Upload
YouTube Videos
Funny Pictures
Funny GIFs
Funny Text
Funny Movies
Login or register
Your Posts
Login or register
Login / Create Account
Create Account
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Click to Create Account
Login to FJ
reset password
Stay logged in
Click to Login
Log in/Sign with Facebook.
Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
Create Channel
vidyagaems
4chan
Tumblr-Content
politics
WholesomeMemes
animemanga
marvel
FJNN
aww
cat
csectioncomics
oc-comic-makers
starwars
CartoonGoodness
OneForAll
furry
warhammer40k
UnlimitFateWorks
kingofthehill
tf2
dank-webms
fallout
pokemon
harry-potter
cat-channel
art
Daily-Jokes
dccomics
cute
bertstrips
PrimitiveTech
MemeComps
dungeons-n-drags
gwen
fatpeoplehate
Splatoon-Time
freestuff
food
overwatch-time
political
dragonballz
cringe-channel
Advice
|
Anime & Manga
|
Books
|
Cooking
|
Drawing & Art
|
Fitness and Weight Loss
|
Video Games
|
Guns
|
Hating
|
Hobby
|
Items2
|
Music
|
Pokemon
|
Politics
|
Religion
|
Science
|
Social
|
Sports
|
Tabletop Gaming
|
Technology
|
Television
Remaining character count: 4000
Spoiler Image
[ + ]
Image or Video File:
Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
Record voice message?
0:00
Click to start recording.
Enter Captcha Code:
Scroll to comment?
Back to the content 'American Politics'
Refresh
Options
asd
2
new threads.
1
new replies.
#14083
-
natedizzie
Reply
+4
(11/10/2012)
[-]
A Question to all those that voted for OBAMA.
Would you have voted for him if he was found in the wrong in the Benghazi or the Fast and the furious scandals?
Did you think that having those celebrities and concerts at his rallies make him look like a better candidate?
Last one,
Since he backs a singular world government do you?
#14110
to #14083
-
Patheos
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
1. No
2. No
3. Indifferent
#14084
to #14083
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
Wait, I'm republican and I support singular world government. Is that not our thing?
#14181
to #14084
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
"I support singular world government."
Tell me you're kidding.
#14196
to #14181
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Someone else said that as well. Looks like you didn't read the previous responses. Please do so.
#14199
to #14196
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
I've read said comments now, and Jebus Herbert Christ on a plastic cross, you have no idea what you're talking about.
You're nothing short of delusional.
#14200
to #14199
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Meh. I don't think so. But to each his own.
#14201
to #14200
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
"But to each his own."
That's exactly what a global government will deny me.
#14202
to #14201
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Not the one I have in mind. It would have most of the same freedoms as America has now, and that includes Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression.
#14203
to #14202
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Everything short of universal self-determination will not do.
Maybe you're okay with living under a yoke, I'm not.
#14204
to #14203
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Universal self-determination? Why sugarcoat it? Just say anarchy. I won't judge you.
#14205
to #14204
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
That's not a sugarcoat, that's a synonym.
I'm not hiding anything and have never made a secret out of it; yeah, I'm an Anarchist and a radical one at that.
I dislike using the term though, as it instantly creates a wrong picture and prejudice of marauding punks and burning cities in people's minds.
#14206
to #14205
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
I would never presume that that's the universal agenda of all anarchists, because I know it's not. But it is a serious risk among certain individuals within the group, and for that reason, it's a little too dangerous for my taste.
#14207
to #14206
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Then stick to your self-imposed tyrants for a false sense of security but leave me out of it.
#14208
to #14207
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Tyrants? Where did you get the idea that I was advocating tyranny?
#14209
to #14208
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
What do you call it when people's lives are dominated by laws and rulers they have never agreed on, then?
#14210
to #14209
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Society. And that's not entirely true, because most laws
are
agreed upon. They're either common sense laws (like don't steal and don't kill) or they get voted on. My idea of a world government wouldn't be any more powerful than America's government is today.
#14211
to #14210
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Funny way of spelling tyranny. Or government, for that matter.
I did not vote to be ruled over. I did not agree to be liable to military service. I never agreed to paying taxes or what the state then does with the money that is rightfully mine and their disgusting pretense of "democracy" changes nothing about that.
I disagree. I do not want to be ruled. They do not have my consent.
They are tyrants held in place by nothing but their lies and violence.
#14212
to #14211
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Then I suggest you develop your survival skills, procure a boat, a kindly get the fuck out of my country.
#14213
to #14212
-
techketzer
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
May I present a rebuttal?
Go fuck yourself with a cactus.
That's the first thing you have to learn; you hold no authority whatsoever over me or anyone else.
#14217
to #14213
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
It doesn't matter what country you live in because they all have at least some form of government. And you wouldn't be ale to survive without it. That's why humans developed it.
#14214
to #14213
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
I was not attempting to exercise any form of authority. I was merely making a suggestion. You would obviously be happier if you left, and we would be happier without you. It's a win-win.
#14216
to #14214
-
techketzer
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
First of all, chances are I'm not a resident of your national people-farm so the whole point is moot to begin with.
Second, no. I have the right to live in self-determination everywhere I damn well please, and I intend to make use of it.
I intend to make this world a bit better and less violent than it was before and that is not accomplished by running.
#14100
to #14084
-
Ruspanic
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
The idea of the "New World Order" came from George H.W. Bush, but in general Republicans oppose strong government power.
That said, there are neoconservatives who support using military force to spread democracy and pursue American (non-security) interests abroad. These people tend to be Republicans.
#14101
to #14100
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
Ohhh. Well I don't support the use of heavy force, but I do sympathize, to some degree, with those who want all the world's countries to be united in one global super-nation. Seems like it would get rid of a lot of problems.
#14089
to #14084
-
latinotornado
Reply
+2
(11/10/2012)
[-]
please tell me you're joking
#14098
to #14089
-
anon
id:
1532726d
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
He's either
troll
ing or just being satirical of the stereotype that Americans are a bunch of imperialists. Doubt he's serious.
#14102
to #14098
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
Semi-serious. As I said in reply to Ruspanic's comment, I don't advocate heavy force or fascism, but the idea of uniting all countries into one global country appeals to me. I don't believe world peace is a realistic goal, but that would at least be a step closer to it.
#14109
to #14102
-
anon
id:
584e79f7
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
I don't like the idea of global government too much, but so long as there is no single person or group of people with very large amounts of power, then I can see it working without corruption so easily overtaking it. It would have to operate under some sort of democratic parliamentary form of government.
#14116
to #14109
-
jokeface
Reply
+1
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Oh I agree. Certainly not one person representing it. I don't even like having a president that much. I think Congress is enough by itself. The way I imagine a world government would be like having just that, but on a larger scale.
#14107
to #14102
-
rageisfunny
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
Why does one global country appeal to you?
#14122
to #14107
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
I feel that as a species, we shouldn't be divided amongst ourselves. We're the most advanced race on the planet, and we use that quality to kill each other. I'm not saying that a world government would rid us of war and violence, because that's absurd. They would still exist but I just feel as though it would alleviate some of the enmity and competition between nations, as well as unite us in a common sense of nationalism.
#14144
to #14122
-
rageisfunny
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
So for a general feeling of nationalism? Each country already has that to varying degrees. Also, it wouldn't work. I would guess that a majority of countries wouldn't want that as everyone would lose individualism. Also, imagine how powerful that government would be.
#14160
to #14144
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Not just general nationalism,
common
nationalism. The ability for everyone in the world to salute the same flag. Treat every other human being as a fellow citizen. And the idea is that everyone in the world would live under the same laws and policies, which would give people a better sense of equality. And the government would only have as much power as the average government has over its country currently. The only difference would be the number of governors and the area of its jurisdiction.
#14163
to #14160
-
rageisfunny
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Yea maybe. What checks are their on the government? What type of government is it?
#14167
to #14163
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Like I said, it would be like Congress, but larger. No front man though. That's too dangerous. What do you mean by checks?
#14174
to #14167
-
rageisfunny
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Checks on the government expanding their power. And so the government would only be Congress, with representatives in both houses from all nations?
#14197
to #14174
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Again, I don't think the government would need any more power than it already has. This is how I would do it: You go down the list of all the issues (healthcare, welfare, etc.) and find out which country is #1 for each respective issue. Then create a universal government that emulates all of those countries for those issues. Obviously some issues would be eliminated entirely, such as foreign policy, because it would all be the same nation. The military would still exist because we would need someone better than the police to help maintain peace when some people get violent. Not to mention we would need a defense in case our planet gets invaded by a hostile alien race. But overall, there would be no war except small disputes between locally-grown militias. Economic problems would be eased, and without war, the brightest minds from every country could collaborate on solving problems like disease and the energy crisis.
#14221
to #14197
-
rageisfunny
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
Think how long it takes our Congress to decide things. It would take hundreds of times longer then that if everyone was represented in Congress. What is to stop the government from con
troll
ing every aspect of our lives? Currently, if a country does something horrible, like genocide, other countries usually call them out and levy sanctions against them. What if this one universal government decided that Cuba should no longer be populated, and killed everybody on the island.
#14249
to #14221
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/12/2012)
[-]
Why would they feel the need to commit genocide when they could just relocate the to a different part of the world? The entire planet is one territory now.
#14256
to #14249
-
rageisfunny
Reply
0
(11/12/2012)
[-]
Cause its easier and more cost effective to kill them. Still, length of deciding things put before Congress.
#14198
to #14197
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/11/2012)
[-]
And as for the second part of your question, yes.
#14093
to #14089
-
jokeface
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
Well I live in America, so I'm kind of an imperialist. My wish is for the rest of the world to become part of America.
#14086
to #14084
-
natedizzie
Reply
0
(11/10/2012)
[-]
I am neither republican nor democrat so I wouldn't no.
Back to the content 'American Politics'
Top in 24 Hours
Yeah lay off him
457
3h ago
Goodest old boy
417
5h ago
Buying a cake
318
4h ago
God save our gracious meme 235
147
3h ago
Classic
313
5h ago
Killer Moth done right
744
8h ago
Pun
302
5h ago
Girl who used to be paralysed surprises her nurse
1600
12h ago
60 years difference
527
8h ago
Anon learns the Truth
855
9h ago
How could the other team do this to us ?
41
38m ago
How to increase workplace productivity a 5 step guide
1343
11h ago
towering acrid Koala
65
2h ago
Zucc juice
221
5h ago
Worth it
387
7h ago
strong cumbersome Opossum
620
8h ago
Best Dad
916
11h ago
Ocean
861
11h ago
African Tradition
343
8h ago
Jackie and jade
801
10h ago
God
41
52m ago
Is anyone else like this with anyone?
248
7h ago
A ---- Parody
667
9h ago
Mr. Krabs is one thicc bih
774
10h ago
Han solo
567
10h ago
Germany
286
8h ago
Petco
801
11h ago
Meanwhile in China
410
9h ago
Can't afford GoW? Say no more
24
21m ago
TF2 memes
423
8h ago
Anon uses Cricket
515
10h ago
Sun Bears
585
10h ago
How Lewd
282
6h ago
Far Cry 3 in a nutshell
351
9h ago
face puff and scruff
123
6h ago
unbiased quarrelsome snotty Cockroach
266
8h ago
Anon confesses to his crush
491
10h ago
Sister's new kid
548
10h ago
I thought not.
337
9h ago
I Always Wait
590
11h ago