Upload
Login or register

sorry but this has politics

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
+43
Views: 7882 Submitted: 10/30/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (39)
[ 39 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#7 - taurusguy
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
**** this whole thing, its just made to drive you into choosing the wrong one, the whole "Pretty interesting isn't it? Makes a person think before judging someone" WHAT THE **** IS THERE TO THINK ABOUT? Who the **** chooses a crooked man instead of the other 2 candidates? Of course you will choose ******* Hitler, B is somewhat okay, but A, WHO THE **** CHOOSES A CROOKED CANDIDATE IF YOU KNOW HE IS CROOKED.
Did people know Hitler will go on a ******* killing spree? NO, ****, you cant just expect the bad guy will turn good, you will first hope the good guy doesnt turn bad and when that doesnt work you hope the bad guy doesnt turn worse.
Professionals built the Titanic? Who is the blame if a car expertly made crashes? The fact that the driver is a ******* retard or the fact that you cant foolproof every little ******* thing. Now, THE ARK WAS ACTUALLY ******* BUILT?
The last one, ok, i wont even start, that is the least bad in this.
But the first one, WHAT THE ACTUAL ****? I cant recommend her to have an abortion? Life is a ******* gamble, just because you will get lucky once doesnt mean you should keep trying. I dont care if the child that would be aborted was the 2nd coming of christ, you cant keep digging through a pile of **** hoping you get a golden nugget, you can, i cant tell you not to, but its not smart, and 99% of the time you wont find a golden ******* nugget.
also wtf, where is the response for the first one
User avatar #13 to #7 - AndromedaBlade
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
mein kampf was out long before hitler took office. it says fairly clearly what he planned to do once in office (including killing a multitiude of people). otherwise, your point is not invalid. just factually erroneous. bye.
User avatar #28 to #13 - chuckstein
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/31/2013) [-]
But when it describes candidate C it doesn't say he wrote a book.
#8 - feratrox
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
Wait didn't the Titanic sink because of that iceberg instead of just being built badly?
And didn't the Ark... you know... not exist?
Overall I like this post, but that point doesn't make sense. You should leave important stuff to professionals.
User avatar #9 to #8 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
Well, there was the whole not enough life rafts thing, I think.

And dont quote me on this, but I was watching a documentary awhile back, and I recall them mentioning a few design issues, which while standard at the time, may have hastened sinking.
User avatar #10 to #8 - dreamcast
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
Well you see the thing is the Titanic would have survived if one more hull had been added to the ship. They didn't had it however because they didn't think the ship could ever sink let alone be penatrated that deep. They also didn't put enough life boats on the ship because they wanted more space on deck for the rich people. Yet again thinking the ship could never sink.
#14 to #8 - cheastnut [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
>#8,9 also it's believed that the rudders were to small and the look outs didn't have the means to look far enough, so it couldn't turn a ship that size in time. largely it had poor workmanship because people had so much faith in it
>there is no proof that the ark wasn't real, also the fact that other cultures had their own 'story' and 'ark' in each section of the world so the famous one would really only need to carry a percentage and most animals in the world are quite capable of surviving long periods of time in/under water.
>overall i don't like your comment and would appreciate it if you wouldn't try to crap on someone elses beliefs with your beliefs, the point was mostly just that 'a point' to give an idea. you should leave the important stuff to the professionals.
#37 to #8 - xxxgnipsxxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/31/2013) [-]
The Ark was actually a bunch of barges owned by a sumerian King in Ur. It was an important river crossing and however he found out there was a flood coming (the gods warned him), he saved as many people and animals as possible. The jews borrowed this little piece of history, along with most of their really old stories in the old testament.
#1 - theturtletrolley
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
It's the members of the US congress.   
This post actually got me. Thumb for you
It's the members of the US congress.
This post actually got me. Thumb for you
User avatar #34 to #1 - riverofchex
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/31/2013) [-]
My favorite is how you're the only one so far who's made an actual guess
User avatar #25 - asheskirata
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
"Remember amateurs built the ark"

Seriously? You're seriously using THE BIBLE in an attempt to prove your point? The book with some of the most questionable and down right absurd historicity that came out of the Bronze Age? Dude... amateurs built the first aircraft. That would've been a better line. Nobody gives a **** about a fictitious boat. Unless they believe it actually existed.
#26 to #25 - nylak
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/31/2013) [-]
Exactly what I was thinking. The post was on shaky grounds before that, and that comment just killed it.
User avatar #27 to #26 - asheskirata
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/31/2013) [-]
I mean, while I can see, and agree with, your general message of don't judge people or try to get them to act a certain way unless you know them or have an idea of how it could affect the world... You have to realize that, while it may be sad, society as a whole does this. Individual people aren't going to matter much, but it's when society as a collective calls something a norm, that it becomes THE norm.
User avatar #19 - noblexfenrir
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
Question 1:

Is she supporting them herself and not taking money from others or the system? If she is, then I couldn't give less of a ****. I don't care if it was Beethoven, amazing people are born everyday, so are random *********.

Question 2:

Literally would not vote for any of them, because I don't give a **** about a politicians home life, I care about their policies. The only candidate I would exclude would be maybe A because he consults astrologists, which can apply to his decisions in office.

Oh and surprise surprise, Hitler really wasn't all that ******* bad, what was done under his reign sucked but we don't seem to make it a habit of attributing the kills under the leader of a nation unless they lost. By that regard, Abraham Lincoln is the most anti-american president since he specifically ordered the Union to kill Confed. soldiers, since that is how you win wars. But I wouldn't and many others wouldn't say that about him.

"Pretty interesting isn't it? Makes a person think before judging someone."
No, no it doesn't.

"Remember: Amateurs...built the ark."
Hey I can build a fictitious boat to!

"Professionals...built the Titanic"
It crashed into a ******* iceberg that hit it just right to abuse the structural failings, if under the same conditions as the Ark, ya know, sitting in an endless sea of water without the need to go anywhere then it probably would have been just ******* fine.

"And Finally, can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics:"

Do they offer me enough money to make me want to work for them? Then I absolutely will. I could care less about their supposed moral failings.
#21 to #19 - ssurtrebor **User deleted account**
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
User avatar #22 to #21 - noblexfenrir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
I got it, it's just stupid.
#23 to #19 - crycamellia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
#11 - Welshhobo
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
>First half says not to judge people based on some facts
>Second half judges people based on some facts

ULTIMATE HURRRR
#15 - bellabaloo
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
You're a ******* idiot. Just because Beethoven was a miracle birth, doesn't mean every whore with an STI and 10 other ****** up kids is going to have a genius, it will most likely be some retarded brainless child with no quality of life taking up space on our Earth. God, catholic prolife assholes piss me off like none other. Did you honestly write this and think it was a good idea? And you forgot Candidate C was a genocidal killer. You can pick three bad traits about someone and make them seem like an asshole, or pick 3 good traits and make them seem like an angel. You proved nothing. Oh, and THE ARK WASN'T REAL. I'm pretty sure it would have sunk if it crashed into a giant iceberg too, if it really existed.
#32 - danielsturk
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/31/2013) [-]
A: Famous does good job
B: Famous does good job
C: Kills ppl

You only said the bad things about the first two, who you chose for probably having the worst rep
You only said the good things about hitler
It isn't hard to make someone look good/bad if you only show one side, that's what the media is for.

Most famous ark: Believed to have lasted 40 days
Most famous titantic(only?): Lasted 4 days
User avatar #33 to #32 - danielsturk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/31/2013) [-]
Im canadian and I dont give a single **** about politics so exuuuse-me if yours views of A and B are negative, I'm only assuming they were good politicians/presedents/whatever
#16 - habanaro
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
What is this-- facebook?
#6 - anon id: 18232d50
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
The abortion one is silly. No, you didn't kill Beethoven. You killed a bunch of cells. For all you know an abortion could have killed a hitler-skeletor hybrid.