The saying goes, “Two wrongs don’t make a** right,” but I’ve only seen anything** get settled by having one side submit to the other’s affliction.Everything is subjective. We all have our own devils we have to face, our own personalHitlers, who genocide the hope we have for humanity. You haveto hand it to him, as evil as he was, while he was in charge, he made the world around him exactly what he wanted. Sure, call me a monster, but there are good traits in everyone, even the mostdisgusting. Why shouldn’t there be two wrongs? Why doesn’t an eye for an eye work? With enough perseverance, any obstacle is conquerable, or at least destroyable. Left wing hippies always tell right wing bigots to stop cramming their belief’s down people’s throats. The irony is sweet, isn’t it? Telling someone not to tell someone something. Why shouldn’t the Fundamentalists have their say? What stops them from stoning homosexuals? Why is it you can smoke a bowl and preach how “If everyone smoked pot, we’d all be happy,” and they can’t stop you and say “If everyone lived by the bible, it’d end the same?” Is the hypocrisy of both tyranny and anarchy, within themselves as a system, so obvious that nobody, not even the most passionate, can see it?
The only thing that matters in life is making the world what youwant it to be. Convert as many people as possible to your cause, even if your belief is that everyone should have their own opinion. The only way to make this world bearable, you left wing, useless **** , is 100% affirmation for your freedomlessliberty; and the only way you conservative, high-strung ***** get to enforce your totalitarianism is by entirely abolishing all opposition.
Thus, it appears we find ourselves before an obdurate, and inevitable species-wide impasse.