only humans. somthing about the illermanarti and penis or soihapkdhg'k. CHECK OUT . rik,. WHAT THE . THERE'S A RUNNING SAW NEAR YOUR HANDS. YOU DONT HAVE ANY PROTECTION ON. YOU'RE NOT EVEN HOLDING THE HAMMER THE RIGHT WAY YOU
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

only humans

somthing about the illermanarti and penis or soihapkdhg'k

Tags: Birds
CHECK OUT . rik,
...
+1095
Views: 56561
Favorited: 60
Submitted: 12/20/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to stickmansam E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #49 - foursome (12/20/2013) [-]
**** TREES
ALGAE YES
#47 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
only humans can kill nature to do what nature does only better
User avatar #45 - mcfluffykins **User deleted account** (12/20/2013) [-]
I always like those dick house things. You know those miniature houses that people hang in their trees with a little hole cut in it for your dick? Well apparently they are actually for birds and I am not allowed to be within 5 miles of schools any more.
#52 to #45 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
User avatar #43 - niggernazi (12/20/2013) [-]
well maybe the birds that are living in the tree is ********* who just sit there all day and **** on your car.
#40 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
Humans are the dominant species. You're going against nature if you try to limit the current dominant species. We're allowed to do what we want because we are at the top of the food chain. You don't get mad at a lion for eating too many gazelles. That's how nature is.
User avatar #36 - nintendolover (12/20/2013) [-]
It's not about the birds. It's about the profit.
User avatar #34 - doctorfamp (12/20/2013) [-]
well, did you expect a chimpanzee to do it?
User avatar #28 - thrakerzad (12/20/2013) [-]
yeah, it takes wood to make a birdhouse
User avatar #29 to #28 - Kingsteveooo (12/20/2013) [-]
Yes but you are killing the home of a bird, to build a bird house..
User avatar #30 to #29 - thrakerzad (12/20/2013) [-]
bird houses were always dumb.
#23 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
and beavers
User avatar #21 - nabagala (12/20/2013) [-]
its called home improvement
#18 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
USA Car Crash Compilation 2013 ( United States and Canada ) - See more at: You need to login to view this link
#10 - Siphus (12/20/2013) [-]
As popular as this notion is, did you know that proper forestry actually helps the environment and the economy?   
   
When companies clear forest they always replant onsite or at least in a similar area.  The disturbance is actually good for surrounding ecosystems and helps create more biodiversity among plant and animal species by create more niches for them to live, depending on the method of cut.   
   
Just sayin.
As popular as this notion is, did you know that proper forestry actually helps the environment and the economy?

When companies clear forest they always replant onsite or at least in a similar area. The disturbance is actually good for surrounding ecosystems and helps create more biodiversity among plant and animal species by create more niches for them to live, depending on the method of cut.

Just sayin.
#50 to #10 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
Well yes and no in that it helps.

Here in Colorado for the last couple of years (we're talking decades) we abided by certain laws when it came to forestry management. The kicker is that we're now discovering that our methods although helpful in some regards are also extremely volatile in other regards. All those forest fires that happen here? Yeah, a good part of that can be attributed to us ******* up the forest. And again, we're only now figuring out what the problems are.

The trick? Who's to say that we don't figure out what went wrong, try to fix it, and only end up making things as bad as before due to our lack of knowledge?
User avatar #44 to #10 - leadstriker (12/20/2013) [-]
LOL
ARE YOU ******* KIDDING ME
User avatar #38 to #10 - mutzaki (12/20/2013) [-]
The disturbance in ecosystems, while promoting adaptations, also means entire colonies and species die out, which usually negatively affects following species in the food chain. I very highly doubt the "stimulus of growth" anywhere near outweighs the obvious negatives.

And the part about replanting varies very much depending on the country. Some parts of the world simply don't care, and sometimes the growth of trees is too slow to catch up with human deforestation.
User avatar #55 to #38 - Siphus (12/20/2013) [-]
I dont know of any forestry companies that destroy the entire ecosystem, they usually only cut certain areas.
User avatar #35 to #10 - teseus (12/20/2013) [-]
It really depends where you live. There are countries (like mine) where people are chopping lots of forests and they never replant anything. We had lats projects that promoted reforestation (not sure if there's any law that requires you to replant what you cut down, but anyway, the companies pretty much pay their way out of trouble when a scandal arises). It's all fun and games on paper or in countries that actually care about their environment.

Just sayin.
#32 to #10 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
One of my lecturers is researching this in Malaysia. From what he's found full clearing is pretty detrimental to all biodiversity he's studied (ant and bird-life if i remember correctly). Controlled logging can be very useful for carbon sinks though. If not too many trees are logged and they are made into furniture and not burned they keep carbon in them and more trees grow trapping more carbon. It seemed to have little effect on biodiversity too. Then again this may have been just in rainforest habitats. Just saying though, there is evidence that full logging of an area can be pretty harmful.
User avatar #22 to #10 - Rei ONLINE (12/20/2013) [-]
It's a lot better then the ******* bushfires. Plus the wood actually gets used for more then just burning down the country.
User avatar #20 to #10 - partnerintroll (12/20/2013) [-]
**** where can i find this information quoted by a credible source? I would love to use this argument in debate rounds
#37 to #20 - jukuku (12/20/2013) [-]
Keep in mind you can't just cut down every single tree and claim is is good for the environment. As of now, regardless of cut, we're using too much wood. We cut down forests much faster than they can recover. It's important that we try to be more efficient with our resources, especially timber.
User avatar #39 to #37 - partnerintroll (12/20/2013) [-]
Sure. But the debate round is a two hour long information processing session and I would like a counter to deforestation impacts that the other team my concede so I can win the impact turn
#41 to #39 - jukuku (12/20/2013) [-]
Not going to lie I only read half your post, I was gleaning. Yeah, in that case, it would be useful.
User avatar #17 to #10 - ancientchaos (12/20/2013) [-]
today I learned something interesting

neet
#3 - rockmanfan (12/20/2013) [-]
WHAT THE **** .
THERE'S A RUNNING SAW NEAR YOUR HANDS.
YOU DONT HAVE ANY PROTECTION ON.
YOU'RE NOT EVEN HOLDING THE HAMMER THE RIGHT WAY YOU ********
User avatar #54 to #3 - vinylshark (12/20/2013) [-]
Protection clothes? There are no protection clothes for working on a buzzsaw.
Wearing gloves while working on a buzzsaw would be one of the dumbest ideas ever, because the gloves could easily get caught in the saw blade.
Trust me, I make an apprenticeship as carpenter.

The clothes you (probably) mean are mostly safety pants for working with a chainsaw.
User avatar #56 to #54 - rockmanfan (12/20/2013) [-]
i was referring to eye protection, i know gloves are a terrible idea
User avatar #58 to #56 - vinylshark (12/21/2013) [-]
Protection googles are a good idea, but no one really uses them (at least not where I work).
User avatar #42 to #3 - milthyfoustache (12/20/2013) [-]
in fairness if you put your hand in a saw your ****** even with protection on
User avatar #51 to #42 - animedudej (12/20/2013) [-]
the protective clothing is designed so that if it snags it wont rip your hand off...
User avatar #33 to #3 - akho (12/20/2013) [-]
If he sat down, he'd so be screwed in the ass
#31 to #3 - cfourthewin (12/20/2013) [-]
off to nsfw...
off to nsfw...
#27 to #3 - joelgrosso (12/20/2013) [-]
HFW he gets fired..
User avatar #26 to #3 - ieatbengay (12/20/2013) [-]
artists know nothing about DIY
User avatar #24 to #3 - noisia (12/20/2013) [-]
This is my nomination for comment of the year.
User avatar #14 to #3 - Dwarf (12/20/2013) [-]
He was definitely wearing a condom.
#11 to #3 - xkenxmx (12/20/2013) [-]
Jesus christ dude, it's a comic strip. Stop being a whiny pedantic ******
User avatar #15 to #11 - macacobr (12/20/2013) [-]
Jesus christ dude, it's a FJ comment. Stop being a whiny pedantic ******
#6 to #3 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
as for that hammer and the protection i agree the pic ****** that up, but as far as the hand goes usually people like to put the margin of safety at 4-6 inches, but i see where your going with this....one other thing is its literally a saw blade on a wooden table....how does that work?
User avatar #2 - gayboard (12/20/2013) [-]
But wood isn't just used for making bird houses though.
User avatar #4 to #2 - infinitereaper ONLINE (12/20/2013) [-]
I just realized that if you live in a house built with wood in it you're literally living in the carcasses of once living organisms
#12 to #4 - gerfox (12/20/2013) [-]
If you eat egg you are devouring the unborn babies of hens.
User avatar #25 to #12 - commontroll (12/20/2013) [-]
Nah, you're just eating their refrigerated periods.
#13 to #12 - masculino (12/20/2013) [-]
Nope, because eggs needs to be "spermed" by a cock to start life.
So the eggs you eat, could never hatch chickens.
User avatar #5 to #4 - Ruspanic (12/20/2013) [-]
That's ******* metal.
#1 - omnipotentsoap (12/20/2013) [-]
picture I took near Bromley Mountain Vermont
written on paper
the stupid...it hurts
User avatar #53 to #1 - mrdrpage ONLINE (12/20/2013) [-]
It died a martyr.
#16 to #1 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
Your stupidity hurts worse. The paper was made before he decided to write that. He didn't kill a tree, turn it into paper, and use it. Use common sense, dip **** .
#46 to #16 - anonymous (12/20/2013) [-]
It's called supply and demand, condom chewer. You buy some ******* paper, the people that produce paper get your scrotum-sucking money. They get your money, they have proof that there's a demand for paper, so they cut down more anus-mincing trees. You really want to "save the ********* trees", you're gonna have to somehow convince the majority of the world to stop using paper, which isn't gonna happen any time soon, you ass-winged dick muncher.
In short, that picture is retarded. People who think that there's no eco-friendly method of forestry are retarded. And you, my fellow anon...you're retarded. The kind of retarded that ends with you covering a park bench in semen and trying to light on fire with your teeth and a xylophone. Piss off, ass mcgee.
#59 to #46 - omnipotentsoap (12/21/2013) [-]
that was beautiful
that was beautiful
#9 to #1 - arisgjaodosd (12/20/2013) [-]
It's only one sheet. Do you know how much paper you can get from one tree? Me neither, but probably a lot. If they somehow manage to save a tree it probably pays off.
#48 to #9 - niggershits (12/20/2013) [-]
an average tree can be turned into around 80.500 sheets of paper
User avatar #8 to #1 - robertolee (12/20/2013) [-]
Was probably that elephant poo paper stuff.
#7 to #1 - thrixus (12/20/2013) [-]
Paper is usually sourced from responsible sources which means that the companies would have the responsibility to replant the trees. In this picture they're probably trying to protect a lot of trees from being knocked down for buildings or something?
 Friends (0)