^This is you still being an idiot.



Do tell, where did you receive your masters degree? How many papers have you had published?
User avatar #108 to #107 - drewhenry
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
There you go again, using that uneducated term "idiot"

Are you attempting to insult me, or are you just using that word, because it makes you feel more correct?

I am basing my opinions on the fact of human nature, that they tend to be crude, hateful beings and that people have altered even historical truths.

There are sources that say that Abraham Lincoln was for equal rights, but he himself said that he wasn't.

User avatar #109 to #108 - alecbaldwinning
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
>Getting off topic
>Implying that I can't be both mean, and correct/educated at the same time.
>Still being a cum gurgling ************ autistic retarded idiot
User avatar #111 to #109 - drewhenry
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I'm not saying that you are wrong, I am just saying that have equal possibility to be right. Also, that part calling me a cum gurgling ************ autistic retarded idiot was just unnecessary. I could accept you just calling me an idiot, because I can understand that you may be a little angry that I challenge your own opinions with others that just as likely are true. Your response there lets me know that you are no longer worth responding to from this point forward.
#112 to #111 - alecbaldwinning
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
&quot;equal possibility to be right&quot; &quot;that just as likely are true&quot;   
&gt; This one actually made me lol  Implying a topic which can be interpreted freely, automatically, baselessly grants equal 50/50 chance to either possibility.   
   
&quot;that part calling me a cum gurgling ************ autistic retarded idiot was just unnecessary&quot;   
&gt;gif related   
   
&quot;because I can understand that you may be a little angry&quot;   
&gt;You couldn't make me angry for all of King Midas's silver. I'm just an unpleasant ************.    
   
&quot;you are no longer worth responding to from this point forward.&quot;   
&gt; More backing out of a dispute because you're losing. That's how this started in the first place. Your circular logic has, quite literally, brought us full circle.
"equal possibility to be right" "that just as likely are true"
> This one actually made me lol Implying a topic which can be interpreted freely, automatically, baselessly grants equal 50/50 chance to either possibility.

"that part calling me a cum gurgling ************ autistic retarded idiot was just unnecessary"
>gif related

"because I can understand that you may be a little angry"
>You couldn't make me angry for all of King Midas's silver. I'm just an unpleasant ************.

"you are no longer worth responding to from this point forward."
> More backing out of a dispute because you're losing. That's how this started in the first place. Your circular logic has, quite literally, brought us full circle.


User avatar #126 to #112 - drewhenry
-1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Since apparently you couldn't get it through your head, there was no winning in that argument, because you are just being unreasonable. There was no need for you to respond to me after the argument had already stopped.(obviously because you are "just an unpleasant ************.") That is why I wanted to stop talking to you, not because I was "losing." The only even slightly educated response you have contributed was the bit on how it is a topic shrouded in unknowns, which proves neither point. Also, I was never off topic; I brought up an example of people recording what they were told to write but altering details. It is a known fact that people change things to make it fit more into what they personally think; it has happened countless times.
User avatar #148 to #111 - alecbaldwinning
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
"there was no winning in that argument" "not because I was "losing."
>You're literally the only person who can't see that you've lost both times. Because you're an idiot.

"There was no need for you to respond to me after the argument had already stopped." "That is why I wanted to stop talking to you"
>Every time you reply, you demonstrate that the argument is in fact,!! not stopped!!. Idiot.

And once again for good measure. Idiot.

User avatar #27 - kennyh
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Whenever I see stuff like this that says anything about "and then they shut up" I never believe it. People will dogmatically stick to their own first opinion (about anything) in the face of a mountain of evidence contradicting it. I'll never believe a cheesy quote got anyone to "shut up"
#39 to #27 - cuteboot
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
Idk, I think it happens sometimes when you just say the absolutely perfect thing. Sorry for the random story but I thought it pertained. Like the other day my mom was giving me **** for planning on going to prom with another girl I'm of the female variety and she said she'd be very happy if I went with a boy. I responded with "well this is what would make me happy," and she just legitimately shut up. She did not say another word and i eventually walked away feeling badass as ****.
#42 to #39 - someoneexplain **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
**someoneexplain rolls 3,059**

I think that was her coming to terms as a mother with what she sees as you being gay and isn't perfectly relevant.

The problem Kennyh was talking about is when people become territorial about what they are talking about and refuse to budge during the course of a conversation.

Personally, I can't relate to the racist/extremist/anti-whatever grandparent stuff. I know mine fairly well and though they are fairly moral and have their opinions, they aren't bigoted.
#154 to #42 - cuteboot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
The only thing is that she didn't come to terms with it, sorry i didn't give good background info. Shes been against it for years and still is, so for me it was a big win to render her speechless.
User avatar #22 - thorandahalf
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(04/03/2014) [-]
I thought I'd put this here because I wanted to listen to it after seeing this and maybe others would to Colors of the Wind