just a question

lionti

Hey FJ, my friend asked me the other night what would I rather, not needing to eat or not needing to sleep. My friend and I turned out to have an interesting fight/discussion. So there you go guys what would you rather no need to sleep or no need to eat?

Here are the details:
Not needing to eat means that you don't wither away to some boney piece of **** , you just never get hungry OR thirsty. Your body does not change in any way shape or form but you can lose weight if you work out and not put it back on because you don't need to eat anything.

Not needing to sleep will not change your body either you just never get tired and you always feel well rested, your eyes wont become blood shot or your face wrinkle up, you simply just wont need to sleep and have full energy 24/7.

-1

Views:	901
Favorited:	0
Submitted:	09/18/2013

Share On Facebook

+Favorite Subscribe to lionti

Comments(17):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs

Anonymous comments allowed.

17 comments displayed.

#5 - vgmddg (09/18/2013) [-]

I think I'd pick sleep. Generally you spend a full third of your life in bed (ideally), and the modern world has its ways of depriving you of sleep wherever possible. Ideal sleep schedule requires about 8 hours of sleep at least. Not having to sleep means you get all those hours back, and you're higher functioning the whole time and have more time to get further in life. Eating takes much less time out of each day than sleeping.

And food is ******* awesome.

#17 - megaducktoaster ONLINE (09/18/2013) [-]

I'd go with not needing to sleep, it's much more usefull

#2 - tragicrhapsody (09/18/2013) [-]

no sleep, 24/7 productivity/downtime would improve any human's life dramatically

#1 - abject (09/18/2013) [-]

Not need to sleep.. definitely.

#3 to #1 - abject (09/18/2013) [-]

Think of all the extra time you'll have while everyone else is sleeping!

(Plus, if you feel like sleeping anyway, it doesn't say you can't sleep)

#13 to #3 - morphedpink (09/18/2013) [-]

I think being alone with your thoughts as often as you would be might drive you insane eventually.

#14 to #13 - abject (09/18/2013) [-]

Like I said, if I felt like sleeping, I would (as it doesn't say anywhere in the rules that you can't; there just isn't a necessity for it).

#15 to #14 - morphedpink (09/18/2013) [-]

I thought the same thing about the eating,since you can lose weight. Nothing says you can't eat and get to a desired weight. Valid point, though.

#16 - brobathehutt (09/18/2013) [-]

Muscle weighs more than fat, so working out would make you gain weight (in a good way). I'm assuming not needing to eat makes us into super plants where all you need is sunlight (not even water apparently), but not needing to sleep is still 1000000 times better.

#12 - averageteengirl (09/18/2013) [-]

Not needing to eat. I like to sleep because I have some pretty sweet dreams. And just because you don't need to eat don't mean you can't just to taste it.

#6 - megusters (09/18/2013) [-]

Not needing to eat, because technically, we don't need to sleep anyways.

#7 to #6 - abject (09/18/2013) [-]

True, but you feel the effects of lack of sleep.

#8 to #7 - megusters (09/18/2013) [-]

Well, wouldn't not needing to eat also mean that my energy would never run out? Considering the fact that food contains most of the energy we need to function?

#9 to #8 - abject (09/18/2013) [-]

No, not needing to eat just means you don't get hungry.

Straight from the content: Not needing to eat means that you don't wither away to some boney piece of **** , you just never get hungry OR thirsty. Your body does not change in any way shape or form but you can lose weight if you work out and not put it back on because you don't need to eat anything.