| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
ITT: What's your policy on Pseudo-Legendary Pokemon?
1 is fine, 2 is pushing it, and 3 is the max. You're a goddamn noob if you have an entire party of Pseudo-Legendaries.
1 is fine, 2 is pushing it, and 3 is the max. You're a goddamn noob if you have an entire party of Pseudo-Legendaries.
I usually use Metagross when I've got the Beldum in Emerald, and I sometimes use Dragonite. That's about it, really.
If you've got the pseudos because of types then I guess it's fine, but if you're getting pseudos just to say "HEY I'VE GOT A PSEUDO TEAM LOLOL" then I'd probably say no.
If you've got the pseudos because of types then I guess it's fine, but if you're getting pseudos just to say "HEY I'VE GOT A PSEUDO TEAM LOLOL" then I'd probably say no.
with the exception of Salamance (awesome dragon/flying type and learns a lot of fire type moves) I don't use any of those, nor got any of those :P. I prefer common types too, cuz I only have used 1 legendary to battle with for a while as well, Rayquaza, other than that, for some reason, I feel it's more satisfying and challenging to beat a Pokemon game with NO Legendaries and/or Pseudo-Legendaries except Black and White because you have to have those Legendaries to battle N with...
i think if you put in the effort to actually find them, train them legitimately from their first form, you have earned the right to use them. but actual legendaries, as in the ones that start off at a high level and you know exactly where they are, should be banned from battling entirely, and shouold be considered trophies for collection only