i wonder if he will find out. . Tattoo of Leviticus 18: 22 forbidding : Not knowing that Leviticus 19: 28 forbids tattoos: Priceless. wow, guess hes gotta remind himself not to take it in the ass so often



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - supercookieduster (11/23/2013) [-]
wow, guess hes gotta remind himself not to take it in the ass so often
#1 - soundofwinter (11/23/2013) [+] (2 replies)
He won't, these types of people don't actually read their Bibles
#10 - anonymous (11/23/2013) [+] (2 replies)
This is the passage implied:
"'You shall not make any cuts in your body for the dead nor make any tattoo marks on yourselves: I am the LORD."
As you may, or may not be able to see and understand, it refers to making a tattoo with the meaning "I am the Lord".

[inb4 red avalanche]
#12 to #10 - lordaurion (11/23/2013) [-]
No it doesn't.
User avatar #24 - breadbasket (11/24/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Leviticus says that eating pork is an abomination.
Leviticus says that sleeping with another man is an abomination.

I know a lot of fag haters that eat tons of pork.
#17 - sjt (11/23/2013) [-]
The meaning of the passage refers to tattooing yourself in memory of the dead. This was to separate the God's people from the religious practices of the peoples that surrounded them at the time. Those practices including bodily mutilation of some degree or some sort of permanent bodily marking, example tattoo, to show a permanent grieving for the dead. Taking an action like this was seen as a lack of belief in the teachings of God at the time that their loved ones were not in heaven but somewhere else not pleasant, that their surviving relatives should grieve their unfortunate resting place always.
#27 - mayoroftownsville (11/24/2013) [-]
I want to get a Leviticus 19:28 tattoo
User avatar #6 - PenguinsOfMars (11/23/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Hate to play devil's advocate but the line prohibiting tattoos meant it because Pagan beliefs would cut, disfigure, and tattoo themselves to mourn a loss because they thought it pleased the gods. So naturally the bible forbids that because it drew people away from Christianity before it was mainstream. Most Christians now pick and choose the parts of the bible they believe in but for some reason homophobia stayed.
User avatar #59 - ADeadlYLepricoN (11/24/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Leviticus 19:28 says in a single paragraph that as Christians we are not allowed to get hair cuts, shave, alter our bodies with ink or cuts, or allow our people (namely daughters) to dress provocatively.

Basically I am a Christian who believes that
A) Things and times change, and most of these things would not be a big deal anymore
B) The Lord that I believe in and worship cares for more about love for him and others, as well as tolerance and unity with your fellow man than he does about the ink in your skin or the man in your bed.
#44 - vauge (11/24/2013) [+] (1 reply)
All I noticed the hand tattoo.
#49 - caplocker (11/24/2013) [-]
Only a closet queer would tattoo stupid **** like that on their arm to remind theirselves not to take a dick in the ass. Be gay if you want, if there is a God and he gives a **** what you cram in your ass he's probably going to bitch about a lot more than that.
#41 - commit (11/24/2013) [-]
And it would make a fantastic tattoo
#36 - thehandthatfeeds (11/24/2013) [-]
They said no tatts to remember dead people foo!
#34 - sloot (11/24/2013) [-]
After some heated debates in one of my classes it was brought to our attention that Leviticus 18:22 was very likely translated incorrectly. It was originally meant to say something along the lines of treating your fellow man like a woman (women weren't people in those times) was an abomination. So it is entirely up to the reader to take what they want from it, but even if this is the case I find trusting a book that has changed hands hundreds of times for translation, and also having been altered by god knows how many people to fit what they think is morally correct just a little bit silly.
User avatar #21 - jovisman ONLINE (11/24/2013) [-]
5 bucks says he would tell you that you are taking it out of context
User avatar #11 - turian (11/23/2013) [+] (8 replies)
i dont think any bible ever mentions tatoos....
User avatar #32 to #20 - pwnedomega (11/24/2013) [-]
According to Christians, he did not come to make a new law, he came to re-enforce it. The Torah (or the Law/Old testament ) is still highly relevant and still should be followed. A lot of Christians don't want to listen so they just say "Oh its irrelevant!"
User avatar #7 - suxferyu (11/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)
"'Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves"

or it could mean not to get a tattoo for somebody that died, like getting their name or something tattooed onto yourself
#3 - NizzleBuckie (11/23/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #23 - ancientchaos (11/24/2013) [-]
Leviticus is a silly book
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)