so to you it's stupid to believe that some thing sentient created everything other then a random events and eventually life being created for no purpose what so ever. neat story bro

Random events? What random events do you speak of?
It's not stupid to believe in a sentient creator, but what is tupid is to base your life and attitude around something you believe is true because you were told it was true, contrare to evidence. it is foolish to believe in something when it flies in the face of evidence, common sense and out of fear.
But hey, everyone's entitled to believe in whatever the hell they want, and shouldn't be persecuted for it unless it causes them to commit crimes.

i believe in science, and also the fact that ppl look to others for guidence. thats what seperate followers from leaders, and alsol give way to coruption. even in realigion.

Also, "...life being created for no purpose what so ever..."
What the hell are you even talking about?

i believe that life was created by chance, but that doesnt mean a diety couldnt exist. for all i know a god couldve created the universe 14 billion years ago, but then again that theroy would be flawed because the bible states that god created the earth in 7 days. though it more believeable that a diety created the universe 14 billion years ago than a person writing something that he thought was true, and millions of people believe in.

That comment was meant for SirCool, but anyway!
What do you mean when you use "chance" in this instance?

well, i would liek the word "luck" more because everything had to come in order for the world to be created.
things like: earth being the right distance for it not to me too hot or too cold
all the rigght molecules coming together to form the elements, animals, and everything we see and touch.
stuff like that. chance or luck are 2 words that desribe that well/

It wasn't luck that created life...
That's like saying it's luck that Hydrogen bonds with Oxygen and by chance creates Oxygen.
Earthdidn't come together the right distance, life adapted to conditions. There are organisms that live in horrible conditions (temperature etc), akin to other planets. There are also suspected fossils of bacteria on other planets within our solar system.

Sorry to be a bit pedantic here, but it was the elements that bonded to form molecules... Sorry!

i;m just gonna stop posting this stuff because its getting to boring

Sorry, wrong comment!

i'd agree with you but i fear the red thumbs,
...must...assimilate...must...be...confomist.
*help me*

Religion was first created as a way to explain the world when science couldn't. It also explained life after death and provided rules to give order to the average person's life, such as do not kill, rape, marry more than one person, etc. Finally, it gave them an all powerful (albeit imaginary) deity to pray to for hope, strength, food, etc.

Now you know.

that's not what religion is religion is people coming together to worship and follow the being who created everything as we try and find the meaning of life even though i respect your opinion don't demean my beliefs because they are not the same as yours

that mostly sounds like Christianity.

how does that sound like only christianity it sounds like all religion the difference in religions is usually the messiah or their god(s) it is mainly the same general beliefs but there are a few that are different

As I have understood, it is simply the human need for answers to things that cannot be easily answered. Of course, this being thousands of years old when the human race was no smarter than dirt.

Then go ahead and fill in the answers.

You haven't posed any questions.

I was obviously talking about the questions of reference...

There are no questions directed towards Mr. Gamer.
With that in mind, 'banana', 'monkey'& 'tectonic activity' can all be answers.

Okay then here's an example: How did the universe come to be?

The leading theoretical model is that our Universe was born from the expansion of a singualrity.
There are also other theories, such as the mult-verse theory and the infinite universe (cycle) theory.

Which one do you believe personally?

Personally, I am undecided presently. However, I swing towards a combination of the expansion (big bang) and multi-verse.

But something had to be present to start that, didn't it?

Like what?
Something that consciously started it?
Or just something that started it, unconsciously?

Either way. It wouldn't be logical if it came from nothing.

What if the Universe is in an infinite cycle?
And why would it be illogical to think it could have came from nothign?

If it's an infinite cycle, then you got me there. At least it makes more sense than the big bang theory though... because coming from nothing just doesn't make sense. HOW would it have come from nothing?

I just copped what your post said there...
The Big Bang theory does not posit our Universe coming from nothing. The only thing that hypothesises that our 'current' Universe was created ex nihilo is religion, not science.
Religion states that everything in this universe came from nothing.

If the Universe isn't infinite, then either way it came from nothing.

Technically nothing either way, but it's more logical to think that God created it from nothing instead of it just coming from nothing on it's own.

Then you would have to explain where/ how your God originated.

God is God, He wasn't created. Since there was no time just like there was nothing, He was always there. "He was always there" is hard to wrap your mind around, but less so when you consider that there was no time.

so, stupid people looking for someone to tell them what to believe?

Pretty much. But its open for debate. Anywho, religion is too touchy anymore.