hawking is king of science. . If governments are involved in covering up the knowledge of aliens, then they are doing a much better job of it than they seem to  hawking is king of science If governments are involved in covering up the knowledge aliens then they doing a much better job it than seem to
Upload
Login or register

hawking is king of science

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
If governments are
involved in covering up
the knowledge of aliens,
then they are doing a
much better job of it than
they seem to do at
anything else."
Stephen Hawking
...
+482
Views: 19026 Submitted: 02/01/2014
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (36)
[ 36 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#2 - rahtoga
+33 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #6 - Gamby
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
That moment when you realize Stephen Hawkings is doing a duck face
#7 to #6 - afaik
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #17 - IamWhoIam
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
"There are two possibilities, either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Both are equally terrifying."
#18 to #17 - funnyjunkyeahyeah
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Thank you for that very well known and extremely overused quote that you didn't even give the source of.
User avatar #19 to #18 - IamWhoIam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
I couldn't remember who said it. I put it in quotes to show that it wasn't mine (clearly).
#20 to #19 - funnyjunkyeahyeah
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
I didn't know who said it either, until I took 5 seconds to google it just now - Arthur C. Clarke
User avatar #21 to #20 - IamWhoIam
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Quoting things correctly on Funnyjunk is the least of my worries.
#22 to #21 - funnyjunkyeahyeah
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
It's a matter of respect. If you're going to use someone else's ideas, at least have the decency to spend a few seconds to find out who it is.
User avatar #23 to #22 - IamWhoIam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Again it's ******* Funnyjunk. If I was writing a paper for my Philosophy class it would be cited with whatever speech, journal, or interview he said it in. But I'm not so I'm not going to. Because Funnyjunk. And that idea clearly isn't yours so why don't you cite whatever authority figure in your life taught you that.
#25 to #23 - funnyjunkyeahyeah
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
You would cite it in for your philosophy class because it would be for your own benefit. You don't cite it here because you don't give a **** about the man who you're ripping off. You have no common decency. There is no specific source for this idea because it's common ******* decency practiced by nearly everyone. If I had a source, maybe it would be society, but that's a little vague.
User avatar #29 to #25 - richardstiffy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Wait, are you not worried about who made the content too? I don't see any sources or you questioning who actually made it, which looks very hypocritical to me.
User avatar #27 to #25 - IamWhoIam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
1. I'm not ripping him off. What would I gain imaginary green thumbs in the comment sections of a website that doesn't matter? I'm not gaining anything for this. It's not like Clarke is losing anything by me saying his quote without his name on here. He's dead. He CAN'T lose anything more.
2. I know a lot about Arthur C. Clarke and all of the good work that he did for human kind. I just forgot that he was the one to say this and didn't feel like looking it up.
User avatar #30 to #27 - DiabloStrawhat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
I honestly don't think you're being that disrespectful. This guy is just being a citation nerd.
User avatar #37 to #30 - IamWhoIam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
I had no intention of disrespecting Sir Arthur C. Clarke.
#13 - epicburana
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
#24 to #13 - pantception
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Not really related, but it was the first thing I thought of. Glad Google agreed with me.
User avatar #11 - owlexterminator
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
hawking is king of haw
#5 - infinitereaper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Anybody remember this ****?
The government wasn't hiding aliens, the aliens were in control and doing whatever the **** they wanted. The government was working for them.

If aliens were advanced enough to get here, they're damn well advanced enough to hide themselves and toy with us as they please.
#35 - bongoboon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
govrnmnt pls
#32 - cleateater
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
I doubt he said that.
#28 - stalini
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
omg i luv science and stephen is such a boss xD
User avatar #14 - lordzak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
No, I don't agree. The amount that has been leaked so far could only be an extremely small percentage of what are covering up then they would be doing a pretty good job.
[ 36 comments ]
Leave a comment