since we're all doing unpopular opinions. . I THIN WE SHINE]! m, Orr All SEVERE“ MI] l' WHAT' S m MINT Bl _ THEM "taur THEY KAJHIIT BE , I .. Oh look, it's Hitler. unpopular opinion puffin handicapped retarded
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

since we're all doing unpopular opinions

I THIN WE SHINE]! m, Orr All SEVERE“ MI] l'
WHAT' S m MINT Bl _ THEM "taur THEY KAJHIIT BE , I .
...
  • Recommend tagsx

Comments(306):

[ 306 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #5 - anthonyd (04/24/2014) [+] (5 replies)
Oh look, it's Hitler.
User avatar #16 - luckybastard (04/24/2014) [+] (5 replies)
many of us here are unproductive members of society
#8 - rapebear (04/24/2014) [+] (3 replies)
Because this isn't Ancient Greece, or Africa, or Nazi Germany. Also, some people would call your sociopathical view of this situation as a severe mental handicap.
#83 - soulstealerr (04/25/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Your argument is invalid.
#118 - airplaneseightteen (04/25/2014) [+] (20 replies)
Let me tell you why you should be beaten with a blunt ******* object you ******* waste of oxygen. My sister, Paige, was born with a chromosome deletion (iP36 deletetion if anyone cares), and shes a a freakin sweetheart. And you wanna know something? I think she deserves to enjoy her life in the way she does well more than you do ******** . If you see the way she is, her little quirks, her funny noises and actions, youd feel like a complete asshole. she DESERVES to live life. EVERYONE does. theres a reason shes here. Sure, shes sometimes difficult, and she even has some maintenence requirements that should have been gone 13 years ago (she is 17 in august), but thats literally NOTHING in comparison to having her put to death. Like, im ******* steaming right now, and if it wasnt 1230 right now, id be breaking **** in my ******* room like no damned tomorrow. **** you man. **** you so bad. Who the **** do you think you are? Im not even sure if any of this makes ******* sense, but Im almost in tears with the intense ******* anger I have right now. excuse me everyone, please, I cant even handle this right now.
#100 - feistyoneyouare (04/25/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Because all the best ideas start with mass genocide, it'll totally work out.
Because all the best ideas start with mass genocide, it'll totally work out.
User avatar #53 - antijoke (04/25/2014) [+] (1 reply)
well at least he is using the meme right
User avatar #120 - guffspeak (04/25/2014) [+] (4 replies)
Why stop there?
Old people cannot be as productive in society, plus they drain resources. Kill.
Disabled war vets cant be very productive, plus they have all these ptsd problems,
Lets just finish what the insurgents couldn't. Kill.
Cats don't contribute **** . Well, actually they contribute nothing BUT **** . Kill.
Small children might some day contribute, but thats a risk. And atm they are really annoying. Kill.
People who only work 40 hours a week instead of working overtime don't need as many body parts, we will take a leg. Thats better.

Yes, i see your point. We should totally do that.
User avatar #18 - shadowblaziard (04/24/2014) [+] (1 reply)
This is one of those posts where everybody in the commentsection gets butthurt.
#76 - mastersaturday (04/25/2014) [+] (2 replies)
You guys are great.

"Hey everyone, stop using the Unpopular Puffin incorrectly!"

"Okay, here's one that's actually controversial."

*reads* "You ******* monster, jump in a pit and die!"
#130 - angelwithashotgun (04/25/2014) [+] (4 replies)
Who are you to decide that their lives are worthless?   
   
So people like Stephen hawking should be killed because he is handicapped? Yeah, that's a great 						*******					 idea.
Who are you to decide that their lives are worthless?

So people like Stephen hawking should be killed because he is handicapped? Yeah, that's a great ******* idea.
#19 - megaguyx (04/24/2014) [+] (3 replies)
Well, with the way health technology is improving, we may not have to kill them...

Pic related, it will become the solution to a handicap.
#285 - srvhendrix (04/25/2014) [-]
Who says their life is going to suck? I work at a school for children with special needs and they're the happiest children I've ever come across. I work with a particular child who has cerebral palsy and spastic quadriplegia. She cannot walk; change herself; feed herself or talk, but she is constantly smiling and laughing. Her Parents and everyone around her absolutely adore her. She's certainly a lot happier than some of the little 						*****					 at the High School down the road.   
   
Who's right is it to decide how someone is going to live their life? There are a lot of people who''s lives suck without them being disabled or mentally handicapped. Would you suggest we kill them off too? It isn't anyone's right to determine if someone is entitled to their life or not. Leave them be.
Who says their life is going to suck? I work at a school for children with special needs and they're the happiest children I've ever come across. I work with a particular child who has cerebral palsy and spastic quadriplegia. She cannot walk; change herself; feed herself or talk, but she is constantly smiling and laughing. Her Parents and everyone around her absolutely adore her. She's certainly a lot happier than some of the little ***** at the High School down the road.

Who's right is it to decide how someone is going to live their life? There are a lot of people who''s lives suck without them being disabled or mentally handicapped. Would you suggest we kill them off too? It isn't anyone's right to determine if someone is entitled to their life or not. Leave them be.
#253 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (04/25/2014) [-]
Yes my Fuhrer! We shall also sterilize the blind and deaf and anyone else who isn't pure! HEIL MEIN FUHRER!
Yes my Fuhrer! We shall also sterilize the blind and deaf and anyone else who isn't pure! HEIL MEIN FUHRER!
User avatar #123 - sexyhimself ONLINE (04/25/2014) [+] (1 reply)
with that logic we should kill off half the people on the internet as well.....
#2 - kaboomz (04/24/2014) [-]
ops fw
#279 - lordfohawk (04/25/2014) [-]
Because though you may not value their life, they and their family might
User avatar #252 - lordscooby (04/25/2014) [+] (2 replies)
**** you cunt. my adoptive mom had polio when she was a kid. she's been permanently confined to a wheelchair her whole life. yet she was more of a productive member of society than anyone i know. she served on the city council in memphis, she was the FIRST disabled foster parent in the state of Tennessee, and she's helped turn around the lives of 40 plus kids, not including me. so **** your unpopular opinion. *********** cockknocker
#248 - AnonymousDonor (04/25/2014) [-]
whoa more comments than thumbs   
im way too sleepdeprived and impatient to go through everyone's points so ill just hope what i say hasn't already been beaten to death   
   
the question of course is purely rational/practical/logical - some would say cold, but not entirely illogical   
   
and i know there are at least three reasons why we don't kill them off:   
   
--the first is the obvious that we are simply sentimental creatures. emotion is a natural thing and when its their sibling/parent/friend/spouse suddenly tragically becoming ment/phys handicapped, people in short just do not want to let go   
----but it goes further than that. many may give the same reason they would for burying our dead - it "makes us human", "separates us from beasts", etc. but more importantly is that our sentimentality is a social construct that keeps our society more tightly cohesively bound and stronger in general. not to mention that, by acting as though merely existing was something worth fighting to sustain, it instills a deeper meaning and respect for life itself, which is good for both survival and prosperity   
   
--which leads to the second potential reason in what would happen if we didnt - the good ol slippery slope argument. at first its euthanizing the physically handicapped because they literally cannot even perform the actions to be productive, right? but then isn't mental handicap a form of physical impairment? after all the brain dictates action. then who determines what is mentally healthy and unhealthy? its already so easy to kick physicals and some mentals to the curb so why not all but the most "perfect"? compared to the actual geniuses, your average IQ is just as "severely handicapped" as a retard is to you. when does it end?   
   
--last and most obvious is that they do end up being productive members to society. with the exclusion of coma patients and vegetables, any ability to function is still functionality, even if they just end up a cog of lesser society - bagging groceries, etc.
whoa more comments than thumbs
im way too sleepdeprived and impatient to go through everyone's points so ill just hope what i say hasn't already been beaten to death

the question of course is purely rational/practical/logical - some would say cold, but not entirely illogical

and i know there are at least three reasons why we don't kill them off:

--the first is the obvious that we are simply sentimental creatures. emotion is a natural thing and when its their sibling/parent/friend/spouse suddenly tragically becoming ment/phys handicapped, people in short just do not want to let go
----but it goes further than that. many may give the same reason they would for burying our dead - it "makes us human", "separates us from beasts", etc. but more importantly is that our sentimentality is a social construct that keeps our society more tightly cohesively bound and stronger in general. not to mention that, by acting as though merely existing was something worth fighting to sustain, it instills a deeper meaning and respect for life itself, which is good for both survival and prosperity

--which leads to the second potential reason in what would happen if we didnt - the good ol slippery slope argument. at first its euthanizing the physically handicapped because they literally cannot even perform the actions to be productive, right? but then isn't mental handicap a form of physical impairment? after all the brain dictates action. then who determines what is mentally healthy and unhealthy? its already so easy to kick physicals and some mentals to the curb so why not all but the most "perfect"? compared to the actual geniuses, your average IQ is just as "severely handicapped" as a retard is to you. when does it end?

--last and most obvious is that they do end up being productive members to society. with the exclusion of coma patients and vegetables, any ability to function is still functionality, even if they just end up a cog of lesser society - bagging groceries, etc.
#211 - WimTehNecro (04/25/2014) [+] (1 reply)
What about the completely useless sacks of 						****					 that have no  disabilities be they physical or mental?
What about the completely useless sacks of **** that have no disabilities be they physical or mental?
[ 306 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)