Well, shit. That is one of the best things I have ever heard.

Democratic.

Ideally? A hobbesian Leviathan state. Realistically? No fucking clue. Everything has its flaws, and it doesn't look like any system is faring well at the moment. Even China's power-elite single party system hasn't stopped their economy from slowing.

No political system works because either someone gets fucked over or people exploited it.

You sir deserve a god damn medal for that comment

Thank you. But it's true. That's why I don't follow any specif political party. I stand for individual rights as long as it has the consent claws.

Agreed. Every party has it's ups and downs.

Well, I believe American Capitalism could work, if our system and people would hold their ground and not let money buy them out, like now.

For our system to work we need honest people something are government is lacking. For one the federal government asserts itself as more dominet then the state government. WHen they should be equal further more congress is way to powerful despite the check/ balance system

Exactly, man. But I don't believe in State rights, I believe in individual rights.

The states grant most of our individual rights though.

True. But why would we want one right in one place, and not the same in another? I believe we shouldn't focus on state's rights, but on individual rights.

Good point

Well then you have anarchy, and I personally believe that government is superior to that. I just haven't found the government that I feel is best yet.

Yeah, but if there's anarchy, nothing stops me from creating a new government to rule. Also, as an individual, nothing stops me from killing and destroying everything.

A Monarchy.

I disagree.

Monarchy, didn't stop WW1, what makes you think it can protect you?

I don't Government shouldn't protect it's people it should serve it .

if you want someone to serve you, why don't you hire a domestic servant?
A government is an organization that you pay to protect you( that's oversimplified version)

Government is a person or people who run society in a certain place. If we need protection we can do it ourselves. I want my government to just make sure it's people are happy.

and with a monarchy, the King/Queen, tends to satiate their own desires. So how is it an equitable government?

Magna carta Limites the power of the king and queen. With the right limitations I belvie it can work

I suppose putting all the power in person cuts out the possibility for a bureaucracy, I mean what could possibly go wrong?
<(What could go wrong)

If you limited their power that couldn't happen Hitler was an absolute dictatorship

who limits the power? In Monarchy, no power rivals the King/Queen's.
(can't say "people", because you've given up your rights so that the Gov't may better serve/protect you.)

I can too say people. We have given up no rights. the king is their to guide and serve. Without a his people a King is nothing, but a present. It is yin and yang.

Well, if people hold power over the King/Queen, isn't that position a wasteful expenditure? he/she is practically a middleman, if the people will eventually implement their will regardless of his ruling?
in addition, If the people are making decisions, isn't that a democratic system?

No.
The King / Queen makes the laws. The people have the right to revoke any law deemed unfit. So long as it's just. For instance the King wants to pass a law allowing murder the people revoke that law.

The system isnt perfect I have only thought about it as you are asking me these things.

you realize, this sounds suspiciously like a system already in place in the world.
IE. Executive, and Legislative branches of the American gov't system.