more politics. . THE inis: 4 HAS BEEN THE UM Hill 3 YEARS. STOP TO GEARGE THAT. THE MS HEN THE MW Hill 222. He never did. Right to bear arms is not carte blanche to do whatever the you want with a gun. I don't understand how background checks is a violation of that am
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

more politics

THE inis: 4 HAS BEEN THE
UM Hill 3 YEARS. STOP TO GEARGE THAT.
THE MS HEN THE MW Hill 222
...
+205
Views: 19230
Favorited: 23
Submitted: 10/11/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to cheastnut E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(128):

[ 128 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#4 - willysbilly (10/11/2013) [+] (13 replies)
He never did. Right to bear arms is not carte blanche to do whatever the **** you want with a gun. I don't understand how background checks is a violation of that amendement
User avatar #8 - skyggen (10/11/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Ok OP. I've heard this for 5 years now. Obama is for socialism, Obama wants to take away our guns blah blah. So i want to place you on the stand here. Can you bring me ONE instance in which The obama administration have atempted to pass through the senate a law that would in some way restrict americans the right the carry firearms?
#3 - jakatackka (10/11/2013) [-]
OBUMA'S TRYIN TO TAKE MAH GUNS!!!!
#20 - lacklusterpelican (10/11/2013) [+] (32 replies)
It's not even right to bare arms, it's right to bare arms in a militia.  generally refers to an army or other fighting force that is composed of non-professional fighters  Some of you gun nuts are getting as bad as feminists
It's not even right to bare arms, it's right to bare arms in a militia. generally refers to an army or other fighting force that is composed of non-professional fighters Some of you gun nuts are getting as bad as feminists
#24 to #20 - haeckal (10/11/2013) [-]
At the time, the militia was explicitly defined as every adult male.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
#73 - roliga (10/12/2013) [+] (3 replies)
TFW my job is to make sure people don't shoot themselves in the foot (Firearm Safety Instructor)
TFW Europoors try and tell me about how their ass backwards laws would work here
TFW "But muh Great Britbong has no guns so no violence!"
TFW Great Britain is the most violent country in the EU
TFW Tony Blair's daughter was held at gun point the other week regardless of banned guns
TFW I open carry a Glock 17 gen 4 with two extra magazines every day
TFW libruhl little liberal lady boys try to tell me how I'm causing all the gun violence because their parents told them so after 5 minutes of watching CNN, aka, the least trustable news outlets when it comes to firearms
TFW majority of cops don't know **** about firearms and should not be recognized or looked at as authorities on guns
TFW cops have no legal duty to protect your sorry ass (see Warren v. District of Columbia)
TFW the 13 year olds on this site who refuse to look at the facts that people use firearms legally to defend themselves more a year than Jamal does to shoot up Darnell's crack house.

Get at me Europoors/Libtards. God it is satisfying to say that...
#53 - padawonjohn (10/11/2013) [-]
Can we please keep polotics out of Funnjunk.   
   
It's not funny, nor is it a good time.   
   
especially pictures like this, that would be better fit on a 						******					 facebook page
Can we please keep polotics out of Funnjunk.

It's not funny, nor is it a good time.

especially pictures like this, that would be better fit on a ****** facebook page

#23 - areyouawakeyet (10/11/2013) [+] (7 replies)
But that didn't ******* happen.
Obama hasn't tried taking away guns; "tea party" asshats keep screaming it, but he hasn't done a damn thing. In fact, gun sales have shot up through the roof under Obama because ever since he's been elected we've had idiots run around thinking he was going to take their guns away.
User avatar #49 - hawaiianhappysauce (10/11/2013) [+] (11 replies)
The only reason why the Affordable Care Act was passed was because the Democrats had a majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Every Republican voted no for that bill. It's dangerous to have a majority in both parts of Congress because now only half the American's are being represented.

The reason why we had such a huge number of Democrats is because of something I like to call "Bush Derangement Syndrome." We have a ton of idiots who blame Bush for every single problem in America, some people still blame him TO THIS DAY.
User avatar #44 - mutzaki (10/11/2013) [-]
This is exactly why I should still be able to own slaves.
#37 - spacedunk ONLINE (10/11/2013) [-]
Americans referring to the constitution to point out faults in current law is ******* hillarious.
Free speech has been butchered so much, it's retarded. And nothing has been done to undo the new laws that caused it.
The constitution doesn't actually mean anything in modern America when it comes to making laws.
#18 - technobanana (10/11/2013) [-]
Just because its old it doesn't mean its right... a lot has changed in 222 years stop being such idiots and see that the system is kinda broken and wrong and it needs changing...
#1 - anonymous (10/11/2013) [+] (7 replies)
throwing this out there for anyone who can read:
idgaf about obamacare except one part in it... the FINE you get.. which is unconstitutional the government can not force an individual to buy a service provided by the government. and lets face it, the government can offer rates no other company can match so its practically going to be just that
User avatar #27 to #1 - CallMeCrisco ONLINE (10/11/2013) [-]
What get's me is I'd be fined for a service I'm not using that my taxes would be paying for. I'd have to pay twice for something I don't want.

That's not ******* legal.
User avatar #94 - shmoopy (10/12/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The 2nd amendment allows for citizens to own any weapon the military uses (right of the citizens to keep and bear arms in order to create a well regulated militia). There are several laws in place that infringe on that right. Obama has supported potential gun control laws that further infringe on that right. You'd have to be completely retarded not to realize this.
#84 - theism (10/12/2013) [+] (4 replies)
>Guns are definitely the same now as in 1776.
>You're definitely going to join a militia and use those guns there.
>You definitely need a high powered semi-automatic weapon to defend yourself from petty thieves and crack heads.
>The republican party definitely isn't pulling one of the ********* moves even in the worst time for ****** political moves.
>Obama is definitely the only one pushing for gun control.
>Completely unregulated firearms are definitely a great idea. Look how well it works for Somalia.
>The affordable care act is definitely just liberal socialism. No conservative would ever propose anything like that. Mitt Romney's healthcare was totally different.
#97 to #84 - Griffino (10/12/2013) [-]
1. nope...who cares
2. maybe
3. educated people worry about crackheads, people who know history worry about tyranny
4. off topic...you're stupid
5. this makes no sense, no one said he was...you're stupid
6. compare us to a backwards culture without laws?...you're stupid
7. off topic... you're...nevermind
#19 - adrummerboy (10/11/2013) [-]
....cool politics
....cool politics
User avatar #17 - adu (10/11/2013) [+] (3 replies)
More recent gun legislation doesn't infringe on right to bear arms, but it does add a bunch of unnecessary bureaucracy and can be quite pedantic. Sometimes the difference between "law abiding citizen" and "armed criminal" is plus or minus one bullet in the cartridge.
#9 - anonymous (10/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
haha, american politics, whats the point, jews are ******* you as we speak
User avatar #14 to #9 - danilawleit (10/11/2013) [-]
slow down there, Hitler.
#80 - anonymous (10/12/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Yes, but 222 years ago they didn't have automatic weapons and mass shooting multiple times a year. Asking for a thorough background check doesn't seem to be asking much in lieu of our 10,000 gun related ******* a year.
User avatar #98 to #85 - jacklane (10/12/2013) [-]
I beg to differ. It only says to bear arms and that it shall not be infringed. I see no limitations as to what type of firearm. Also, shall not be infringed.
#57 - theguythatisnotyou (10/11/2013) [-]
Republicans and Democrats are arguing while the third-parties just say "I told you this would happen."
[ 128 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)