Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#82 - lolibear (08/21/2012) [-]
extra point, it's been proven that every living human being decends from one man around 200-300 BC,
User avatar #83 to #82 - AngryPlatypus (08/21/2012) [-]
There was way more than one person in the year 300 bc...
#84 to #83 - lolibear (08/21/2012) [-]
no, think about how you have or had 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents and so on. well somewhere along the way that man is where every human living right now has him as one of there great(xsomenumber) grandfathers
User avatar #86 to #84 - AngryPlatypus (08/21/2012) [-]
Yes but he didn't live in the year 300 bc.
#87 to #86 - lolibear (08/21/2012) [-]
hmm?
User avatar #88 to #87 - AngryPlatypus (08/21/2012) [-]
There were empires in the year 300, man's common ancestor lived way before that.
#91 to #88 - lolibear (08/21/2012) [-]
nono, what i'm saying is that all LIVING HUMAN BEINGS RIGHT NOW, share him as a common anscestor. not a species based ancestor, but a literal, family ancestor, there's plenty of other people from his time period that are ancestors to many, but he is the youngest link to everyone living on earth RIGHT NOW.
#102 to #91 - bravojim (08/21/2012) [-]
it was a lot further back than 300bc, there were people living in australia and the americas back then so aboriginies and native americans can't be decended from that one guy
#107 to #102 - nanobuzz (08/27/2012) [-]
The guy back in 300 BC had human ancestors. Its just that the MOST RECENT ancestor that everyone (statistically) shares was approximately 300 BC
 Friends (0)