Well define "work" because our government is clearly screwed clear bribery and nobody willing to point it out and each side bickering at each other for no reason other than to appear t have a purpose. Anarchism would bring decentralization, not exploitable because no one is obligated to do anything. That is what is needed on a large scale because you're right no one would be behind traditional anarchy. This would be more extremist or lawless libertarianism. Not the best description but A society with no "leader" only decisions to be made by the populace and education to fit focusing a lot on morals due to the present impossibility of enforcing laws upon a large population such as our societies do now. Taking the laws out of the equation because they will be broken anyway and taking bureaucracy out of situations better suited to common sense.